欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (02): 341-343.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00341

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘薯近缘野生种Ipomoea trifida(4x) GISH分析

向素琼;汪卫星;李晓林;陈瑶;郭启高;何桥;梁国鲁*   

  1. 西南大学园艺园林学院, 重庆北碚400716

  • 收稿日期:2007-06-19 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-02-12 网络出版日期:2008-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 梁国鲁

GISH Analysis of Sweet Potato Wild Relative Ipomoea trifida (4x)

XIANG Su-Qiong,WANG Wei-Xing,LI Xiao-Lin,CHEN Yao,GUO Qi-Gao,HE Qiao,LIANG Guo Lu*   

  1. Horticulture and Landscape College, Southwest University, Beibei 400716, Chongqing, China

  • Received:2007-06-19 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-02-12 Published online:2008-02-12
  • Contact: LIANG Guo Lu

摘要:

以甘薯近缘野生种I. trifida (2x)为探针, 与I. trifida (4x) 2个株系“695104”和“697288”的体细胞染色体进行基因组荧光原位杂交, 结果显示, 2株系都与I. trifida (2x)有很近的亲缘关系, 但2株系的信号存在差异。“695104”几乎所有染色体整条都有均匀明亮的信号, 应为I. trifida (2x)基因组直接加倍而来;而 “697288”与“695104”不同, 虽然各条染色体也均有杂交信号, 但信号的区域与亮度有差异, 较为复杂, 可分为三种情况。第1种是整条染色体有均匀明亮的信号, 亮度与分布区域同“695104” , 有41条;第2种是几乎整条染色体有信号, 但亮度较第一种暗, 有14条;第3种为染色体部分区域有信号, 亮度较前二者更暗, 有5条。推测 “697288”是在加倍同时或之后又发生了基因组重组与部分变异。

关键词:

甘薯, 近缘野生种, 基因组原位杂交(GISH)

Abstract:

Using genomic DNA of I. trifida (2x) as probe, I. trifida (4x) lines 695104 and 697288 were analyzed with genome in situ hybridization (GISH). The results showed that the two liness were very closely related to I. trifida (2x) based on hybridization signals. Bright and even hybridization signals were observed on all chromosomes of 695104, showing that I. trifida (4x) 695104 should be from doubling of I. trifida (2x) chromosome set. Hybridization signals of 697288 differed from those of 695104 in brightness and region size. It displayed there types: the first was that 41 chromosomes appeared bright and even signals on whole chromosomal; the second was that 14 chromosomes presented even signals almost on whole chromosome but weaker than the first; the third was that 5 chromosomes displayed more weaker signals than those of both the first and the second. Therefore 697288 might derived from I. trifida (2x), but through recombination and variation.

Key words: Sweet potato, Ipomoea trifida, Genome in situ hybridization (GISH)

[1] 赵美丞, 刁现民. 谷子近缘野生种的亲缘关系及其利用研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 267-279.
[2] 张海燕,段文学,解备涛,董顺旭,汪宝卿,史春余,张立明. 不同时期干旱胁迫对甘薯内源激素的影响及其与块根产量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(01): 126-136.
[3] 唐道彬,安建刚,丁祎,白慧,张凯,吕长文,傅体华,王季春. 甘薯块根硬度与干物质含量的相关性[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(08): 1234-1244.
[4] 汪顺义,李欢,刘庆,史衍玺*. 施钾对甘薯根系生长和产量的影响及其生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(07): 1057-1066.
[5] 石璇,王茹媛,唐君,李宗芸,罗永海. 利用简化基因组技术分析甘薯种间单核苷酸多态性[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(05): 641-647.
[6] 王翠娟,史春余,刘娜,刘双荣,余新地. 结薯数差异显著的甘薯品种生长前期根系特性及根叶糖组分比较[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(01): 131-140.
[7] 宁运旺,马洪波,张辉,汪吉东,许仙菊,张永春*. 甘薯源库关系建立、发展和平衡对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(03): 432-439.
[8] 柳洪鹃,史春余,柴沙沙. 不同产量水平甘薯品种光合产物分配差异及其原因[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(03): 440-447.
[9] 王翠娟,史春余,王振振,柴沙沙,柳洪鹃,史衍玺. 覆膜栽培对甘薯幼根生长发育、块根形成及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(09): 1677-1685.
[10] 唐忠厚,张允刚,魏猛,陈晓光,史新敏,张爱君,李洪民,丁艳锋. 耐低钾和钾高效型甘薯品种(系)的筛选及评价指标[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(03): 542-549.
[11] 孙健, 岳瑞雪, 钮福祥, 徐飞, 朱红. 淀粉型甘薯品种直链淀粉含量、糊化特性和乙醇发酵特性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(03): 479-486.
[12] 柳洪鹃, 李作梅, 史春余, 张立明. 腐植酸提高食用型甘薯块根可溶性糖含量的生理基础[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(04): 711-716.
[13] 李爱贤,刘庆昌,王庆美,张立明,翟红,刘树震. 利用SRAP标记构建甘薯分子连锁图谱[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(08): 1286-1295.
[14] 陈观水,周以飞,林生,张铮,潘大仁. 甘薯IbNPR1全长cDNA序列的分离与表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(12): 2218-2224.
[15] 陆漱韵;李太元. 甘薯组(Batatas Section)种间、种内交配不亲和特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 1992, 18(03): 161-168.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!