欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 1350-1362.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23036

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

绿洲灌区麦后复种绿肥并还田对翌年玉米根系性状及水分利用效率的影响

王玉珑(), 于爱忠(), 吕汉强, 吕奕彤, 苏向向, 王鹏飞, 柴健   

  1. 甘肃农业大学农学院/省部共建干旱生境作物学国家重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-21 接受日期:2022-09-05 出版日期:2023-05-12 网络出版日期:2022-09-20
  • 通讯作者: *于爱忠, E-mail: yuaizh@gsau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: wyl1489270573@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省教育厅产业支撑项目(2021CYZC-54);甘肃省基础研究创新群体项目(20JR5RA037);甘肃农业大学伏羲杰出人才培育计划项目(Gaufx-04J01)

Effects of green manure replanting and returning after wheat on following year’s maize root traits and water use efficiency in oasis irrigation area

WANG Yu-Long(), YU Ai-Zhong(), LYU Han-Qiang, LYU Yi-Tong, SU Xiang-Xiang, WANG Peng-Fei, CHAI Jian   

  1. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University/Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2022-04-21 Accepted:2022-09-05 Published:2023-05-12 Published online:2022-09-20
  • Contact: *E-mail: yuaizh@gsau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Industrial Support Project of Gansu Provincial Department of Education(2021CYZC-54);Innovation Group of Basic Research in Gansu Province(20JR5RA037);Fuxi Outstanding Talent Cultivation Program of Gansu Agricultural University(Gaufx-04J01)

RichHTML

11

PDF

582

摘要：

针对西北干旱绿洲灌区麦后休闲期长, 水分蒸发量大、水资源利用率不高等问题, 研究了绿肥不同还田方式对玉米根系性状和水分利用效率的影响及其相互关系, 以期为构建区域水资源高效利用种植模式提供理论依据和技术支撑。2020至2021年基于田间定位试验, 研究了绿肥全量翻压(tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in the soil, TG), 绿肥地表覆盖免耕(no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface, NTG), 绿肥地上部移除根茬翻压(tillage with root incorporated in the soil and above ground green manure removed, T), 绿肥地上部移除免耕(no-tillage with above ground manure removed, NT)和传统翻耕、休闲(conventional tillage and leisure, CT) 5个处理对轮作玉米土壤贮水量、玉米根系性状和水分利用效率的影响。结果表明, 绿肥地表覆盖免耕和绿肥全量翻压处理显著提高了0~110 cm土层土壤贮水量; 与CT相比, NTG和TG的全生育期平均土壤贮水量分别提高14.0%~15.0%和8.8%~12.0%。绿肥地表覆盖免耕和绿肥全量翻压处理显著提高了玉米根长、根表面积、根体积和根干重; 与CT相比, NTG和TG的根长分别提高20.7%~26.0%和19.9%~28.5%; 根表面积分别提高43.0%~52.9%和41.3%~58.7%; 根体积分别提高45.7%~46.7%和40.6%~46.7%; 根干重分别提高48.0%~51.5%和41.9%~50.2%。绿肥地表覆盖免耕和绿肥全量翻压处理显著提高了玉米籽粒产量和水分利用效率; 与CT相比, NTG和TG的籽粒产量分别提高15.4%~34.3%和19.1%~32.0%, NTG和TG的水分利用效率分别提高19.5%~39.2%和20.5%~34.8%。玉米拔节期、大喇叭口期和吐丝期的根长、根表面积与土壤贮水量均呈显著正相关, 根长、根表面积、根体积、根干重与水分利用效率均呈显著正相关。因此, 在干旱绿洲灌区绿肥地表覆盖免耕和绿肥全量翻压处理有利于改善土壤水分条件, 优化玉米根系生长, 从而提高产量和水分利用效率; 其中, 绿肥地表覆盖免耕处理效果突出, 可作为该区适宜的绿肥还田方式。

关键词: 轮作, 绿肥, 玉米, 根系, 水分利用效率

Abstract:

