Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agronomica Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (03): 357-368.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00357

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Adaptability and Phenotypic Variations of Agronomic Traits in Common Bean Germplasm Resources in Different Environments

Lan-Fen WANG1(), Jing WU1, Zhao-Li WANG2, Ji-Bao CHEN3, Li YU2, Qiang WANG4, Shu-Min WANG1,*()   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081,China
    2 Bijie Agricultural Science Institute, Bijie 551700, Guizhou, China
    3 Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang 473061, Henan, China
    4 Institute of Crop Breeding, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2017-04-27 Accepted:2017-11-21 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2017-12-11
  • Contact: Shu-Min WANG E-mail:wanglanfen@caas.cn;wangshumin@caas.cn
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-09), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Infrastructure for Crop Germplasm Resources (NICGR2017-006), Protection and Utilization for Crop Germplasm Resources (NWB036-07), and the Program of Introducing International Super Agricultural Science and Technology (2016-X6).

RichHTML320

2

PDF

1229

Abstract:

This study aimed at evaluating the phenotypic variation and environmental adaptability of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm resources. Twelve traits of 686 accessions of common bean were assessed in Harbin of Heihongjiang province, Nanyang of Henan province, Bijie of Guizhou province and Ledong of Hainan province in 2014-2015. The results showed that Ledong was the best location for the reproduction of germplasm resources from South America and Bijie was the best location for the reproduction of Chinese germplasm resources. There were large variations in the 12 traits among the 686 common bean germplasm resources and the average (across locations) coefficients of variation ranged from 8.11% of growth duration to 70.83% of plant height. Hundred-seed weight showed the highest heritability of 0.73, whereas days from sowing to flowering showed the lowest one of 0.01. The correlation and path analysis revealed that number of pods per plant was the most important factor affecting the yield per plant. Two hundred and eighteen specific germplasm resources were identified with dwarf, large-seed, and early maturity and so on, among which nine had three favorable traits and 53 had two favorable traits simultaneously.

Key words: common bean, germplasm resource, environmental adaptation, phenotypic evaluation, heritability, correlation analysis, path analysis

Table 1

Origin of materials"

中国种质来源
Origin of domestic germplasm		 份数
No.		 引进种质来源
Origin of alien germplasm		 份数
No.
中国黑龙江 Heilongjiang, China 86 阿根廷 Argentina 38
中国山西 Shanxi, China 66 巴西 Brazil 38
中国内蒙古 Inner Mongolia, China 63 国际热带农业研究中心 CIAT 37
中国贵州 Guizhou, China 56 哥伦比亚 Columbia 18
中国吉林 Jilin, China 42 法国 France 8
中国云南 Yunnan, China 37 墨西哥 Mexico 8
中国湖北 Hubei, China 34 美国 America 5
中国陕西 Shaanxi, China 33 秘鲁 Peru 4
中国四川 Sichuan, China 25 危地马拉 Guatemala 3
中国甘肃 Gansu, China 21 保加利亚 Bulgaria 2
中国河北 Hebei, China 11 玻利维亚 Bolivia 2
中国北京 Beijing, China 10 多米尼加共和国 Dominican Republic 1
中国山东 Shandong, China 9 厄瓜多尔 Ecuador 1
中国新疆 Xinjiang, China 6 海地 Haiti 1
中国湖南 Hunan, China 2 加拿大 Canada 1
中国江苏 Jiangsu, China 1 葡萄牙 Portugal 1
中国辽宁 Liaoning, China 1 委内瑞拉 Venezuela 1
中国台湾 Taiwan, China 1 英国 UK 1
中国西藏 Xizang, China 1 赞比亚 Zambia 1
中国海南 Hainan, China 1 智利 Chile 1
不详 Unknown 1 不详 Unknown 7
合计 Total 507 合计 Total 179

Table 2

Sunshine duration, temperature condition and seed setting rate of 686 common bean accessions in four locations"

