Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 1892-1895.

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Different Intercropping and Mixture Modes on Forage Yield and Quality of Oat and Common Vetch

WANG Xu,ZENG Zhao-Hai,ZHU Bo,HU Yue-Gao*   

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
  • Received:2006-12-22 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-11-12 Published:2007-11-12
  • Contact: HU Yue-Gao

Abstract:

It is an important measure of intercropping and mixture modes of oat and common vetch to increase forage yield and quality. The experiment was carried out to study the effects of different intercropping and mixture modes on forage yield and quality of oat and common vetch under low soil nitrogen environment in Yanqing County of Beijing. The results indicated the forage yield and quality of oat and common vetch were the highest during the oat dough stage and common vetch scorch stage by comparing and analyzing 12 different modes. Compared with oat monoculture, the best planting mode was intercropping of oat and common vetch at 3:1 by which the land utilization ratio (LER) increased by 76%. Dry forage yield was increased by 47% in milking stage and 40% in dough stage. Forage nitrogen yield was also enhanced by 52.6% than oat monoculture and 2.6% than common vetch in milking stage and 97.2% and 103.2% in dough stage, which have been notably differentiated in monoculture(P<0.05).The dry forage yield in mixture was higher than in monoculture (P<0.05), but have no notably difference in these treatments. Forage nitrogen yield was highest in the mixture of oat and common vetch at 1:2 in two harvest time and LER was increased by 51%. Intercropping and mixture of oat and common vetch can increase 0.3%–22.7% RFV than monoculture. Combined with forage yield, quality, and LER, the best intercropping mode is oat and common vetch at 3:1. The increased forage yield might be related with reasonable row proportion and strap distance in the intercropping.

Key words: Oat, Common vetch, Intercropping, Mixture, Forage yield, Forage quality

[1] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[2] PENG Xi-Hong, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, YANG Xue-Li, REN Jun-Bo, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, LUO Kai, XIE Chen, LEI Lu, YONG Tai-Wen, YANG Wen-Yu. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on soil aeration and root nodule growth of relay strip intercropping soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[3] SONG Li-Jun, NIE Xiao-Yu, HE Lei-Lei, KUAI Jie, YANG Hua, GUO An-Guo, HUANG Jun-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of shade tolerance of forage soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1741-1752.
[4] DANG Ke, GONG Xiang-Wei, LYU Si-Ming, ZHAO Guan, TIAN Li-Xin, JIN Fei, YANG Pu, FENG Bai-Li, GAO Xiao-Li. Effects of nitrogen application rate on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of mung bean under the proso millet and mung bean intercropping [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(6): 1175-1187.
[5] WANG Yi-Fan, YIN Wen, HU Fa-Long, FAN Hong, FAN Zhi-Long, ZHAO Cai, YU Ai-Zhong, CHAI Qiang. Response of photosynthetic performance of intercropped wheat to interaction intensity between above- and below-ground [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(5): 929-941.
[6] LUO Kai, XIE Chen, WANG Jin, WANG Tian, HE Shun, YONG Tai-Wen, YANG Wen-Yu. Effect of exogenous plant growth regulators on carbon-nitrogen metabolism and flower-pod abscission of relay strip intercropping soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 752-760.
[7] ZHANG Jin-Dan, FAN Hong, DU Jin-Yong, YIN Wen, FAN Zhi-Long, HU Fa-Long, CHAI Qiang. Synchronously higher planting density can increase yield via optimizing interspecific interaction of intercropped wheat and maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(12): 2481-2489.
[8] WANG Fei, GUO Bin-Bin, SUN Zeng-Guang, YIN Fei, LIU Ling, JIAO Nian-Yuan, FU Guo-Zhan. Effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on growth and yield of maize under intercropping with peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(11): 2220-2231.
[9] QIN Xiao-Min, PAN Hao-Nan, XIAO Jing-Xiu, TANG Li, ZHENG Yi. Effects of maize and soybean intercropping on nodule growth, nitrogen fixation of soybean under low phosphorus condition [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(11): 2268-2277.
[10] REN Yuan-Yuan, ZHANG Li, YU Yao-Chuang, ZHANG Yan-Jun, ZHANG Sui-Qi. Competitive effect of soybean density on yield formation in maize/soybean intercropping systems [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(10): 1978-1987.
[11] CHEN Xiao-Jing,LIU Jing-Hui,YANG Yan-Ming,ZHAO Zhou,XU Zhong-Shan,HAI Xia,HAN Yu-Ting. Effects of salt stress on physiological indexes and differential proteomics of oat leaf [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1431-1439.
[12] DU Jin-Yong,CHAI Qiang,WANG Yi-Fan,FAN Hong,HU Fa-Long,YIN Wen,LI Deng-Ye. Effect of above- and below-ground interaction intensity on photosynthetic characteristics of wheat-maize intercropping [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1398-1406.
[13] Yong-Fu REN,Guo-Peng CHEN,Tian PU,Cheng CHEN,Jin-Xi ZENG,Xiao PENG,Yan-Wei MA,Wen-Yu YANG,Xiao-Chun WANG. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics to low light stress in ear leaves of high photosynthetic efficiency maize at narrow row of maize-soybean strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(5): 728-739.
[14] Ke DANG,Xiang-Wei GONG,Guang-Hua CHEN,Guan ZHAO,Long LIU,Hong-Lu WANG,Pu YANG,Bai-Li FENG. Nitrogen accumulation, metabolism, and yield of proso millet in proso millet- mung bean intercropping systems [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(12): 1880-1890.
[15] ZHOU Ping-Ping,YAN Hong-Hai,PENG Yuan-Ying. Hexaploid ancestor of cultivated hexaploid oats inferred from high throughput GBS-SNP markers [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(10): 1604-1612.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!