Long leisure time, high evaporation, and low water use efficiency in fallow period are the most prominent constraints for crop production in the northwest arid oasis irrigated agricultural region. In this study, the relationship between maize root traits and its water utilization under different green manure returning methods were investigated in this area. To determine the effects of different returning methods of green manure on soil water storage, root traits and water use efficiency of maize, a field experiment was carried out in a typical oasis irrigation region from 2020 to 2021. The treatments included tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in the soil (TG), no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface (NTG), harvesting and removing above ground green manure and tillage with root incorporated in the soil (T), no-tillage with above ground green manure harvested and removed (NT), and conventional tillage and fallow without green manure after spring wheat harvest (CT). The results indicated NTG and TG significantly increased soil water storage in 0-110 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, the average water storage of NTG and TG during the whole growth period increased by 14.0%-15.0% and 8.8%-12.0%, respectively. Compared with CT, the NTG and TG treatments increased root length (20.7%-26.0% and 19.9%-28.5%), root surface area (43.0%-52.9% and 41.3%-58.7%), root volume (45.7%-46.7% and 40.6%-46.7%), and root dry weight (48.0%-51.5% and 41.9%-50.2%), respectively. The NTG and TG significantly increased maize grain yield and its water use efficiency. Compared with CT, maize grain yield of NTG and TG increased 15.4%-34.3% and 19.1%-32.0%, the WUE of NTG and TG increased 19.5%-39.2% and 20.5%-34.8%, respectively. The root length and root surface area were positively related to soil water storage at maize jointing, tasseling, and silking stages. The root length, root surface area, root volume, and root dry weight were positively related with WUE at jointing, big trumpet, and silking stages. In conclusion, this study suggested the full quantity of green manure returned in the field was beneficial to increase soil water storage, optimize root traits, and thus improving the yield and water use efficiency in maize. Among them, no-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface was recommend as a feasible green manure returning method in the oasis irrigation area.

Key words: rotation, green manure, maize, root, water use efficiency

图1

2020-2021年试验区日降雨量和日均温变化"

表1

试验处理及代码"

处理代码
Treatment code		 处理
Treatment
TG 绿肥全量翻压 Tillage with full quantity of green manure incorporated in the soil
NTG 绿肥地表覆盖免耕 No-tillage with full quantity of green manure mulched on soil surface
T 绿肥地上部移除根茬翻压 Tillage with root incorporated in the soil and above ground green manure removed
NT 绿肥地上部移除免耕 No-tillage with above ground manure removed
CT 传统翻耕、休闲 Conventional tillage and leisure

图2

不同处理0~110 cm土层土壤贮水量变化 TG: 绿肥全量翻压; T: 绿肥地上部移除根茬翻压; NTG: 绿肥地表覆盖免耕; NT: 绿肥地上部移除免耕; CT: 传统翻耕、休闲。图中不同小写字母表示同一生育时期各处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。误差线表示标准差(n = 3)。"

表2

不同处理下的玉米根长"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 大喇叭口期
Big trumpet stage		 吐丝期
Silking stage
2020 CT 1266 b 5251 c 6302 d
NT 1305 b 5293 b 6868 cd
NTG 2436 a 6618 a 11,014 a
T 1406 b 5302 b 7163 c
TG 2544 a 6552 a 9892 b
2021 CT 1056 c 4002 c 5705 d
NT 1045 c 4411 b 6951 c
NTG 2176 a 5410 a 10,557 a
T 1042 c 4503 b 6544 cd
TG 1816 b 5601 a 9893 b

表3

不同处理下的玉米根表面积"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 大喇叭口期
Big trumpet stage		 吐丝期
Silking stage
2020 CT 572 e 1347 b 2101 b
NT 646 d 1393 b 2294 b
NTG 1003 a 2002 a 3584 a
T 675 c 1387 b 2020 b
TG 974 b 1919 a 3301 a
2021 CT 383 b 1056 d 1621 d
NT 481 b 1323 c 2026 c
NTG 814 a 1758 a 3413 a
T 451 b 1405 c 2056 c
TG 927 a 1658 b 2812 b