地点
Location		 播种-收获日期Sowing-harvest date (month/day) 日照时长
Sunshine hours (h)		 日最高温度
Daily max. temp. (°C)		 日最低温度
Daily min. temp. (°C)
平均值
Mean		 最大值Max. 最小值Min. 平均值
Mean		 最大值Max. 最小值Min. 平均值
Mean		 最大值Max. 最小值Min.
哈尔滨 Harbin 5/23-9/30 14.47 15.72 11.77 26.0 37 10 16.0 24 -2
南阳 Nanyang 4/30-8/31 13.88 14.32 12.88 30.0 38 21 21.2 28 11
毕节 Bijie 4/21-9/22 13.33 13.85 12.13 24.1 31 13 16.3 21 9
乐东 Ledong 11/19-2/23 11.11 11.63 10.59 26.3 32 19 16.1 23 8
种质材料份数 No. of accessions 结实率
Seed setting rate (%)
未出苗Emergence-failed 幼苗死亡
Seedling-died		 未开花
Bloom-failed		 未成熟
Immature		 正常结实
Fertile
哈尔滨 Harbin 6 10 45 16 609 88.78
南阳 Nanyang 0 6 69 46 565 82.36
毕节 Bijie 9 7 2 39 629 91.69
乐东 Ledong 2 1 0 0 683 99.56

Table 3

Variation of 686 accessions of common bean in 12 agronomic traits in four locations"

性状
Trait		 地点
Location		 最小值
Min.		 最大值
Max.		 均值
Average		 标准差
SD		 变异系数
CV (%)		 遗传力Heritability
播种至出苗时间
Days from sowing to
emergence (d)		 哈尔滨 Harbin — — — — — —
南阳 Nanyang 9.00 14.00 12.19 0.96 7.92
毕节 Bijie 17.00 23.00 20.38 0.97 4.74
乐东 Ledong 7.00 13.00 7.80 0.91 11.68
播种至开花时间
Days from sowing to
flowering (d)		 哈尔滨 Harbin 33.00 82.00 48.72 11.78 24.18 0.01
南阳 Nanyang 33.00 89.00 49.43 7.86 15.91
毕节 Bijie 45.00 80.00 56.33 7.49 13.29
乐东 Ledong 30.00 49.00 36.63 3.57 9.74
生育期 哈尔滨 Harbin 69.00 129.00 100.14 14.13 14.11 0.58
Growth duration (d) 南阳 Nanyang 63.00 122.00 88.79 5.89 6.63
毕节 Bijie 92.00 154.00 106.64 7.77 7.29
乐东 Ledong 67.00 99.00 80.41 6.22 7.74
株高 哈尔滨 Harbin 22.00 385.00 154.76 105.72 68.31 0.58
Plant height (cm) 南阳 Nanyang 14.29 376.14 133.20 81.75 61.37
毕节 Bijie 6.00 440.00 113.80 93.91 82.52
乐东 Ledong 18.00 280.00 79.12 56.28 71.13
主茎节数 哈尔滨 Harbin 2.00 27.20 6.52 5.86 89.90 0.28
Node number per plant 南阳 Nanyang — — — — —
毕节 Bijie 1.80 24.00 7.66 5.11 66.66
乐东 Ledong 3.40 32.67 13.20 5.16 39.10
主茎分枝数
Branch number per plant		 哈尔滨 Harbin 2.20 8.40 4.53 1.05 23.14 —
南阳 Nanyang 3.00 18.00 6.49 2.32 35.78
毕节 Bijie 1.00 5.00 1.86 0.57 30.85
乐东 Ledong 1.00 6.71 2.45 0.69 28.10
性状
Trait		 地点
Location		 最小值
Min.		 最大值
Max.		 均值
Average		 标准差
SD		 变异系数
CV (%)		 遗传力Heritability
单株荚数 哈尔滨 Harbin 3.90 177.00 32.32 18.86 58.35 0.09
Pod number per plant 南阳 Nanyang 0.10 94.00 20.23 17.58 86.93
毕节 Bijie 0.75 41.50 9.86 6.67 67.68
乐东 Ledong 1.80 44.50 12.29 6.26 50.93
荚长 哈尔滨 Harbin 4.72 18.58 10.96 2.28 20.80 0.53
Pod length (cm) 南阳 Nanyang 4.39 22.98 8.19 2.20 26.80
毕节 Bijie 4.44 21.00 10.15 2.37 23.39
乐东 Ledong 4.00 20.40 10.50 2.77 26.37
荚宽 哈尔滨 Harbin 6.20 19.80 9.94 1.84 18.53 0.67
Pod width (cm) 南阳 Nanyang 5.20 21.50 9.73 2.37 24.37
毕节 Bijie 5.60 21.00 10.44 1.91 18.33
乐东 Ledong 4.80 25.00 9.96 2.04 20.46
单荚粒数 哈尔滨 Harbin 2.60 10.00 5.67 1.26 22.22 0.30
Seed number per pod 南阳 Nanyang 0.70 7.50 3.69 1.17 31.63
毕节 Bijie 1.25 8.20 4.72 1.17 24.71
乐东 Ledong 1.40 9.60 5.12 1.06 20.66
单株产量 哈尔滨 Harbin 2.88 175.46 40.55 23.20 57.22
Yield per plant (g) 南阳 Nanyang — — — — — —
毕节 Bijie 0.30 48.86 9.67 6.74 69.63
乐东 Ledong 1.00 40.07 12.39 6.24 50.35
百粒重
Hundred-seed weight (g)		 哈尔滨 Harbin 10.80 90.00 35.08 13.14 37.46 0.73
南阳 Nanyang 4.00 56.90 28.34 9.06 31.98
毕节 Bijie 9.60 85.30 33.41 13.45 40.26
乐东 Ledong 4.10 87.50 32.48 14.78 45.52

Table4

Correlation coefficients among agronomic traits of the common bean accessions in the four locations"

Table 5

Simple correlation coefficient decomposition between yield per plant and other traits"

地点
Location		 性状
Trait		 相关系数
Correlation coefficient		 通径系数
Path
coefficient		 间接通径系数Indirect path coefficient
PPL HGT HSW SPP MAT DFF PL 合计Total
哈尔滨 单株荚数PNP 0.637 0.691 — 0.091 -0.161 0.037 — -0.021 — -0.054
Harbin 株高PH 0.549 0.373 0.168 — -0.020 0.064 — -0.035 — 0.177
百粒重HSW -0.074 0.327 -0.341 -0.023 — -0.058 — 0.021 — -0.401
单荚粒数SNP 0.349 0.121 0.214 0.197 -0.157 — — -0.026 — 0.228
播种至开花时间DSF 0.213 -0.081 0.177 0.162 -0.083 0.039 — — — 0.295
毕节 单株荚数PNP 0.779 0.906 — — -0.180 0.071 — — -0.018 -0.109
Bijie 百粒重HSW -0.096 0.365 -0.447 — — -0.079 — — 0.047 -0.526
荚长PL 0.132 0.113 -0.140 — 0.153 0.004 — — — 0.017
单荚粒数SNP 0.388 0.124 0.523 — -0.232 — — — 0.004 0.290
乐东 单株荚数PNP 0.589 0.750 — — -0.227 0.065 0.092 -0.064 -0.027 -0.161
Ledong 百粒重HSW 0.103 0.468 -0.363 — — -0.103 0.005 0.045 0.051 -0.365
单荚粒数SNP 0.246 0.226 0.214 — -0.213 — 0.058 -0.058 0.019 0.020
生育期 GD 0.508 0.233 0.297 — 0.010 0.056 — -0.102 0.015 0.275
播种至开花时间DSF 0.300 -0.142 0.339 — -0.147 0.092 0.168 — -0.009 0.443
荚长PL 0.226 0.099 -0.203 — 0.239 0.043 0.035 0.013 — 0.127

Table6

Sixty=two accession of common bean with two or three elite traits"

[1] Broughton W J, Hernández G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J.Beans (Phaseolus spp.) — model food legumes. Plant Soil, 2003, 252: 55-128
[2] Schmutz J, McClean P E, Mamidi S, Wu G A, Cannon S B, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu S, Song Q, Chavarro C, Torres-Torres M, Geffroy V, Moghaddam S M, Gao D, Abernathy B, Barry K, Blair M, Brick M A, Chovatia M, Gepts P, Goodstein D M, Gonzales M, Hellsten U, Hyten D L, Jia G, Kelly J D, Kudrna D, Lee R, Richard M M, Miklas P N, Osorno J M, Rodrigues J, Thareau V, Urrea C A, Wang M, Yu Y, Zhang M, Wing R A, Cregan P B, Rokhsar D S, Jackson S A. A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications.Nat Genet, 2014, 46: 707-713
[3] Garner W W, Allard H A.The effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. Agric Res, 1920, 18: 553-606
[4] Wallace D H.Physiological genetics of plant maturity, adaptation and yield. In: Janick J ed. Plant Breeding Reviews. Vol. 3. Hoboken, NJ, USA. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1985. pp 21-166
[5] White J W, Laing D R.Photoperiod response of flowering in diverse genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Field Crops Res, 1989, 22: 113-128
[6] Delgadosalinas A, Turley T, Richman A, Lavin M.Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and wild species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae).Syst Bot, 1999, 24: 438-460
[7] Delgadosalinas A, Bibler R, Lavin M.Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst Bot, 2006, 31: 779-791
[8] Bitocchi E, Nanni L, Bellucci E, Rossi M, Giardini A.Mesoamerican origin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is revealed by sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 788-796
[9] Desiderio F, Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Rau D, Rodriguez M.Chloroplast microsatellite diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris. Front Plant Sci, 2013, 3: 312
[10] Bellucci E, Bitocchi E, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti E, Giardini A, Attene G, Nanni L, Papa R.Genomics of Origin, Domestication and Evolution of Phaseolus vulgaris. In: Tuberosa R, Graner A, Frison E, eds. Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources, Springer Netherlands, 2014. pp 483-507
[11] Debouck D G, Smartt J.Beans. In: Smartt J, Simmonds N W, eds. Evolution of Crop Plants. 2nd Edn. Longman Harlow, England, 1995. pp 287-294
[12] 郑卓杰. 中国食用豆类学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997: 222-249
Zheng Z J.Food Legumes in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1997. pp 222-249 (in Chinese)
[13] Santalla M, Rodiño A P, De Ron A M. Allozyme evidence supporting southwester Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for common bean.Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104: 934-944
[14] Angioi S A, Rau D, Attene G, Nanni L, Bellucci E, Logozzo G, Negri V, Spagnoletti Z P, Papa R.Beans in Europe: origin and structure of the European landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 121: 829-843
[15] Antunes P L, Bilhalva A B, Elias M C, Soares G J D. Valor nutricional de feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cultivars Rico 23, Carioca, Piratâ-1 E Rosinha-G2. Rev Bras Agro, 1995, 1: 12-18
[16] Júnior V A, Melo P G, Pereira H S, Bassinello P Z, Melo L C.Genetic potential of common bean progenies selected for crude fiber content obtained through different breeding methods.Genet Mol Res, 2015, 14:5763-5774
[17] Ribeiro N D, Londero P M G, Hoffmann J L, Poersch N L, Filho A C. Dissimilaridade genética para proteína e fibra em grãos de feijão dos grupos preto e de cor. Rev Bras Agron, 2005, 11: 167-173
[18] 王述民, 段醒男, 丁国庆, 王晓鸣. 普通菜豆种质资源的收集与评价. 中国种业, 1999, (03): 50-51
Wang S M, Duan X N, Deng G Q, Wang X M.Collection and evaluation of common bean germplasm resources.Chin Seed Ind, 1999, (03): 50-51 (in Chinese)
[19] 王述民, 张亚芝, 刘绍文, 李家银, 王石宝. 普通菜豆优异种质联合鉴定与评价. 中国种业, 1997, (2): 5-7
Wang S M, Zhang Y Z, Liu S W, Li J Y, Wang S B.Joint identification and evaluation of common bean excellent germplasms. China Seed Ind, 1997, (2): 5-7 (in Chinese)
[20] 王述民, 张亚芝, 王石宝, 刘绍文, 李家银. 普通菜豆优异种质联合鉴定研究. 中国种业, 1996, (03): 12-14
Wang S M, Zhang Y Z, Wang S B, Liu S W, Li J Y.Joint identification research of common bean excellent germplasms.Chin Seed Ind, 1996, (03): 12-14 (in Chinese)
[21] 王述民, 张亚芝, 魏淑红. 普通菜豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. pp 12-21
Wang S M, Zhang Y Z, Wei S H.Descriptors and Data Standard for Common Bean. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. pp 12-21 (in Chinese)
[22] 胡家蓬, 王佩芝, 程须珍. 中国食用豆类优异资源. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998
Hu J P, Wang P Z, Cheng X Z.Elite Germplasm of Chinese Food Legume. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998 (in Chinese)
[23] 王述民. 普通菜豆生产技术. 北京: 北京教育出版社, 2016. pp 52-53
Wang S M.Production Technology for Common Bean. Beijing: Beijing Education Press, 2016. pp 52-53 (in Chinese)
[24] 李莹. 大豆品种产量构成因素的研究. 大豆科学, 1984, 3: 209-214
Li Y.Research of Soybean Yield Components. Soybean Sci, 1984, 3: 209-214 (in Chinese)
[25] 杨光宇. 大豆品种主要数量性状的相关和通径分析. 吉林农业科学, 1985, (1): 7-10
Yang G Y.Correlation and path analysis of soybean varieties main quantitative character.Jilin Agric Sci, 1985, (1): 7-10 (in Chinese)
[26] Hamblin J, Evans A M.The estimation of cross yield using early generation and parental yields in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica, 1976, 25: 515-520
[27] Adams M W.Basis of yield component compensation m crops with special reference of field bean,Phaseolus vulgaris L. Crop Sci, 1967, 7: 637-640
[28] Nienhuis J, Singh S P.Effects of location and plant density on yield and architectural traits in dry beans.Crop Sci, 1985, 25: 355-358
[29] Sarafi A A.Yield-component selection experiment involving American and Iranian cultivars of the common bean.Crop Sci, 1978, 18: 5-7
[30] Sullivan J G, Buss F A.Recurrent mass selection for increased seed yield and seed protein percentage in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using a selection index. J Am Soc Hort Sci, 1983,108: 42-46
[31] Nienhuis J, Singh S P.Genetics of seed yield and its components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Middle-American origin: II. Genetic variance, heritability and expected response from selection. Plant Breed, 1988, 101: 143-154
[1] CHEN Xiao-Hong, LIN Yuan-Xiang, WANG Qian, DING Min, WANG Hai-Gang, CHEN Ling, GAO Zhi-Jun, WANG Rui-Yun, QIAO Zhi-Jun. Development of DNA molecular ID card in hog millet germplasm based on high motif SSR [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 908-919.
[2] HU Liang-Liang, WANG Su-Hua, WANG Li-Xia, CHENG Xu-Zhen, CHEN Hong-Lin. Identification of salt tolerance and screening of salt tolerant germplasm of mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) at seedling stage [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 367-379.
[3] ZHANG He, JIANG Chun-Ji, YIN Dong-Mei, DONG Jia-Le, REN Jing-Yao, ZHAO Xin-Hua, ZHONG Chao, WANG Xiao-Guang, YU Hai-Qiu. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system for cold tolerance and screening of cold-tolerance germplasm in peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1753-1767.
[4] WANG Yan-Yan, WANG Jun, LIU Guo-Xiang, ZHONG Qiu, ZHANG Hua-Shu, LUO Zheng-Zhen, CHEN Zhi-Hua, DAI Pei-Gang, TONG Ying, LI Yuan, JIANG Xun, ZHANG Xing-Wei, YANG Ai-Guo. Construction of SSR fingerprint database and genetic diversity analysis of cigar germplasm resources [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(7): 1259-1274.
[5] REN Yuan-Yuan, ZHANG Li, YU Yao-Chuang, ZHANG Yan-Jun, ZHANG Sui-Qi. Competitive effect of soybean density on yield formation in maize/soybean intercropping systems [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(10): 1978-1987.
[6] SUN Zhi-Guang, WANG Bao-Xiang, ZHOU Zhen-Ling, FANG Lei, CHI Ming, LI Jing-Fang, LIU Jin-Bo, Bello Babatunde Kazeem, XU Da-Yong. Screening of germplasm resources and QTL mapping for germinability under submerged condition in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(1): 61-70.
[7] ZHANG Yi,XU Nai-Yin,GUO Li-Lei,YANG Zi-Guang,ZHANG Xiao-Qing,YANG Xiao-Ni. Optimization of test location number and replicate frequency in regional winter wheat variety trials in northern winter wheat region in China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(8): 1166-1173.
[8] HASAN Umut,SAWUT Mamat,Shui-Sen CHEN,Dan LI. Inversion of leaf area index of winter wheat based on GF-1/2 image [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(5): 787-797.
[9] ZHANG Xiao-Jun,XIAO Jin,WANG Hai-Yan,QIAO Lin-Yi,LI Xin,GUO Hui-juan,CHANG Li-Fang,ZHANG Shu-Wei,YAN Xiao-Tao,CHANG Zhi-Jian,WU Zong-Xin. Evaluation of resistance to Fusarium head blight in Thinopyrum-derived wheat lines [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(01): 62-73.
[10] GAO Huan-Huan,YE Sang,WANG Qian,WANG Liu-Yan,WANG Rui-Li,CHEN Liu-Yi,TANG Zhang-Lin,LI Jia-Na,ZHOU Qing-Yuan,CUI Cui. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of aluminum-toxicity tolerance during seed germination in Brassca napus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1416-1430.
[11] Cui CUI,Chuang CHENG,Yu-Feng ZHAO,Huan-Huan GAO,Rui-Li WANG,Liu-Yan WANG,Qing-Yuan ZHOU. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of aluminum-toxicity tolerance during germination stage in 52 varieties (lines) of pea germplasm [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(5): 798-805.
[12] YUAN Yi-Chuan, CHEN Xiao-Yu, LI Ming-Ming, LI Ping, JIA Ya-Tao, HAN Yuan-Huai, XING Guo-Fang. Screening of germplasm tolerant to low phosphorus of seedling stage and response of root protective enzymes to low phosphorus in foxtail millet [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(4): 601-612.
[13] Qian WANG,Cui CUI,Sang YE,Ming-Sheng CUI,Yu-Feng ZHAO,Na LIN,Zhang-Lin TANG,Jia-Na LI,Qing-Yuan ZHOU. Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Germplasm Resources with Tribenuron-methyl Tolerance at Germination Stage in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1169-1184.
[14] Yi XU,Lie-Mei ZHANG,Jian-Min QI,Mei SU,Shu-Sheng FANG,Li-Lan ZHANG,Ping-Ping FANG,Li-Wu ZHANG. Correlation Analysis between Yield of Bast Fiber and Main Agronomic Traits in Jute (Corchorus spp.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(6): 859-866.
[15] Ren-Feng XUE, Li WANG, Ming FENG, Wei-De GE. Identification and Expression Analysis of Likely Orthologs of Tobacco Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2 in Common Beans [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(05): 642-649.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd