Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 2066-2079.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14163

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Assessment of cold tolerance of different peanut varieties and screening of evaluation indexes at germination stage

BAI Dong-Mei1,*(), XUE Yun-Yun1, HUANG Li2, HUAI Dong-Xin2, TIAN Yue-Xia1, WANG Peng-Dong1, ZHANG Xin1, ZHANG Hui-Qi1, LI Na1, JIANG Hui-Fang2, LIAO Bo-Shou2,*()   

  1. 1Industrial Crop Research Institute, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
    2Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, Hubei, China
  • Received:2021-09-07 Accepted:2021-11-29 Online:2022-08-12 Published:2021-12-15
  • Contact: BAI Dong-Mei,LIAO Bo-Shou E-mail:baidm1221@163.com;lboshou@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31871662);China Agriculture Research System(CARS-13);Cultivation Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(YGJPY1901);Biological Breeding Project of Shanxi Academy University(YZGC049);Outstanding Youth Fund Project of Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences(YCX2020YQ33)

RichHTML401

29

PDF

367

Abstract:

Cold temperature and cold damage is one of the important abiotic stress factors restricting the development of peanut industry. The ability of peanut varieties to tolerate cold at germination stage is an important guarantee to determine the uniformity of seeding emergence, high yield, and high quality. In this research, 62 peanut varieties with different genotypes were comprehensively assessed for cold tolerance at germination stage by using comprehensive index value, weight, membership function value, and D-value of each variety. The results showed that the higher the D-value, the stronger the cold tolerance, and vice versa. The 62 varieties were divided into five categories by systematic cluster analysis: the first category was high cold-tolerant, the second was cold-tolerant, the third was intermediate cold-tolerant, the fourth was sensitive, and the fifth was highly sensitive. Correlation analysis revealed that the correlations between oleic acid content and D-value and other four indexes of cold tolerance did not reach a significant level, indicating that the acid content of peanut oil had nothing to do with the cold tolerance in peanut germination stage. A significant positive correlation between each relative index value and D-value indicated that there was consistency among the relative index values of cold tolerance in peanut germination stage. The analysis of its relative index characteristic value, contribution value, and weight demonstrated that the relative germination rate could be used as the positive index of cold tolerance identification in peanut bud period, that is, the greater the relative germination rate, the stronger its cold tolerance at germination stage, and vice versa. Five varieties with high cold-tolerance were selected, and the relative germination rate as the evaluation index of cold-tolerance in peanut germination stage was established in this study, providing basic materials and efficient assessing methods for the quick assessment of cold-tolerant peanut germplasm in peanut germination stage, cultivation of new varieties with cold-tolerance and related theoretical researches.

Key words: peanut varieties, cold stress, cold-tolerance at germination stage, evaluation indexes

Table 1

Information of peanut cultivars (lines) used in this study"