表4

不同处理下的玉米根体积"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 大喇叭口期
Big trumpet stage		 吐丝期
Silking stage
2020 CT 19 c 42 c 51 bc
NT 22 b 44 c 52 b
NTG 35 a 63 a 106 a
T 22 b 43 c 46 c
TG 32 a 54 b 101 a
2021 CT 16 b 38 b 39 c
NT 19 b 41 b 46 c
NTG 30 a 49 a 94 a
T 16 b 42 b 48 c
TG 30 a 54 a 68 b

表5

不同处理下的玉米根干重"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 大喇叭口期
Big trumpet stage		 吐丝期
Silking stage
2020 CT 3 c 14 c 14 c
NT 3 bc 14 c 15 c
NTG 7 a 19 a 28 a
T 4 b 15 b 19 b
TG 7 a 18 a 29 a
2021 CT 2 c 9 c 12 c
NT 4 bc 9 c 17 b
NTG 6 a 14 a 26 a
T 3 bc 10 c 17 b
TG 5 ab 12 b 23 a

图3

土壤贮水量与玉米根系性状的关系 **表示在0.01概率水平相关显著。"

图4

不同处理下玉米产量和水分利用效率 处理同表2。不同小写字母表示同一年份各处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。"

表6

玉米根系性状与水分利用效率的相关性"

