Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 1938-1947.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14155

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING · GERMPLASM RESOURCES · MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Bna.C02SWEET15 positively regulates the flowering time of rapeseed through photoperiodic pathway

LI Sheng-Ting1,**(), XU Yuan-Fang1,**(), CHANG Wei1, LIU Ya-Jun2, GU Yuan2, ZHU Hong1, LI Jia-Na1,3,4, LU Kun1,3,4,*()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
    2Agricultural Technology Extension Station in Lincang City, Lincang 677099, Yunnan, China
    3Engineering Research Center of South Upland Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China
    4Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
  • Received:2021-08-26 Accepted:2021-11-29 Online:2022-08-12 Published:2021-12-16
  • Contact: LU Kun E-mail:lishengting0123@163.com;1095245283@qq.com;1095245283@qq.com;drlukun@swu.edu.cn
  • About author:First author contact:

    ** Contributed equally to this work

  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31871653);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFD0100500);Project of Intellectual Base for Discipline Innovation in Colleges and Universities(B12006);Key Project of Chongqing Natural Science Foundation(cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0033);Chongqing Postgraduate Research Innovation Project(CYB21115);Germplasm Creation Special Program of Southwest University

Abstract:

Flowering time, an important agronomic index of crops, is related to the growth cycle and the yield of crops. Sugar transporters are important carbohydrate transporters in plants, whereas there are few reports on the effect of sugar transporters on flowering time in rapeseed (Brassica napus). In this study, sucrose transporter Bna.C02SWEET15 related to flowering in rapeseed were screened and identified from Fox-Hunting library, whose biological function and regulation mechanism were further characterized through expression pattern and subcellular localization analysis, phenotype analysis in transgenic plants and mutant, detection of marker genes expression related to flowering. Bna.C02SWEET15 could be identified in all tissues of Brassica napus, and the relative expression level was the most significant in seeds at 30 days after flowering. Bna.C02SWEET15 was located in cell membrane, and the promoter activity was mainly in anther and seed at 30 days after flowering. Overexpression of Bna.C02SWEET15 in Arabidopsis resulted in flowering in advance and increased the expression of photoperiod key genes CO, FT, and LFY, while decreased the expression of negative regulation gene FLC. In addition, the flowering time of atsweet15a and transgenic RNAi-Bna.C02SWEET15 were later. We proposed that Bna.C02SWEET15 could positively regulate the flowering time through photoperiod pathway, thus affecting the growth cycle and final yield in rapeseed. These results provide important basis for understanding the regulatory role of sugar transporters in crops and lay a theoretical foundation for understanding the regulatory role of sugar transporters in crops.

Key words: Brassica napus, Bna.C02SWEET15, photoperiod, flowering

Table S1

Primers used in this study"

引物名称
Prime name
引物序列
Primer sequences (5'-3')
26S-F rRNA CACAATGATAGGAAGAGCCGAC
26S-R rRNA CAAGGGAACGGG CTTGGCAGAATC
BnaActin7-F TGGGTTTGCTGGTGACGAT
BnaActin7-R TGCCTAGGACGACCAACAATACT
qRT F-BnaSWEET15 TCCTTGTATTCCTCGCTCCC
qRT R-BnaSWEET15 CAGCCGAAAGAGTTGATGGT
OV-SWEET15 F CACCATGAGTTTGGCACACCAAAT
OV-SWEET15 R ATGCCTGAGAGCTTCTTGCAC
Bna.C02SWEET15-PRO-F acctgcaggcatgcaACAGACCTCGTTTCTATAGCTATCT
Bna.C02SWEET15-PRO-R taccctcagatctaccatggAAACTAATGAGTCTCAGGTGGTGT
F Hyg CTATTTCTTTGCCCTCGGACGA
R Hyg ATGAAAAAGCCTGAACTCACCGCG
F35S3ND GGAAGTTCATTTCATTTGGAGAG
OCS5ND CGATCATAGGCGTCTCGCATATCTC
F Bar CGACATCCGCCGTGCCACCGA
R Bar GTACCGGCAGGCTGAAGTCCAGC
Actin real F GGTAACATTGTGCTCAGTGGTGG
Actin real R AACGACCTTAATCTTCATGCTGC
qRT F-AtSWEET15 CATAGCCATGTTCTTCGCTTAC
qRT R-AtSWEET15 CTTTGTCTTTATCACACGAGCC
M13pF ACACAGGAAACAGCTATGACCAT
M13pR GGGTCCTAACCAAGAAAATGAA
RNAi-SWEET15-F GGATCCGACGTCTCTCCCATACCAACATTCATAACA
RNAi-SWEET15-R TCTAGACCATGGATAGTATAAGCTGTACTACT
BnaPAP2-F GGATCCACCTAAGCATGCATTTGAAAA
BnaPAP2-R ATTTAAATGACGTCAGGTTTACATTCAAGACACA
引物名称
Prime name
引物序列
Primer sequences (5'-3')
F35S3N GGAAGTTCATTTCATTTGGAGAG
ROCST5N GCTCAGGTTTTTTACAACGTGCAC
CO real F GCCATCAGCGAGTTCCAATTCTAC
CO real R CCTTCCTCTTGATCCACCACCAG
FLC real F CGTCGCTCTTCTCGTCGTCTC
FLC real R TTCGGTCTTCTTGGCTCTAGTCAC
FT real R GCCTGCCAAGCTGTCGAAACAATA
FT real F TCCCTGCTACAACTGGAACAACCT
LFY real F TCCACTGCCTAGACGAAGAAGC
LFY real R TCCCAGCCATGACGACAAGC
N674321-LP CAGCCGAGTACAGAGACTTGG
N674321-RP TTTCCTCGCTTTTATCTTCGG
LBb1.3 ATTTTGCCGATTTCGGAAC

Fig. 1

Relative expression pattern of Bna.C02SWEET15 in Brassica napus A: the expression pattern of Bna.C02SWEET15 in Brassica napus using qRT-PCR. R: root; St: stem; L: leaf; F: flowers; MB: main bud; 5D-S, 10D-S: silique at 5 days and 10 days after flowering; 15D-SE, 21D-SE, 30D-SE: seeds at 15, 21, and 30 days after flowering; 15D-SW, 21D-SW, 30D-SW: seed pericarp at 15, 21, and 30 days after flowering; B: histochemical staining of proBna.C02WEET15::GUS. a: seed pericarp after germination; b: young seedling; c: rosette; d: stem leaf; e: anther; f: silique; g: root; h: seed at 30 days after flowering."

Fig. 2

Subcellular localization of Bna.C02SWEET15-YFP protein Bar: 20 μm."

Fig. 3

Phenotypic observation and marker gene expression detection of Bna.C02SWEET15 overexpressed transgenic plants A: phenotypic observation in overexpressed transgenic plants; bar: 1 cm. B: the expression level of Bna.C02SWEET15 in transgenic seedlings using qRT-PCR; C: flowering time of Bna.C02SWEET15 transgenic plants; D: marker genes expression in flowering pathway. * and ** represent significant difference at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively."

Fig. 4

Phenotypic observation of Arabidopsis thaliana mutant atsweet15 A: sequence similarity between AtSWEET15 and Bna.C02SWEET15; B: map of mutant insertion sites; C: phenotypic observation of atsweet15a; D: the expression level of AtSWEET15 in atsweet15a. Bar: 1 cm. ** represents significant difference at the 0.01 probability level. "

Fig. 5

Phenotypic observation of transgenic RNAi-Bna.C02SWEET15 A: phenotypic observation of RNAi-Bna.C02SWEET15; B: gene expression level in transgenic seedlings; C: flowering time of RNAi-Bna.C02SWEET15 transgenic plants; bar: 10 cm. ** represents significant difference at the 0.01 probability level."

[1] Blümel M, Dally N, Jung C. Flowering time regulation in crops- what did we learn from Arabidopsis? Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2015, 32: 121-129.
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.023
[2] Wahl V, Ponnu J, Schlereth A, Arrivault S, Langenecker T, Franke A, Feil R, E. Lunn J, Stitt M, Schmid M. Regulation of flowering by trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science, 2013, 339: 704-707.
doi: 10.1126/science.1230406
[3] Atsuko K, René R. Genetic and molecular basis of floral induction in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot, 2020, 71: 2490-2504.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa057
[4] Wang T Y, Ping X K, Cao Y R, Jian H J, Gao Y M, Wang J, Tan Y C, Xu X F, Lu K, Li J N, Liu L Z. Genome-wide exploration and characterization of miR172/euAP2 genes in Brassica napus L. for likely role in flower organ development. BMC Plant Biol, 2019, 19: 336.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1936-2
[5] Rolland F, Baenagonzalez E, Sheen J. SUGAR SENSING AND SIGNALING IN PLANTS: conserved and novel mechanisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2006, 57: 675-709.
pmid: 16669778
[6] Rolland F, Sheen J. Sugar sensing and signaling networks in plants. Biochem Soc Trans, 2005, 33: 269-271.
doi: 10.1042/BST0330269
[7] Smeekens S, Ma J, Hanson J, Rolland F. Sugar signals and molecular networks controlling plant growth. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2010, 13: 273-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.002
[8] Jian H J, Lu K, Yang B, Wang T Y, Zhang L, Zhang A X, Wang J, Liu L Z, Qu C M, Li J N. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of the SUC and SWEET gene families of sucrose transporters in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 1464.
[9] López-Coria M, Sánchez-Sánchez T, Martínez-Marcelo V H, Aguilera-Alvarado G P, Flores-Barrera M, King-Díaz B, Sánchez N S. SWEET transporters for the nourishment of embryonic tissues during maize germination. Genes, 2019, 10: 780.
doi: 10.3390/genes10100780
[10] Buendía-Monreal M, Gillmor C S. Convergent repression of miR156 by sugar and the CDK8 module of Arabidopsis mediator. Dev Biol, 2017, 423: 19-23.
doi: S0012-1606(16)30267-6 pmid: 28108181
[11] Lemoine R. Sucrose transporters in plants: update on function and structure. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2000, 1465: 246-262.
pmid: 10748258
[12] Williams L E, Lemoine R, Sauer N. Sugar transporters in higher plants-a diversity of roles and complex regulation. Trends Plant Sci, 2000, 5: 283-290.
pmid: 10871900
[13] Chen L Q, Hou B H, Lalonde S, Takanaga H, Hartung M L, Qu X Q, Guo W J, Kim J G, Underwood W, Chaudhuri B, Chermak D, Antony G, White F F, Somerville S C, Mudgett M B, Frommer W B. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature, 2010, 468: 527-534.
doi: 10.1038/nature09606
[14] Chen L Q, Qu X Q, Hou B H, Sosso D, Osorio S, Fernie A R, Frommer W B. Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science, 2012, 335: 207-210.
doi: 10.1126/science.1213351
[15] Talbot N J. Raiding the sweet shop. Nature, 2010, 468: 510-511.
doi: 10.1038/468510a
[16] Chandran D. Co-option of developmentally regulated plant SWEET transporters for pathogen nutrition and abiotic stress tolerance. IUBMB Life, 2015, 67: 461-471.
doi: 10.1002/iub.1394 pmid: 26179993
[17] Seo P J, Ryu J, Kang S K, Park C M. Modulation of sugar metabolism by an INDETERMINATE DOMAIN transcription factor contributes to photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2011, 65: 418-429.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04432.x
[18] Chen L Q. SWEET sugar transporters for phloem transport and pathogen nutrition. New Phytol, 2014, 201: 1150-1155.
doi: 10.1111/nph.12445
[19] 张凯, 魏丝雨, 常玮, 范永海, 卢坤. 甘蓝型油菜全基因组cDNA FOX-hunting过表达文库构建. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43: 435-442.
Zhang K, Wei S Y, Chang W, Fan Y H, Lu K. Construction of whole genome full-length cDNA FOX-hunting overexpression library in Brassica napus. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2021, 43: 435-442. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] Lu K, Li T, He J, Chang W, Zhang R, Liu M, Yu M N, Fan Y H, Ma J Q, Sun W, Qu C M, Liu L Z, Li N N, Liang Y, Wang R, Qian W, Tang Z L, Xu X F, Lei B, Zhang K, Li J N. qPrimerDB: a thermodynamics-based gene-specific qPCR primer database for 147 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018, 46: D1229-D1236.
[21] Earley K W, Haag J R, Pontes O, Opper K, Juehne T, Song K M, Pikaard C S. Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. Plant J, 2010, 45: 616-629.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02617.x
[22] 马丽娟, 冯瑜, 江丽萍, 申敏, 柴友荣. pFGC5941的改造及芸薹属透明种1基因(TT1)家族RNA干扰载体构建. 农业生物技术学报, 2010, 18: 1189-1196.
Ma L J, Feng Y, Jiang L P, Shen M, Chai Y R. Modification of pFGC5941 and construction of RNAi vector of Brassica transparent testa 1 gene (TT1) family. J Agric Biotcchnol, 2010, 18: l189-1196. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 刘询, 张斌, 李浪, 刘春林, 阮颖. 甘蓝型油菜BnaLCR23基因CRISPR-Cas9表达载体的构建及遗传转化. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15: 3024-3029.
Liu X, Zhang B, Li L, Liu C L, Ruan Y. Construction and genetic transformation of BnaLCR23 gene CRISPR-Cas9 expression vector in Brassica napus L. Mol Plant Breed, 2017, 15: 3024-3029. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Chao H Y, Li T, Luo C, Huang H L, Ruan Y F, Li X D, Niu Y, Fan Y H, Sun W, Zhang K, Li J N, Qu C M, Lu K. BrassicaEDB: a gene expression database for Brassica crops. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 13: 5831.
[25] Zheng Q M, Tang Z, Xu Q, Deng X X. Isolation, phylogenetic relationship and expression profiling of sugar transporter genes in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2014, 119: 609-624.
doi: 10.1007/s11240-014-0560-y
[26] Kanno Y, Oikawa T, Chiba Y, Ishimaru Y, Shimizu T, Sano N, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Ueda M, Seoet M. AtSWEET13 and AtSWEET14 regulate gibberellin-mediated physiological processes. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 13245.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13245 pmid: 27782132
[27] Coneva V, Guevara D, Rothstein S J, Colasanti J. Transcript and metabolite signature of maize source leaves suggest a link between transitory starch to sucrose balance and the autonomous floral transition. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 5079-5092.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers158
[28] Klemens P A W, Patzke K, Deitmer J, Spinner L, Hir R L, Bellini C, Bedu M, Chardon F, Krapp A, Neuhaus H E. Overexpression of the vacuolar sugar carrier AtSWEET16 modifies germination, growth, and stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2013, 163: 1338-1352.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.224972
[29] Chincinska I A, Liesche J, Krugel U, Michalska J, Geigenberger P, Grimm B, Kühn C. Sucrose transporter StSUT4 from potato affects flowering, tuberization, and shade avoidance response. Plant Physiol, 2008, 146: 515-528.
doi: 10.1104/pp.107.112334 pmid: 18083796
[30] Mouradov A, Cremer F, Coupland G. Control of flowering time: interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. Plant Cell, 2002, 14: S111-S130.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.001362
[31] Komeda Y. Genetic regulation of time to flower in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2004, 55: 521-535.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141644
[32] Bäurle I, Dean C. The timing of developmental transitions in plants. Cell, 2006, 125: 655-664.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.005
[33] Flowers J M, Hanzawa Y, Hall M C, Moore R C, Purugganan M D. Population genomics of the Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time gene network. Mol Biol Evol, 2009, 26: 2475-2486.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp161
[34] Blackman B K, Rasmussen D A, Strasburg J L, Raduski A R, Burke J M, Knapp S J, Michaels S D, Rieseberg L H. Contributions of flowering time genes to sunflower domestication and improvement. Genetics, 2010, 187: 271-287.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.121327
[1] Peng Jia-Luo, Li Ying, Li Dan-Dan, Yang Jun-Ning, Guo Xue-Feng, Zhang Wen-Jiao, Yu Xiao-Xue, Zhou Ya-Rong, Wang Zhen-Yu, Wang Cai-Xiang, Ma Xiong-Feng, Su Jun-Ji. Identification of class I LBD family members in upland cotton and function and haplotype analyses of GhLBD6 in regulating flowering period [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1682-1697.
[2] Wang Chu-Rui, Li Kai-Xiang, Zhao Zhi, Xiao Lu, Tang Guo-Yong, Zhao Zhi-Gang, Xu Liang, Du De-Zhi, Liu Hai-Dong. Development and application of KASP markers for functional sites of the early flowering gene BnCRY2 in Brassica napus L. spring rapeseed [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[3] Ma Yi-Na, Wu Xiao-Ming-Yu, Li Ou-Qi, Wang Yuan, Chen Li, Zhang Ying-Chuan, Zhao Lun, Wen Jing, Fu Ting-Dong, Shen Jin-Xiong. Functional analysis of the Bna-miR1040-EIF3A module in regulating flowering time in rapeseed (Brassica napus) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[4] Lou Hong-Xiang, Xing Ren-Peng, Wang Bo, Wang Jing, Xu Zheng-Hua, Zhao Jie, Kuai Jie, Zhou Guang-Sheng. Effects of sowing date on the utilization efficiency of light and temperature resources and yield in Brassica napus in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(2): 539-551.
[5] WANG Bin, MENG Jiang-Yu, QIU Hao-Liang, HE Ya-Jun, QIAN Wei. Identification and expression pattern analysis of the BnaDUF579 gene family in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[6] WANG Qiong, ZOU Dan-Xia, CHEN Xing-Yun, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Hong-Mei, LIU Xiao-Qing, JIA Qian-Ru, WEI Li-Bin, CUI Xiao-Yan, CHEN Xin, WANG Xue-Jun, CHEN Hua-Tao. Genome-wide association analysis and candidate genes prediction of flowering time and maturity date traits in soybean (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[7] LI Wen-Jia, LIAO Yong-Jun, HUANG Lu, LU Qing, LI Shao-Xiong, CHEN Xiao-Ping, JIN Jing-Wei, WANG Run-Feng. Genome-wide associate analysis of flowering traits and identification of candidate genes in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(5): 1400-1408.
[8] XIA Qi, GUO Ying, WANG Kun-Mei, WANG Si-Yi, JU Jian-Ye, PENG Ya-Wen, LIU Zhong-Song, XIA Shi-Tou. Correlation between salicylic acid and anthocyanins accumulation in seeds of different varieties in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197.
[9] ZHANG Qin, DAI Cheng, MA Chao-Zhi. Auxin response reporter gene transformation of Brassica napus and dynamic signal analysis of GUS in different tissues [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(3): 667-675.
[10] SUN Cheng-Ming, ZHOU Xiao-Ying, CHEN Feng, ZHANG Wei, WANG Xiao-Dong, PENG Qi, GUO Yue, GAO Jian-Qin, HU Mao-Long, FU San-Xiong, ZHANG Jie-Fu. Functional analysis and prediction of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) in the regulation of branch angle in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(3): 559-567.
[11] YANG Fang-Ping, GUO Ying, TIAN Yuan-Yuan, XU Yu-Feng, WANG Lan-Lan, BAI Bin, ZHAN Zong-Bing, ZHANG Xue-Ting, XU Yin-Ping, LIU Jin-Dong. Effect of vernalization and photoperiod genes and evaluation of cold tolerance for wheat landraces from Gansu province, China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(2): 370-382.
[12] ZHUANG Yue-Ming, SONG Yi, CHEN Hang-Hang, LU Zhi-Feng, LIAO Shi-Peng, LI Xiao-Kun, CONG Ri-Huan, REN Tao, LU Jian-Wei. Effects of application of nitrogen on endophytic microbiota and seed quality in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) seeds [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3357-3368.
[13] HUANG Rong, ZHOU Qu-Chen, CHEN Chu-Ming, LUO Qian, YI Dong, DU Chang-Huan, HUANG Xiang-Yu, SHENG Feng, DU Xue-Zhu. Effects of BnNRT2.3-like overexpression on nitrogen uptake, utilization efficiency, and yield in Brassica napus L. [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197.
[14] JU Jian-Ye, YANG Liu, CHEN Hao, KANG Lei, XIA Shi-Tou, LIU Zhong-Song. Single-nucleus transcriptome analysis reveals the cellular differentiation trajectories and molecular mechanisms underlying yellow seed coat formation in rapeseed [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874.
[15] ZHANG Wen, LI Yu, WANG Chuang, SHI Lei, DING Guang-Da. Functional study of the phosphate transporter protein BnaPT48 in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!