编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 油酸含量
Oleic acid content (%)		 编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 油酸含量
Oleic acid content (%)
1 花育20 Huayu 20 42.40 32 农大636 Nongda 636 37.00
2 徐0124 Xu 0124 36.50 33 豫花151 Yuhua 151 79.20
3 花育6802 Huayu 6802 48.10 34 濮花67 Puhua 67 47.10
4 金花19 Jinhua 19 41.70 35 徐花24 Xuhua 24 80.50
5 豫航花7号Yuhanghua 7 51.10 36 徐花23 Xuhua 23 78.70
6 农大402 Nongda 402 47.60 37 花育6811 Huayu 6811 51.80
7 冀040-11 Ji 040-11 80.80 38 濮花70 Puhua 70 40.00
8 商花5号Shanghua 5 43.00 39 豫花158 Yuhua 158 42.20
9 冀农G94 Jinong G94 78.60 40 花育6808 Huayu 6808 40.70
10 冀5059 Ji 5059 46.40 41 冀农花19 Jinonghua 19 78.50
11 濮花56 Puhua 56 48.30 42 豫花157 Yuhua 157 80.70
12 皖花4号Wanhua 4 38.50 43 花育655 Huayu 655 77.50
13 农大R366 Nongda R366 38.80 44 漯花22 Luohua 22 46.50
14 开农92 Kainong 92 51.30 45 冀农花16 Jinonghua 16 78.90
15 远杂9102 Yuanza 9102 36.40 46 13R526 49.40
16 豫花80 Yuhua 80 81.00 47 花育6312 Huayu 6312 45.30
17 宇花16 Yuhua 16 42.60 48 花育6311 Huayu 6311 38.70
18 冀11-17 Ji 11-17 41.80 49 豫花177 Yuhua 177 79.80
19 漯花18 Luohua 18 43.70 50 郑农26 Zhengnong 26 41.60
20 豫花136 Yuhua 136 41.90 51 山花35 Shanhua 35 40.70
21 冀914 Ji 914 81.00 52 开农313 Kainong 313 78.50
22 豫花138 Yuhua 138 79.10 53 皖花14 Wanhua 14 39.40
23 豫花124 Yuhua 124 77.50 54 济花8号 Jihua 8 79.90
24 商花40 Shanghua 40 41.80 55 驻花6号 Zhuhua 6 40.30
25 徐0231 Xu 0231 38.10 56 济花5号Jihua 5 80.90
26 花育6306 Huayu 6306 41.50 57 开农112 Kainong 112 38.10
27 花育6805 Huayu 6805 48.10 58 晋花10 Jinhua 10 49.20
28 花育613 Huayu 613 40.70 59 汾花12 Fenhua 12 46.40
29 冀5038 Ji 5038 43.60 60 DF12 77.81
30 宛花6号Wanhua 6 40.20 61 花育44 Huayu 44 49.22
31 农大141 Nongda 141 39.70 62 徐68-4 Xu 68-4 46.41

Fig. 1

Germination of nine varieties under normal temperature and low temperature stress"

Fig. 2

Each index value of 62 varieties after normal temperature and low temperature stress"

Table 2

Differences in indices of different peanut at germination stage"

指标
Index		 最小值
Min.		 最大值
Max.		 平均值
Average		 标准偏差
Standard deviation		 偏度
Skewness		 峰度
Kurtosis		 变异系数
Coefficient variation
常温发芽率NTGR (%) 45.00 100.00 76.56 13.34 -0.27 -0.56 0.17
低温发芽率LTGR ( %) 0 90.00 35.67 21.37 0.61 -0.05 0.60
相对发芽率RGR (%) 0 93.75 45.07 23.79 0.18 -0.74 0.53
常温发芽指数NTGI 4.08 9.81 7.23 1.35 -0.24 -0.37 0.19
低温发芽指数LTGI 0 7.29 2.81 1.35 0.63 -0.21 0.64
相对发芽指数RGI (%) 0 85.16 37.56 21.55 0.32 -0.66 0.57
常温发芽势NTGP (%) 31.67 95.00 65.05 14.25 -0.18 0.03 0.22
低温发芽势LTGP (%) 0 75.00 28.81 18.69 0.60 -0.35 0.65
相对发芽势RGP (%) 0 95.12 42.80 25.67 0.34 -0.68 0.58
常温芽长NTSL (mm) 296.21 1027.17 578.08 163.15 0.49 -0.02 0.28
低温芽长LTSL (mm) 0 738.31 241.80 168.61 0.78 0.13 0.70
相对芽长RSL (%) 0 95.66 40.54 24.52 0.41 -0.56 0.60

Table 3

Cold-tolerance indices of different peanut at germination stage (%)"