根系性状
Root trait		 相关系数Correlation coefficient
拔节期Jointing stage 大喇叭口期Tasseling stage 吐丝期Silking stage
根长Root length 0.937** 0.928** 0.941**
根表面积Root surface area 0.934** 0.884** 0.959**
根体积Root volume 0.913** 0.909** 0.900**
根干重Dry weight of root 0.936** 0.918** 0.958**
[1] Guo Q, Huang G M, Guo Y L, Zhang M C, Zhou Y Y, Duan L S. Optimizing irrigation and planting density of spring maize under mulch drip irrigation system in the arid region of Northwest China. Field Crops Res, 2021, 266: 108141.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108141
[2] 赵西宁, 吴普特, 冯浩, 汪有科. 黄土高原半干旱区集雨补灌生态农业研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 3187-3194.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.09.021
Zhao X N, Wu P T, Feng H, Wang Y K. Advance in research of supplemental irrigation of collected rain water for eco-agriculture in Semi-Arid Loess Plateau of China. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 3187-3194. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Ti J S, Yang Y H, Pu L L, Wen X Y, Yin X G, Chen F. Ecological compensation for winter wheat fallow and impact assessment of winter fallow on water sustainability and food security on the North China Plain. J Clean Prod, 2021, 328: 129431.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129431
[4] Ju X T, Gu B J, Wu Y Y, Galloway J N. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Global Environ Chang, 2016, 41: 26-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.08.005
[5] 刘立生, 徐明岗, 张璐, 文石林, 高菊生, 董春华. 长期种植绿肥稻田土壤颗粒有机碳演变特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21: 1439-1446.
Liu L S, Xu M G, Zhang L, Wen S L, Gao J S, Dong C H. Evolution characteristics of soil particulate organic carbon in the paddy field with long-term planting green manure. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2015, 21: 1439-1446. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 佀国涵, 赵书军, 王瑞, 徐大兵, 秦兴成, 谭军, 向必坤, 袁家富. 连年翻压绿肥对植烟土壤物理及生物性状的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20: 905-912.
Si G H, Zhao S J, Wang R, Xu D B, Qin X C, Tan J, Xiang B K, Yuan J F. Effects of consecutive overturning of green manure on soil physical and biological characteristics in tobacco-planting fields. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2014, 20: 905-912. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 杜青峰, 王党军, 于翔宇, 姚露花, 和玉吉, 王瑞, 马生兰, 郭彦军. 玉米间作夏季绿肥对当季植物养分吸收和土壤养分有效性的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(3): 225-233.
Du Q F, Wang D J, Yu X Y, Yao L H, He Y J, Wang R, Ma S L, Guo Y J. The effects of corn and green manure intercropping on soil nutrient availability and plant nutrient uptake. Acta Pratac Sin, 2016, 25(3): 225-233. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 曹卫东, 包兴国, 徐昌旭, 聂军, 高亚军, 耿明建. 中国绿肥科研60年回顾与未来展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23: 1450-1461.
Cao W D, Bao X G, Xu C X, Nie J, Gao Y J, Geng M J. Reviews and prospects on science and technology of green manure in China. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2017, 23: 1450-1461. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 樊志龙, 柴强, 曹卫东, 于爱忠, 赵财, 谢军红, 殷文, 胡发龙. 绿肥在我国旱地农业生态系统中的服务功能及其应用. 应用生态学报. 2020, 31: 1389-1402.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.023
Fan Z L, Chai Q, Cao W D, Yu A Z, Zhao C, Xie J H, Yin W, Hu F L. Ecosystem service function of green manure and its application in dryland agriculture of China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31: 1389-1402. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 刘建香, 郭树芳, 雷宝坤, 郭云周. 绿肥生产利用方式对云南高原红壤理化性状及玉米产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28: 237-246.
Liu J X, Guo S F, Lei B K, Guo Y Z. Effects of green manure production and utilization on the physiochemical properties of red soil and maize yield in Yunnan Plateau. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2022, 28: 237-246. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 吕奕彤, 于爱忠, 吕汉强, 王玉珑, 苏向向, 柴强. 绿洲灌区玉米农田土壤团聚体组成及其稳定性对绿肥还田方式的响应. 中国生态农业学报, 2021, 29: 1194-1204.
Lyu Y T, Yu A Z, Lyu H Q, Wang Y L, Su X X, Chai Q. Composition and stability of soil aggregates in maize farmlands under different green manure utilization patterns in an oasis irrigation area. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2021, 29: 1194-1204. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 吕汉强, 于爱忠, 柴强. 绿洲灌区玉米产量及水分利用对绿肥还田方式的响应. 中国生态农业学报, 2020, 28: 671-679.
