欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 1339-1349.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.22031

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

硅素穗肥优化滨海盐碱地水稻矿质元素吸收分配提高耐盐性

韦海敏1,2(), 陶伟科1,2, 周燕1,2, 闫飞宇1,2, 李伟玮1,2, 丁艳锋1,2, 刘正辉1,2, 李刚华1,2,*()   

  1. 1南京农业大学农业农村部作物生理生态与生产管理重点实验室, 江苏南京210095
    2南京农业大学江苏省现代作物生产协同创新中心, 江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-13 接受日期:2022-10-10 出版日期:2023-05-12 网络出版日期:2022-11-15
  • 通讯作者: *李刚华, E-mail: lgh@njau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 2018101014@njau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2021361);江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2019377)

Panicle silicon fertilizer optimizes the absorption and distribution of mineral elements in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in coastal saline-alkali soil to improve salt tolerance

WEI Hai-Min1,2(), TAO Wei-Ke1,2, ZHOU Yan1,2, YAN Fei-Yu1,2, LI Wei-Wei1,2, DING Yan-Feng1,2, LIU Zheng-Hui1,2, LI Gang-Hua1,2,*()   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology Ecology and Production Management, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
    2Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China.
  • Received:2022-05-13 Accepted:2022-10-10 Published:2023-05-12 Published online:2022-11-15
  • Contact: *E-mail: lgh@njau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province(BE2021361);Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province(BE2019377)

RichHTML

16

PDF

2811

摘要：

本研究旨在阐明硅素穗肥调控盐碱地水稻抽穗期矿质元素分配的作用机制。以常规粳稻淮稻5号为材料, 于2019年和2020年在江苏沿海大丰盐碱地(盐分3.4 g kg-1, pH 8.3)开展大田试验, 设置3个硅肥用量(0、60和100 kg hm-2), 于幼穗分化期随穗肥施入。结果表明: (1) 硅素穗肥促进抽穗期植株养分吸收, 提高成熟期干物质量和产量, 与Si0相比, Si60平均增产4.3%, Si100平均增产8.6%; (2) 硅素穗肥优化了水稻不同部位K+、Na+分配, 提高水稻叶片、上部叶鞘、中下部茎秆K+含量, 降低穗、上部叶片、叶鞘、茎秆Na+含量, 提高各部位的K+/Na+, 进而提高离子稳态; (3) 硅素穗肥促进叶片大量元素N、P、Ca、Mg和微量元素Fe、Mn的积累, 与Si0相比, 硅素穗肥显著提高了16.5%的P含量、18.5%的Mg含量、22.4%的Ca含量、19.8%的Fe含量, 缓解盐碱胁迫对水稻叶片的不利影响。综上所述, 硅素穗肥优化了盐碱胁迫下水稻矿质元素的吸收分配, 减轻幼嫩器官盐胁迫程度, 促进叶片多种有益元素积累, 促进水稻养分吸收, 且100 kg hm-2效果最佳。

关键词: 水稻, 盐碱地, 硅肥, 矿质营养, 产量

Abstract:

This purpose of this study is to elucidate the mechanism of silicon fertilizer on mineral element distribution at heading stage in rice. In this study, a field experiment was carried out in the coastal beach saline-alkali of Jiangsu Province (3.4 g kg-1 soil salinity, pH 8.3). The conventional japonica rice (Huaidao 5) was used as the material, and three silicon fertilizer amounts (0, 60 and 100 kg hm-2) were applied with panicle fertilizer at panicle initiation stage. The results showed that: (1) Silicon panicle fertilizer promoted plant nutrient absorption at heading stage, increased dry matter accumulation at mature stage, and increased yield, Si60 increased by 4.3% on average, Si100 increased by 8.6% on average. (2) Silicon panicle fertilizer optimized the distribution of K+ and Na+ in rice at heading stage. Silicon increase K+ content in leaves, upper sheaths and lower stems of rice, decreased Na+ content in panicles, upper leaves, sheaths and stems, and increased the K+/Na+ ratio in various tissues, thus improving ion homeostasis of rice. (3) Silicon panicle fertilizer promoted the accumulation of N, P, Ca, Mg, Fe, and Mn in leaves. Compare with Si0, the average increase of the two silicon treatments was 16.5% in P, 18.5% in Mg, 22.4% in Ca and 19.8% in Fe, and alleviated the adverse effects of saline-alkali stress on rice leaves. In summary, silicon panicle fertilizer optimizes the absorption and distribution of mineral elements in rice, reduced salt stress in young organs, promoted the accumulation of beneficial elements in leaves, improved nutrient absorption of rice, and the effect of 100 kg hm?2 was better.

