Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 1649-1658.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.04051

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS •     Next Articles

Cloning and functional analysis of a drought tolerance-related gene IbNAC72 in sweet potato

ZHANG Huan1(), YANG Nai-Ke1, SHANG Li-Li2, GAO Xiao-Ru1, LIU Qing-Chang1, ZHAI Hong1, GAO Shao-Pei1, HE Shao-Zhen1,*()   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Sweet Potato Biology and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Laboratory of Crop Heterosis & Utilization and Joint Laboratory for International Cooperation in Crop Molecular Breeding, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    2 Yantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yantai 265500, Shandong, China
  • Received:2020-02-29 Accepted:2020-07-02 Online:2020-11-12 Published:2020-07-13
  • Contact: Shao-Zhen HE E-mail:zhanghuan1111@cau.edu.cn;sunnynba@cau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD1000700);This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD1000704);the Beijing Food Crops Innovation Consortium Program(BAIC09-2020);the China Agriculture Research System(CARS-10,甘薯)

RichHTML374

120

PDF

781

Abstract:

NAC (NAM/ATAF/CUC) is a plant-specific transcription factor family, which plays an important role in plant growth, development and stress responses. In this study, we cloned IbNAC72, a drought tolerance-related gene from sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] variety Lizixiang by RACE method. The IbNAC72 cDNA of 1319 bp in length, had an open reading frame (ORF) of 1008 bp, and encoded a 335 amino acids polypeptide, with a molecular weight of 37.4 kD and an isoelectric point (pI) of 8.76. The genomic DNA of IbNAC72 gene was 1199 bp and was deduced to contain 3 exons and 2 introns. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis revealed that IbNAC72 had a close relationship with the predicted protein products of Ipomoea nil. RT-qPCR analysis showed that IbNAC72 was expressed at the highest level in the leaves of sweet potato, and it was strongly induced by PEG-6000 and NaCl, respectively. IbNAC72 was transformed into tobacco via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Its overexpression significantly enhanced drought tolerance in the transgenic tobacco plants. Under drought stress, transgenic plants developed stronger root system; the SOD activity was significantly increased whereas the MDA content was significantly decreased in transgenic plants compared to those of wild type plants. This study showed that IbNAC72 gene was closely related to drought tolerance, providing a basis for in-depth study on the drought tolerance molecular mechanism of IbNAC72 in sweet potato.

Key words: sweet potato, NAC transcription factor, IbNAC72, overexpression, drought tolerance

Table 1

Primers used for IbNAC72 gene cloning and functional analysis"

引物名称
Primer name		 引物序列
Primer sequence (5′-3′)		 用途
Function
NAC-1 CGGAAAGTTGGGATCAAGAA 3′-RACE扩增
NAC-2 CAGGAAGACCGGAAGTTCAA 3′-RACE amplification
NAC-3 TTGAACTTCCGGTCTTCCTG 5′-RACE扩增
NAC-4 ATTCGCCCTGCTAGGAAGAT 5′-RACE amplification
NAC-F ATGGGTGTGAAAGATATGGACC ORF、DNA序列扩增
NAC-R TTACTGCCTGAACGCTAAGCTAC ORF and DNA sequence amplification
NAC-QF TCTTCAACAAGACGACAAGTCAAG RT-qPCR检测
NAC-QR AGGAAAACTCAATGCCATTG RT-qPCR detection
Actin-F AGCAGCATGAAGATTAAGGTTGTAGCAC 甘薯内参基因检测
Actin-R TGGAAAATTAGAAGCACTTCCTGTGAAC Sweet potato internal control
NAC-OE-F (Xba I) GCTCTAGAATGGGTGTGAAAGATATGGACC 过表达载体构建
NAC-OE-R (Sac I) CGAGCTCTTACTGCCTGAACGCTAAGCTAC Construction of overexpression vector

Fig. 1

Sequence analysis of IbNAC72 A: multiple protein sequence alignment of IbNAC72 with other plant NAC72 proteins; the red lines indicate the five subdomains a to e. B: phylogenetic analysis of NAC72 proteins. C: comparison of the genomic structures of IbNAC72 and AtNAC72; boxes indicate exons, and lines indicate introns."

