欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 950-959.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.94121

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

品种和生育时期对冠层光谱指数(NDVI)估测马铃薯植株氮素浓度的影响

杨海波,张加康,杨柳,贾禹泽,刘楠,李斐()   

  1. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院 / 内蒙古自治区土壤质量与养分资源重点实验室, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010018
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-17 接受日期:2019-12-26 出版日期:2020-06-12 网络出版日期:2020-01-14
  • 通讯作者: 李斐
  • 作者简介:E-mail: hbyang93@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    2018年内蒙古自治区高等学校“青年科技英才支持计划”(NJYT-18-A08);国家自然科学基金项目(41361079)

Effect of variety and growth period on NDVI estimation of nitrogen concentration in potato plants

YANG Hai-Bo,ZHANG Jia-Kang,YANG Liu,JIA Yu-Ze, ,LI Fei()   

  1. Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Soil Quality and Nutrient Resource / College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2019-08-17 Accepted:2019-12-26 Published:2020-06-12 Published online:2020-01-14
  • Contact: Fei LI
  • Supported by:
    “Youth Science and Technology Talents Support Program” (NJYT-18-A08) of Colleges and Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2018(NJYT-18-A08);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41361079)

RichHTML

13

PDF

1099

摘要：

NDVI是反映作物叶绿素相对含量及氮素水平的重要参数, 但是作物品种和生育时期的变化对NDVI估测氮素营养的能力有重要影响。本研究在内蒙古阴山北麓马铃薯主产区进行了多年多品种田间试验, 于2014—2016年7月上旬至8月中旬马铃薯关键生育时期, 利用便携式主动作物传感器GreenSeeker获取马铃薯冠层光谱指数NDVI, 对比了品种和生育时期对NDVI估测结果的影响。结果表明, 块茎形成期NDVI与马铃薯植株氮素浓度相关性较差, 随着生育时期的推进, NDVI与植株氮素浓度的线性相关性增强, 块茎膨大期与淀粉积累期组合会显著提高NDVI与植株氮素浓度的线性建模效果。品种混合会降低NDVI的灵敏性, 增加数据的离散性, 基于时间序列归一化的光谱指数TNDVI能够克服这些问题, 尤其是在块茎膨大期TNDVI与植株氮素浓度的拟合决定系数(R 2)能够由原来的0.13提高到0.47。TNDVI对块茎形成期、块茎膨大期和淀粉积累期组合的线性估测建模R 2为0.76, 显著高于NDVI。株型展开型的品种在块茎膨大期和淀粉积累期更具线性拟合趋势。研究表明, 马铃薯生育时期和品种对NDVI估测植株氮素浓度有显著影响, 且生育时期的影响更大。构建的TNDVI光谱指数能够克服品种差异导致的块茎膨大期、淀粉积累期数据分异及饱和现象, 为NDVI在马铃薯植株氮素浓度诊断应用的普适性上提供了理论依据与方法。

关键词: 马铃薯, 品种, 生育时期, 主动作物传感器, 归一化光谱指数, 植株氮素浓度

Abstract:

The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) is an important parameter to reflect relative chlorophyll content and nitrogen level of crops, but NDVI’s ability to estimate nitrogen nutrition is affected by varieties and growth period. The field experiments using several varieties were conducted in the main potato producing areas at the north foot of Yinshan mountain, Inner Mongolia. From early July to mid-august in 2014 to 2016, the canopy spectral index NDVI was measured by using the pocket active crop sensor GreenSeeker during potato critical growth period. The effects of cultivars and growth stages on NDVI estimation of nitrogen concentration in potato plants were compared. The linear correlation between NDVI and plant nitrogen concentration (PNC) was poor in tuber initiation, but increased in process of growth period. The combination of tuber bulking period and starch accumulation period significantly improved the linear modeling effect of NDVI and PNC. Variety combination reduced the sensitivity of NDVI and increased the discreteness of data, which could be offset by NDVI time series normalization (TNDVI), especially the fitting coefficient of determination (R 2) of TNDVI and PNC increased from 0.13 to 0.47 in the tuber bulking period. The R 2of linear estimation model of TNDVI for the combination of tuber initiation, tuber bulking and starch accumulation period was 0.76, which was significantly higher than that of NDVI. Plant-expanded varieties had a more linear fitting trend during tuber bulking and starch accumulation. The growth period and potato varieties had significant effects on NDVI estimation of PNC, and growth period had a greater effect. The established TNDVI spectral index overcame the data differentiation and saturation phenomenon during tuber bulking and starch accumulation caused by variety difference, which provides a theoretical basis and method for the application of NDVI in the diagnosis of nitrogen concentration in potato plants.