Lyu H Q, Yu A Z, Chai Q. Response of maize yield and water use to different green manure utilization patterns in arid oasis irrigation area. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2020, 28: 671-679. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 李含婷, 柴强, 王琦明, 胡发龙, 于爱忠, 赵财, 殷文, 樊志龙, 范虹. 绿洲灌区不同施氮水平下玉米绿肥间作模式的水分利用特征. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 2608-2618.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.011
Li H T, Chai Q, Wang Q M, Hu F L, Yu A Z, Zhao C, Yin W, Fan Z L, Fan H. Water use characteristics of maize-green manure intercropping under different nitrogen application levels in the oasis irrigation area. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 2608-2618. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.011
[14] 陈姣, 张池, 陈玉佩, Rana Ammar, 曹卫东, 高亚军, 王朝辉, 黄冬琳, 张达斌. 不同绿肥和覆膜措施对渭北旱塬冬小麦产量和土壤水分动态的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27: 2136-2148.
Chen J, Zhang C, Chen Y P, Ammar R, Cao W D, Gao Y J, Wang Z H, Huang D L, Zhang D B. Effects of different green manure crops and mulching approaches on wheat yield and soil moisture dynamics in the dryland region. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2021, 27: 2136-2148. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 沈晓琳, 王丽丽, 赵建宁, 李刚, 修伟明, 杨其琛, 张贵龙. 耕作方式对潮土土壤团聚体微生物群落结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32: 2713-2721.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.023
Shen X L, Wang L L, Zhao J N, Li G, Xiu W M, Yang Q C, Zhang G L. Effects of tillage managements on soil microbial community structure in soil aggregates of fluvo-aquic soil. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2021, 32: 2713-2721 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 赵亚丽, 薛志伟, 郭海斌, 穆心愿, 李潮海. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米耗水特性和水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 3359-3371.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.17.004
Zhao Y L, Xue Z W, Guo H B, Mu X Y, Li C H. Effects of tillage and straw returning on water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency in the winter wheat and summer maize rotation system. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 3359-3371. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 张素瑜, 王和洲, 杨明达, 王静丽, 贺德先. 水分与玉米秸秆还田对小麦根系生长和水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49: 2484-2496.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.13.004
Zhang S Y, Wang H Z, Yang M D, Wang J L, He D X. Influence of returning corn stalks to field under different soil moisture contents on root growth and water use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49: 2484-2496. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 魏欢欢, 王仕稳, 杨文稼, 孙海妮, 殷俐娜, 邓西平. 免耕及深松耕对黄土高原地区春玉米和冬小麦产量及水分利用效率影响的整合分析. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50: 461-477.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.03.005
Wei H H, Wang S Y, Yang W J, Sun H N, Yin L N, Deng X P. Meta analysis on impact of no-tillage and subsoiling tillage on spring maize and winter wheat yield and water use efficiency on the Loess Plateau. Sci Agric Sin, 2017, 50: 461-477. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.03.005
[19] Kan Z R, Liu Q Y, He C, Jing Z H, Virk A L, Qi J Y, Zhao X, Zhang H L. Responses of grain yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat to tillage in the North China Plain. Field Crops Res, 2020, 249: 107760.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107760
[20] 苗芳芳, 勉有明, 普雪可, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 侯贤清. 耕作覆盖对宁南旱区土壤团粒结构及马铃薯水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 2366-2376.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.11.010
Miao F F, Mian Y M, Pu X K, Wu C H, Zhou Y J, Hou X Q. Effects of tillage with mulching on soil aggregate structure and water use efficiency of potato in dry-farming area of southern Ningxia. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 2366-2376. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.11.010
[21] 段海霞, 罗崇亮, Naseer M H, 熊友才. 优化作物根系构型, 发展生态农业:2017年作物根系与根际互作国际研讨会综述. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(2): 1-9.
Duan H X, Luo C L, Naseer M H, Xiong Y C. Optimization of crop roots architecture and eco-agriculture development: a review on the international symposium on crop roots and rhizosphere interactions. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2019, 37(2): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 夏梓泰, 程伟威, 赵吉霞, 李永梅, 范茂攀. 不同种植模式对玉米根系及土壤团聚体稳定性的影响. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30: 2331-2338.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.12.008
Xia Z T, Cheng W W, Zhao J X, Li Y M, Fan M P. Effects of different planting patterns on maize root system and soil aggregate stability. Ecol Environ Sci, 2021, 30: 2331-2338. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 冯福学, 黄高宝, 柴强, 于爱忠, 乔海军, 黄涛. 不同耕作措施对冬小麦根系时空分布和产量的影响. 生态学报, 2009, 29: 2499-2506.
Feng F X, Huang G B, Chai Q, Yu A Z, Qiao H J, Huang T. Effects of different tillage on spatiotemporal distribution of winter wheat root and yield. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29: 2499-2506. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 高飞, 李霞, 任佰朝, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 张吉旺. 小麦玉米周年生产中耕作方式对夏玉米根系特性和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50: 2141-2149.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.019
Gao F, Li X, Ren B C, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhao B, Zhang J W. Root characteristics and grain yield of summer maize under different winter wheat-summer maize tillage systems. Sci Agric Sin, 2017, 50: 2141-2149. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.019
[25] Chai Q, Gan Y T, Turner N C, Zhang R Z, Yang C, Niu Y I, Soddique K H M. Water-saving innovations in Chinese agriculture. Adv Agron, 2014, 126: 149-201.
[26] 吕汉强, 胡发龙, 于爱忠, 苏向向, 王玉珑, 殷文, 柴强. 荒漠绿洲区不同绿肥还田方式下玉米农田土壤团聚体微结构特征. 中国生态农业学报, 2022, 30: 952-964.
Lyu H Q, Hu F L, Yu A Z, Su X X, Wang Y L, Yin W, Chai Q. Soil aggregates microstructure characteristics of maize farmland under the utilization patterns of green manure in desert oasis area. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2022, 30: 952-964. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] Gan Y T, Mooleki S P, Lemke R L, Zentner R P, Ruan Y F. Durum wheat productivity in response to soil water and soil residual nitrogen associated with previous crop management. Agron J, 2016, 108: 1468-1478.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2015.0244
[28] 员学锋, 吴普特, 汪有科, 徐福利. 免耕条件下秸秆覆盖保墒灌溉的土壤水、热及作物效应研究. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(7): 22-26.
Yuan X F, Wu P T, Wang Y K, Xu F L. Effects of straw mulching on soil moisture, heat and crops under no-tillage irrigation. Trans CSAE, 2006, 22(7): 22-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] Wang S L, Wang H, Hafeez M B, Zhang Q, Yu Q, Wang R, Wang X L, Li J. No-tillage and subsoiling increased maize yields and soil water storage under varied rainfall distribution: A 9-year site-specific study in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Res, 2020, 255: 107867.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107867
[30] 殷文, 柴强, 胡发龙, 樊志龙, 范虹, 于爱忠, 赵财. 干旱内陆灌区不同秸秆还田方式下春小麦田土壤水分利用特征. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52: 1247-1259.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012
Yin W, Chai Q, Hu F L, Fan Z L, Fan H, Yu A Z, Zhao C. Characteristics of soil water utilization in spring wheat field with different straw retention approaches in dry inland irrigation areas. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52: 1247-1259 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012
[31] 周怀平, 解文艳, 关春林, 杨振兴, 李红梅. 长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米产量、效益及水分利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19: 321-330.
Zhou H P, Xie W Y, Guan C L, Yang Z X, Li H M. Effects of long-term straw-returning on corn yield, economic benefit and water use in arid farming areas. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2013, 19: 321-330. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 余海英, 彭文英, 马秀, 张科利. 免耕对北方旱作玉米土壤水分及物理性质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22: 99-104.
Yu H Y, Peng W Y, Ma X, Zhang K L. Effects of no-tillage on soil moisture and physical properties of dry maize in northern China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2011, 22: 99-104. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 赵娜, 赵护兵, 曹群虎, 鱼昌为, 孙蔚, 李敏, 曹卫东, 高亚军. 渭北旱区夏闲期豆科绿肥对土壤肥力性状的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(2): 124-128, 146.
Zhao N, Zhao H B, Cao Q H, Yu C W, Sun W, Li M, Cao W D, Gao Y J. Effects of legume green fertilizer on soil fertility during summer fallow period in Weibei arid region. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2011, 29(2): 124-128, 146 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] Zhang D B, Zhang C, Ren H L, Xu Q, Yao Z Y, Yuan Y Q, Yao P W, Zhao N, Li Y Y, Zhang S Q, Zhai B N, Wang Z H, Huang D L, Cao W D, Gao Y J. Trade-offs between winter wheat production and soil water consumption via leguminous green manures in the Loess Plateau of China. Field Crops Res, 2021, 272: 108278.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108278