编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 相对发芽率
RGR		 相对发芽指数
RGI		 相对发芽势
RGP		 相对芽长
RSL
1 花育20 Huayu 20 64.53 48.21 61.76 46.98
2 徐0124 Xu 0124 23.94 17.15 21.43 16.75
3 花育6802 Huayu 6802 51.72 42.99 46.15 34.70
4 金花19 Jinhua 19 26.02 19.94 28.38 20.68
5 豫航花7号 Yuhanghua 7 48.08 43.84 47.73 51.61
6 农大402 Nongda 402 22.67 14.38 10.71 17.08
7 冀040-11 Ji 040-11 91.07 74.28 86.67 81.14
8 商花5号 Shanghua 5 23.44 17.22 22.06 15.64
9 冀农G94 Jinong G94 11.41 7.85 8.11 7.79
10 冀5059 Ji 5059 20.09 13.25 13.64 9.27
11 濮花56 Puhua 56 34.76 25.00 30.88 30.02
12 皖花4号 Wanhua 4 62.50 46.53 61.67 60.05
13 农大R366 Nongda R366 21.20 17.15 23.68 13.82
14 开农92 Kainong 92 5.17 3.80 7.14 3.19
15 远杂9102 Yuanza 9102 93.75 77.62 91.30 81.29
16 豫花80 Yuhua 80 5.36 3.23 2.27 2.19
17 宇花16 Yuhua 16 55.00 36.20 37.50 47.08
18 冀11-17 Ji 11-17 0 0 0 0
19 漯花18 Luohua 18 60.00 50.57 57.89 55.65
20 豫花136 Yuhua 136 17.31 14.45 16.41 18.00
21 冀914 Ji 914 20.83 17.10 17.31 21.06
22 豫花138 Yuhua 138 18.37 13.43 15.79 14.50
23 豫花124 Yuhua 124 18.00 12.77 16.88 14.47
24 商花40 Shanghua 40 32.93 27.04 34.29 27.93
25 徐0231 Xu 0231 20.45 15.77 21.71 10.69
26 花育6306 Huayu 6306 51.39 41.04 46.28 48.70
27 花育6805 Huayu 6805 73.66 57.13 61.22 57.01
28 花育613 Huayu 613 53.80 44.15 53.05 38.60
29 冀5038 Ji 5038 10.42 7.21 6.82 6.64
30 宛花6号 Wanhua 6 41.18 29.48 30.68 29.74
31 农大141 Nongda 141 45.00 32.60 36.59 33.56
32 农大636 Nongda 636 36.06 23.44 18.75 27.86
33 豫花151 Yuhua 151 45.00 34.85 40.71 38.41
34 濮花67 Puhua 67 51.79 39.78 41.25 48.53
35 徐花24 Xuhua 24 68.64 58.84 62.95 71.06
36 徐花23 Xuhua 23 35.63 30.33 36.36 30.15
37 花育6811 Huayu 6811 69.77 62.72 87.10 63.57
38 濮花70 Puhua 70 25.61 18.13 15.79 19.81
39 豫花158 Yuhua 158 59.69 52.26 60.33 51.08
40 花育6808 Huayu 6808 58.50 47.41 54.88 52.34
41 冀农花19 Jinonghua 19 41.25 34.44 34.46 36.33
42 豫花157 Yuhua 157 29.72 24.84 27.94 26.61
43 花育655 Huayu 655 55.88 46.97 49.43 42.33
44 漯花22 Luohua 22 79.25 67.60 76.60 84.97
编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 相对发芽率
RGR		 相对发芽指数
RGI		 相对发芽势
RGP		 相对芽长
RSL
45 冀农花16 Jinonghua 16 58.59 51.74 55.00 44.59
46 13R526 68.33 63.39 77.03 67.91
47 花育6312 Huayu 6312 73.40 59.95 61.05 62.44
48 花育6311 Huayu 6311 75.00 70.81 77.42 58.44
49 豫花177 Yuhua 177 42.67 36.16 38.21 36.34
50 郑农26 Zhengnong 26 55.81 48.00 50.00 48.05
51 山花35 Shanhua 35 89.36 82.34 86.93 92.53
52 开农313 Kainong 313 49.22 44.44 51.32 57.43
53 皖花14 Wanhua 14 65.38 59.60 66.18 74.34
54 济花8号 Jihua 8 37.50 38.84 53.57 50.85
55 驻花6号 Zhuhua 6 84.38 85.16 95.12 95.66
56 济花5号 Jihua 5 11.11 8.67 11.25 9.74
57 开农112 Kainong 112 28.64 27.71 29.69 35.64
58 晋花10 Jinhua 10 52.66 47.60 60.81 51.78
59 汾花12 Fenhua 12 58.93 51.37 54.17 69.06
60 DF12 36.16 30.85 36.70 32.58
61 花育44 Huayu 44 93.10 80.28 93.75 93.61
62 徐68-4 Xu 68-4 33.33 28.75 33.14 23.73