Key words: potato, varieties, growth stage, active crop sensor, NDVI, PNC

图1

试验地位置及试验小区分布 T1~T7分别代表由低到高的氮肥用量处理; a、b、c、d为4次重复。"

表1

NDVI与马铃薯植株氮素浓度的相关性(R2)"

时间
Year		 品种
Species		 函数类型
Function types		 块茎形成期
Tuber
initiation (A)		 块茎膨大期
Tuber
bulking (B)		 淀粉积累期
Starch
accumulation (C)		 A+B B+C A+B+C
2014 克新1号
Kexin 1		 线性函数 LF 0.04 0.83** 0.44** 0.38** 0.52** 0.52**
二次函数 QF 0.09 0.87** 0.44** 0.48** 0.52** 0.59**
幂函数 PF 0.04 0.85** 0.44** 0.45** 0.52** 0.55**
指数函数 EF 0.04 0.83** 0.44** 0.38** 0.52** 0.52**
2015 夏坡蒂Xiapodi 线性函数 LF 0.04 0.37** 0.36** 0.04 0.85** 0.52**
二次函数 QF 0.05 0.48** 0.40** 0.10 0.85** 0.67**
幂函数 PF 0.04 0.41** 0.35** 0.03 0.83** 0.58**
指数函数 EF 0.04 0.38** 0.35** 0.04 0.85** 0.53**
2016 荷兰14号
Holland 14		 线性函数 LF 0.07 0.44** 0.52** 0.01 0.72** 0.52**
二次函数 QF 0.08 0.56** 0.64** 0.15 0.76** 0.74**
幂函数 PF 0.07 0.45** 0.55** 0.01 0.74** 0.58**
指数函数 EF 0.08 0.44** 0.52** 0.01 0.72** 0.52**
全部All 线性函数 LF 0.03 0.07* 0.50** 0 0.48** 0.28**
二次函数 QF 0.06 0.13* 0.57** 0 0.58** 0.42**
幂函数 PF 0.03 0.08* 0.52** 0 0.50** 0.32**
指数函数 EF 0.03 0.07* 0.49** 0 0.48** 0.28**

图2

马铃薯块茎形成期、块茎膨大期、淀粉积累期NDVI与植株氮素浓度的估测模型"

图3

马铃薯组合生育时期NDVI与植株氮素浓度的估测模型 A, B和C分别代表马铃薯块茎形成期、块茎膨大期和淀粉积累期。"

图4

马铃薯品种混合条件下NDVI和植株氮素浓度估测模型的构建 A, B和C分别代表马铃薯块茎形成期、块茎膨大期和淀粉积累期。"

图5

品种混合时马铃薯块茎膨大期和淀粉积累期TNDVI与植株氮素浓度估测模型的构建"

图6

品种混合时马铃薯组合生育时期TNDVI与植株氮素浓度估测模型的构建"

图7

NDVI和TNDVI估测建模的敏感性分析 A、B、C分别代表块茎形成期、块茎膨大期和淀粉积累期。"