Fig. 2

Expression analysis of IbNAC72 A: transcriptional levels of IbNAC72 in different tissues of 4-week-old in vitro-grown Lizixiang plants; B: transcriptional levels of IbNAC72 in different tissues of 3-month-old field-grown Lizixiang plants; C: expression level of IbNAC72 in the Lizixiang plants under 100 mmol L-1 NaCl treatment; D: expression level of IbNAC72 in the Lizixiang plants under 20% PEG-6000 treatment. The error bars indicate ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at the 0.05 probability level based on one-way ANOVA."

Fig. 3

Construction and identification of IbNAC72 overexpression vector A: PCR amplification of IbNAC72 gene; B: double enzyme digestion detection of pC3301-121-IbNAC72."

Fig. 4

Production and identification of IbNAC72 transgenic tobacco plants A-D: transformation, screening and regeneration of IbNAC72 transgenic tobacco plants; E-I: the leaves, stems, and roots of the overexpression plants show positive reactions in the GUS assay, whereas no GUS expression is detected in WT; H: PCR analysis of GUS-positive plants; I: transcript levels of IbNAC72 in transgenic and WT plants. M: BL2000 DNA markers; W: water as a negative control; P: pCAMBIA3301-121-IbNAC72 as a positive control; C: WT as a negative control; WT: wild-type tobacco plants; T1-T3: IbNAC72-overexpressing tobacco lines. The error bars indicate ± SD (n = 3). ** indicates significant difference at the 0.01 probability level based on Student’s t-test."

Fig. 5

Overexpression of IbNAC72 enhances drought tolerance of transgenic tobacco plants A: phenotypes of transgenic plants and WT grown for four weeks under drought stress; B: plant height of transgenic plants and WT grown for four weeks under drought stress; C: root phenotype of transgenic plants and WT grown for four weeks under drought stress; D: fresh weight of the root of transgenic plants and WT grown for four weeks under drought stress. The error bars indicate ± SD (n = 3). ** indicates significant difference at the 0.01 probability level based on Student’s t-test. Abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 4."

Fig. 6

Effects of drought stress on SOD activity and MDA accumulation in transgenic plants A: the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in transgenic plants and WT grown for four weeks under drought stress; B: the malondialdehyde (MDA) content in transgenic plants and WT grown for four weeks under drought stress. The error bars indicate ± SD (n = 3). ** indicate significant difference at the 0.01 probability level based on Student’s t-test. Abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 4."

[1] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). http://www.fao.org/statistics/en/, 2020.5.
[2] 王莺, 赵文, 张强. 中国北方地区农业干旱脆弱性评价. 中国沙漠, 2019, (4):150-158.
Wang Y, Zhao W, Zhang Q. Evaluation of agricultural drought vulnerability in Northern China. J Desert Res, 2019, (4):150-158 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 贾敬敦, 张富. 依靠科技创新推进我国盐碱地资源可持续利用. 中国农业科技导报, 2014,16(5):1-7.
Jia J D, Zhang F. Sustainable utilization of saline-alkali land resources through scientific and technological innovation in China. J Agric Sci Technol, 2014,16(5):1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 胡兴旺, 金杭霞, 朱丹华. 植物抗旱耐盐机理的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(24):137-142.
Hu X W, Jin H X, Zhu D H. Research progress of drought and salt resistant mechanism of plant. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2015,31(24):137-142 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Duan M, Zhang R, Zhu F, Zhang Z, Gou L, Wen J, Dong J, Wang T. A lipid-anchored NAC transcription factor is translocated into the nucleus and activatesGlyoxalase I expression during drought stress. Plant Cell, 2017,29:1748-1772.
pmid: 28684428
[6] Elena B, Annamaria G, Eleonora C. Plant MYB transcription factors: their role in drought response mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci, 2015,16:15811-15851.
doi: 10.3390/ijms160715811 pmid: 26184177
[7] Eckardt N A. DREB duo defines distinct drought and cold response pathways. Plant Cell, 2019,6:1196-1197.
[8] Chen J, Nolan T M, Ye H, Zhang M, Tong H, Xin P, Chu J, Chu C, Li Z, Yin Y. Arabidopsis WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 transcription factors are involved in brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and drought responses. Plant Cell, 2017,29:1425-1439.
pmid: 28576847
[9] Zhang H, Gao X, Zhi Y, Li X, Zhang Q, Niu J, Wang J, Zhai H, Zhao N, Li J, Liu Q, He S. A non-tandem CCCH-type zinc finger protein, IbC3H18, functions as a nuclear transcriptional activator and enhances abiotic stress tolerance in sweet potato. New Phytol, 2019,223:1918-1936.
pmid: 31091337
[10] 王芳, 孙立娇, 赵晓宇, 王婕婉, 宋兴舜. 植物NAC转录因子的研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2019,35(4):88-93.
Wang F, Sun L J, Zhao X Y, Wang J W, Song X S. Research progresses on plant NAC transcription factors. Biotechnol Bull, 2019,35(4):88-93 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Nakashima K, Tran L, Van Nguyen D, Fujita M, Maruyama K, Todaka D, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Functional analysis of a NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC6 involved in abiotic and biotic stress-responsive gene expression in rice. Plant J, 2007,51:617-630.
pmid: 17587305
[12] Zheng X, Chen B, Lu G, Han B. Overexpression of a NAC transcription factor enhances rice drought and salt tolerance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2009,379:985-989.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.163 pmid: 19135985
[13] Hu H, Dai M, Yao J, Xiao B, Li X, Zhang Q, Xiong L. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006,103:12987-12992.
pmid: 16924117
[14] Yuan X, Wang H, Cai J, Bi Y, Song F. Rice NAC transcription factor ONAC066 functions as a positive regulator of drought and oxidative stress response. BMC Plant Biol, 2019,19:278-284.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1883-y pmid: 31238869
[15] Fujita M, Fujita Y, Maruyama K, Seki M, Hiratsu K, Ohme- Takagi M, Shinozaki K. A dehydration-induced NAC protein, RD26, is involved in a novel ABA-dependent stress-signaling pathway. Plant J, 2004,39:863-876.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02171.x pmid: 15341629
[16] Lu M, Zhang D, Shi Y, Song Y, Li Y, Wang T. Overexpression of a stress induced maize NAC transcription factor gene, ZmSNAC1, improved drought and salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:2177-2182.
[17] Xu Z, Kim S, Hyeon D, Kim D, Dong T, Park Y, Jin J, Joo S, Kim S, Hong J, Hwang D, Hwang I. The Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor ANAC096 cooperates with bZIP-type transcription factors in dehydration and osmotic stress responses. Plant Cell, 2013,25:4708-4724.
pmid: 24285786
[18] Sakuraba Y, Kim Y, Han S, Lee B, Paek N. The Arabidopsis transcription factor NAC016 promotes drought stress responses by repressing AREB1 transcription through a trifurcate feed- forward regulatory loop involving NAP. Plant Cell, 2015,27:1771-1787.
pmid: 26059204
[19] Thirumalaikumar V, Devkar V, Mehterov N, Ali S, Ozgur R, Turkan I, Mueller-Roeber B, Balazadeh S. NAC transcription factor JUNGBRUNNEN 1 enhances drought tolerance in tomato. Plant Biotechnol J, 2018,16:354-366.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12776 pmid: 28640975
[20] Al Abdallat A, Ayad J, Elenein J, Al Ajlouni Z, Harwood W. Overexpression of the transcription factor HvSNAC1 improves drought tolerance in barley(Hordeum vulgare L.). Mol Breed, 2014,33:401-414.
[21] Wang B, Zhai H, He S, Zhang H, Ren Z, Zhang D, Liu Q. A vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene, IbNHX2, enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato. Sci Hortic, 2016,201:153-166.
[22] Zhai H, Wang F, Si Z, Huo J, Xing L, An Y, He S, Liu Q. A myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase gene, IbMIPS1, enhances salt and drought tolerance and stem nematode resistance in transgenic sweet potato. Plant Biotechnol J, 2016,14:592-602.
pmid: 26011089
[23] Kang C, Zhai H, Xue L, Zhao N, He S, Liu Q. A lycopene β-cyclase gene, IbLCYB2, enhances carotenoid contents and abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato. Plant Sci, 2018,272:243-254.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.005 pmid: 29807598
[24] Zhu H, Zhou Y, Zhai H, He S, Zhao N, Liu Q. Transcriptome profiling reveals insights into the molecular mechanism of drought tolerance in sweetpotato. J Integr Agric, 2019,18:9-23.
[25] 王关林, 方宏筠. 植物基因工程(第2版). 北京: 科学出版社, 2002. pp 344-362.
Wang G L, Fang H J. Plant Genetic Engineering, 2nd edn. Beijing: Science Press, 2002. pp 344-362(in Chinese).
[26] Jefferson R A, Kavanagh T A, Bevan M W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J, 1987,6:3901.
pmid: 3327686
[27] 李伟, 韩蕾, 钱永强, 孙振元. 植物NAC转录因子的种类、特征及功能. 应用与环境生物学报, 2011,17:596-606.
Li W, Han L, Qian Y Q, Sun Z Y. Characteristics and functions of NAC transcription factors in plants. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2011,17:596-606 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] Li X, Li X, Li M, Yan Y, Liu X, Li L. Dual function of NAC072 in ABF3-mediated ABA-responsive gene regulation in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci, 2016,7:1075.
pmid: 27486475
[29] Guan H, Liu X, Niu F, Zhao Q, Fan N, Cao D, Fu Y. OoNAC72, a NAC-type Oxytropis ochrocephala transcription factor, conferring enhanced drought and salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci, 2019,10:890.
pmid: 31354764
[30] Wu H, Fu B, Sun P, Xiao C, Liu J. A NAC transcription factor represses putrescine biosynthesis and affects drought tolerance. Plant Physiol, 2016,172:1532-1547.
pmid: 27663409
[31] Mao H, Li S, Wang Z, Cheng X, Li F, Mei F, Chen N, Kang Z. Regulatory changes in TaSNAC8 are associated with drought tolerance in wheat seedlings. Plant Biotechnol J, 2019,10:1-15.
[32] Chen D, Chai S, Mcintyre C L, Xue G P. Overexpression of a predominantly root-expressed NAC transcription factor in wheat roots enhances root length, biomass and drought tolerance. Plant Cell Rep, 2017,37:225-237.
pmid: 29079898
[33] 王建华, 刘鸿先, 徐同. 超氧物歧化酶(SOD)在植物逆境和衰老生理中的作用. 植物生理通讯, 1989, (1):1-7.
Wang J H, Liu H X, Xu T. The role of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in stress physiology and senescence physiology of plant. Plant Physiol Commun, 1989, (1):1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34] Zhang H, Zhang Q, Zhai H, Gao S, Yang L, Wang Z, Xu Y, Huo J, Ren Z, Zhao N, Wang X, Li J, Liu Q, He S. IbBBX24 promotes the jasmonic acid pathway and enhances fusarium wilt resistance in sweet potato. Plant Cell, 2020,32:1102-1123.
pmid: 32034034
[1] ZHOU Wen-Qi, QIANG Xiao-Xia, WANG Sen, JIANG Jing-Wen, WEI Wan-Rong. Mechanism of drought and salt tolerance of OsLPL2/PIR gene in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[2] YUAN Da-Shuang, DENG Wan-Yu, WANG Zhen, PENG Qian, ZHANG Xiao-Li, YAO Meng-Nan, MIAO Wen-Jie, ZHU Dong-Ming, LI Jia-Na, LIANG Ying. Cloning and functional analysis of BnMAPK2 gene in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 840-850.
[3] SONG Tian-Xiao, LIU Yi, RAO Li-Ping, Soviguidi Deka Reine Judesse, ZHU Guo-Peng, YANG Xin-Sun. Identification and expression analysis of cell wall invertase IbCWIN gene family members in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(7): 1297-1308.
[4] MENG Jiang-Yu, LIANG Guang-Wei, HE Ya-Jun, QIAN Wei. QTL mapping of salt and drought tolerance related traits in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(3): 462-471.
[5] WANG Cui-Juan, CHAI Sha-Sha, SHI Chun-Yu, ZHU Hong, TAN Zhong-Peng, JI Jie, REN Guo-Bo. Anatomy characteristics and IbEXP1 gene expression of tuberization under ammonia nitrogen treatment in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(2): 305-319.
[6] LI Xiao-Xu, WANG Rui, ZHANG Li-Xia, SONG Ya-Meng, TIAN Xiao-Nan, GE Rong-Chao. Cloning and functional identification of gene OsATS in rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(10): 2045-2052.
[7] Yong-Chen LIU,Cheng-Cheng SI,Hong-Juan LIU,Bin-Bin ZHANG,Chun-Yu SHI. Reason exploration for soil aeration promoting photosynthate transportation between sink and source in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(3): 462-471.
[8] Shan-Bin CHEN, Si-Fan SUN, Nan NIE, Bing DU, Shao-Zhen HE, Qing-Chang LIU, Hong ZHAI. Cloning of IbCAF1 and identification on tolerance to salt and drought stress in sweetpotato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(12): 1862-1869.
[9] JIANG Zhong-Yu, TANG Li-Xue, LIU Hong-Juan, SHI Chun-Yu. Changes of endogenous hormones on storage root formation and its relationship with storage root number under different potassium application rates of sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(11): 1750-1759.
[10] ZHANG Hai-Yan, WANG Bao-Qing, FENG Xiang-Yang, LI Guang-Liang, XIE Bei-Tao, DONG Shun-Xu, DUAN Wen-Xue, ZHANG Li-Ming. Effects of drought treatments at different growth stages on growth and the activity of osmotic adjustment in sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(11): 1760-1770.
[11] MA Jin-Jiao,LAN Jin-Ping,ZHANG Tong,CHEN Yue,GUO Ya-Lu,LIU Yu-Qing,YAN Gao-Wei,WEI Jian,DOU Shi-Juan,YANG Ming,LI Li-Yun,LIU Guo-Zhen. Overexpression of OsMPK17 protein enhances drought tolerance of rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 20-30.
[12] Wen-Qing SHI,Bin-Bin ZHANG,Hong-Juan LIU,Qing-Xin ZHAO,Chun-Yu SHI,Xin-Jian WANG,Cheng-Cheng SI. Response mechanism of sweet potato storage root formation and bulking to soil compaction and its relationship with yield [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(5): 755-763.
[13] Wen-Xue DUAN,Hai-Yan ZHANG,Bei-Tao XIE,Bao-Qing WANG,Li-Ming ZHANG. Identification of Salt Tolerance and Screening for Its Indicators in Sweet Potato Varieties during Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1237-1247.
[14] Bin YU,Hong-Yu YANG,Li WANG,Yu-Hui LIU,Jiang-Ping BAI,Feng ZHANG,Di WANG,Jun-Lian ZHANG. Relationship between Potato Canopy-air Temperature Difference and Drought Tolerance [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(7): 1086-1094.
[15] Long LI,Xin-Guo MAO,Jing-Yi WANG,Xiao-Ping CHANG,Yu-Ping LIU,Rui-Lian JING. Drought Tolerance Evaluation of Wheat Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(7): 988-999.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No.12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081,China Email:xbzw@chinajournal.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd