ZHANG Wen-Jing;ZHOU Zhi-Guo" /> 两个棉花品种纤维发育关键酶活性变化特征及其与纤维比强度的关系
欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 437-446.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00437

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

两个棉花品种纤维发育关键酶活性变化特征及其与纤维比强度的关系

束红梅;王友华;张文静;周治国*   

  1. 南京农业大学/农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室,江苏南京 210095

  • 收稿日期:2007-06-07 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-12 网络出版日期:2008-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 周治国

Activity Changes for Enzymes Associated with Fiber Development and Relation with Fiber Specific Strength in Two Cotton Cultivars

SHU Hong-Mei,WANG You-Hua,ZHANG Wen-Jing,ZHOU Zhi-Guo*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China

  • Received:2007-06-07 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-03-12 Published online:2008-03-12
  • Contact: ZHOU Zhi-Guo

摘要:

选择棉纤维比强度差异明显的2个品种,研究了棉纤维发育关键酶(蔗糖合成酶和β-1,3-葡聚糖酶)活性的变化特征及其与纤维比强度的关系。结果表明,棉纤维发育过程中蔗糖合酶、β-1,3-葡聚糖酶活性变化特征在生化和mRNA转录水平上均存在明显的差异,影响纤维素的沉积特性及纤维比强度。高强纤维品种(科棉1号,平均比强度为35 cN·tex-1)的蔗糖合酶和β-1,3-葡聚糖酶活性及其基因表达量和维持高表达时间均高于低强纤维品种(德夏棉1号,平均比强度为26 cN·tex-1)。其中,高强纤维品种蔗糖合酶的基因表达量铃龄25 d时明显高于低强纤维品种,而β-1,3-葡聚糖酶的基因表达量则在铃龄10~25 d高于低强纤维品种。在纤维素形成过程中,高强纤维品种的纤维素累积平缓且纤维素累积持续期长于低强纤维品种,品种间差异程度受棉株果枝部位影响。在棉纤维发育过程中,Expansin、β-1,4-葡聚糖酶的基因表达量随铃龄的增加呈下降趋势(铃龄20 d时表达量显著下降),这与棉纤维形成过程(铃龄25 d前伸长较快,随后趋于停止)一致,且高强纤维品种维持高表达时间长与其纤维伸长期较长相吻合。

关键词: 棉花品种, 酶活性, 基因表达, 纤维素累积, 纤维比强度

Abstract:

Fiber strength is one of the important criterions of cotton quality, and many complex physiological and biochemical processes are involved in fiber formation. To detect the relationship enzyme activities in cotton fiber development with fiber specific strength, two cotton cultivars (Kemian 1 which is a cultivar with high strength fiber, average fiber specific strength is 35 cN·tex-1; Dexiamian 1 which is a cultivar with low strength fiber, average fiber specific strength is 26 cN·tex-1.) were used to investigate the characteristics of sucrose synthase (SuSy) and β-1,3-glucanase which play very important roles in developing cotton fiber, and dynamic changes of the related gene (sucrose synthase, β-1,3-glucanase, β-1,4-glucanase, Expansin) expression. The results showed that there were differences between the two cultivars in variations of the cellulose deposition and fiber specific strength which was related with the changes of key enzyme activities and the gene expression levels. The activity and gene expression of sucrose synthase and β-1,3-glucanase were higher in Kemian 1 than in Dexiamian 1. High concentration and high gene expression of SuSy and β-1,3-glucanase in cotton fiber resulted in a long period and tempered cellulose accumulation and high strength fiber formation. Dexiamian 1 had low activities of the key enzymes and low expression levels which led to a short and rapid cellulose accumulation duration and low strength fiber. From results above, we suggest that the different characteristics of key enzymes activity (sucrose synthase and β-1,3-glucanase ) in fiber of different cotton cultivars may cause the differences in the cellulose accumulation and fiber strength.

Key words:

Enzyme activity, Gene expression, Cellulose accumulation, Fiber strength

[1] 李海芬, 魏浩, 温世杰, 鲁清, 刘浩, 李少雄, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 梁炫强. 花生电压依赖性阴离子通道基因(AhVDAC)的克隆及在果针向地性反应中表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1558-1565.
[2] 姚晓华, 王越, 姚有华, 安立昆, 王燕, 吴昆仑. 青稞新基因HvMEL1 AGO的克隆和条纹病胁迫下的表达[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1181-1190.
[3] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
[4] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[5] 王艳朋, 凌磊, 张文睿, 王丹, 郭长虹. 小麦B-box基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1437-1449.
[6] 宋天晓, 刘意, 饶莉萍, Soviguidi Deka Reine Judesse, 朱国鹏, 杨新笋. 甘薯细胞壁蔗糖转化酶基因IbCWIN家族成员鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1297-1308.
[7] 解盼, 刘蔚, 康郁, 华玮, 钱论文, 官春云, 何昕. 甘蓝型油菜CBF基因家族的鉴定和表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2394-2406.
[8] 李鹏, 刘彻, 宋皓, 姚盼盼, 苏沛霖, 魏跃伟, 杨永霞, 李青常. 烟草非特异性脂质转移蛋白基因家族的鉴定与分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2184-2198.
[9] 黄素华, 林席跃, 雷正平, 丁在松, 赵明. 强再生力水稻品种碳氮营养与激素生理特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2278-2289.
[10] 米文博, 方园, 刘自刚, 徐春梅, 刘高阳, 邹娅, 徐明霞, 郑国强, 曹小东, 方新玲. 白菜型冬油菜温敏不育系PK3-12S育性转换的差异蛋白质组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1507-1516.
[11] 靳舒荣,王艳玫,常悦,王月华,李加纳,倪郁. 不同收获指数甘蓝型油菜β-淀粉酶活性及其基因家族成员的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1279-1285.
[12] 要凯,赵章平,康益晨,张卫娜,石铭福,杨昕宇,范艳玲,秦舒浩. 沟垄覆膜对连作马铃薯土壤酶活性、理化性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1286-1292.
[13] 赵松超,李一凡,刘博远,赵铭钦. 晾制密度对雪茄烟叶膜脂过氧化作用及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1090-1098.
[14] 王凯,赵小红,姚晓华,姚有华,白羿雄,吴昆仑. 茎秆特性和木质素合成与青稞抗倒伏关系[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 621-627.
[15] 孙凯,刘振,胡恒宇,李耕,刘文涛,杨柳,宁堂原,王彦玲. 有机培肥与轮耕方式对夏玉米田土壤碳氮和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 401-410.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!