欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (03): 479-486.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00479

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

淀粉型甘薯品种直链淀粉含量、糊化特性和乙醇发酵特性的关系

孙健,岳瑞雪,钮福祥,徐飞,朱红   

  1. 中国农业科学院甘薯研究所 / 江苏徐州甘薯研究中心,江苏徐州, 221121
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-24 修回日期:2011-12-15 出版日期:2012-03-12 网络出版日期:2012-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 钮福祥, E-mail: niufuxiang@sina.com, Tel: 0516-82028151
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金项目(CARS-11-B-20)和徐州市科技计划项目(XJ11B005)资助。

Relationship among Amylose Content, Starch Pasting and Ethanol Fermentation in Sweetpotato Varieties for Starch Use

SUN Jian,YUE Rui-Xue,NIU Fu-Xiang,XU Fei,ZHU Hong   

  1. Institute of Sweetpotato, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Centre of Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221121, China
  • Received:2011-08-24 Revised:2011-12-15 Published:2012-03-12 Published online:2012-01-04
  • Contact: 钮福祥, E-mail: niufuxiang@sina.com, Tel: 0516-82028151

摘要: 15个淀粉型甘薯品种为试验材料,测定其直链淀粉含量、糊化特性和乙醇发酵特性,并分析它们之间的差异和相互关系。结果表明,不同甘薯品种的干物率、淀粉含量和直链淀粉含量(AC)均存在较大差异,相关分析表明,AC与干物率、淀粉含量之间呈极显著正相关;不同品种甘薯的糊化特性之间存在一定差异,但RVA谱特征值之间关系密切;不同甘薯品种的乙醇发酵特性之间也存在较大差异,乙醇含量与发酵强度之间呈极显著正相关。进一步分析表明,AC与RVA各特征值之间相关性不显著,而干物率、淀粉含量与糊化温度(PT)均呈极显著正相关(相关系数分别为r=0.661, P<0.01; r=0.670, P<0.01);AC与乙醇含量、发酵强度之间有显著正相关关系(相关系数分别为r=0.653, P<0.01; r=0.698, P<0.01),但与发酵效率、发酵黏度的相关性不显著;发酵黏度与崩解值(BDV)呈显著负相关(r= –0.563, P<0.05),与消减值(SBV)显著正相关(r=0.639, P<0.05),而乙醇含量、发酵效率和发酵强度与淀粉RVA各特征值之间的相关性均不显著。聚类分析将15个品种分为3大类,第I类品种AC和BDV均较高,第II类品种的AC最高、BDV最低,而第III类品种AC最低、BDV最高。甘薯的AC和BDV可以作为评价甘薯乙醇发酵特性的指标,同时较高AC和BDV值应是燃料乙醇专用甘薯品种的选育方向。

关键词: 甘薯, 直链淀粉, 糊化特性, 乙醇发酵, RVA

Abstract: Fifteen starch-based sweetpotato varieties were used to test amylose contents (AC), starch pasting properties and ethanol fermentation characteristics, and analyze the difference and relationship among them. The results indicated that there were significant differences among dry matter content, starch content and AC of different sweetpotato varieties, and AC was significantly correlated to dry matter content and starch content. Differences presented among pasting properties in different varieties of sweetpotato, and the relationship among RVA eigenvalues was close. There were significant differences among ethanol fermentation characteristics of different sweetpotato varieties, and ethanol content was significantly correlated to fermentative strength. There were no significant correlation between AC and RVA eigenvalues, but pasting temperature (PT) was positively correlated to dry matter content (r=0.661, P<0.01) and starch content (r=0.670, P<0.01). AC was positively correlated to ethanol content (r=0.653, P<0.01) and fermentative strength (r=0.698, P<0.01), but not significantly correlated to fermentation efficiency and fermented mash viscosity. Fermented mash viscosity was negatively correlated to breakdown (BDV) (r= –0.563, P<0.05) and positively correlated to setback (SBV) (r=0.639, P<0.05), but ethanol content, fermentation efficiency and fermentative strength were not significantly correlated to RVA eigenvalues. The cluster analysis showed that 15 varieties were divided into three parts: the first part featured higher AC and BDV, the second part had highest AC and lowest BDV, and the third part had lowest AC and highest BDV. Consequently, AC and BDV could be used as the indexes to evaluate the ethanol fermentation characteristics of sweetpotato, and the sweetpotato with higher AC and BDV was the breeding targets for fuel ethanol.