Table 4

Value of each comprehensive index (CI), index weight, μ(X), D-value, and comprehensive evaluation"

Fig. 3

Cluster analysis of cold-tolerance abilities of 62 peanut varieties at germination stage"

Table 5

Correlation analysis of cold tolerance indexes and oleic acid contents in peanut at germination stage"

性状
Trait		 油酸含量
Oleate (%)		 相对发芽率
RGR (%)		 相对发芽指数RGI (%) 相对发芽势
RGP (%)		 相对芽长
RSL (%)		 D值
D-value
油酸含量 Oleate (%) 1
相对发芽率 RGR (%) -0.185 1
相对发芽指数 RGI (%) -0.157 0.985** 1
相对发芽势 RGP (%) -0.156 0.968** 0.986** 1
相对芽长 RSL (%) -0.134 0.953** 0.968** 0.953** 1
D值 D-value -0.160 0.988** 0.996** 0.987** 0.982** 1
[1] 廖伯寿. 我国花生生产发展现状与潜力分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42: 1-6.
Liao B S. A review on progress and prospects of peanut industry in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2020, 42: 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 张鹤, 蒋春姬, 殷冬梅, 董佳乐, 任婧瑶, 赵新华, 钟超, 王晓光, 于海秋. 花生耐冷综合评价体系构建及耐冷种质筛选. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 1753-1767.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04182
Zhang H, Jiang C J, Yin D M, Dong J L, Ren J Y, Zhao X H, Zhong C, Wang X G, Yu H Q. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system for cold tolerance and screening of cold tolerance germplasm in peanut. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 1753-1767. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 于树涛, 于洪波, 苏君伟, 赵立仁, 史普想, 赵艳, 唐月异, 王秀贞, 吴琪, 王传堂. 低温胁迫下花生差异表达基因的分离与分析. 核农学报, 2014, 28: 569-576.
Yu S T, Yu H B, Su J W, Zhao L R, Shi P X, Zhao Y, Tang Y Y, Wang X Z, Wu Q, Wang C T. Isolation and analysis of gifferentially expressed genes from peanut under low-temperature stress. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2014, 28: 569-576. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 王晶珊, 封海胜, 栾文琪. 低温对花生出苗的影响及耐低温种质的筛选. 中国油料, 1985, (3): 28-32.
Wang J S, Feng H S, Luan W Q. Effect of low temperature on seed emergence and screening low temperature resistance germplasm. Chin Oil Crop Sci, 1985, (3): 28-32. (in Chinese)
[5] 封海胜. 花生种子吸胀期间耐低温性鉴定. 中国油料, 1991, (1): 67-70.
Feng H S. Identification on low temperature resistance of peanut seed during imbibition stage. Chin Oil Crop Sci, 1991, (1): 67-70. (in Chinese)
[6] Upadhyaya H D, Reddy L J, Dwivedi S L, Gowda C L L, Singh S. Phenotypic diversity in cold-tolerant peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm. Euphytica, 2009, 165: 278-291.
[7] 刘海龙, 陈小姝, 杨富军, 白冬梅, 孙晓苹, 吕永超, 任小平, 姜慧芳, 高华援. 花生种质资源耐低温表型鉴定方法研究. 花生学报, 2017, 46(3): 20-25.
Liu H L, Chen X S, Yang F J, Bai D M, Sun X P, Lyu Y C, Ren X P, Jiang H F, Gao H Y. Research of identification method on low temperature resistance of peanut germplasm resources phenotype. J Peanut Sci, 2017, 46(3): 20-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 吕建伟, 马天进, 李正强, 陈锋, 姜慧芳. 花生种质资源出苗期耐低温性鉴定方法及应用. 花生学报, 2014, 43(3): 13-18.
Lyu J W, Ma T J, Li Z Q, Chen F, Jiang H F. Identification method of low temperature tolerance on peanut germplasm resource. J Peanut Sci, 2014, 43(3): 13-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 唐月异, 王传堂, 高华媛, 凤桐, 张树伟, 王秀贞, 张建成, 禹山林. 花生种子吸胀期间耐低温性及其与品质性状的相关研究. 核农学报, 2011, 25: 436-442.