[1] 张晗, 赵小敏, 郭熙, 张佳佳, 叶春, 叶英聪, 李小毛 . 基于冠层高光谱信息的水稻生长监测应用研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(12):1-9.
Zhang H, Zhao X M, Guo X, Zhang J J, Ye C, Ye Y C, Li X M . Advances in application of rice growth monitoring based on canopy layer spectral information, Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2018,46(12):1-9 (in Chinese).
[2] 张卫峰, 马林, 黄高强, 武良, 陈新平, 张福锁 . 中国氮肥发展贡献和挑战. 中国农业科学, 2013,46:3161-3171.
Zhang W F, Ma L, Huang G Q, Wu L, Chen X P, Zhang F S . The development and contribution of nitrogenous fertilizer in China and challenges faced by the country. Sci Agric Sin, 2013,46:3161-3171 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 魏全全, 李岚涛, 任涛, 王振, 王少华, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍 . 基于数字图像技术的冬油菜氮素营养诊断. 中国农业科学, 2015,48:3877-3886.
Wei Q Q, Li F T, Ren T, Wang Z, Wang S H, Li X K, Lu J W . Diagnosing nitrogen nutrition status of winter rapeseed via digital Image processing technique. Sci Agric Sin, 2015,48:3877-3886 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Nigon T J, Mulla D J, Rosen C J, Cohen Y, Alchanatis V, Rud R . Evaluation of the nitrogen sufficiency index for use with high resolution, broadband aerial imagery in a commercial potato field. Precision Agric, 2014,15:202-226.
doi: 10.1007/s11119-013-9333-6
[5] Wei W, Xia Y, Tian Y C, Liu X J, Jun N I, Cao W X, Yan Z H . Common spectral bands and optimum vegetation indices for monitoring leaf nitrogen accumulation in rice and wheat. J Integr Agric, 2012,11:2001-2012.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60457-2
[6] 卢艳丽, 白由路, 杨俐苹, 王磊 . N利用GreenSeeker法诊断春玉米氮素营养状况的研究. 玉米科学, 2008,16(1):111-115.
Lu Y L, Bai Y L, Yang L P, Wang L . Diagnos is on nitrogen status using GreenSeeker in spring maize. J Maize Sci, 2008,16(1):111-115 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 郭建华, 王秀, 孟志军, 赵春江, 宇振荣, 陈立平 . 主动遥感光谱仪 Greenseeker与 SPAD 对玉米氮素营养诊断的研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,14(1):43-47.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0107
Guo J H, Wang X, Meng Z J, Zhao C J, Yu Z R, Chen L P . Study on diagnosing nitrogen nutrition status of corn using GreenSeeker and SPAD meter. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2008,14(1):43-47 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0107
[8] 张俊华, 张佳宝, 李立平 . 基于冬小麦植被指数的氮肥调控技术研究. 土壤学报, 2007,44:550-555.
Zhang J H, Zhang J B, Li L P . Nitrogen regulation technology based on canopy spectral property of winter wheat. Acta Pedol Sin, 2007,44:550-555 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] Raun W R, Solie J B, Johnson G V, Stone M L, Lukina E V, Thomason W E, Schepers J S . In-season prediction of potential grain yield in winter wheat using canopy reflectance. Agron J, 2001,93:131-138.
[10] Franzen D W. Nitrogen management in sugar beet using remote sensing and GIS. In: Francis J P, David C, eds. GIS Applications in Agriculture. New York: Taylor and Francis Group, 2007. pp 35-39.
[11] Li F, Gnyp M L, Jia L L, Miao Y X, Yu Z H, Koppe W, Chen X P, Zhang F S . Estimating N status of winter wheat using a handheld spectrometer in the North China Plain. Field Crops Res, 2008,106:77-85.
[12] Gnyp M L, Miao Y X, Yuan F, Ustin S L, Yu K, Yao Y K, Bareth G . Hyperspectral canopy sensing ofpaddy rice aboveground biomass at different growth stages. Field Crops Res, 2014,155:42-55.
[13] Xia T T, Miao Y X, Wu D L, Shao H . Active optical sensing of spring maize for in-season diagnosis of nitrogen status based on nitrogen nutrition index. Remote Sensing, 2016,8:605.
doi: 10.3390/rs8070605
[14] Yao Y K, Miao Y X, Cao Q, Wang H Y . In-season estimation of rice nitrogen status with an active crop canopy sensor. IEEE J Selected Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sensing, 2014,7:4403-4413.
[15] 于静, 李斐, 秦永林, 樊明寿 . 应用主动作物冠层传感器对马铃薯氮素营养诊断. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2013,33:3092-3097.