Key words: Sweetpotato, Amylose, Pasting property Ethanol fermentation, RVA

[1]Ma D F, Li H M, Tang J, Xie Y P, Li Q, Cao Q H, Zhang Y G, Zhang A J. Current status and future prospects of development of sweet potato industry in China. In: Ma D F ed. Sweetpotato in Food and Energy Security. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2010. pp 3–9

[2]Fu Y-F(傅玉凡), Liang Y-Y(梁媛媛), Sun F-N(孙富年), Li M(李明), Leng J-C(冷晋川), Zhang Q-T(张启堂), He P(何平). Variations of starch content in storage roots of sweetpotato during their development. J Southwest Univ (西南大学学报), 2008, 30(4): 56–60 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Huang H-H(黄华宏), Lu G-Q(陆国权), Zheng Y-F(郑遗凡). Variation in root starch gelatinization characteristics during the growth and development of sweetpotato. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 38(3): 462–467 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Yang X-R(杨晓蓉), Li X(李歆), Ling J-Y(凌家煜). Differences among rice categories in pasting characteristics and amylose content. J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc (中国粮油学报), 2001, 16(6): 37–40 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Liu H(刘辉), Zhang M(张敏). Relationships between amylose content and gelatinization characteristics of different varieties of millet. Food Sci (食品科学), 2010, 31(15): 31–33 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Varavinit S, Shobsngob S, Varanyanond W. Effeet of amylose content on gelatinization, retrogradation and pasting properties of flours from different cultivars of thai rice. Starch/Staerke, 2003, 55: 410–415

[7]Zhou X-L(周小理), Xiao W-Y(肖文艳), Zhou Y-M(周一鸣). Study on relationship between pasting properties and amylose content of different buckwheat varieties. Food Sci (食品科学), 2008, 29(11): 37–40 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Wu X, Zhao R, Wang D. Effects of amylose, corn protein, and corn fiber contents on production of ethanol from starch-rich media. Cereal Chem, 2006, 83: 569–575

[9]Zhang Y-G(张允刚), Fang B-P(房伯平). Descriptors and Data Standard for Sweetpotato (甘薯种质资源描述规范和数据标准). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. pp 83–84 (in Chinese)

[10]Kitahara K, Ooi Y, Mizukami S, Suganuma T, Nagahama T. Physicochemical properties of starches from sweet potato cultivars. J Appl Glycosci, 1996, 43: 59–66

[11]Mcleary B V, Solah V, Gibson T S. Quantitative measurement of total starch in cereal flours and products. J Cereal Sci, 1994, 20: 51–58

[12]Standards of Ministry of Agriculture, the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国农业部标准). Measuring Methods of Rice Quality Characteristics (米质测定方法). Beijing: China Standards Press, 1988 (in Chinese)

[13]Tang Z-H(唐忠厚), Li H-M(李洪民), Zhang A-J(张爱君), Shi X-M(史新敏), Sun J(孙健), Zhu H(朱红), Xu F(徐飞). Effects of long-term phosphorus fertilization on quality and starch RVA characters in sweetpotato. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2011, 17(2): 391–396 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Jin Y-L(靳艳玲), Gan M-Z(甘明哲), Zhou L-L(周玲玲), Xue H-L(薛慧玲), Zhang L(张良), Zhao H(赵海). Ethanol production with 4 varieties of sweet potato at different growth stages. Chin J Appl Environ Biol (应用与环境生物学报), 2009, 15(2): 267–270 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Liu Y(刘艳), Zhao H(赵海), Qi T-S(戚天胜), Tang Q-L(唐秋琳), Huang Y-F(黄宇峰). Fast production of ethanol by Zymomonas mobilis (Zy-1). Chin J Appl Environ Biol (应用与环境生物学报), 2007, 13(1): 69–72 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Wang F Z, Shen W, Rao Z M. Construction of a flocculating yeast for fuel ethanol production. Biotechnol Lett, 2008, 30: 97–102

[17]Lu G-Q(陆国权), Tang Z-H(唐忠厚), Huang H-H(黄华宏). Genotype variation in amylose content and starch pasting properties of sweetpotato storage at two K levels. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis (浙江农业学报), 2005, 17(5): 280–283 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Zhang L(张莉), Li Z-X(李志西), Mao J-Y(毛加银). Rheology of chestnut starch paste. Acta Univ Agric Bor-occid (西北农业学报), 2001, 10(3): 90–92 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Cooke D, Gidley M J. Loss of crystalline and molecular order during starch gelatinization origin of the enthalpic transition. Carbohydr Res, 1992, 227: l03–ll2  

[20]Ramesh M, Ali S Z, Bhattacharya K R. Structure of rice starch and itsrelation to cooked-rice texture. Carbohydr Polym, 1999, 38: 337–347

[21]Liang L-S(梁丽松), Xu J(徐娟), Wang G-X(王贵禧), Ma H-L(马惠铃). Relationship between starch pasting, amylose content and starch granule size in different Chinese chestnut variety groups. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(1): 251–260 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Zhang K(张凯), Li X-H(李新华), Zhao Q-C(赵前程), Li N-J(李乃洁), Yang X-L(杨晓丽). Study and comparison on gelatilization characteristics of starches from different msize varieties. J Shenyang Agric Univ (沈阳农业大学学报), 2005, 36(1): 107–109 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Zhang Y-X(张艳霞), Ding Y-F(丁艳锋), Li G-H(李刚华), Wang Q-S(王强盛), Huang P-S(黄丕生), Wang S-H(王绍华). Starch structure and paste property of rice with different amylose content. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(7): 1201–1205 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]Lii C Y, TsaiM L, Tseng K H. Effect of amylose content on the rheological property of rice starch. Cereal Chem, 1996, 73(4): 415–420

