作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (03): 432-439.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00432
宁运旺,马洪波,张辉,汪吉东,许仙菊,张永春*
NING Yun-Wang,MA Hong-Bo,ZHANG Hui,WANG Ji-Dong,XU Xian-Ju,ZHANG Yong-Chun*
摘要:
以盆栽、田间微区和田间裂区试验分析不同氮肥用量对苏薯16(半直立株型)和苏薯11(匍匐株型)生长前期(0~30 d)、中期(30~60 d)和后期(60~120 d)根系形态、单株薯数、叶面积指数、茎叶生物量、根生物量和T/R值的影响。结果表明,在全生育期内,施氮对甘薯茎叶生长均有显著促进作用,但对根生长的影响各不相同。生长前期,低量施氮对根系生长和分化有促进作用,而适量和高量施氮则表现显著抑制作用,并使30 d时单株薯数显著降低29.3%~36.6%或1.3~2.0个(P<0.05),但同一甘薯品种、不同施氮处理的单株薯数在生长中期之后又趋于一致。生长中期,适量和过量施氮可显著促进源库规模的发展,并使甘薯茎叶生物量增加量分别显著提高35.5%~48.9%和73.4%~79.8%(P<0.05),叶面积指数迅速达到4左右,而对根生物量增加量无显著影响(P>0.05)。生长后期,施氮过多时(N32处理)茎叶鲜重持续增加,到收获时叶面积指数和蔓薯比分别达4.9~5.6和1.50~1.51,显著高于适量施氮处理时的3.3~3.5和0.58~0.64(P<0.05);施氮过少时(N30处理)则反之,收获时不施氮处理的叶面积指数和蔓薯比分别为1.6~1.9和0.36~0.42,其中叶面积指数显著低于适量施氮处理(P<0.05);不同施氮处理的单个薯重差异越来越大,适量施氮处理的单个薯重(218~345g)显著高于不施氮(181~262g)和过量施氮处理(160~285 g, P<0.05),所以适量施氮处理的最终单株块根产量(1.02~1.20 kg)也高于不施氮处理(0.88~0.91 kg)和过量施氮处理(0.79~0.87 kg, P<0.05)。表明,移栽前一次性基施氮的条件下,不施或少施氮有利于甘薯生长前期源库关系的提早建立,适量或过量施氮有利于甘薯生长中期源库关系的发展,而仅有适量施氮有利于维持甘薯生长后期的源库平衡。
| [1]Hai M R, Kubota F. The effects of drought stress and leaf ageing on leaf photosynthesis and electron transport in photosystem 2 in sweet potato(Ipomoea batatas Lam.) cultivars.Photosynthetica, 2003, 41: 253–258[2]李明, 傅玉凡, 王大一, 蒲志刚, 吴洁, 谭文芳. 不同肉色甘薯交互嫁接后块根干物质积累研究. 西南农业学报, 2010, 23: 1418–1423 Li M, Fu Y F, Wang D Y, Pu Z G, Wu J, Tan W F. Accumulation of dry matter in sweetpotato storage roots after reciprocal grafts among five varieties with different fresh color. Sourthwest China J AgricSci, 2010, 23: 1418–1423 (in Chinese with English abstract)[3]江苏省农业科学院, 山东省农业科学院. 中国甘薯栽培学. 上海科学技术出版社, 1982, pp 47–49Jiangsu and Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science.Sweet Potato Cultivation in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 1982, pp 47–49(in Chinese) [4]Kim S H, Mizuno K, Sawada S, Fujimura T. Regulation of tuber formation and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) by nitrate. Plant Growth Regulation, 2002, 37: 207–213[5]张庆会, 徐步东. 试论甘薯块根的生长机理. 生物学通报, 2002, 37(8):22–23 Zhang Q H, Xu B D. Discussion on the mechanism of sweetpotato tuber growth. Chin Bull Bot, 2002, 37(8):22–23(in Chinese)[6]Firon N, LaBonte D, Villordon A, McGregor C, Kfir Y, Pressman E. The Sweetpotato. Chapter 3 Botany and Physiology: Storage Root Formation and Development. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009,pp13–26[7]戴明宏, 赵久然, 杨国航, 王荣焕, 陈国平. 不同生态区和不同品种玉米的源库关系及碳氮代谢. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 1585–1595 Dai M H, Zhao J R, Yang G H, Wang R H, Chen G P. Source-sink relationship and carbon-nitrogen metabolism of maize in different ecological regions and varieties. SciAgric Sin, 2011, 44: 1585–1595(in Chinese with English abstract)[8]易镇邪, 王璞, 张红芳, 申丽霞, 刘明, 戴明宏. 氮肥类型与施用量对华北平原夏玉米源库关系的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12: 294–300 Yi Z X, Wang P, Zhang H F, Shen L X, Liu M, Dai M H. Effects of type and application rate of nitrogen fertilizer on source-sink relationship in summer maize in North China Plain. Plant NutrFertSci, 2006, 12: 294–300(in Chinese with English abstract)[9]吉春容, 赵琳, 李世清, 李生秀. 施氮和栽培模式对半湿润农田生态系统冬小麦源特征的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(11): 53–59Ji C R, Zhao L, Li S Q, Li S X. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and planting modes on the source characteristic of winter wheat in sub-humid farmland ecosystem. J Northwest A&F Univ(Nat SciEdit), 2007, 35(11): 53–59(in Chinese with English abstract)[10]莫钊文, 李武, 段美洋, 潘圣刚, 田华, 唐湘如. 减氮对华南早晚兼用型水稻源库特性的影响及其机理. 华北农学报, 2013, 28(5): 206–212Mo Z W, Li W, Duan M Y, Pan S G, Tian H, Tang X R. Effects of reduced nitrogen fertilizer on source and sink characteristics of early/late season rice in Sourth China and their mechanism.ActaAgricBoreali-Sin, 2013, 28: 206–212 (in Chinese with English abstract) [11]冯跃华, 潘剑, 何腾兵, 刘应春, 王尚有, 赵福胜, 田晋文, 潘兴书, 范乐乐. 不同施氮水平对超级稻源库特性的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(15): 252–256Feng Y H, Pan J, He T B, Liu Y C, Wang S Y, Zhao F S, Tian J W, Pan X S, Fan L L. Effect of different fertilizer-N application rate on source-sink characteristics of super hybrid rice.ChinAgricSci Bull, 2010, 26: 252–256 (in Chinese with English abstract)[12]中谷诚. 甘薯块根的库容:I. 库容的发展对源活力的影响.国外农学: 杂粮作物, 1989, (6):10–14Zhong G C. Sink capacity of sweetpotato storage roots:I. Effect of development of sink capacity on source potential. Foreign Agric: Coarse Cereal Crops, 1989, (6):10–14 (in Chinese)[13]Li L, Chao C H. Variation of sweet potatoes with respect to source potentials and sink capacities.Euphytica, 1990, 47: 131–138[14]Hahn S K. A quantitative approach to source potentials and sink capacities among reciprocal grafts of sweet potato varieties.Crop Sci, 1977, 17:559–562[15]泽畑秀. 关于甘薯块根膨大特性的研究: II.养分供给量对块根膨大的影响. 国外农学: 杂粮作物, 1990, (5): 21–24Ze T X. Studies on characteristic of tuber enlargement in sweet potato:II: Effects of nutrient supply on tuber enlargement of sweetpotato. Foreign Agric: Coarse Cereal Crops, 1990, (5): 21–24(in Chinese)[16]谢一芝, 邱瑞镰, 林长平. 施肥对苏薯2号物质生产及其品质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 1989, (7):7–9Xie Y Z, Qiu R L, Lin C P. Effects of fertilization on production and quality of sweetpotato Su2. J Jiangsu AgricSci, 1989, (7):7–9(in Chinese)[17]王留梅, 毛守民, 潘明华, 周利霞. 甘薯叶面积系数田间速方法初探. 中国农学通报, 2001, 17(6): 82Wang L M, Mao S M, Pan M H, Zhou L X. Field rapid determination of leaf area index of sweet potato. Chin AgricSciBull, 2001, 17(6): 82(in Chinese)[18]王庆美, 张立明, 王振林. 甘薯内源激素变化与块根形成膨大的关系. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38: 2414–2420Wang Q M, Zhang L M, Wang Z L. Formation and thickening of tuberous roots in relation to the endogenous hormone concentrations in sweetpotato. SciAgricSin, 2005, 38: 2414–2420(in Chinese with English abstract)[19]宁运旺, 马洪波, 许仙菊, 汪吉东, 张辉, 许建平, 陈杰, 张永春. 氮磷钾缺乏对甘薯前期生长和养分吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 486–495Ning Y W, Ma H B, Xu X J, Wang J D, Zhang H, Xu J P, Chen J, Zhang Y C. Effects of Deficiency of N, P, or K on Growth traits and nutrient uptakes of sweetpotato in early growing stage.SciAgric Sin, 2013, 46: 486–495(in Chinese with English abstract)[20]Wilson LA. Stimulation of adventitious bud production in detached sweet potatoleaves by high nitrogen supply.Euphytica. 1973,22:324–326[21]陈晓光, 李洪民, 张爱君, 史新敏, 唐忠厚, 魏猛, 史春余. 不同氮水平下多效对食用型甘薯光合和淀粉积累的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 1728–1733Chen X G, Li H M, Zhang A J, Shi X M, Tang Z H, Wei M, Shi C Y. Effect of paclobutrazol under different N-application rates on photosynthesis and starch accumulation in edible sweet potato.ActaAgron Sin, 2012, 38: 1728–1733(in Chinese with English abstract)[22]陈晓光, 史春余, 李洪民, 张爱君, 史新敏. 氮肥和多效矬对甘薯叶片生理功能和产量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2013, 22(2): 71–75Chen X G, Shi C Y, Li H M, Zhang A J, Shi X M.Effect of PP333 and N fertilizer on yield and physiological function of sweet potato leaves.ActaAgricBoreali-occident Sin, 2013, 22(2): 71–75(in Chinese with English abstract)[23]Osaki M, Ueda H, Shinano T, Matsui H, Tadano T. Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen compounds in sweet potato plants grown under different nitrogen application rates. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1995, 41:547–555[24]Ankumah R O, Khan V, Mwamba K, KpomblekouA. The influence of source and timing of nitrogen fertilizers on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of four sweet potato cultivars. Agric, Ecosyst& Environ, 2003, 100: 201–207[25]Hill W A, Dodo H, Hahn S K, Mulongoy K. Adeyeye S O. Sweet potato root and biomass production with and without nitrogen fertilization. Agron J, 1990, 82: 1120–1122 |
| [1] | 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846. |
| [2] | 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858. |
| [3] | 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801. |
| [4] | 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816. |
| [5] | 陆一楚, 李振影, 买春海, 赵晓蕊, 王利祥. 夜间复合体关键基因AhLUX1正向调控花生结瘤的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1658-1668. |
| [6] | 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471. |
| [7] | 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521. |
| [8] | 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102. |
| [9] | 马海会, 张国平, 杨思存, 王红丽. 不同密度下氮肥运筹对半干旱区青贮玉米碳氮积累与转运特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1193-1207. |
| [10] | 王懿涵, 李富昌, 刘意, 朱国鹏. 甘薯IbOPR2基因启动子克隆及调控因子的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1268-1276. |
| [11] | 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219. |
| [12] | 杨宗桃, 杨婷, 王禹童, 艾静, 李燕烨, 刘家勇, 邓军, 赵勇, 张跃彬. 甘蔗CLC基因家族鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 722-734. |
| [13] | 于永超, 刘明, 靳容, 赵鹏, 张强强, 王静, 朱晓亚, 唐忠厚. 甘薯高氮徒长的生理机制和转录组分析研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 813-824. |
| [14] | 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894. |
| [15] | 刘宁, 樊平, 王成, 陈琪琪, 成庆悦, 铁夏娜, 汤菁莎, 刘彬彬, 谢鸿堃, 王嘉悦, 施园青, 马均. 减氮配施有机肥对机插稻产量形成与氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 866-880. |
|
||