欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 1977-1987.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01977

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家大豆品种区域试验对照品种的生育期组归属

吴存祥1,2，李继存1,4，沙爱华3，曾海燕1，孙石1，杨光明1，周新安3，常汝镇1，年海2,*，韩天富1,*   

  1. 1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农作物基因资源与基因改良国家重大科学工程, 北京100081; 2华南农业大学农学院, 广东广州 510642; 3中国农业科学院油料作物研究所, 湖北武汉 430062; 4济宁市农业科学研究院, 山东济宁 272031
  • 收稿日期:2011-10-30 修回日期:2012-07-05 出版日期:2012-11-12 网络出版日期:2012-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 韩天富, E-mail: hantf@mail.caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-82105875; 年海, E-mail: hnian@scau.edu.cn, Tel: 020-85280202
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-04)和国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(3-4)资助。

Maturity Group Classification of Check Varieties in National Soybean Uniform Trials of China

WU Cun-Xiang1,2, LI Ji-Cun1,4, SHA Ai-Hua3, ZENG Hai-Yan1, SUN Shi1, YANG Guang-Ming1, ZHOU Xin-An3, CHANG Ru-Zhen1, NIAN Hai2,*,HAN Tian-Fu1,*   

  1. 1National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2College of Agriculture, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou 510642, China; 3 Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China; 4 Jining Agricultural Science Institute, Jining 272031, China
  • Received:2011-10-30 Revised:2012-07-05 Published:2012-11-12 Published online:2012-09-10
  • Contact: 韩天富, E-mail: hantf@mail.caas.net.cn, Tel: 010-82105875; 年海, E-mail: hnian@scau.edu.cn, Tel: 020-85280202

PDF

2874

被引次数

56

摘要：

以38个分属MG000~MGVIII的北美大豆生育期组标准品种的生育期表现为参考, 通过多点对比试验, 对来自16个试验组的国家大豆品种区域试验19个对照品种进行生育期组鉴定与划分。所有品种均在北京、武汉两地春播, 并选用部分代表性品种在18个国家大豆品种区域试验点进行补充试验。结果表明, 国家大豆品种区域试验对照品种的生育期组介于MG0~MGVI之间。不同区域的对照品种可归属相同的生育期组。北方春大豆区晚熟组、西北春大豆区、黄淮海夏大豆区及西南山区春大豆区的对照品种均属MGIII；长江流域春大豆区、热带亚热带夏大豆区对照品种属MGV或MGVI。热带亚热带春大豆区2个对照品种福豆301和泉豆7号所在生育期组差异较大, 分别归属MGII和MGIV。根据生育期组并考虑其他因素, 建议将黄淮海夏大豆品种区域试验组由目前3个组以黄河为界划分为2个组, 并对南方部分试验组进行调整。北方春大豆晚熟组和西北春大豆区对照品种尽管生育期组相当, 但因品种抗旱性要求不同, 建议分别设置区域试验。

关键词: 大豆, 国家区域试验, 对照品种, 生育期组

Abstract:

Maturity Group (MG) is a widely-used system for soybean varieties classification in the world. However, it has not been adopted yet in China. In the current studies, we identified the MG catagories for 19 check varieties from the National Soybean Uniform Trials of China by comparing the check varieties with 38 MG standard varieties from the North America, which covered MG000–MGVIII. The check varieties from 16 trial groups represented most of the released soybean varieties in China. All standard and check varieties were sown in spring of Beijing and Wuhan, and the supplementary tests using local varieties were conducted in other 18 sites across the country. The results showed that the MGs of check varieties in the National Soybean Uniform Trials ranged from MG0 to MGVI. Some varieties from different trial groups could be classified into the same MGs, for example, MGIII included the varieties from the Late Group of the Northern Spring Planting Soybean Region, Northwest Spring Planting Soybean Region, all three (north, mid and south) zones of Huanghuaihai Summer Planting Soybean Region, and Southwest Mountainous Spring Planting Soybean Region; the varieties from Yangtze River Spring Planting Soybean Region and the Tropical and Subtropical Summer Planting Soybean Regions were classified into MGV and MGVI. Fudou 301 and Quandou 7, check vrieties from the Tropical and Subtropical Spring Planting Soybean Regions, belonged to MGII and MGIV, respectively. Based on the MG classification and other factors, the authors suggested that the Huanghuaihai Summer Planting Soybean Region can be changed to two (north and south) zones from the current three (north, mid, and south) zones, and the regionization of National Soybean Uniform trials in South China should also be modified. Late Maturity Group of the Northern Spring Planting Soybean Region and the Northwest Spring Planting Soybean Region, both belong to MGIII, should be separated because they are different ecotypes in drought tolerance. The results of this experiment pave the way for establishing the MG system based on biological identities of varieties in order to classify soybean varieties and regionalize the soybean production regions in China.

Key words: Soybean, Uniform trial, Check variety, Maturity Group

[1]Wang J-L(王金陵). Soybean ecotypes and soybean cultivation and breeding. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1961, (1): 24–27 (in Chinese)



[2]Wang J-L(王金陵), Wu Y-X(武镛祥), Wu H-L(吴和礼), Sun S-C(孙善澄). Analysis on photoperiod ecotypes of cultivated soybeans from different lantitude regions of China. Acta Agric Sin (农业学报), 1956, 7(2): 169–180 (in Chinese)



[3]Wang J-L(王金陵). On the ecological characteristics and germplasm resources in soybean. Oil Crops China (中国油料), 1981, (1): 1–9 (in Chinese)



[4]Ren Q-X(任全兴), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Ma Y-H(马育华). A study on the ecological properties of the growth periods of the Chinese soybean varieties. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1987: 20(5): 23–28 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Wang G-X(王国勋), Luo X-H(罗学华), Li Y-H(李友华). Discussion about the ecological type of duration and it uses in introduction of soybean (Soja max L.) in China. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1982, 1(1): 33–40 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]Bu M-H(卜慕华), Pan T-F(潘铁夫). A study on the regionalization of soybean producing area in China. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1982, 1(2): 105–121 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Hao G(郝耕), Chen X-J(陈杏娟), Bu M-H(卜慕华). Classification of the Chinese soybean cltivars into maturity group. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1992, 18(4): 275–281 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Ning H-L(宁海龙), Wang J-L(王金陵), Li W-B(李文滨). Soybean Ecotypes. In: Wang L-Z(王连铮), Guo Q-Y(郭庆元), eds. Contemporary Soybean Research in China. Beijing: Jindun Press, 2007. pp 63–67 (in Chinese)



[9]Hartwig E E. Growth and reproduction characteristics of soybean grown under short-day conditions. Crop Sci, 1970, 12: 47–53



[10]Zhang L X, Kyei-Boahen S, Zhang J, Zhang M H, Freeland T B, Watson C E Jr, Liu X M. Modifications of optimum adaptation zones for soybean maturity groups in the USA. Crop Manag, 2007, doi:10.1094/CM-2007-0927-01-RS



[11]Zhang L, Chen Y, Wu C, Han T. Comparison of soybean (Glycine max) variety trial systems and procedures in the USA and China. Plant Manag, 2010, doi:10.1094/CM-2010-0405-01-RV



[12]Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Wang Y-S(汪越胜), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Wang J-A(王继安), Chang R-Z(常汝镇). Studies on the classification of maturity groups of soybeans in China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(3): 286–292 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Li F-S(李福山), Ma D-Q(马德泉). Study on soybean variety introduction laws: II. Performances of US varieties grown in China. Oil Crops China (中国油料), 1981, (1): 33–42 (in Chinese)



[14]Fehr W R, Caviness C E. Stages of Soybean Development. Special Report 80, Cooperative Extension Service, Agriculture and Home Economic Experiment Station. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University, 1977. pp 1–11



[15]Tang Q-Y(唐启义). DPS Data Processing System—Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining(Second Edition)(DPS数据处理系统——实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘). Beijing: Science Press, 2010 (in Chinese)



[16]Wang Y-S(汪越胜), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Geographical distribution of the maturity groups of spring sowing soybeans from China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 1999, 21(3): 23–26 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Wang Y-S(汪越胜), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). The distribution of maturity groups of soybean varieties from various proviences in China. Crop Germplasm Resour (作物品种资源), 1999, (4): 5–6 (in Chinese)



[18]Wang Y-S(汪越胜), Chen D-S(陈冬生), Ma H-H(马宏惠). Study on relation between response to photo-temperature and response to photoperiod of soybeans from china. J Anhui Norm Univ (安徽师范大学学报), 2000, 23(3): 231–233 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Han T-F(韩天富), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Chen F-Y(陈风云), Qiu J-X(邱家驯). Photoperiod response and agronomic characters of soybean varieties with different growth period structures. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(5): 550–557 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Zhang G-D(张国栋). Procedure and method for the soybean uniform tests in the United States. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1995, 14(2): 174–179 (in Chinese)
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[4] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[5] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[6] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[7] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[8] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[9] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[10] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[11] 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
[12] 林洋, 史晓蕾, 陈强, 刘兵强, 杨庆, 于慧娟, 闫龙, 武小霞, 杨春燕. 大豆蛋白质脂肪及脂肪酸组分相关QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910.
[13] 王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885.
[14] 李威, 朱玉鹏, 孙宾成, 温有祥, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥. 转基因大豆结合免耕平作实现东北地区大豆生产轻简化[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2738-2749.
[15] 陈敏, 贾蓉, 张金传, 张辰煜, 褚俊聪, 姚伟, 葛军勇, 王星宇, 杨亚东, 曾昭海, 臧华栋. 半干旱区燕麦与豆科作物带状复合种植的产量优势及氮素利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2727-2737.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2