Key words: rice, saline-alkali stress, silicon, mineral elements, rice yield

图1

硅素穗肥对盐碱地水稻干物质量和产量的影响 A、B: 干物质量; C、D: 水稻产量。数据代表平均值±标准差, n = 3。不同的字母表示根据Duncan’s多重比较得出的不同处理间的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图2

硅素穗肥对盐碱地水稻不同器官钾离子含量的影响 不同器官(A、B)、叶片(C、F)、叶鞘(D、G)、茎秆(E、H)钾离子含量。数据代表平均值±标准差, n = 3。在同一器官, 不同的字母表示根据Duncan’s多重比较得出的不同处理间的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图3

硅素穗肥对盐碱地水稻不同器官钠离子含量的影响 处理同图2。数据代表平均值±标准差, n = 3。在同一器官, 不同的字母表示根据Duncan’s多重比较得出的不同处理间的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图4

硅素穗肥对盐碱地水稻不同器官钾钠比值的影响 处理同图2。数据代表平均值±标准差, n = 3。在同一器官, 不同的字母表示根据Duncan’s多重比较得出的不同处理间的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图5

硅素穗肥对盐碱地水稻不同器官氮、磷、钙、镁含量的影响 不同器官氮含量(A、B)、磷含量(C、D)、钙含量(E、F)、镁含量(G、H)。数据代表平均值±标准差, n = 3。在同一器官, 不同的字母表示根据Duncan’s多重比较得出的不同处理间的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图6

硅素穗肥对盐碱地水稻不同器官铁、锰、锌、铜含量的影响 不同器官铁含量(A、B)、锰含量(C、D)、锌含量(E、F)、铜含量(G、H)。数据代表平均值±标准差, n = 3。在同一器官, 不同的字母表示根据Duncan’s多重比较得出的不同处理间的差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

图7

硅素穗肥对盐碱地水稻矿质元素分配影响示意图 A: 盐胁迫; B: 盐胁迫+硅肥。图片展示了K+、Na+在不同叶片的分配比例, 不同器官矿质元素显著的含量变化。叶片颜色越深表示Na+含量越高, 叶片颜色越浅表示K+/Na+越高, 盐胁迫程度越低。"

[1] FAOSTAT.https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, 2021-06-05.
[2] Julkowska M J M M, Testerink C T C. Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt. Trends Plant Sci, 2015, 20: 586-594.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.008 pmid: 26205171
[3] 韦还和, 张徐彬, 葛佳琳, 陈熙, 孟天瑶, 杨洋, 熊飞, 陈英龙, 戴其根. 盐胁迫对水稻颖花形成及籽粒充实的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 2471-2480.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02083
Wei H H, Zhang X B, Ge J L, Chen X, Meng T Y, Yang Y, Xiong F, Chen Y L, Dai Q G. Effects of salinity stress on spikelets formation and grains filling in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 2471-2480. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 凌启鸿. 盐碱地种稻有关问题的讨论. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(4): 1-2.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2018.04.001
Ling Q H. Discussion on the related problems of rice planting in saline-alkali soil. China Rice, 2018, 24(4): 1-2. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2018.04.001
[5] Ling F L, Su Q W, Jiang H, Cui J J, He X L, Wu Z H, Zhang Z A, Liu J, Zhao Y J. Effects of strigolactone on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics in salt-stressed rice seedlings. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 6183.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63352-6 pmid: 32277136
[6] Khatun S, Rizzo C A, Flowers T J. Genotypic variation in the effect of salinity on fertility in rice. Plant Soil, 1995, 173: 239-250.
doi: 10.1007/BF00011461
[7] Devidas Wankhade S, Cornejo M, Mateu-Andres I, Sanz A. Morpho-physiological variations in response to NaCl stress during vegetative and reproductive development of rice. Acta Physiol Plant, 2013, 35: 323-333.
doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-1075-y
[8] Flam-Shepherd R, Huynh W Q, Coskun D, Hamam A M, Britto D T, Kronzucker H J. Membrane fluxes, bypass flows, and sodium stress in rice: the influence of silicon. J Exp Bot, 2018, 69: 1679-1692.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx460 pmid: 29342282
[9] Sairam R K, Tyagi A. Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr Sci India, 2004, 86: 407-421.
[10] Shelden M C, Gilbert S E, Tyerman S D. A laser ablation technique maps differences in elemental composition in roots of two barley cultivars subjected to salinity stress. Plant J, 2020, 101: 1462-1473.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14599
[11] Etesami H, Jeong B R. Silicon (Si): review and future prospects on the action mechanisms in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Ecotox Environ Safe, 2018, 147: 881-896.
doi: S0147-6513(17)30661-9 pmid: 28968941
[12] Thorne S J, Hartley S E, Maathuis F J M. Is silicon a panacea for alleviating drought and salt stress in crops? Front Plant Sci, 2020, 11: 1221.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01221 pmid: 32973824
[13] Emam M M, Khattab E H, Helal M N, Deraz E A. Effect of selenium and silicon on yield quality of rice plant grown under drought stress. Aust J Crop Sci, 2014, 8: 596-605.
[14] Gunes A, Kadioglu Y K, Pilbeam D J, Inal A, Coban S, Aksu A. Influence of silicon on sunflower cultivars under drought stress, II: Essential and nonessential element uptake determined by polarized energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence. Commun Soil Sci Plan, 2008, 39: 1904-1927.
doi: 10.1080/00103620802134719
[15] Wasti S, Manaa A, Mimouni H, Nsairi A, Ibtissem M, Gharbi E, Gautier H, Ben Ahmed H. Exogenous application of calcium silicate improves salt tolerance in two contrasting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivars. J Plant Nutr, 2017, 40: 673-684.
doi: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1250908
[16] Xu C X, Ma Y P, Liu Y L. Effects of silicon (Si) on growth, quality and ionic homeostasis of aloe under salt stress. South Afr J Bot, 2015, 98: 26-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.01.008
[17] Sun L, Wu L H, Ding T P, Tian S H. Silicon isotope fractionation in rice plants, an experimental study on rice growth under hydroponic conditions. Plant Soil, 2008, 304: 291-300.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9552-1
[18] Ma J F, Nishimura K, Takahashi E. Effect of silicon on the growth of rice plant at different growth-stages. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1989, 35: 347-356.
doi: 10.1080/00380768.1989.10434768
[19] Zhu Y X, Gong H J, Yin J L. Role of silicon in mediating salt tolerance in plants: a review. Plants (Basel), 2019, 8: 147.
doi: 10.3390/plants8060147
[20] Yan G, Fan X, Tan L, Yin C, Li T, Liang Y. Root silicon deposition and its resultant reduction of sodium bypass flow is modulated by OsLsi1 and OsLsi2 in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2021, 158: 219-227.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.015
[21] Gong H J, Randall D P, Flowers T J. Silicon deposition in the root reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by reducing bypass flow. Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 1970-1979.
pmid: 16930322
[22] Yan G C, Fan X P, Zheng W N, Gao Z X, Yin C, Li T Q, Liang Y C. Silicon alleviates salt stress-induced potassium deficiency by promoting potassium uptake and translocation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Physiol, 2021, 258: 153379.
[23] Coskun D, Britto D T, Huynh W Q, Kronzucker H J. The role of silicon in higher plants under salinity and drought stress. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 1072.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01072 pmid: 27486474
[24] Bosnic P, Bosnic D, Jasnic J, Nikolic M. Silicon mediates sodium transport and partitioning in maize under moderate salt stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2018, 155: 681-687.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.018
[25] Wang H, Zhang M, Guo R, Shi D, Liu B, Lin X, Yang C. Effects of salt stress on ion balance and nitrogen metabolism of old and young leaves in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol, 2012, 12: 194.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-194
[26] Niu X M, Bressan R A, Hasegawa P M, Pardo J M. Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol, 1995, 109: 735-742.
doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.735 pmid: 12228628
[27] Jumberi A, Yamada M, Yamada S, Fujiyama H. Salt tolerance of grain crops in relation to ionic balance and ability to absorb microelements. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2001, 47: 657-664.
doi: 10.1080/00380768.2001.10408430
[28] Farshidi M, Abdolzadeh A, Sadeghipour H R. Silicon nutrition alleviates physiological disorders imposed by salinity in hydroponically grown canola (Brassica napus L.) plants. Acta Physiol Plant, 2012, 34: 1779-1788.
doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-0975-1
[29] Kafi M, Rahimi Z. Effect of salinity and silicon on root characteristics, growth, water status, proline content and ion accumulation of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.). Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2011, 57: 341-347.
doi: 10.1080/00380768.2011.567398
[30] Javaid T, Farooq M A, Akhtar J, Saqib Z A, Anwar-Ul-Haq M. Silicon nutrition improves growth of salt-stressed wheat by modulating flows and partitioning of Na+, Cl- and mineral ions. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2019, 141: 291-299.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.06.010
[31] Horuz A, Korkmaz A. The effect of silicon fertilization on reducing salt stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Agric Sci, 2014, 20: 215-229.
[32] Avestan S, Ghasemnezhad M, Esfahani M, Barker A V. Effects of nano silicon dioxide on leaf anatomy, chlorophyll fluorescence, and mineral element composition of strawberry under salinity stress. J Plant Nutr, 2021, 44: 3005-3019.
doi: 10.1080/01904167.2021.1936036
[33] Tuna A L, Kaya C, Higgs D, Murillo-Amador B, Aydemir S, Girgin A R. Silicon improves salinity tolerance in wheat plants. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 62: 10-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.06.006
[34] Abdullah Z, Khan M A, Flowers T J. Causes of sterility in seed set of rice under salinity stress. J Agron Crop Sci, 2001, 187: 25-32.
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-037X.2001.00500.x
[35] Huang Y, Zhang W, Zhao L, Cao H. Effects of Si on the index of root activity, MDA content and nutritional elements uptake of rice under salt stress. Asian J Ecotox, 2009, 4: 860-866.
[36] Yang J C, Zhang J H. Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytol, 2006, 169: 223-236.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01597.x pmid: 16411926
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[4] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[5] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[6] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[8] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[9] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[10] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[14] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[15] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2