欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 1211-1221.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24079

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

Bna-miR43-FBXL调控模块参与甘蓝型油菜铝胁迫的功能分析

张盈川1(), 吴晓明玉1, 陶保龙1, 陈丽1,2, 鲁海琴1, 赵伦1, 文静1, 易斌1, 涂金星1, 傅廷栋1, 沈金雄1,*()   

  1. 1华中农业大学作物遗传改良全国重点实验室/国家油菜工程技术研究中心, 湖北武汉 430070
    2长江师范学院现代农业与生物工程学院, 重庆 408100
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-02 接受日期:2022-07-21 出版日期:2023-05-12 网络出版日期:2022-08-19
  • 通讯作者: *沈金雄, E-mail: jxshen@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: yczhang612@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31871654)

Functional analysis of Bna-miR43-FBXL regulatory module involved in aluminum stress in Brassica napus

ZHANG Ying-Chuan1(), WU Xiao-Ming-Yu1, TAO Bao-Long1, CHEN Li1,2, LU Hai-Qin1, ZHAO Lun1, WEN Jing1, YI Bin1, TU Jing-Xing1, FU Ting-Dong1, SHEN Jin-Xiong1,*()   

  1. 1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/National Engineering Research Center of Rapeseed, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China,
    2School of Advanced Agriculture and Bioengineering, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China
  • Received:2022-04-02 Accepted:2022-07-21 Published:2023-05-12 Published online:2022-08-19
  • Contact: *E-mail: jxshen@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31871654)

摘要:

在酸性土壤中, 铝是制约作物生长和产量的一个重要因素, 如何利用酸性土地意义重大。本研究的对象是前期本课题鉴定到的一个未被报道的miRNA——Bna-miR43。系统地对甘蓝型油菜中Bna-miR43及其靶基因进行生物信息学分析以及表达模式鉴定, 并构建Bna-miR43过表达载体探讨了Bna-miR43-FBXL模块在甘蓝型油菜响应铝胁迫的分子机制。5°-RACE结果表明Bna-miR43在甘蓝型油菜中真实切割BnaA09g03940DBnaCnng24950D。生物信息学分析表明, BnaA09g03940DBnaCnng24950D在拟南芥中的同源基因为AT5G27950, 编码含F-box的E3泛素连接酶。qRT-PCR结果显示, Bna-miR43及其靶基因在甘蓝型油菜不同组织以及铝胁迫瞬时处理下的表达水平存在此消彼长的现象。油菜转基因试验表明, Bna-miR43的过表达株系地上部分长势良好, 体内积累了较少的MDA和H2O2, 同时转基因植株根系的铝积累量较对照少。本研究结果为甘蓝型油菜中铝胁迫响应提供参考。

关键词: 甘蓝型油菜, Bna-miR43, F-box, 铝胁迫

Abstract:

Aluminum is one of the main factors that limited crop growth and yield in acid soil and how to utilize acid soil is of great significance. This study is based on Bna-miR43, an unreported miRNA identified in the previous study. We analyzed the molecular characteristics, conserved structure, phylogenetic analysis, and the expression level of Bna-miR43 and its target genes in Brassica napus. The Bna-miR43 over expression vector was constructed to explore the molecular mechanism of Bna-miR43- FBXL module in Brassica napus in aluminum stress. 5'-RACE showed that Bna-miR43 actually cleaved BnaA09g03940D and BnaCnng24950D. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the homologous gene of BnaA09g03940D and BnaCnng24950D in Arabidopsis was AT5G27950, encoding E3 ubiquitin ligase contained F-box. The qRT-PCR indicated that the relative expression levels of Bna-miR43 and its target genes had a phenomenon of trade-off in different tissues of Brassica napus and under transient treatment of aluminum stress. Aluminum treatment showed that the entire aerial part of the transgenic plant grew much better than control and accumulated less MDA and H2O2. Meanwhile, the aluminum accumulation in the root of transgenic plants was less than the control. In this study, these results may provide reference for the response of aluminum stress in Brassica napus.

