ZHANG Wen-Jing;ZHOU Zhi-Guo" /> 两个棉花品种纤维发育关键酶活性变化特征及其与纤维比强度的关系
欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 437-446.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00437

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

两个棉花品种纤维发育关键酶活性变化特征及其与纤维比强度的关系

束红梅;王友华;张文静;周治国*   

  1. 南京农业大学/农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室,江苏南京 210095

  • 收稿日期:2007-06-07 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-12 网络出版日期:2008-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 周治国

Activity Changes for Enzymes Associated with Fiber Development and Relation with Fiber Specific Strength in Two Cotton Cultivars

SHU Hong-Mei,WANG You-Hua,ZHANG Wen-Jing,ZHOU Zhi-Guo*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China

  • Received:2007-06-07 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-03-12 Published online:2008-03-12
  • Contact: ZHOU Zhi-Guo

摘要:

选择棉纤维比强度差异明显的2个品种,研究了棉纤维发育关键酶(蔗糖合成酶和β-1,3-葡聚糖酶)活性的变化特征及其与纤维比强度的关系。结果表明,棉纤维发育过程中蔗糖合酶、β-1,3-葡聚糖酶活性变化特征在生化和mRNA转录水平上均存在明显的差异,影响纤维素的沉积特性及纤维比强度。高强纤维品种(科棉1号,平均比强度为35 cN·tex-1)的蔗糖合酶和β-1,3-葡聚糖酶活性及其基因表达量和维持高表达时间均高于低强纤维品种(德夏棉1号,平均比强度为26 cN·tex-1)。其中,高强纤维品种蔗糖合酶的基因表达量铃龄25 d时明显高于低强纤维品种,而β-1,3-葡聚糖酶的基因表达量则在铃龄10~25 d高于低强纤维品种。在纤维素形成过程中,高强纤维品种的纤维素累积平缓且纤维素累积持续期长于低强纤维品种,品种间差异程度受棉株果枝部位影响。在棉纤维发育过程中,Expansin、β-1,4-葡聚糖酶的基因表达量随铃龄的增加呈下降趋势(铃龄20 d时表达量显著下降),这与棉纤维形成过程(铃龄25 d前伸长较快,随后趋于停止)一致,且高强纤维品种维持高表达时间长与其纤维伸长期较长相吻合。

关键词: 棉花品种, 酶活性, 基因表达, 纤维素累积, 纤维比强度

Abstract:

Fiber strength is one of the important criterions of cotton quality, and many complex physiological and biochemical processes are involved in fiber formation. To detect the relationship enzyme activities in cotton fiber development with fiber specific strength, two cotton cultivars (Kemian 1 which is a cultivar with high strength fiber, average fiber specific strength is 35 cN·tex-1; Dexiamian 1 which is a cultivar with low strength fiber, average fiber specific strength is 26 cN·tex-1.) were used to investigate the characteristics of sucrose synthase (SuSy) and β-1,3-glucanase which play very important roles in developing cotton fiber, and dynamic changes of the related gene (sucrose synthase, β-1,3-glucanase, β-1,4-glucanase, Expansin) expression. The results showed that there were differences between the two cultivars in variations of the cellulose deposition and fiber specific strength which was related with the changes of key enzyme activities and the gene expression levels. The activity and gene expression of sucrose synthase and β-1,3-glucanase were higher in Kemian 1 than in Dexiamian 1. High concentration and high gene expression of SuSy and β-1,3-glucanase in cotton fiber resulted in a long period and tempered cellulose accumulation and high strength fiber formation. Dexiamian 1 had low activities of the key enzymes and low expression levels which led to a short and rapid cellulose accumulation duration and low strength fiber. From results above, we suggest that the different characteristics of key enzymes activity (sucrose synthase and β-1,3-glucanase ) in fiber of different cotton cultivars may cause the differences in the cellulose accumulation and fiber strength.

Key words:

Enzyme activity, Gene expression, Cellulose accumulation, Fiber strength

[1] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[2] 詹戈锐, 余文, 李锋, 武明珠, 徐馨, 罗朝鹏, 巫升鑫, 杨军, 张智强, 王中. 烟草NtWRKY6基因响应ABA表达及其调控多酚合成的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 446-458.
[3] 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261.
[4] 景秀清, 蔡永朵, 邓宁, 赵晓东, 翟飞红, 曾群. 藜麦RopGEF家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 28-43.
[5] 杨颖聪, 张俊豪, 唐一哲, 乔唱唱, 王鹏博, 黄明, 徐国伟, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对旱地小麦籽粒淀粉及其合成相关酶活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2467-2484.
[6] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[7] 张冬玲, 于爱忠, 吕汉强, 杨学慧, 王玉珑, 王鹏飞, 尚永盼, 尹波, 刘亚龙, 王凤. 绿肥还田结合减量施氮对绿洲灌区麦田N2O排放和小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1005-1021.
[8] 苏明, 吴佳瑞, 洪自强, 李翻过, 周甜, 吴宏亮, 康建宏. 西北半干旱区马铃薯块茎淀粉形成及产量对磷肥减量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 713-727.
[9] 张恒, 冯雅岚, 田文仲, 郭彬彬, 张均, 马超. 小麦TaSnRK基因家族鉴定及在局部根区干旱下的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 632-649.
[10] 张辰煜, 葛军勇, 褚俊聪, 王星宇, 赵宝平, 杨亚东, 臧华栋, 曾昭海. 燕麦红芸豆带状间作的产量效应及根系形态与土壤酶活性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 459-469.
[11] 王鹏博, 张冬霞, 乔唱唱, 黄明, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对豫西旱地小麦土壤酶活性和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 534-547.
[12] 王丽萍, 李盼, 赵连豪, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 何蔚, 柴强, 殷文. 西北绿洲灌区玉米叶片衰老特征对不同地膜覆盖利用方式的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 233-246.
[13] 肖明昆, 严炜, 宋记明, 张林辉, 刘倩, 段春芳, 李月仙, 姜太玲, 沈绍斌, 周迎春, 沈正松, 熊贤坤, 罗鑫, 白丽娜, 刘光华. 卷叶木薯及其突变体叶片的比较转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2143-2156.
[14] 高维东, 胡城祯, 张龙, 张艳艳, 张沛沛, 杨德龙, 陈涛. 小麦泛素结合酶TaUBC16基因的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 1971-1988.
[15] 周香玉, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波, 张学昆. 甘蓝型油菜苗期响应渍害胁迫的生理调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1015-1029.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!