Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 951-964.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00951

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS •     Next Articles

Genetic Similarity and Specificity of Ten Important Soybean Cultivar Families Released in China

XIONG Dong-Jin1,2,**,WANG Wu-Bin1,**,ZHAO Tuan-Jie1,GAI Jun-Yi1,*   

  1. 1 Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University / National Center for Soybean Improvement / National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 School of Life Science and food Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
  • Received:2013-11-03 Revised:2014-03-04 Online:2014-06-12 Published:2014-04-09
  • Contact: 盖钧镒, E-mail: sri@njau.edu.cn E-mail:sri@njau.edu.cn

Abstract:

Analysis of the affinity relationship and genetic similarity among cultivars is important for crop genetic improvement. In this study, a total of 161 SSRs covering the entire soybean genome were analyzed for the genetic diversity, similarity and specificity of 10 important families composed of 179 cultivars using PowerMarker Ver. 3.25. The results showed that there were totally 1697 alleles, averaging 10.5 per locus, ranging from 5 to 24 with average polymorphism information content of 0.832, ranging from 0.545 to 0.943 in the population. According to the SSR cluster analysis, the 179 cultivars were clustered into six groups, eleven subgroups, with a tendency that the cultivars in a family tended to be grouped into a same cluster. There existed significant correlation (r = 0.67) between coefficient of parentage (CP) and genetic similarity coefficient (GSC) of the population. The CP and GSC values of A295, A133, A122, and A231 families were relatively low, which means that the genetic bases of the four families were relatively broad. In contrast, the CP and GSC values of A291, A201, A084, and A002 families were relatively high, indicating their genetic bases were relatively narrow due to more cultivars obtained from pure line selection. The CP and GSC values between the A019 family from Northeast China and other nine families were the lowest among all pairwise combinations of families. The genetic specificity analysis showed that there existed much more complementary alleles, specifically existent and specifically deficient alleles in A019 in comparison with in other families, indicating the former is distant from the latter. On the other hand, the families in Eco-region II and III, contained fewer complementary alleles, specifically existent and specifically deficient alleles, which might be due to some frequent germplasm exchange between the neighboring eco-regions. For example, there were no specifically existent alleles in A002, A231, A122 and no specifically deficient alleles in A084, A201, A034, and A231. The present results are of significance in broadening the genetic basis of soybean cultivar.

Key words: Soybean, Released cultivar, SSR, Genetic diversity, Specificity

[1]Cui Z L, Carter T E, Burton J W. Genetic diversity patterns in Chinese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1780–1793



[2]Zhou X G, Carter T E, Cui Z L, Miyazaki S, Burton J W. Genetic diversity patterns in Japanese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 1331–1342



[3]盖钧镒, 崔章林. 中国大豆育成品种的亲本分析. 南京农业大学学报, 1994, 17: 19–23



Gai J Y, Cui Z L. Ancestral analysis of soybean cultivars released in China. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 1994, 17: 19–23 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Sneller C H. Pedigree analysis of elite soybean lines. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 1515–1522



[5]Bharadwaj C H, Satyavathi C T, Tiwari S P. Genetic base of soybean (Glycine max) varieties released in India as revealed by coefficient of parentage. Ind J Agric Sci, 2002, 72: 467−469



[6]Bonato A L V, Calvo E S, Geraldi I O, Arias C A A. Genetic similarity among soybean (Glycine max (L) Merrill) cultivars released in Brazil using AFLP markers. Genet Mol Biol, 2006, 29: 692–704



[7]Narvel J M, Fehr W R, Chu W S, Grant D, Shoemaker R C. Simple sequence repeat diversity among soybean plant introductions and elite genotypes. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1452–1458



[8]Abe J, Xu D H, Suzuki Y, Kanazawa A, Shimamoto Y. Soybean germplasm pools in Asia revealed by nuclear SSRs. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 106: 445–453



[9]Mimura M, Coyne C J, Bambuck M W, Lumpkin T A. SSR diversity of vegetable soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2007, 54: 497–508



[10]Wang L X, Guan R X, Li Y H, Lin F Y, Luan W J, Li W, Ma Y S, Liu Z X, Chang R Z, Qiu L J. Genetic diversity of Chinese spring soybean germplasm revealed by SSR markers. Plant Breed, 2008, 127: 56–61



[11]Ude G N, Kenworthy W J, Costa J M, Cregan P B, Alvernaz J. Genetic diversity of soybean cultivars from China, Japan, North America, and North American ancestral lines determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 1858–1867



[12]Fu Y, Peterson G W, Morrison M J. Genetic diversity of Canadian soybean cultivars and exotic germplasm revealed by simple sequence repeat markers. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 1947–1954



[13]Yamanaka N, Sato H, Yang Z, Xu D H, Catelli L L, Arias C A A, Abdelnoor R V, Nepomuceno A L. Genetic relationships between Chinese, Japanese, and Brazilian soybean gene pools revealed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Genet Mol Biol, 2007, 30: 85–88



[14]Priolli R H G, Mendes-Junior C T, Sousa S M B, Sousa N E A, Contel E P B. Soybean genetic diversity in time and among breeding programs in Brazil. Pesq Agropec Bras, 2004, 39: 967–975



[15]Priolli R H G, Mendes-Junior C T, Arantes N E, Contel E P B. Characterization of Brazilian soybean cultivars using microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Biol, 2002, 25: 185–193



[16]关荣霞, 郭娟娟, 常汝镇, 邱丽娟. 国外种质对中国大豆育成品种遗传贡献的分子证据. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1393–1398



Guan R X, Guo L L, Chang L Z, Qiu L J. Marker-based evidence of broadening the genetic base of Chinese soybeans by using introduced soybeans. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1393–1398 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]张军, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 亚洲大豆栽培品种遗传多样性、特异性和群体分化研究. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 3511–3520



Zhang J, Wang Z Q, Gai J Y. Genetic diversity, specificity and population differentiation of soybean cultivars in Asia. Agric Sci China, 2008, 41: 3511–3520 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Maccaferri M, Sanguineti M C, Xie C, Smith J S, Tuberosa R. Relationships among durum wheat accessions: II. A comparison of molecular and pedigree information. Genome, 2007, 50: 385–399



[19]Van Becelaere G, Lubbers E L, Paterson A H, Chee P W. Pedigree- vs. DNA marker-based genetic similarity estimates in cotton. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 2281–2287



[20]张军, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 我国黄淮和南方主要大豆育成品种家族产量和品质优异等位变异在系谱中遗传的研究. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 191–201



Zhang J, Zhao T J, Gai J Y. Inheritance of elite alleles of yield and quality traits in the pedigrees of major cultivar families released in Huanghuai Valleys and Southern China . Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 191–201 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]熊冬金, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 中国大豆育成品种亲本分析. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 2589–2598



Xiong D J, Tao T J, Gai J Y. Parental analysis of soybean cultivars released in China. Agric Sci China, 2008, 41: 2589–2598 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]熊冬金, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 1923—2005年中国大豆育成品种的核心祖先亲本分析. 大豆科学, 2007, 26: 2589–2598



Xiong D J, Tao T J, Gai J Y. The core ancestors of soybean cultivars released during 1923–2005 in China. Soybean Sci, 2007, 26: 2589–2598 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Aljanabi S M, Forget L, Dookun A. An improved and rapid protocol for the isolation of polysaccharide- and polyphenol-free sugarcane DNA. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1999, 17: 181



[24]Song Q J, Marek L F, Shoemaker R C, Lark K G, Concibido V C, Delannay X, Specht J E, Cregan P B. A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 122–128



[25]Cox T S, Kiang Y T, Gorman M B, Rodgers D M. Relationship between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in the soybean. Crop Sci,1985, 25: 529–532



[26]Cui, Z L, Carter T E, Burton J W, Genetic base of 651 Chinese soybean cultivars released during 1923 to 1995. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1470–1481



[27]Liu K, Muse S V. PowerMarker: An integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21: 2128–2129



[28]Nei M,Tajima F, Tateno Y. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol, 1983, 19: 153–170



[29]盖钧镒, 赵团结, 崔章林, 邱家驯. 中国1923—1995年育成的651个大豆品种的遗传基础. 中国农业科学, 1998, 31: 35–43



Gai J Y, Tao T J, Cui Z L, Qiu J X. Nuclear and cytoplasmic contributions of germplasm from distinct areas to the soybean cultivars released during 1923–1995 in China. Agric Sci China, 1998, 31: 35–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[30]Barrett B A, Kidwell K K, Fox P N. Comparison of AFLP and pedigree-gased genetic diversity assessment methods uing wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1271–1278

[1] XIAO Ying-Ni, YU Yong-Tao, XIE Li-Hua, QI Xi-Tao, LI Chun-Yan, WEN Tian-Xiang, LI Gao-Ke, HU Jian-Guang. Genetic diversity analysis of Chinese fresh corn hybrids using SNP Chips [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] CHEN Ling-Ling, LI Zhan, LIU Ting-Xuan, GU Yong-Zhe, SONG Jian, WANG Jun, QIU Li-Juan. Genome wide association analysis of petiole angle based on 783 soybean resources (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[3] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[4] YU Chun-Miao, ZHANG Yong, WANG Hao-Rang, YANG Xing-Yong, DONG Quan-Zhong, XUE Hong, ZHANG Ming-Ming, LI Wei-Wei, WANG Lei, HU Kai-Feng, GU Yong-Zhe, QIU Li-Juan. Construction of a high density genetic map between cultivated and semi-wild soybeans and identification of QTLs for plant height [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[5] LI A-Li, FENG Ya-Nan, LI Ping, ZHANG Dong-Sheng, ZONG Yu-Zheng, LIN Wen, HAO Xing-Yu. Transcriptome analysis of leaves responses to elevated CO2 concentration, drought and interaction conditions in soybean [Glycine max (Linn.) Merr.] [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[6] PENG Xi-Hong, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, YANG Xue-Li, REN Jun-Bo, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, LUO Kai, XIE Chen, LEI Lu, YONG Tai-Wen, YANG Wen-Yu. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on soil aeration and root nodule growth of relay strip intercropping soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[7] WANG Hao-Rang, ZHANG Yong, YU Chun-Miao, DONG Quan-Zhong, LI Wei-Wei, HU Kai-Feng, ZHANG Ming-Ming, XUE Hong, YANG Meng-Ping, SONG Ji-Ling, WANG Lei, YANG Xing-Yong, QIU Li-Juan. Fine mapping of yellow-green leaf gene (ygl2) in soybean (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
[8] CHEN Xiao-Hong, LIN Yuan-Xiang, WANG Qian, DING Min, WANG Hai-Gang, CHEN Ling, GAO Zhi-Jun, WANG Rui-Yun, QIAO Zhi-Jun. Development of DNA molecular ID card in hog millet germplasm based on high motif SSR [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 908-919.
[9] ZHANG Xia, YU Zhuo, JIN Xing-Hong, YU Xiao-Xia, LI Jing-Wei, LI Jia-Qi. Development and characterization analysis of potato SSR primers and the amplification research in colored potato materials [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 920-929.
[10] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[11] DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[12] ZHOU Yue, ZHAO Zhi-Hua, ZHANG Hong-Ning, KONG You-Bin. Cloning and functional analysis of the promoter of purple acid phosphatase gene GmPAP14 in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 590-596.
[13] WANG Juan, ZHANG Yan-Wei, JIAO Zhu-Jin, LIU Pan-Pan, CHANG Wei. Identification of QTLs and candidate genes for 100-seed weight trait using PyBSASeq algorithm in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[14] ZHANG Guo-Wei, LI Kai, LI Si-Jia, WANG Xiao-Jing, YANG Chang-Qin, LIU Rui-Xian. Effects of sink-limiting treatments on leaf carbon metabolism in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 529-537.
[15] YU Tao-Bing, SHI Qi-Han, NIAN-Hai , LIAN Teng-Xiang. Effects of waterlogging on rhizosphere microorganisms communities of different soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1690-1702.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!