[35] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 1081-1090.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14067
Sun S M, Han B, Chen L, Sun W N, Zhang X L, Yang X Y. Root system architecture analysis and genome-wide association study of root system architecture related traits in cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 1081-1090. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14067
[36] 姜英, 王峥宇, 廉宏利, 王美佳, 苏业涵, 田平, 隋鹏祥, 马梓淇, 王英俨, 孟广鑫, 孙悦, 李从锋, 齐华. 耕作和秸秆还田方式对东北春玉米吐丝期根系特征及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53: 3071-3082.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.008
Jiang Y, Wang Z Y, Lian H L, Wang M J, Su Y H, Tian P, Sui P X, Ma Z Q, Wang Y Y, Meng G X, Sun Y, Li C F, Qi H. Effects of tillage and straw incorporation method on root trait at silking stage and grain yield of spring maize in northeast China. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53: 3071-3082. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.008
[37] 张达斌, 李婧, 姚鹏伟, 王峥, 赵娜, 鱼昌为, 曹群虎, 曹卫东, 高亚军. 夏闲期连续两年种植并翻压豆科绿肥对旱地冬小麦生长和养分吸收的影响. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21: 59-65.
Zhang D B, Li J, Yao P W, Wang Z, Zhao N, Yu C W, Cao Q H, Cao W D, Gao Y J. Effects of two years incorporation of leguminous green manure during summer fallow period on winter wheat growth and nutrients uptake in dryland. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2012, 21: 59-65 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] Myint T, Gong D Z, Meu X R, Gao L L, Li H R, Hao W P, Gu F X. Mulching improved soil water, root distribution and yield of maize in the Loess Plateau of northwest China. Agric Water Manage, 2020, 241: 106340.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106340
[39] 吕汉强, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 苏向向, 吕奕彤, 柴强. 干旱绿洲灌区玉米氮素吸收利用对绿肥还田利用方式的响应. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 93-103.
Lyu H Q, Yu A Z, Wang Y L, Su X X, Lyu Y T, Chai Q. Effect of green manure retention practices on nitrogen absorption and utilization by maize crops in the arid oasis irrigation area. Acta Pratac Sin, 2020, 29(8): 93-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 952-961.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.12007
Wang L, Cui Y Z, Wu Y H, Hao X S, Zhang C H, Wang J Y, Liu Y X, Li X G, Qin Y H. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure (Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 952-961 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.12007
[1] 徐冉, 陈松, 徐春梅, 刘元辉, 章秀福, 王丹英, 褚光. 施氮量对籼粳杂交稻甬优1540产量和氮肥利用效率的影响及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1630-1642.
[2] 张振博, 贾春兰, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 张吉旺. 氮磷配施对夏玉米产量和叶片衰老特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1616-1629.
[3] 刘佳, 邹晓悦, 马继芳, 王永芳, 董志平, 李志勇, 白辉. 谷子MAPK家族成员的鉴定及其对生物胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1480-1495.
[4] 李璐璐, 明博, 高尚, 谢瑞芝, 王克如, 侯鹏, 薛军, 李少昆. 不同熟期玉米品种籽粒田间脱水特征差异性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1643-1652.
[5] 李慧, 王旭敏, 刘苗, 刘朋召, 李巧丽, 王小利, 王瑞, 李军. 基于夏玉米产量和氮素利用的水氮减量方案优选[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1292-1304.
[6] 张俊杰, 陈金平, 汤钰镂, 张锐, 曹红章, 王丽娟, 马梦金, 王浩, 王泳超, 郭家萌, KRISHNA SV Jagadish, 杨青华, 邵瑞鑫. 花期前后干旱胁迫对复水后夏玉米光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1397-1409.
[7] 岳海旺, 韩轩, 魏建伟, 郑书宏, 谢俊良, 陈淑萍, 彭海成, 卜俊周. 基于GYT双标图分析对黄淮海夏玉米区域试验品种综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1231-1248.
[8] 刘昕萌, 程乙, 刘玉文, 庞尚水, 叶秀芹, 卜艳霞, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊, 刘鹏. 黄淮海区域现代夏玉米品种产量与资源利用效率的差异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1363-1371.
[9] 吴希, 王家瑞, 郝淼艺, 张宏军, 张仁和. 种植密度对不同生育期玉米品种光温资源利用率和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1065-1078.
[10] 张金鑫, 葛均筑, 马玮, 丁在松, 王新兵, 李从锋, 周宝元, 赵明. 华北平原冬小麦-夏玉米种植体系周年水分高效利用研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 879-892.
[11] 舒泽兵, 罗万宇, 蒲甜, 陈国鹏, 梁冰, 杨文钰, 王小春. 基于高产与高效条件下鲜食玉米鲜食大豆带状间作田间配置技术优化[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1140-1150.
[12] 张晨晖, 章岩, 李国辉, 杨子君, 查莹莹, 周驰燕, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 郭保卫. 侧深施肥下水稻高产形成的根系形态及其生理变化特征[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1039-1051.
[13] 栾奕, 白岩, 卢实, 李磊鑫, 王德强, 高婷婷, 石洁, 杨洪明, 路明. “十三五”国家东华北春玉米区域试验品种抗病性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1122-1131.
[14] 许加波, 吴鹏昊, 黄博文, 陈占辉, 马月虹, 任姣姣. 利用F2:3家系来源单倍体定位玉米雄穗相关性状QTL及全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 622-633.
[15] 王雪, 谷淑波, 林祥, 王威雁, 张保军, 朱俊科, 王东. 微喷补灌水肥一体化对冬小麦产量及水分和氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 784-794.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
京ICP备15008789号-2