Yu J, Li F, Qin Y L, Fan M S . Active crop canopy sensor-based nitrogen diagnosis for potato. Spectroscopy Spectral Anal, 2013,33:3092-3097 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 高兴, 李斐, 杨海波, 黄绍福, 张加康, 苗杰, 黄伟杰 . 基于红边位置的马铃薯植株氮浓度估测方法研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25:296-310.
Gao X, Li F, Yang H B, Huang S F, Zhang J K, Miao J, Huang W J . Appropriate calculation method for the use of red edge position to estimate potato nitrogen concentration. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2019,25:296-310 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Wang W, Yao X, Yao X F, Tian Y C, Liu X J, Ni J, Cao W X, Zhu Y . Estimating leaf nitrogen concentration with three-band vegetation indices in rice and wheat. Field Crops Res, 2012,129:90-98.
[18] Mistele B, Schmidhalter U . Spectral measurements of the total aerial N and biomass dry weight in maize using a quadrilateral-view optic. Field Crops Res, 2008,106:94-103.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.11.002
[19] 杨贵军, 邢著荣, 黄文江, 齐腊, 李伟国 . 不同株型冬小麦冠层结构特征多时相分析. 农业工程学报, 2010,26(7):227-234.
Yang G J, Xing Z R, Huang W J, Qi L, Li W G . Analysis of winter canopy structure for different plant types of growth period. Trans CSAE, 2010,26(7):227-234 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Raun W R, Solie J B, Johnson G V, Stone M L, Lukina E V, Thomason W E, Schepers J S . In-season prediction of potential grain yield in winter wheat using canopy reflectance. Agron J, 2001,93:131-138.
[21] Sharma L K, Franzen D W . Use of corn height to improve the relationship between active optical sensor readings and yield estimates. Precision Agric, 2014,15:331-345.
[22] Walsh O S, Klatt A R, Solie J B, Godsey C B, Raun W R . Use of soil moisture data for refined GreenSeeker sensor based on nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Precision Agric, 2013,14:343-356.
doi: 10.1007/s11119-012-9299-9
[23] Viña A, Gitelson A A, Nguy-Robertson A L, Peng Y, . Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops. Remote Sensing Environ, 2011,115:3468-3478.
[24] 任建强, 陈仲新, 周清波, 唐华俊 . 基于叶面积指数反演的区域冬小麦单产遥感估测. 应用生态学报, 2010,21:2883-2888.
Ren J Q, Chen Z X, Zhou Q B, Tang J H . LAI-based regional winter wheat yield estimation by remote sensing. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010,21:2883-2888 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 陈国欢, 张锐, 李艳迪, 赵佳琪, 任湧涛, 张天赐, 郭华春, 李俊, 杨芳. 外源硒叶面喷施对浅紫色马铃薯块茎花青素合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1876-1890.
[2] 王文辕, 燕雪嘉, 刘玉霖, 孙晓彤, 李亚楠, 唐鑫华, 石瑛. 耐弱光马铃薯品种筛选及转录因子编码基因StPIF3的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1631-1645.
[3] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[4] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[5] 田立涛, 丁宁, 王树林, 齐恩芳, 张荣, 王蕊蕊, 马利雯, 李建武, 杨江伟. 马铃薯Argonaute基因家族鉴定及晚疫病诱导表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1116-1126.
[6] 汪玲, 胡好, 宋家凤, 程洁蓝, 陈颖, 郑婷婷, 吕钊彦, 朱晓彪, 侯华兰. 马铃薯UDP-糖基转移酶基因StUGT52的克隆及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 665-676.
[7] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[8] 张宇, 刘芳, 蔡诚诚, 杨小华, 吉阿么石扎, 杨元军, 王西瑶. 溴乙烷与赤霉素协同处理破除马铃薯块茎休眠的机理初探[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 825-838.
[9] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[10] 徐强, 谢奎忠, 胡新元, 岳云, 董博, 罗爱花. 连作对马铃薯根际土壤线虫群落结构与功能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 527-538.
[11] 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420.
[12] 亓青松, 牛翔雨, 刘冰可, 康禄, 王琛, 封德顺. 小偃麦辐射诱变种质芽期和苗期耐盐鉴定、筛选及耐盐指标评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 389-404.
[13] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[14] 姬炫彤, 卞春松, 金黎平, 李森, 秦军红, 李广存. 不同耐旱型马铃薯根际微生物对干旱的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 165-177.
[15] 田甲春, 葛霞, 李守强, 李梅, 田世龙, 张亚倩, 程建新, 李玉梅. 低O2高CO2贮藏环境延缓马铃薯块茎衰老的作用机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 262-278.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2