Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (10): 2605-2618.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.53014

;

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Isolation and identification of a new pathogen Trichoderma asperellum causing ear rot in maize

XIAO Sen-Lin1(), QUE Fan2(), ZHOU Zhi-Huan2(), ZHANG Hai-Xia1, XING Jin-Feng1, ZHU Xiang-Zhang2, ZHANG Yan-Bing2, ZHANG Nan2, SUN Xuan1, WANG Rong-Huan1, SONG Wei1, WANG Wei-Xiang2,*(), ZHAO Jiu-Ran1,*()   

  1. 1Maize Research Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    2College of Plant Science and Technology, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 100096, China
  • Received:2025-02-27 Accepted:2025-07-09 Online:2025-10-12 Published:2025-07-28
  • Contact: *E-mail: wangwei6455@sina.com;E-mail: maizezhao@126.com E-mail:forestxiao@163.com;13516440109@163.com;15123596106@163.com;wangwei6455@sina.com;maizezhao@126.com
  • About author:First author contact:**Contributed equally to this work
  • Supported by:
    Special Project for Science and Technology Innovation Capacity Building of Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences(KJCX20240332);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31871638)

Abstract:

Maize ear rot, caused by pathogenic fungi, significantly reduces both yield and grain quality. More than 20 pathogens have been reported to cause this disease, with F. verticillioides and F. graminearum being the most prevalent in China. In recent years, a distinct form of ear and grain rot, characterized by white hyphae and greenish-blue spores, has been frequently observed in various maize-growing regions across the country. However, the specific pathogen responsible for this type of ear rot had not been clearly identified. In this study, we identified the pathogen using a combination of morphological characterization, rDNA-ITS sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing. The results revealed that T. asperellum is the causative agent of maize greenish ear rot. A representative strain, Tr.10, was selected for pathogenicity re-evaluation by inoculating 419 maize inbred lines with a conidial suspension using ear needle-inoculation. The results confirmed that Tr.10 conidia successfully reinfected a wide range of inbred lines, inducing typical T. asperellum ear rot symptoms. Significant variation in disease resistance was observed across the tested lines. Among the 419 genotypes, 6.8% were classified as highly resistant, 30.4% as resistant, 30.7% as moderately resistant, 24.9% as susceptible, and 7.1% as highly susceptible. Notably, 25 inbred lines, including PHN47, F321, and Jing 2416K, exhibited high levels of resistance. These findings provide important insights into resistance mechanisms and offer a foundation for molecular breeding of Trichoderma ear rot-resistant maize cultivars.

Key words: maize ear rot, T. asperellum, pathogenesis, needle spike cob inoculation, resistance identification

Fig. 1

Field samples of naturally occurring maize ear rot and PCR amplification of pathogenic fungal DNA A: collected samples of naturally occurring maize ear rot disease from twenty-six fields in nine cities (counties) including Beijing, Hainan, Henan, Inner Mongolia, Jilin, and Gansu; B: electrophoretic gel diagram of twenty-six diseased spike samples after DNA extraction and PCR amplification with universal primers."

Table 1

Identification of pathogenic fungi from maize ear rot samples collected from twenty-six regions"

编号
Number
采样地点
Sampling location
鉴定菌种类别
Identification of fungal strain type
编号
Number
采样地点
Sampling location
鉴定菌种类别
Identification of fungal strain type
1 海南三亚Sanya, Hainan 棘孢木霉T. asperellum 14 甘肃张掖Zhangye, Gansu 哈茨木霉T. harzianum
2 北京怀柔Huairou, Beijing 哈茨木霉T. harzianum 15 甘肃张掖Zhangye, Gansu 哈茨木霉T. harzianum
3 北京怀柔Huairou, Beijing 哈茨木霉T. harzianum 16 甘肃张掖Zhangye, Gansu 哈茨木霉T. harzianum
4 北京怀柔Huairou, Beijing 哈茨木霉T. harzianum 17 甘肃张掖Zhangye, Gansu 哈茨木霉T. harzianum
5 北京怀柔Huairou, Beijing 哈茨木霉T. harzianum 18 河南荥阳Xingyang, Henan 棘孢木霉T. asperellum
6 北京怀柔Huairou, Beijing 哈茨木霉T. harzianum 19 河南荥阳Xingyang, Henan 棘孢木霉T. asperellum
7 北京怀柔Huairou, Beijing 哈茨木霉T. harzianum 20 河南荥阳Xingyang, Henan 棘孢木霉T. asperellum
8 北京通州Tongzhou, Beijing 棘孢木霉T. asperellum 21 河南郑州Zhengzhou, Henan 哈茨木霉T. harzianum
9 北京通州Tongzhou, Beijing 哈茨木霉T. harzianum 22 吉林四平Siping, Jilin 哈茨木霉T. harzianum
10 北京通州Tongzhou, Beijing 哈茨木霉T. harzianum 23 吉林四平Siping, Jilin 哈茨木霉T. harzianum
11 北京通州Tongzhou, Beijing 青霉Penicillium oxalicum 24 辽宁铁岭Tieling, Liaoning 棘孢木霉T. asperellum
12 北京通州Tongzhou, Beijing 青霉Penicillium oxalicum 25 辽宁铁岭Tieling, Liaoning 哈茨木霉T. harzianum
13
北京通州Tongzhou, Beijing
青霉Penicillium oxalicum
26
内蒙古赤峰
Chifeng, Inner Mongolia
哈茨木霉T. Harzianum

