作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 1767-1776.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01767
• 研究简报 • 上一篇
许俊伟,孟天瑶,荆培培,张洪程*,李超,戴其根,魏海燕,郭保卫
XU Jun-Wei,MENG Tian-Yao,JING Pei-Pei,ZHANG Hong-Cheng,LI Chao,DAI Qi-Gen,WEI Hai-Yan,GUO Bao-Wei
摘要:
以籼粳杂交稻品种甬优2640、甬优1640,杂交籼稻品种丰两优香1号、新两优6380为材料,设置6个密度(A: 31.7 cm × 30.0 cm、B: 22.2 cm × 30.0 cm、C: 17.1 cm × 30.0 cm、D: 13.9 cm × 30.0 cm、E: 11.7 cm × 30.0 cm、F: 10.6 cm × 30.0 cm),比较研究不同机插密度对不同类型水稻抗倒伏能力的影响。两年试验结果表明,产量随密度的增加呈先升后降的趋势,籼粳杂交稻和杂交籼稻均以13.9 cm × 30.0 cm处理产量最高。密度对两种类型水稻影响也不完全一致,籼粳杂交稻在C~E密度下产量均高于10.5 t hm-2,且未发生倒伏或倒伏较少,能获得高产稳产;杂交籼稻只有在D密度下产量高于10.0 t hm-2,表观倒伏率较高,较难稳产。随着密度的增加,2个类型品种茎秆的倒伏指数逐渐增大,茎粗、单位节间干重、茎壁厚度都呈下降趋势。随着灌浆时间的增加,籼粳杂交稻倒伏指数先升高后降低,高峰值出现在抽穗后30 d,茎壁厚度、节间充实度、单茎茎鞘重先降低后升高,抽穗后30 d达最低值。杂交籼稻倒伏指数一直升高,茎壁厚度一直下降,节间充实度先下降,抽穗后30 d后略有下降或回升但不明显,单茎茎鞘重先降低后升高,抽穗后30 d最低,抽穗后30 d前后是发生倒伏的敏感时期。
| [1]张忠旭, 陈温福, 杨振玉, 华泽田, 高日玲, 高勇, 赵迎春. 水稻抗倒伏能力与茎秆物理性状的关系及其对产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1999, 30(2): 81–85Zhang Z X, Chen W F, Yang Z Y, Hua Z T, Gao R L, Gao Y, Zhao Y C. Effect of lodging resistance on yield and its relationship with stalk physical characteristics. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 1999, 30(2): 81–85 (in Chinese with English abstract)[2]Yang S R, Chen W F, Zhang B L. Trends in breeding rice for ideotype. Chin J Rice Sci, 1988, 2(3): 1–5[3]李诚, 吴俊, 庄文, 邓启云. 水稻高产育种与形态改良. 杂交水稻, 2013, 28(3): 1–5Li C, Wu J, Zhuang W, Deng Q Y. Research progress in rice breeding for high yield through improvement of plant type. Hybrid Rice, 2013, 28(3): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)[4]黄艳玲, 石英尧, 申广勒, 石扬娟, 王维刚, 陈多璞. 水稻茎秆性状与抗倒伏及产量因子的关系. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(4): 203–206Huang Y L, Shi Y Y, Shen G L, Shi Y J, Wang W G, Chen D P. Study on the relationship between rice lodging resistance and culm traits & the yield factors. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2008, 24(4): 203–206 (in Chinese with English abstract)[5]杨艳华, 朱镇, 张亚东, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 周丽慧, 姚姝, 张颖慧, 董少玲, 王才林. 不同水稻品种(系)抗倒伏能力与茎秆形态性状的关系. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27: 231–235 Yang Y H, Zhu Z, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhou L H, Yao Z, Zhang Y H, Dong S L, Wang C L. Relationship between lodging resistance and stem morphological traits in different rice varieties (lines). Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2011, 27: 231–235 (in Chinese with English abstract)[6]李国辉, 钟旭华, 田卡, 黄农荣, 潘俊峰, 何庭蕙. 施氮对水稻茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响及其形态和力学机理. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 1323–1334Li G H, Zhong X H, Tian K, Huang N R, Pan J F, He T H. Effect of nitrogen application on stem lodging resistance of rice and its morphological and mechanical mechanisms. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 1323–1334 (in Chinese with English abstract)[7]申广勒, 石英尧, 黄艳玲, 石扬娟, 王维刚, 张从合, 陈多璞. 水稻抗倒伏特性及其与茎秆性状的相关性研究. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(12): 58–62Shen G L, Shi Y Y, Huang Y L, Shi Y J, Wang W G, Zhang C H, Chen D P. Study on rice lodging resistance character and correlation between the culm traits and lodging resistance traits. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2007, 23(12): 58–62 (in Chinese with English abstract)[8]李红娇, 张喜娟, 李伟娟, 徐正进. 超高产粳稻品种抗倒伏性的初步研究. 北方水稻, 2008, 38(2): 22–27Li H J, Zhang X J, Li W J, Xu Z J. Initial research on lodging resistance in super high-yielding japonica rice cultivars. North Rice, 2008, 38(2): 22–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)[9]李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同种植方式对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 2234–2243Li J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of different planting methods on the culm lodging resistance of super rice. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 2234–2243 (in Chinese with English abstract)[10]董丹, 陈书强, 刘柏林, 王嘉宇, 徐正进. 直立穗型基因对水稻抗倒伏能力的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2009, 31: 202–207Dong D, Chen S Q, Liu B L, Wang J Y, Xu Z J. Effects of erect panicle gene on lodging resistance of rice. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2009, 31: 202–207 (in Chinese with English abstract)[11]李红娇, 张喜娟, 李伟娟, 徐正进, 徐海. 不同穗型粳稻品种抗倒伏性的比较. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23: 191–196Li H J, Zhang X J, Li W J, Xu Z J, Xu H. Lodging resistance in japonica rice varieties with different panicle types. Chin J Rice Sci, 2009, 23: 191–196 (in Chinese with English abstract)[12]张喜娟, 李红娇, 李伟娟, 徐正进, 陈温福, 张文忠, 王嘉宇. 北方直立穗型粳稻抗倒性的研究. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 2305–2313Zhang X J, Li H J, Li W J, Xu Z J, Chen W F, Zhang W Z, Wang J Y. The lodging resistance of erect panicle japonica rice in northern China. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 2305–2313 (in Chinese with English abstract)[13]刘立军, 袁莉民, 王志琴, 徐国伟, 陈云. 旱种水稻倒伏生理原因分析与对策的初步研究. 中国水稻科学, 2002, 16: 225–230Liu L J, Yuan L M, Wang Z Q, Xu G W, Chen Y. Preliminary studies on physiological reason and countermeasure of lodging in dry-cultivated rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2002, 16: 225–230 (in Chinese with English abstract)[14]马荣荣, 许德海, 王晓燕, 禹盛苗, 金千瑜, 欧阳由男, 朱练峰. 籼粳亚种间杂交稻甬优6号超高产株型特征与竞争优势分析. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21: 281–286Ma R R, Xu D H, Wang X Y, Yu S M, Jin Q Y, Ou-Yang Y N, Zhu L F. Heterosis on plant morpholoty of Yongyou6, an indica japonica iner subspecific super high yielding hybrid rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 21: 281–286 (in Chinese with English abstract) [15]姜元华, 张洪程, 韦还和, 赵 可, 许俊伟, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 亚种间杂交稻不同冠层叶形组合产量差异及其形成机理. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 2313–2325 Jiang Y H, Zhang H C, Wei H H, Zhao K, Xu J W, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Difference of yield and its formation mechanism of indica-japonica inter-subspecific hybrid rice with different canopy leaf types. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 2313–2325 (in Chinese with English abstract)[16]胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 龚金龙, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 李德剑, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 刘国林, 陆秀军, 刘国涛, 朱嘉炜. 适宜机插株行距提高不同穗型粳稻产量. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(14): 33–44Hu Y J, Xing Z P, Gong J L, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Li D J, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Liu G L, Lu X J, Liu G T, Zhu J W. Suitable spacing in and between rows of plants by machinery improves yield of different panicle type japonica rices. Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(14): 33–44 (in Chinese with English abstract)[17]朱德峰, 陈惠哲. 水稻机插秧发展与粮食安全. 中国稻米, 2009, (6): 4–7Zhu D F, Chen H Z. The development of mechanical transplanting rice and food security. China Rice, 2009, (6): 4–7 (in Chinese)[18]许圣君. 水稻机插秧技术优势及存在问题与对策. 安徽农学通报, 2011, 17(9): 194–196Xu S J. The technical advantages of mechanical transplanting rice and its existing problems and countermeasures. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 17(9): 194–196 (in Chinese)[19]孙永健, 陈宇, 孙园园, 徐徽, 许远明, 刘树金, 马均. 不同施氮量和栽插密度下三角形强化栽培杂交稻抗倒伏性与群体质量的关系. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26: 189–196Sun Y J, Chen Y, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Xu Y M, Liu S J, Ma J. Relationship between culm lodging resistance and population quality of hybrids under triangle-planted system of rice intensification at different nitrogen application rates and planting densities. Chin J Rice Sci, 2012, 26: 189–196 (in Chinese with English abstract)[20]郭玉华, 朱四光, 张龙步, 都华. 不同栽培条件对水稻茎秆材料学特性的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(1): 4–7Guo Y H, Zhu S G, Zhang L B, Du H. Influence on the material characteristics of rice culms in different cultivation conditions. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2003, 34(1): 4–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)[21]Seko H, Samoto K, Suzuki K. Lodging of rice plant in relation to several different cultural conditions (II). Jpn J Crop Sci, 1959, 27: 173–176 (in Japanese)[22]郭玉华, 朱四光, 张龙步. 不同栽培条件对水稻茎秆生化成分的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(2): 89–91Guo Y H, Zhu S G, Zhang L B. Influence of different cultivation conditions on biochemistry components of rice culms. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2003, 34(2): 89–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)[23]杨世民, 谢力, 郑顺林, 李静, 袁继超. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 93–103Yang S M, Xie L, Zheng S L, Li J, Yuan J C. Effects of nitrogen rate and transplanting density on physical and chemical characteristics and lodging resistance of culms in hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 93–103 (in Chinese with English abstract)[24]石扬娟. 施肥方式和栽插密度对水稻抗倒伏性状影响研究. 安徽农业大学硕士学位论文, 安徽合肥, 2008. p 45Shi Y J. Studies on Traits Correalating to Loding Resistance under the Different Fertilization Manner and Planting Density in Rice. MS Thesis of Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China, 2008. p 45 (in Chinese with English abstract)[25]吴春赞, 叶定池, 林华, 倪日群, 赖联赛, 林辉. 栽插密度对水稻产量及品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(9): 190–191Wu C Z, Ye D C, Lin H, Ni R Q, Lai L S, Lin H. Effects of transplanting density on rice yield and its quality. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2005, 21(9): 190–191 (inChinese with English abstract)[26]朱聪聪, 张洪程, 郭保卫, 曹利强, 江峰, 葛梦婕, 花劲, 宋云生, 周兴涛, 霍中洋, 许轲, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 朱大伟. 钵苗机插密度对不同类型水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 122–133Zhu C C, Zhang H C, Guo B W, Cao L Q, Jiang F, Ge M J, Hua J, Song Y S, Zhou X T, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Zhu D W. Effect of planting density on yield and photosynthate production characteristics in different types of rice with bowl mechanical-transplanting method. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 122–133 (in Chinese with English abstract)[27]艾治勇. 超级杂交稻形态及生理特性与抗倒性关系的研究. 湖南农业大学硕士学位论文, 湖南长沙, 2006. p 20Ai Z Y. Study on Relationship between Morphological and Physiological Traits and Lodging Resistance in Super Hybrid Rice (Oryza satival L.). MAS Thesis of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, 2006. p 20 (in Chinese with English abstract)[28] 张丰转. 粳稻抗倒指标的动态变化及栽培调控研究. 东北农业大学硕士学位论文, 哈尔滨, 2010. pp 24–29Zhang F Z. The Dynamic Changes of Lodging-resistance Index and Its Cultural Control in Japonica. MAS Thesis of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 2010. pp 24–29 (in Chinese with English abstract)[29]凌启鸿, 张洪程, 苏祖芳, 凌励. 稻作新理论——水稻叶龄模式. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994. p 71Ling Q H, Zhang H C, Su Z F, Ling L. New Theory of Rice—The Model of Rice Leaf Age. Beijing: Science Press, 1994. p 71 (in Chinese)[30]林贤青, 王雅芬, 朱德峰, 罗玉坤. 水稻茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物与穗部性状关系的研究. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15: 155–157Lin X Q, Wang Y F, Zhu D F, Luo Y K. The non-structural carbohydrate of the stem and sheath in relation to the panicle characteristics in rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2001, 15: 155–157 (in Chinese with English abstract)[31]刘树金. 栽培地点和密度对不同类型品种水稻形态特征与群体质量影响. 四川农业大学硕士学位论文, 四川雅安, 2010. pp 25–26Liu S J. Effects of Transplanting Location and Density on the Morphological and Population Quality of Different Types of Rice. MS Thesis of Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, China, 2010. pp 25–26 (in Chinese with English abstract)[32]姜元华, 张洪程, 赵可, 许俊伟, 韦还和, 王文婷, 孟天瑶, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 机插条件下籼粳杂交稻茎秆的抗倒性评价及成因分析. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(19): 19–29Jiang Y H, Zhang H C, Zhao K, Xu J W, Wei H H, Wang W T, Meng T Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Evaluation and cause analysis of rice-stem lodging resistance for mechanical transplanted indica-japonica hybrid rice. Trans CSAE, 2014, 30(19): 19–29 (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846. |
| [2] | 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816. |
| [3] | 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486. |
| [4] | 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325. |
| [5] | 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290. |
| [6] | 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560. |
| [7] | 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547. |
| [8] | 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535. |
| [9] | 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372. |
| [10] | 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572. |
| [11] | 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521. |
| [12] | 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500. |
| [13] | 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219. |
| [14] | 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250. |
| [15] | 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180. |
|
||