Key words: Brassica napus L., Bna-miR43, F-box, aluminum stress

附表1

Bna-miR43的前体和成熟体序列"

Bna-miR43 序列 Sequence (5°-3°)
前体序列
Precursor sequence
AGTTTAGGTCGAAGATTGGAACATTGGGACCGTGCCCTATTACAAACTTACACACATTGCAAGCATATTTCTATGCTCATACATATGATCAATATAGCCTTCTATCTTAAGTCAAGTATTGTATAATTTAATTTTGTTATACACTAATTTAGATCATGAAGAGTCTGGATTTTTAGTTTTTTTTTCTACAAT
成熟体序列
Mature sequence
GAAGATTGGAACATTGGGACC

图1

Bna-miR43前体结构预测图 箭头所指处为Bna-miR43成熟体序列。"

表1

Bna-miR43降解组预测靶基因情况概述"

靶基因
Target gene
拟南芥同源基因
Arabidopsis homologous gene
靶基因功能
Function of target genes
类别
Category
BnaA09g03940D AT5G27920 F-box蛋白家族 F-box family protein 0
BnaCnng24950D AT5G27920 F-box蛋白家族 F-box family protein 0
BnaA06g06260D AT5G27920 F-box蛋白家族 F-box family protein 0
BnaC05g08010D AT5G27920 F-box蛋白家族 F-box family protein 0

图2

RLM-RACE验证靶基因定向切割位点 图中箭头表示切割位点, 数字表示挑斑克隆验证目标mRNA切割位点的克隆频率。"

图3

油菜靶基因和拟南芥同源基因序列比对结果"

图4

油菜FBXL基因家族进化分析 A: 油菜FBXL基因家族系统发育进化树; B: F-box家族的基因结构与motif。"

图5

FBXL亚族基因序列同一性分析"

图6

Bna-miR43及其靶基因在甘蓝型油菜不同组织中的表达分析 每次试验3次生物学重复, 3次技术重复。*和**分别表示显著水平(P < 0.05)与极显著水平(P < 0.01)。"

图7

Bna-miR43及其靶基因表达量分析 A: 铝胁迫下甘蓝型油菜J572中Bna-miR43及其靶基因的表达模式; B: 过表达Bna-miR43转基因油菜基因表达量分析。每次试验3次生物学重复, 3次技术重复。*和**分别表示显著水平(P < 0.05)与极显著水平(P < 0.01)。"

图8

铝处理J572和Bna-miR43过表达转基因植株表型鉴定 A: 未进行铝处理油菜植株地上部分表型分析; B: 铝处理后的油菜植株地上部分表型分析, 随机取5株同一株系不同油菜植株的倒一叶照相, 其中地上部分表型图标尺为5 cm, 倒一叶图标尺为2 cm; C: 苏木精染色鉴定根中铝分布。-Al3+: J572在0.5 mmol L-1 CaCl2 (pH 4.5)的培养液中培养1周后, 使用苏木精染色, 体式显微镜观察拍照。+Al3+: 转基因油菜与J572在0.5 mmol L-1 CaCl2, 300 μmol L-1 AlCl3 (pH 4.5)培养液中处理1周后, 使用苏木精染色, 体式显微镜观察照相, 左侧图标尺为1 mm, 右侧图标尺为0.5 mm。"

图9

过表达Bna-miR43油菜根系铝胁迫后生理生化指标分析 A: 过表达Bna-miR43油菜根系铝胁迫后MDA含量分析; B: 过表达Bna-miR43油菜根系铝胁迫后过氧化氢含量分析。每次试验3次生物学重复, 3次技术重复。*和**分别表示显著水平(P < 0.05)与极显著水平(P < 0.01)。"

图10

Bna-miR43的可能作用途径"

[1] Sade H, Meriga B, Surapu V, Gadi J, Sunita M S L, Suravajhala P, Kishor P B K. Toxicity and tolerance of aluminum in plants: tailoring plants to suit to acid soils. BioMetals, 2016, 29: 187-210.
doi: 10.1007/s10534-016-9910-z pmid: 26796895
[2] 肖厚军, 王正银. 酸性土壤铝毒与植物营养研究进展. 西南农业学报, 2006, 19: 1180-1188.
Xiao H J, Wang Z Y. Advance on study of aluminum toxicity and plant nutrition in acid soils. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2006, 19: 1180-1188. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Panda S K, Baluška F, Matsumoto H. Aluminum stress signaling in plants. Plant Signal Behav, 2009, 4: 592-597.
doi: 8903 pmid: 19820334
[4] Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn S J, Ryan P R, Delhaize E, Matsumoto H. A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. Plant J, 2004, 37: 645-653.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2003.01991.x pmid: 14871306
[5] Krill A M, Kirst M, Kochian L V, Buckler E S, Hoekenga O A. Association and linkage analysis of aluminum tolerance genes in maize. PLoS One, 2010, 5: e9958.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009958
[6] Sharma T, Dreyer I, Kochian L, Piñeros M A. The ALMT family of organic acid transporters in plants and their involvement in detoxification and nutrient security. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 1488.
pmid: 27757118
[7] Bojórquez-Quintal E, Escalante-Magaña C, Echevarría-Machado I, Martínez-Estévez M. Aluminum, a friend or foe of higher plants in acid soils. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1767.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01767 pmid: 29075280
[8] Inostroza-Blancheteau C, Rengel Z, Alberdi M, Mora M L, Aquea F, Arce-Johnson P, Reyes-Díaz M. Molecular and physiological strategies to increase aluminum resistance in plants. Mol Biol Rep, 2012, 39: 2069-2079.
doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0954-4 pmid: 21660471
[9] Li J Y, Liu J, Dong D, Jia X, McCouch S R, Kochian L V. Natural variation underlies alterations in Nramp aluminum transporter (NRAT1) expression and function that play a key role in rice aluminum tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: 6503-6508.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318975111
[10] Wu Y, Yang Z, How J, Xu H, Chen L, Li K. Overexpression of a peroxidase gene (AtPrx64) of Arabidopsis thaliana in tobacco improves plant’s tolerance to aluminum stress. Plant Mol Biol, 2017, 95: 157-168.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-017-0644-2
[11] Iuchi S, Koyama H, Iuchi A, Kobayashi Y, Kitabayashi S, Kobayashi Y, Ikka T, Hirayama T, Shinozaki K, Kobayashi M. Zinc finger protein STOP1 is critical for proton tolerance in Arabidopsis and coregulates a key gene in aluminum tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 9900-9905.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700117104
[12] Sawaki Y, Iuchi S, Kobayashi Y, Ikka T, Sakurai N, Fujita M, Shinozaki K, Shibata D, Kobayashi M, Koyama H. STOP 1 regulates multiple genes that protect Arabidopsis from proton and aluminum toxicities. Plant Physiol, 2009, 150: 281-294.
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.134700
[13] 鲁海琴, 陈丽, 陈磊, 张盈川, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-Bna-miR311-HSC70-1模块调控甘蓝型油菜响应热胁迫的机制. 作物学报, 2020, 46: 1474-1484.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.04014
Lu H Q, Chen L, Chen L, Zhang Y C, Wen J, Yi B, Tu J X, Fu T D, Shen J X. Mechanism research of Bna-Bna-miR311-HSC70-1 module regulating heat stress response in Brassica napus L. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46: 1474-1484 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] Lima J C, Arenhart R A, Margis-Pinheiro M, Margis R. Aluminum triggers broad changes in microRNA expression in rice roots. Genet Mol Res, 2011, 10: 2817-2832.
doi: 10.4238/2011.November.10.4 pmid: 22095606
[15] Zeng Q Y, Yang C Y, Ma Q B, Li X P, Dong W W, Nian H. Identification of wild soybean miRNAs and their target genes responsive to aluminum stress. BMC Plant Biol, 2012, 12: 182.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-182
[16] He H, He L, Gu M. Role of microRNAs in aluminum stress in plants. Plant Cell Rep, 2014, 33: 831-836.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-014-1565-z pmid: 24413694
[17] 陈丽. 甘蓝型油菜株型及角果长度相关miRNA和靶基因的挖掘. 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2018.
Chen L. The Study of miRNA and Targets Regulate Plant Architecture and Silique Length in Brassica napus L. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Varkonyi-Gasic E, Wu R, Wood M, Walton E F, Hellens R P. Protocol: a highly sensitive RT-PCR method for detection and quantification of microRNAs. Plant Methods, 2007, 3: 12.
pmid: 17931426
[19] Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCt method. Methods, 2001, 25: 402-408.
doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 pmid: 11846609
[20] 金建峰. 番茄两个NAC转录因子响应铝胁迫的功能研究. 浙江大学博士学位论文, 浙江杭州, 2021.
Jin J F. The Study on the Roles of Two NAC Transcription Factors in Response to Aluminum Stress in Tomato. PhD Dissertation of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Xu K, Wu N, Yao W, Li X, Zhou Y, Li H. The biological function and roles in phytohormone signaling of the F-Box protein in plants. Agronomy, 2021, 11: 2360.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112360
[22] Hong M J, Kim J B, Seo Y W, Kim D Y. Regulation of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein (GPI-AP) expression by F-Box/LRR-Repeat (FBXL) protein in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plants, 2021, 10: 1606.
doi: 10.3390/plants10081606
[23] Yu Y, Wang P, Bai Y, Wang Y, Liu C, Ni Z. The soybean F-box protein GmFBX176 regulates ABA-mediated responses to drought and salt stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2020, 176: 104056.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104056
[24] Zhang Y, Zhang J, Guo J, Zhou F, Singh S, Xu X, Xie Q, Yang Z, Huang C F. F-box protein RAE1 regulates the stability of the aluminum-resistance transcription factor STOP1 in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2019, 116: 319-327.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814426116 pmid: 30559192
[25] Sawaki Y, Iuchi S, Kobayashi Y, Ikka T, Sakurai N, Fujita M, Shinozaki K, Shibata D, Kobayashi M, Koyama H. STOP1 regulates multiple genes that protect Arabidopsis from proton and aluminum toxicities. Plant Physiol, 2009, 150: 281-294.
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.134700
[26] Shetty R, Vidya C S N, Prakash N B, Lux A, Vaculik M. Aluminum toxicity in plants and its possible mitigation in acid soils by biochar: a review. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 765: 142744.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142744
[27] Bose J, Babourina O, Rengel Z. Role of magnesium in alleviation of aluminium toxicity in plants. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 2251-2264.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq456 pmid: 21273333
[28] Ohyama Y, Ito H, Kobayashi Y, Ikka T, Morita A, Kobayashi M, Imaizumi R, Aoki T, Komatsu K, Sakata Y, Iuchi S, Koyama H. Characterization of AtSTOP1orthologous genes in tobacco and other plant species. Plant Physiol, 2013, 162: 1937-1946.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.218958
[29] Sagi M, Fluhr R. Superoxide production by plant homologues of the gp91phox NADPH oxidase. Modulation of activity by calcium and by tobacco mosaic virus infection. Plant Physiol, 2001, 126: 1281-1290.
doi: 10.1104/pp.126.3.1281 pmid: 11457979
[30] Daspute A A, Sadhukhan A, Tokizawa M, Kobayashi Y, Panda S K, Koyama H. Transcriptional regulation of aluminum- tolerance genes in higher plants: clarifying the underlying molecular mechanisms. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1358.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01358
[1] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[2] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[3] 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197.
[4] 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899.
[5] 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675.
[6] 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567.
[7] 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197.
[8] 巨建业, 杨柳, 陈浩, 康雷, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 单细胞核转录组分析揭示油菜种皮分化过程和种子颜色差异原因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874.
[9] 张雯, 李玉, 王创, 石磊, 丁广大. 甘蓝型油菜磷转运蛋白BnaPT48的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995.
[10] 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692.
[11] 王晨, 贺丹, 姚敏, 邱萍, 何昕, 熊兴华, 康雷, 刘忠松, 钱论文. 基于转录组分析鉴定甘蓝型油菜开花候选基因以及BnaCOR27功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704.
[12] 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148.
[13] 李嘉欣, 黄莹, 吴潞梅, 赵伦, 易斌, 马朝芝, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 文静. 甘蓝型油菜BnaSLY1基因进化分析及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 44-57.
[14] 钟元, 朱天宇, 戴成, 马朝芝. 耐亚磷酸盐除草剂转基因油菜的创建和抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1158-1171.
[15] 曹松, 姚敏, 任睿, 贾元, 向星汝, 李文, 何昕, 刘忠松, 官春云, 钱论文, 熊兴华. 转录组结合区域关联分析挖掘油菜含油量积累的候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1136-1146.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!