Tang Y Y, Wang C T, Gao H Y, Feng T, Zhang S W, Wang X Z, Zhang J C, Yu S L. Low temperature tolerance during seed imbibition and its relationship to main quality in peanut. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2011, 25: 436-442. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 白冬梅, 薛云云, 赵姣姣, 黄莉, 田跃霞, 权宝全, 姜慧芳. 山西花生地方品种芽期耐寒性鉴定及SSR遗传多样性. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 1459-1467.
Bai D M, Xue Y Y, Zhao J J, Huang L, Tian Y X, Quan B Q, Jiang H F. Identification of cold-tolerance during germination stage and genetic diversity of SSR markers in peanut landraces of Shanxi province. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 1459-1467. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01459
[11] 常博文, 钟鹏, 刘杰, 唐中华, 高亚冰, 于洪久, 郭玮. 低温胁迫和赤霉素对花生种子萌发和幼苗生理响应的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 118-130.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84043
Chang B W, Zhong P, Liu J, Tang Z H, Gao Y B, Yu H J, Guo W. Effects of low temperature stress and gibberellin on seed germination and seedling physiological response of peanut. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 118-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84043
[12] 陈昊, 徐日荣, 陈湘瑜, 张玉梅, 胡润芳, 蓝新隆, 唐兆秀, 林国强. 花生种子萌发吸胀阶段冷害抗性的鉴定及耐冷种质的筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21: 192-200.
Chen H, Xu R R, Chen X Y, Zhang Y M, Hu R F, Lan X L, Tang Z X, Lin G Q. Identification of imbibitional chilling injury resistance for peanut and screening of imbibitional chilling-tolerance germplasm. J Plant Genet Resour, 2020, 21: 192-200. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 薛云云, 白冬梅, 田跃霞, 权宝全. 24份山西花生资源芽期和苗期耐寒性鉴定. 核农学报, 2018, 32: 582-590.
Xue Y Y, Bai D M, Tian Y X, Quan B Q. Cold tolerance identification for 24 peanut resources from Shanxi province at the stage of germination and seedling. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2018, 32: 582-590. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 陈娜, 程果, 潘丽娟, 陈明娜, 张小燕, 王冕, 王通, 许静, 禹山林, 孙泓希, 于树涛, 迟晓元. 东北地区收获期低温对花生品质影响及耐低温品种筛选. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56: 2417-2427.
Chen N, Cheng G, Pan L J, Chen M N, Zhang X Y, Wang M, Wang T, Xu J, Yu S L, Sun H X, Yu S T, Chi X Y. Effects of low temperature on peanut quality and selection of low temperature tolerant varieties in northeast China. Plant Physiol J, 2020, 56: 2417-2427. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 孙东雷, 卞能飞, 王幸, 邢兴华, 沈一, 徐泽俊, 齐玉军, 王晓军. 高油酸花生萌发期耐冷性综合评价及种质筛选. 核农学报, 2021, 35: 1263-1272.
Sun D L, Bian N F, Wang X, Xing X H, Shen Y, Xu Z J, Qi Y J, Wang X J. Comprehensive evaluation of cold tolerance and germplasm screening of high oleic acid peanut at germination stage. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2021, 35: 1263-1272. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 谢志坚. 农业科学中的模糊数学方法. 武汉: 华中理工大学出版社, 1983. pp 99-193.
Xie Z J. Method of Fuzzy Mathematics in Agricultural Science. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 1983. pp 99-193. (in Chinese)
[17] 颜启传. 种子学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001. pp 91-102.
Yan Q C. Seed Science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001. pp 97-102. (in Chinese)
[18] Bell M J, Gillespie T J, Roy R C, Michaels T E, Tollenaar M. Peanut leaf photosynthetic activity in cool field environments. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 1023-1029.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040035x
[19] 王俊娟, 王德龙, 阴祖军, 王帅, 樊伟丽, 陆许可, 穆敏, 郭丽雪, 叶武威, 喻树迅. 陆地棉萌发至幼苗期抗冷性的鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49: 3332-3346.
Wang J J, Wang D L, Yin Z J, Wang S, Fan W L, Lu X K, Mu M, Guo L X, Ye W W, Yu S X. Identification of the chilling resistance from germination stage to seedling stage in upland cotton. Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49: 3332-3346. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 武辉, 侯丽丽, 周艳飞, 范志超, 石俊毅, 阿丽艳·肉孜, 张巨松. 不同棉花基因型幼苗耐寒性分析及其鉴定指标筛选. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 1703-1713.
Wu H, Hou L L, Zhou Y F, Fan Z C, Shi J Y, Aliyan R Z, Zhang J S. Analysis of chilling-tolerance and determination of chillingtolerance evaluation indicators in cotton of different genotypes. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 1703-1713. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 张陇艳, 程功敏, 魏恒玲, 王寒涛, 芦建华, 马峙英, 喻树迅. 陆地棉种子萌发期对低温胁迫的响应及耐冷性鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54: 19-33.
Zhang L Y, Chang G M, Wei H L, Wang H T, Lu J H, Ma Z Y, Yu S X. Chilling tolerance identification and response to cold stress of Gossypium hirsutum varieties (lines) during germination stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2021, 54: 19-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 全国农业技术推广服务中心. 高油酸花生产业纵论. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2019.
National Agricultural Technology Extension Service Center. An Overview of High Oleic Acid Peanut Industry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
[23] 王传堂, 唐月异, 王秀贞, 吴琪, 王志伟, 宫清轩, 冯昊, 杜祖波, 李秋. 高油酸花生新品系丰产性与播种出苗期耐低温高湿田间评价. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(9): 110-114.
Wang C T, Tang Y Y, Wang X Z, Wu Q, Wang Z W, Gong Q X, Peng H, Du Z Q, Li Q. Evaluation on productivity of new high oleic peanut lines and field tolerance to low temperature and high moisture during sowing to emergence period. Shandong Agric Sci, 2019, 51(9): 110-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 王传堂, 张建成, 唐月异, 于树涛, 王强, 刘峰, 李秋. 中国高油酸花生育种现状与展望. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(6): 171-176.
Wang C T, Zhang J C, Tang Y Y, Yu S T, Wang Q, Liu F, Li Q. Current situation and future directions of high oleic peanut breeding in China. Shandong Agric Sci, 2018, 50(6): 171-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] Wang C T, Tang Y Y, Wang X Z, Wu Q, Guan S Y, Yang W Q, Wang P W. Development and characterization of four new high oleate peanut lines. Res Crops, 2013, 14: 845-849.
[26] 张明威, 于国庆, 于树涛, 于洪波, 史普想. 辽宁高油酸花生种植技术. 农业工程技术, 2018, 38(8): 53.
Zhang M W, Yu G Q, Yu S T, Yu H B, Shi P X. Planting technology of high oleic peanut in Liaoning province. Agric Eng Technol, 2018, 38(8): 53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 于树涛, 于国庆, 孙泓希, 仸亮, 王虹, 赵立仁, 于洪波. 高油酸花生品种(品系)的遗传多态性分析. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15: 4033-4039.