Fig. 2

Colony morphology and evolutionary tree of T. asperellum strain Tr.10 A-F: growth of T. asperellum on PDA medium for 1-6 days; G-H: conidiophores and hyphae of T. asperellum under a 400× microscope, scale bar = 100 μm; I: evolutionary relationship diagram between the T. asperellum strain Tr.10 and other fungal species."

Fig. 3

Genomic map of T. asperellum Tr.10 From outer to inner circles, the rings represent: (1) genome position coordinates; (2) GC content; (3) GC skew; (4) coding gene density; (5) rRNA gene density; (6) snRNA and tRNA gene density; and (7) chromosome duplications. GC content: Calculated using a sliding window of genome/1000 bp with the same step size. Inward blue regions indicate areas with GC content lower than the genome-wide average, while outward purple regions indicate higher-than-average GC content. The higher the peak, the greater the deviation from the average. GC skew: also calculated with a window size of genome/1000 bp and step size of genome/1000 bp, using the formula (G-C)/(G+C). Inward-facing green regions represent areas where G content is lower than C content, while outward-facing pink regions indicate the opposite. Gene density: calculated using the same sliding window approach. Coding genes, rRNA, snRNA, and tRNA densities are shown. Darker colors represent higher gene densities within the window. Chromosome duplication: indicates regions of chromosomal duplications identified in the genome."

Fig. 4

ANI analysis of the genomes of T. asperellum, T. harzianum, and T. viride ANI (average nucleotide identity) reflects the distance between two sequences. In the figure, different colors represent the high and low ANI values; the relationship between ANI value and color is shown in the legend on the right, where darker colors indicate larger ANI values between samples."

Table S1

Inter-sample ANI value matrix table (%)"

项目 Item Tr.10 Tr.a Tr.h Tr.v
Tr.10 100.00 93.34 76.22 68.19
Tr.a 93.14 100.00 76.00 68.62
Tr.h 75.53 75.68 100.00 68.57
Tr.v 69.24 69.17 68.96 100.00

Fig. 5

Comparative genomic analysis of Tr.10, T. asperellum and T. harzianum A: synteny analysis of Tr.10 with the genomes of T. asperellum; B: synteny analysis of Tr.10 with the genomes of T. harzianum."

Fig. 6

Fluorescence microscopy observation of maize kernels infected by T. asperellum and sample image of maize inbred lines infected by field inoculation of T. asperellum A and B: fluorescence microscopy images of maize kernel pathological sections stained with WGA488, where green fluorescence indicates fungal hyphae invading the maize kernels. C, E, G: maize samples (PHN47, Luyuan 92, Zhe 376) exhibiting highly resistant phenotypes after inoculation with the T. asperellum strain Tr.10. D, F, H: maize samples (Dan 340, Zheng 58, PHT77) showing highly susceptible phenotypes under the same T. asperellum Tr.10 inoculation."

Table S2

Identification table of 419 maize inbred lines for resistance to T. asperellum-induced ear rot"

名称
Inbred line
发病等级
Disease grade
抗性
Resistance
名称
Inbred line
发病等级
Disease grade
抗性
Resistance
名称
Inbred line
发病等级
Disease grade
抗性
Resistance
鲁原92
Luyuan 92
1.00 高抗HR 廊玉1 Langyu 1 3.30 抗R 4676A 5.40 中抗MR
PHN47 1.00 高抗HR PHKE6 3.33 抗R MZ789 5.44 中抗MR
F321 1.00 高抗HR MZ343 3.40 抗R D82 5.44 中抗MR
F304 1.00 高抗HR 207=PH20 3.40 抗R 原辐黄
Yuanfuhuang
5.44 中抗MR
哲376 Zhe 376 1.00 高抗HR W9706 3.40 抗R 428 5.50 感S
Xin 23 1.00 高抗HR 垦自167-1
Kenzi 167-1
3.40 抗R PHBW8 5.55 感S
金143 Jin 143 1.20 高抗HR 龙系53 Longxi 53 3.40 抗R D9H 5.57 感S
LH156 1.20 高抗HR S07:61 3.44 抗R F404 5.60 感S
244 1.20 高抗HR 罗4 Luo 4 3.44 抗R 2369 5.60 感S
SW1611 1.22 高抗HR SG17 3.44 抗R 库6-49
Ku 6-49
5.60 感S
直32 Zhi 32 1.40 高抗HR Q126 3.44 抗R 京2417
Jing 2417
5.60 感S
M03 1.40 高抗HR K334 3.50 抗R G108 5.60 感S
JN15 1.40 高抗HR KW4M029 3.50 抗R 掖502 Ye 502 5.60 感S
抗病F349
Kangbing F349
1.40 高抗HR KWS49 3.50 抗R PHW79 5.67 感S
5831 1.44 高抗HR BD13 2576 3.60 中抗MR RS710 5.67 感S
L135 1.44 高抗HR C8605 3.60 中抗MR N127 5.67 感S
Mo17 1.44 高抗HR PHG39 3.60 中抗MR 京21-6
Jing 21-6
5.67 感S
京4380
Jing 4380
1.50 高抗HR 哲461 Zhe 461 3.60 中抗MR IB014 5.70 感S
大M0 Da M0 1.50 高抗HR PHG83 3.60 中抗MR LH52 5.70 感S
V022 1.55 高抗HR G80 3.60 中抗MR PHW52 5.80 感S
MC30 1.57 高抗HR 中128 Zhong 128 3.67 中抗MR P131B 5.89 感S
丹598 Dan 598 1.60 高抗HR 黄C Huang C 3.67 中抗MR PHHH9 5.89 感S
京2416
Jing 2416
1.60 高抗HR Q381 3.70 中抗MR 掖478 Ye 478 5.89 感S
X178 1.60 高抗HR 京92H Jing 92H 3.75 中抗MR B73 5.89 感S
PHG84 1.61 高抗HR PHR32 3.75 中抗MR 甘41 Gan 41 5.89 感S
K4104-16 1.67 抗R OQ603 3.75 中抗MR 京02 Jing 02 5.90 感S
浚926 Xun 926 1.67 抗R 赤L015 Chi L015 3.80 中抗MR PHG71 5.90 感S
齐318 Qi 318 1.67 抗R CN1483 3.80 中抗MR 京系108
Jingxi 108
6.00 感S
P138 1.67 抗R 大19 Da 19 3.80 中抗MR CA335 6.00 感S
海9-21 Hai 9-21 1.72 抗R HPHR47 3.80 中抗MR PHT60 6.09 感S
MC0304 1.73 抗R PHG29 3.80 中抗MR W8304 6.10 感S
8902 1.73 抗R 740 3.80 中抗MR LH61 6.10 感S
IBC2 1.75 抗R F429 3.80 中抗MR PHG35orG35 6.10 感S
LH146HT 1.77 抗R PHN82 3.85 中抗MR 哲391 Zhe 391 6.10 感S
1145 1.80 抗R 泰039 Tai 039 3.89 中抗MR 冀58 Ji 58 6.11 感S
黄85B
Huang 85B
1.80 抗R 中106 Zhong 106 3.89 中抗MR 直25 Zhi 25 6.11 感S
PHR31 1.80 抗R PI 406124 4.00 中抗MR F399 6.20 感S
420 1.89 抗R 沈农92-67
Shennong 92-67
4.00 中抗MR PHZ51 6.20 感S
PHJ22 1.89 抗R 通系(85-2)
Tongxi (85-2)
4.00 中抗MR 直100 Zhi 100 6.20 感S
京725 Jing 725 1.89 抗R U8112 4.00 中抗MR LH65 6.20 感S
JG17 1.89 抗R ZMA22 4.00 中抗MR 91黄10
91 Huang 10
6.20 感S
邢K36
Xing K36
1.90 抗R 220 4.00 中抗MR DH351 6.20 感S
H7 1.90 抗R LH119 4.00 中抗MR PHP02 6.20 感S
中85 Zhong 58 1.90 抗R PHk74 4.00 中抗MR H78 6.25 感S
B09 1.90 抗R BA 4.09 中抗MR MC01 6.27 感S
5237 2.00 抗R 京464 Jing 464 4.09 中抗MR SK1098 6.30 感S
614红轴
614 Hongzhou
2.00 抗R 572 4.10 中抗MR ML606 6.30 感S
9010 2.00 抗R 冀53 Ji 53 4.11 中抗MR PHPR5 6.30 感S
龙抗11
Longkang 11
2.00 抗R H21 4.11 中抗MR 农系110
Nongxi 110
6.33 感S
P9-10 2.00 抗R 丹341 Dan 341 4.11 中抗MR 齐406 Qi 406 6.40 感S
IBB14 2.09 抗R DJ7 4.17 中抗MR MBNA 6.40 感S
F101F 2.10 抗R LH132 4.20 中抗MR LH60 6.40 感S
G476 2.11 抗R 9058 4.20 中抗MR LH149 6.40 感S
黄野四
Huangyesi
2.11 抗R DH
(KWS10.KWS73)
4.20 中抗MR 9503 6.45 感S
遵0204 Zun 0204 2.14 抗R JG06 4.20 中抗MR 齐404 Qi 404 6.45 感S
LH150 2.14 抗R 593 4.25 中抗MR C-50 6.50 感S
中黄69
Zhonghuang 69
2.20 抗R S8324 4.25 中抗MR 旅28 Lyu 28 6.55 感S
LH74 2.20 抗R PHRZS 4.27 中抗MR PB80 6.60 感S
LH1 2.20 抗R F518 4.30 中抗MR LH93 6.67 感S
75-364 2.20 抗R K10 4.30 中抗MR 沈219
Shen 219
6.71 感S
PHG72 2.20 抗R CN4379 4.33 中抗MR 长3 Chang 3 6.80 感S
LX9801 2.25 抗R 辽613 Liao 613 4.33 中抗MR PHT55 6.80 感S
K454 2.25 抗R 丹9046 Dan 9046 4.40 中抗MR PHM49 6.80 感S
中134 Zhong 134 2.25 抗R S122 4.43 中抗MR 8001 7.00 感S
H18 2.25 抗R 中5493
Zhong 5493
4.50 中抗MR PHT10 7.00 感S
PHN11 2.29 抗R PI 406119 4.50 中抗MR Oh43 7.00 感S
PHH93 2.30 抗R 78004 4.50 中抗MR 6F576 7.00 感S
PHG42 2.30 抗R 京92 Jing 92 4.56 中抗MR 4N506 7.00 感S
直29 Zhi 29 2.33 抗R MBPM 4.56 中抗MR PHG86 7.00 感S
涿99 Zhuo 99 2.33 抗R KW5G321 4.60 中抗MR Ames 19314 7.00 感S
四-287 Si-287 2.33 抗R 利维9 Liwei 9 4.60 中抗MR 中451
Zhong 451
7.00 感S
YF121 2.40 抗R E28 4.60 中抗MR 京186 Jing 186 7.00 感S
豫87-1 Yu 87-1 2.40 抗R 543 4.60 中抗MR KW7M091 7.00 感S
早709 Zao 709 2.43 抗R 京24 Jing 24 4.60 中抗MR MZ031 7.00 感S
6M502 2.45 抗R 西502 Xi 502 4.60 中抗MR M5972 7.00 感S
PI 539921 2.45 抗R 11430 4.60 中抗MR PI 587142 7.00 感S
吉856 Ji 856 2.50 抗R 段007 Duan 007 4.70 中抗MR LH59 7.00 感S
JH3372 2.50 抗R IBO14 4.70 中抗MR 790 7.20 感S
原黄81
Yuanhuang 81
2.50 抗R D9046 4.71 中抗MR HCL645 7.20 感S
皖系47 Wanxi 47 2.55 抗R D9B 4.75 中抗MR K14 7.20 感S
831 2.56 抗R B84 4.78 中抗MR 掖515 Ye 515 7.20 感S
9F592 2.57 抗R 764 4.78 中抗MR 87916W 7.20 感S
京594 Jing 594 2.60 抗R HB1-1 4.78 中抗MR DK653M 7.20 感S
PH4CV 2.60 抗R HD586 4.78 中抗MR W8555 7.25 感S
黄331
Huang 331
2.60 抗R 本7884-7
Ben 7884-7
4.78 中抗MR L139 7.25 感S
矮68 Ai 68 2.60 抗R 铁7922 Tie 7922 4.80 中抗MR LH38 7.40 感S
京MC08
Jing MC08
2.64 抗R 京X005
Jing X005
4.80 中抗MR SB326 7.40 感S
Ames 10261 2.67 抗R 苏80-1 Su 80-1 4.80 中抗MR PHW43 7.40 感S
齐319 Qi 319 2.78 抗R 吉1037 Ji 1037 4.80 中抗MR P12 7.40 感S
787 2.78 抗R 78371A 5.00 中抗MR 综3 Zong 3 7.40 感S
京724 Jing 724 2.78 抗R 综31 Zong 31 5.00 中抗MR 京388 Jing 388 7.44 感S
M54 2.78 抗R 甸骨11 Diangu 11 5.00 中抗MR LS02 7.44 感S
PHGW7 2.78 抗R 获唐黄
Huotanghuang
5.00 中抗MR J2451 7.50 感S
F398 2.80 抗R 851 5.00 中抗MR P25 7.50 感S
合344 He 344 2.80 抗R K12 5.00 中抗MR W22 7.50 感S
PI 587155 2.80 抗R A801 5.00 中抗MR B334 7.55 高感HS
G433 2.80 抗R 皖系19 Wanxi 19 5.00 中抗MR DH382 7.60 高感HS
KW1A139 2.80 抗R D047 5.00 中抗MR 连87 Lian 87 7.67 高感HS
FAPW 2.80 抗R G35=PHG 5.00 中抗MR H8431 7.80 高感HS
京2418-1
Jing 2418-1
2.80 抗R PH6WC 5.00 中抗MR H130024 7.86 高感HS
G172 3.00 抗R 52106 5.00 中抗MR 吉853 Ji 853 7.90 高感HS
9502 3.00 抗R SK516 5.00 中抗MR 792 8.00 高感HS
沈137 Shen 137 3.00 抗R 维尔44 Wei'er 44 5.00 中抗MR 获白 Huobai 8.10 高感HS
中71 Zhong 71 3.00 抗R 47B47=PHB4 5.14 中抗MR 太113-1
Tai 113-1
8.10 高感HS
吉846 Ji 846 3.00 抗R 1024 5.18 中抗MR 四自四 Sizisi 8.11 高感HS
京27 Jing 27 3.00 抗R 444 5.18 中抗MR PHW65 8.11 高感HS
B547 3.00 抗R Y1518 5.20 中抗MR 百黄混
Baihuanghun
8.14 高感HS
78010 3.00 抗R 叶多白 Yeduobai 5.20 中抗MR PHK29 8.20 高感HS
农系531
Nongxi 531
3.00 抗R PHK76 5.20 中抗MR 丹340
Dan 340
8.25 高感HS
多25 Duo 25 3.00 抗R PHN29 5.20 中抗MR 郑58 Zheng 58 8.33 高感HS
C8605-2 3.00 抗R PHT22 5.20 中抗MR 236 8.60 高感HS
PHG50 3.00 抗R F307 5.22 中抗MR B14 8.60 高感HS
武312 Wu 312 3.00 抗R 多毛3 Duomao 3 5.22 中抗MR 黄早四
Huangzaosi
8.60 高感HS
丰5 Feng 5 3.00 抗R 京9218 Jing 9218 5.22 中抗MR PHT77 8.60 高感HS
PI 594047 3.00 抗R B234 5.25 中抗MR LH57 8.70 高感HS
齐410 Qi 410 3.20 抗R PHVA9 5.25 中抗MR PHG47 8.70 高感HS
NQ508 3.20 抗R MBST 5.40 中抗MR LH39 8.80 高感HS
中16 Zhong 16 3.22 抗R LH190 5.40 中抗MR E8501 8.80 高感HS
DH65232 3.25 抗R 京318 Jing 318 5.40 中抗MR NS701 9.00 高感HS
衡特 Hengte 3.25 抗R 501 5.40 中抗MR CML325 9.00 高感HS
4F1 3.25 抗R NS501 5.40 中抗MR F101M 9.00 高感HS
北711 Bei 711 3.30 抗R 3189 5.40 中抗MR
[1] 李小平, 董怀玉, 陶烨, 姜钰, 王丽娟, 刘旸, 刘延军. 玉米穗粒腐病研究概况. 杂粮作物, 2007, 27(2): 130-132.
Li X P, Dong H Y, Tao Y, Jiang Y, Wang L J, Liu Y, Liu Y J. General situation of corn ear rot research. Rain Fed Crops, 2007, 27(2): 130-132 (in Chinese).
[2] 张帆, 万雪琴, 潘光堂. 玉米抗穗粒腐病QTL定位. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 491-496.
Zhang F, Wan X Q, Pan G T. Molecular mapping of QTL for resistance to maize ear rot caused by Fusarium moniliforme. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 491-496 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 张帆, 万雪琴, 潘光堂. 玉米穗粒腐病研究进展及分子标记辅助选择策略. 分子植物育种, 2004, 2: 122-126.
Zhang F, Wan X Q, Pan G T. Advances on research of maize ear rot and strategies for its QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection (MAS). Mol Plant Breed, 2004, 2: 122-126 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 张海剑, 索相敏. 河北省玉米穗腐病的发生情况及防治建议. 现代农村科技, 2016, (10): 23.
Zhang H J, Suo X M. Occurrence and control suggestions of maize ear rot in Hebei Province. Xiandai Nongcun Keji, 2016, (10): 23 (in Chinese).
[5] Balconi C, Berardo N, Locatelli S, Lanzanova C, Torri A, Redaelli R. Evaluation of ear rot (Fusarium verticillioides) resistance and fumonisin accumulation in Italian maize inbred lines. Phytopathol Mediterr, 2014, 53: 14-26.
[6] Jiang B W, Wang D Y, Zhou J, Cai J, Jiang J J, Wang L X, Li Y G. First report of corn ear rot caused by Fusarium asiaticum in China. Plant Dis, 2022, 107: 1243.
[7] Cao Y Y, Ma J, Han S B, Hou M W, Wei X, Zhang X R, Zhang Z J, Sun S L, Ku L X, Tang J H, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing profiles reveal cell type-specific transcriptional regulation networks conditioning fungal invasion in maize roots. Plant Biotechnol J, 2023, 21: 1839-1859.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.14097 pmid: 37349934
[8] Zhu M, Zhong T, Xu L, Guo C Y, Zhang X H, Liu Y L, Zhang Y, Li Y C, Xie Z J, Liu T T, et al. The ZmCPK39-ZmDi19-ZmPR10 immune module regulates quantitative resistance to multiple foliar diseases in maize. Nat Genet, 2024, 56: 2815-2826.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01968-4 pmid: 39496881
[9] Scott G E. Site of action of factors for resistance to Fusarium moniliforme in maize. Plant Dis, 1984, 68: 804.
[10] Giomi G M, Kreff E D, Iglesias J, Fauguel C M, Fernandez M, Oviedo M S, Presello D A. Quantitative trait loci for Fusarium and Gibberella ear rot resistance in Argentinian maize germplasm. Euphytica, 2016, 211: 287-294.
[11] Wen J, Shen Y Q, Xing Y X, Wang Z Y, Han S P, Li S J, Yang C M, Hao D Y, Zhang Y. QTL mapping of Fusarium ear rot resistance in maize. Plant Dis, 2021, 105: 558-565.
[12] Shang G F, Yu H, Yang J, Zeng Z, Hu Z Q. First report of Fusarium miscanthi causing ear rot on maize in China. Plant Dis, 2021, 105: 1565.
[13] Sanna M, Pugliese M, Gullino M L, Mezzalama M. First report of Trichoderma afroharzianum causing seed rot on maize in Italy. Plant Dis, 2022, 106: 1982.
[14] Chavéz-Díaz I F, Cruz-Cárdenas C I, Sandoval-Cancino G, Calvillo-Aguilar F F, Ruíz-Ramírez S, Blanco-Camarillo M, Rojas- Anaya E, Ramírez-Vega H, Arteaga-Garibay R I, Zelaya-Molina L X. Seedling growth promotion and potential biocontrol against phytopathogenic Fusarium by native rhizospheric Pseudomonas spp. strains from Amarillo Zamorano maize Landrace. Rhizosphere, 2022, 24: 100601.
[15] Ma P P, Liu E P, Zhang Z R, Li T, Zhou Z J, Yao W, Chen J F, Wu J Y, Xu Y F, Zhang H Y.Genetic variation in ZmWAX2 confers maize resistance to Fusarium verticillioides. Plant Biotechnol J, 2023, 21: 1812-1826.
[16] 贾娇, 隋晶, 张伟, 孟玲敏, 白雪, 吴宏斌, 王义生, 张玉榕, 苏前富. 玉米禾谷镰孢穗腐病抗性鉴定接种方法比较. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(5): 149-155.
Jia J, Sui J, Zhang W, Meng L M, Bai X, Wu H B, Wang Y S, Zhang Y R, Su Q F. Comparison of two inoculation methods for resistance of Fusarium graminearum ear rot. J Maize Sci, 2022, 30(5): 149-155 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 魏景超. 真菌鉴定手册. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1979.
Wei J C. Handbook of Fungal Identification. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1979 (in Chinese).
[18] 薛德星, 李美, 高兴祥, 李健. 生防菌棘孢木霉的分离鉴定及生物学特性研究. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(10): 118-123.
Xue D X, Li M, Gao X X, Li J.Isolation, identification and biological characteristics of Trichoderma asperellum GT30. Shandong Agric Sci, 2023, 55(10): 118-123 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 张成, 廖文敏, 薛鸣, 陈迪, 侯巨梅, 刘铜. 棘孢木霉DQ-1分生孢子固体发酵优化及其对4种作物幼苗生长的影响. 中国生物防治学报, 2021, 37: 315-322.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.02.002
Zhang C, Liao W M, Xue M, Chen D, Hou J M, Liu T. Optimization of solid substrate and conditions of Trichoderma asperellum DQ-1 and effect on four crop seedlings growth. Chin J Biol Control, 2021, 37: 315-322 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 孙丽丽, 曹传旺, 薛绪亭, 王志英, 杜春艳. 棘孢木霉可湿性粉剂研制及杀菌活性测定. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(6): 45-52.
Sun L L, Cao C W, Xue X T, Wang Z Y, Du C Y. Preparation and fungicidal bioactivity of wettable powder formulations of Trichoderma asperellum. J Beijing For Univ, 2015, 37(6): 45-52 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 邹佳迅, 范晓旭, 宋福强. 木霉(Trichoderma spp.)对植物土传病害生防机制的研究进展. 大豆科学, 2017, 36: 970-977.
Zou J X, Fan X X, Song F Q. Biocontrol mechanism of Trichoderma spp. against soilborn plant disease. Soybean Sci, 2017, 36: 970-977 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] Verma M, Brar S K, Tyagi R D, Surampalli R Y, Valéro J R. Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma spp. panoply of biological control. Biochem Eng J, 2007, 37: 1-20.
[23] Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones S J, Marra M A. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res, 2009, 19: 1639-1645.
doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109 pmid: 19541911
[24] Saha S, Bridges S, Magbanua Z V, Peterson D G. Empirical comparison of ab initio repeat finding programs. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008, 36: 2284-2294.
[25] Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 1999, 27: 573-580.
doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573 pmid: 9862982
[26] 方中达. 植病研究方法. 第3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998.
Fang Z D. Research Methods of Plant Diseases, 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998 (in Chinese).
[27] 李洪连, 张新, 袁红霞, 李健强. 玉米杂交种穗粒腐病原鉴定. 植物保护学报, 1999, 26: 305-308.
Li H L, Zhang X, Yuan H X, Li J Q. Identification of pathogens causing ear and seed rot in corn hybrids. J Plant Prot, 1999, 26: 305-308 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 张小飞, 邹成佳, 崔丽娜, 李晓, 杨晓蓉, 罗怀海. 西南地区玉米穗腐病病原分离鉴定及接种方法研究. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25: 2078-2082.
Zhang X F, Zou C J, Cui L N, Li X, Yang X R, Luo H H. Identification of pathogen causing maize ear rot and inoculation technique in Southwest China. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2012, 25: 2078-2082 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] Li Y M, Tao X B, Yao L S, Tang S, Zhang X H, Tong L X, Liu Q L, Song T, Zhang D F, Cao Y Y, et al. qRfv2, a quantitative resistance locus against Fusarium ear rot in maize. Crop J, 2025, 13: 41-50.
[30] 李生杰. 浅析玉米病虫害防治. 农家科技, 2019, 9(2): 111.
Li S J. Analysis on the prevention and control of corn diseases and pests. Nongjia Keji, 2019, 9(2): 111 . (in Chinese)
[31] 王兴娥, 赵永田, 刘荣, 刘善灵, 方双燕, 韩昕, 唐贵福, 刘恋. 木霉菌防治植物真菌病害的研究进展. 植物医学, 2024, 3(4): 11-19.
Wang X E, Zhao Y T, Liu R, Liu S L, Fang S Y, Han X, Tang G F, Liu L. Research progress on prevention and control of plant fungal diseases with Trichoderma. Plant Health Med, 2024, 3(4): 11-19 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 那明慧, 赵睿杰, 陈晓旭, 王作英, 高增贵. 玉米木霉穗腐病接种方法及玉米新品种的抗性分析. 玉米科学, 2024, 32(2): 162-167.
Na M H, Zhao R J, Chen X X, Wang Z Y, Gao Z G. Analysis of the inoculation method of Trichoderma ear rot and the resistance of new maize varieties. J Maize Sci, 2024, 32(2): 162-167 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] YE Liang, ZHU Ye-Lin, PEI Lin-Jing, ZHANG Si-Ying, ZUO Xue-Qian, LI Zheng-Zhen, LIU Fang, TAN Jing. Screening candidate resistance genes to ear rot caused by Fusarium verticillioides in maize by combined GWAS and transcriptome analysis [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2279-2296.
[2] ZHU Zheng, WANG Tian-Xing-Zi, CHEN Yue, LIU Yu-Qing, YAN Gao-Wei, XU Shan, MA Jin-Jiao, DOU Shi-Juan, LI Li-Yun, LIU Guo-Zhen. Rice transcription factor WRKY68 plays a positive role in Xa21-mediated resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[3] FU Hua-Ying, ZHANG Ting, PENG Wen-Jing, DUAN Yao-Yao, XU Zhe-Xin, LIN Yi-Hua, GAO San-Ji. Identification of resistance to leaf scald in newly released sugarcane varieties at seedling stage by artificial inoculation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(8): 1531-1539.
[4] ZUO Xiang-Jun, FANG Peng-Peng, LI Jia-Na, QIAN Wei, MEI Jia-Qin. Characterization of aphid-resistance of a hairy wild Brassica oleracea taxa, B. incana [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(6): 1109-1113.
[5] DUAN Can-Xing,DONG Huai-Yu,LI Xiao,LI Hong,LI Chun-Hui,SUN Su-Li,ZHU Zhen-Dong,WANG Xiao-Ming. A large-scale screening of maize germplasm for resistance to multiple diseases in multi-plot demonstration for several years under natural condition [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(8): 1135-1145.
[6] HENG You-Qiang,YOU Xi-Long,WANG Yan. Pathogenesis-related protein gene SfPR1a from Salsola ferganica enhances the resistances to drought, salt and leaf spot disease in transgenic tobacco [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(4): 503-512.
[7] Yang YANG,Guo-Kang CHEN,Cheng GUO,Wei ZHANG,Su-Li SUN,Xiao-Ming WANG,Zhen-Dong ZHU,Can-Xing DUAN. Identification of Maize Germplasm for Resistance to Pythium Stalk Rot [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1256-1260.
[8] WU Lin-Kun,CHEN Jun,WU Hong-Miao,WANG Juan-Ying,QIN Xian-Jin,ZHANG Zhong-Yi,LIN Wen-Xiong. Comparative Proteomics Analysis of R. glutinosa Tuber Root in Response to Consecutive Monoculture [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(02): 243-254.
[9] MA Li-Gong,ZHANG Yun-Hua,MENG Qing-Lin,SHI Feng-Mei,LIU Jia,LI Yi-Chu,WANG Zhi-Ying. Cloning and Function Analysis of Pathogenesis Related Protein Gene HaPR1 from Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(12): 1819-1827.
[10] CAO Ting-Jie,CHEN Yong-Xing,LI Dan,ZHANG Yan,WANG Xi-Cheng,ZHAO Hong,LIU Zhi-Yong. Identification and Molecular Detection of Powdery Mildew Resistance of New Bred Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Henan Province, China [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(08): 1172-1182.
[11] XING Xiao-Ping,YANG Jing,YUAN Hong-Xia,ZHANG Jia-Jia,LI Hong-Lian*,LIU Wen-Xuan*. Resistance to Heterodera filipjevi in Triticum aestivum?Aegilops geniculata Germplasm [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(11): 1956-1963.
[12] WANG Bao-Xiang,HU Jin-Long,SUN Zhi-Guang,SONG Zhao-Qiang,LU Bai-Guan,ZHOU Zhen-Ling,FAN Ji-Wei,QIN De-Rong,LIU Yu-Qiang,JIANG Ling,XU Da-Yong,WAN Jian-Min. An Evaluation System for Rice Black-Streaked Dwarf Virus Disease and Screening for Resistant Rice Germplasm [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(09): 1521-1530.
[13] WANG Shu-Wen,LU Jun-Xing,WAN Hua-Fang,WENG Chang-Mei,WANG Zhen,LI Jia-Na,LU KunLIANG Ying. Overexpression of BnMAPK1 Enhances Resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica napus [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(04): 745-750.
[14] XUE Lin, ZHANG Dan, XU Liang, JIN Meng-Meng, PENG Chang-Dun, XU Chen-Wu. Mining and Analyzing Genetic Diversity for Maize Rough Dwarf Disease Resistant Gerplasms and Its Application in Maize Breeding [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(12): 2123-2129.
[15] YUAN Hong-Xia, ZHANG Fu-Xia, ZHANG Jia-Jia, HOU Xin-Song, LI Hong-Jie, LI Hong-Lian. Resistance of CIMMYT Wheat Germplasm to Heterodera filipjevi Xuchang Population from Henan Province, China [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(11): 1956-1966.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!