[25]Toyokawa H, Rubenthaler G L, Powers J R, Schanus E G. Japanese noodle qualities: II. Starch components. Cereal Chem, 1989, 66(5): 387–391

[26]Hideho M, Sachiko T. Endosperm starch propetties in several wheat cultivars preferred for Japanese noodles. Euphytica, 1994, 72: 171–175

[27]Oda M, Yasuda Y, Okazaki S, Yamauchi Y, Yokoyama Y. A method of flour quality assessment for Japanese noodles. Cereal Chem, 1980, 57: 253–254

[28]Konik C M, Miskelly D M, Gras P W. Starch swelling power, grain hardness and protein: relationship to sensory properties of Japanese noodles. Starch/Staerke, 1993, 45: 139–144

[29]Collado L S, Corke H. Properties of starch noodles as affected by sweetpotato genotype. Cereal Chem, 1997, 74: 182–187

[30]Gao J-H(高锦合), Liang Y-C(梁于朝), Song F-P(宋付平), Li K-M(李开绵). Alcoholic fermentation of cassava of different varieties. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2009, 30(2): 215–218 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[31]Song G-Y(宋高友), Zhang C-S(张纯慎), Su Y-M(苏益民), Liao M-D(廖美丹), Bai C-P(白昌平). Effects of sorghum grain quality on alcohol yield. Liaoning Agric Sci (辽宁农业科学), 1986, (5): 6–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[32]Liimatainen H, Kuokkanen T, Kriinen J. Development of bioethanol production from waste potatoes. In: PongrÀcz E ed. Proceedings of the Waste Minimization and Resources Use Optimization conference. Finland Oulu: Oulu University Press, 2004. pp 123–129

[33]Sun J(孙健), Zhang C-Y(张翠英), Li H-M(李洪民), Zhang A-J(张爱君), Tang Z-H(唐忠厚). Multivariate regression analysis on ethanol yield and quality traits of fresh sweetpotato. J Chin Cereals Oils Assoc (中国粮油学报), 2010, 25(7): 49–53 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王懿涵, 李富昌, 刘意, 朱国鹏. 甘薯IbOPR2基因启动子克隆及调控因子的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1268-1276.
[2] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[3] 于永超, 刘明, 靳容, 赵鹏, 张强强, 王静, 朱晓亚, 唐忠厚. 甘薯高氮徒长的生理机制和转录组分析研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 813-824.
[4] 杨璇, 李健康, 何婉洁, 李友军, 程相涵, 侯文邦. 硒肥对甘薯鲜切后褐变的影响及其机理解析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 578-589.
[5] 张海燕, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 张立明, 段文学. 滴灌条件下不同水溶肥种类和配比对鲜食甘薯产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2485-2500.
[6] 宋改利, 王璐倩, 屈柯飞, 唐建卫, 董纯豪, 黄振朴, 高艳, 牛吉山, 殷贵鸿, 李巧云. Bipolaris sorokiniana黑胚病对中筋小麦淀粉含量、粒度分布与糊化特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2164-2175.
[7] 杨婷婷, 陈娟, ABDUL Rehman, 李婧, 闫素辉, 汪建来, 李文阳. 花后弱光对软质小麦干物质积累转运、籽粒产量和淀粉品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2204-2219.
[8] 王若楠, 张颖星, 于筱菡, 刘少雄, 王跃, 薛亚鹏, 辛旭霞, 张莉, 刘敏轩. 基于近红外快速检测技术的谷子淀粉多样性分析及模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1757-1768.
[9] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[10] 肖正午, 张珂骞, 曹放波, 陈佳娜, 郑华斌, 王慰亲, 黄敏. 糙米粉蒸煮食味品质与糙米淀粉组分含量和糊化特性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1102-1109.
[11] 阳新月, 肖人滈, 张林茜, 唐铭均, 孙光燕, 杜康, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 王季春. 不同生育期涝渍对甘薯抗逆生理特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 744-754.
[12] 霍如雪, 葛祥菡, 石嘉, 李雪蕊, 戴圣杰, 刘振宁, 李宗芸. 甘薯组氨酸激酶蛋白IbHK5响应干旱和盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 650-666.
[13] 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311.
[14] 磨冬枝, 刘芃君, 徐桂娣, 陈泽炀, 谭雪明, 黄英金, 程建峰, 曾研华. 有机无机肥配施对甘薯产量、品质及硒吸收的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3342-3356.
[15] 张顺杰, 吴维泰, 冉禧玥, 赵梓含, 韩永辉, 吴正丹, 张凯. 甘薯β淀粉酶基因IbBAM48829的功能解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3096-3104.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!