Yu S T, Yu G Q, Sun H X, Ren L, Wang H, Zhao L R, Yu H B. Genetic diversity analysis on high oleic acid peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties and strains. Mol Plant Breed, 2017, 15: 4033-4039. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 薛晓梦, 吴洁, 王欣, 白冬梅, 胡美玲, 晏立英, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 低温胁迫对普通和高油酸花生种子萌发的影响研究. 作物学报, 2021, 47: 1768-1778.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04170
Xue X M, Wu J, Wang X, Bai D M, Hu M L, Yan L Y, Chen Y N, Kang Y P, Wang Z H, Huai D X, Lei Y, Liao B S. Effects of cold stress on germination in peanut cultivars with normal and high content of oleic acid. Acta Agron Sin, 2021, 47: 1768-1778. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] 薛晓梦, 李建国, 白冬梅, 晏立英, 万丽云, 康彦平, 淮东欣, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 花生FAD2基因家族表达分析及其低温胁迫的响应. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 1586-1594.
Xue X M, Li J G, Bai D M, Yan L Y, Wan L Y, Kang Y P, Huai D X, Lei Y, Liao B S. Expression profiles of FAD2 genes and their responses to cold stress in peanut. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 1586-1594. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] SHI Lei, MIAO Li-Juan, HUANG Bing-Yan, GAO Wei, ZHANG Zong-Xin, QI Fei-Yan, LIU Juan, DONG Wen-Zhao, ZHANG Xin-You. Characterization of the promoter and 5'-UTR intron in AhFAD2-1 genes from peanut and their responses to cold stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1703-1711.
[2] XUE Xiao-Meng, WU JIE, WANG Xin, BAI Dong-Mei, HU Mei-Ling, YAN Li-Ying, CHEN Yu-Ning, KANG Yan-Ping, WANG Zhi-Hui, HUAI Dong-Xin, LEI Yong, LIAO Bo-Shou. Effects of cold stress on germination in peanut cultivars with normal and high content of oleic acid [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1768-1778.
[3] GAO Yun, ZHANG Yu-Xue, MA Quan, SU Sheng-Nan, LI Chun-Yan, DING Jin-Feng, ZHU Min, ZHU Xin-Kai, GUO Wen-Shan. Effects of low temperature in spring on fertility of pollen and formation of grain number in wheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(1): 104-115.
[4] LI Xu-Kai,LI Ren-Jian,ZHANG Bao-Jun. Identification of rice stress-related gene co-expression modules by WGCNA [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1349-1364.
[5] XUE Xiao-Meng,LI Jian-Guo,BAI Dong-Mei,YAN Li-Ying,WAN Li-Yun,KANG Yan-Ping,HUAI Dong-Xin,LEI Yong,LIAO Bo-Shou. Expression profiles of FAD2 genes and their responses to cold stress in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(10): 1586-1594.
[6] Dao-Ping WANG,Jiang XU,Yong-Ying MU,Wen-Xiu YAN,Meng-Jie ZHAO,Bo MA,Qun LI,Li-Na ZHANG,Ying-Hong PAN. Proteomic Analysis of the Effect of 2,4-Epibrassinolide on Rice Seedlings Response to Cold Stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(6): 897-908.
[7] Dong-Mei BAI,Yun-Yun XUE,Jiao-Jiao ZHAO,Li HUANG,Yue-Xia TIAN,Bao-Quan QUAN,Hui-Fang JIANG. Identification of Cold-tolerance During Germination Stage and Genetic Diversity of SSR Markers in Peanut Landraces of Shanxi Province [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(10): 1459-1467.
[8] HAO Xin-Yuan,YUEChuan,TANG Hu,QIAN Wen-Jun,WANG Yu-Chun,WANG Lu, WANG Xin-Chao,YANG Ya-Jun. Cloning of β-amylase Gene (CsBAM3) and ItsExpression ModelResponseto Cold Stress in Tea Plant [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(10): 1417-1425.
[9] ZHANG Zhi-Meng,DAI Liang-Xiang,SONG Wen-Wu,DING Hong,CI Dun-Wei,KANG Tao,NING Tang-Yuan,WAN Shu-Bo. Effect of Drought Stresses at Different Growth Stages on Peanut Leaf Protective Enzyme Activities and Osmoregulation Substances Content [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(01): 133-141.
[10] CHEN Ji-Bao;JING Rui-Lian;MAO Xin-Guo;CHANG Xiao-Ping;WANG Shu-Min. A Response of PvP5CS2 Gene to Abiotic Stresses in Common Bean [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(07): 1121-1127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WANG Li-Yan;ZHAO Ke-Fu. Some Physiological Response of Zea mays under Salt-stress[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[2] Qi Zhixiang;Yang Youming;Zhang Cunhua;Xu Chunian;Zhai Zhixi. Cloning and Analysis of cDNA Related to the Genes of Secondary Wall Thickening of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Fiber[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29(06): 860 -866 .
[3] NI Da-Hu;YI Cheng-Xin;LI Li;WANG Xiu-Feng;ZHANG Yi;ZHAO Kai-Jun;WANG Chun-Lian;ZHANG Qi;WANG Wen-Xiang;YANG Jian-Bo. Developing Rice Lines Resistant to Bacterial Blight and Blast with Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 100 -105 .
[4] DAI Xiao-Jun;LIANG Man-Zhong;CHEN Liang-Bi. Comparison of rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences in Oryza sativa L.[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(11): 1874 -1878 .
[5] WANG Bao-Hua;WU Yao-Ting;HUANG Nai-Tai;GUO Wang-Zhen;ZHU Xie-Fei;ZHANG Tian-Zhen. QTL Analysis of Epistatic Effects on Yield and Yield Component Traits for Elite Hybrid Derived-RILs in Upland Cotton[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(11): 1755 -1762 .
[6] WANG Chun-Mei;FENG Yi-Gao;ZHUANG Li-Fang;CAO Ya-Ping;QI Zeng-Jun;BIE Tong-De;CAO Ai-Zhong;CHEN Pei-Du. Screening of Chromosome-Specific Markers for Chromosome 1R of Secale cereale, 1V of Haynaldia villosa and 1Rk#1 of Roegneria kamoji[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(11): 1741 -1747 .
[7] Zhao Qinghua;Huang Jianhua;Yan Changjing. A STUDY ON THE POLLEN GERMINATION OF BRASSICA NAPUS L.[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 1986, (01): 15 -20 .
[8] ZHOU Lu-Ying;LI Xiang-Dong;WANG Li-Li;TANG Xiao;LIN Ying-Jie. Effects of Different Ca Applications on Physiological Characteristics, Yield and Quality in Peanut[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(05): 879 -885 .
[9] ZHENG Tian-Qing;XU Jian-Long;FU Bing-Ying;GAO Yong-Ming;Satish VERUKA;Renee LAFITTE;ZHAI Hu-Qu;WAN Jian-Min;ZHU Ling-Hua;LI Zhi-Kang. Preliminary Identification of Genetic Overlaps between Sheath Blight Resistance and Drought Tolerance in the Introgression Lines from Directional Selection[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(08): 1380 -1384 .
[10] YANG Yan;ZHAO Xian-Lin; ZHANG Yong;CHEN Xin-Min;HE Zhong-Hu;YU Zhuo;XIA Lan-Qin
. Evaluation and Validation of Four Molecular Markers Associated with Pre-Harvest Sprouting Tolerance in Chinese Wheats[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(01): 17 -24 .
Add: No.12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081,China Email:xbzw@chinajournal.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd