欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (04): 662-668.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00662

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

苗期水分胁迫对玉米根系生长杂种优势的影响

李博;田晓莉*;王刚卫;潘飞;李召虎   

  1. 中国农业大学作物化学控制研究中心 / 农业部作物栽培与耕作学重点开放实验室/植物生理学与生物化学国家重点实验室, 北京 100094
  • 收稿日期:2007-09-03 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-04-12 网络出版日期:2008-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 田晓莉

Heterosis of Root Growth in Maize (Zea mays L.) Seedling under Water Stress

LI Bo,TIAN Xiao-Li*,WANG Gang-Wei,PAN Fei,LI Zhao-Hu   

  1. Center of Crop Chemical Control / Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Farming System / State Key Laboratory of National Plant Physiology and
    Biochemical, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
  • Received:2007-09-03 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-04-12 Published online:2008-04-12
  • Contact: TIAN Xiao-Li

摘要: 以玉米杂交种高油115及其亲本(母本220、父本1145) 为材料, 研究了玉米苗期根系生长的杂种优势及水分胁迫的影响。试验设水分充足、轻度干旱和严重干旱3个处理, 田间持水量分别为75%、55%和35%。结果表明, 在水分充足条件下, 根长(RL)、根表面积(SA)和根干重(RDW)均表现出不同程度的中亲优势和超亲优势, 轻度干旱显著降低了各指标的杂种优势, 而严重干旱则完全抑制了根系生长的杂种优势。根系各性状中, RL的杂种优势最强。在水分充足条件下, 与中等根(根直径0.25~0.45 mm)和粗根(根直径>0.45 mm)相比, 细根(根直径0.05~0.20 mm)的RL、SA及其占总根系比例的杂种优势最高。轻度干旱胁迫虽然降低了根系的杂种优势, 但RL、SA仍表现出显著的超亲优势和中亲优势(粗根的超亲优势除外)。此外, 只有细根RL和SA占总根系的比例在轻度干旱胁迫下具有显著的中亲优势, 说明杂交种可以通过生成较亲本更高比例的细根来抵抗轻度干旱胁迫。

关键词: 玉米, 幼苗, 杂种优势, 根系生长, 水分胁迫

Abstract: Maize (Zea mays L.), the earliest crop for heterosis application, is highly sensitive to water stress. The root system is one of the important organs contributing to drought tolerance. However, few reports have provided quantitative data on the hybrid vigor in root development of maize, especially on that under water stress. The objective of this study was to investigate the hete- rosis of maize root growth at seedling stage and the effects of water availability on it. Hybrid maize Gaoyou 115 (220 × 1145) and its parents were subjected to three water treatments: 75%, 55%, and 35% of field water-holding capacity, considered as well watered (WW), moderate water stress (MWS), and severe water stress (SWS) respectively. The desired soil water regimes were well prepared at the beginning of the experiment, and kept by weighing. Under WW treatment, substantial midparent heterosis (MPH) and overparent hereosis (OPH) were observed for root dry weight (RDW), root length (RL), and root surface area (SA). MPH for these traits was in the range between 100% and 203%, and OPH between 99% and 189%. MWS clearly reduced the degree of heterosis compared with WW; MPH was in the range between 73% and 108%, and OPH between 55% and 59%. However, SWS arrested hybrid vigor in root growth almost completely. These results indicate that heterosis of root growth in maize seedlings varies with water availability. The maximum heterosis for root growth was obtained in RL with average 155.5% MPH and aver-age 124.2% OPH over WW and MWS. Compared with middle (0.25 mm < root diameter (DA)≤0.45 mm) and coarse (0.45 mm < DA) roots, fine (0.05 mm < DA≤0.20 mm) roots displayed the highest degree of MPH and OPH in absolute RL and SA under WW, MPH for its RL and SA was 265% and 246%, respectively, and OPH 218% and 208%, respectively. For the ratios of RL and SA to the total RL and SA respectively, they only displayed significant and slight MPH, but compared with middle and coarse roots, fine roots (with 21% and 44% of MPH for RL% and SA%, respectively) still had the highest degree of heterosis. Although we still detected significant MPH and OPH for absolute RL and SA regardless of root diameter classes (except for OPH for coarse roots) and significant MPH for the ratios of RL and SA concerning fine roots under MWS, it was obvious that MWS reduced het-erosis of RL and SA, especially for fine roots. MPH values for absolute RL and SA showed about one-fold decreases, and OPH showed more than two-fold decreases. Additionally, absolute RL and SA for fine roots do not reveal heterosis under SWS, but the ratios of RL and SA for them significantly displayed 9% and 16% of MPH, respectively. This suggests that the seedlings of hybrid maize develop more and greater proportion of fine roots than its parents (especially under water stress), which enable them to resist moderate drought better.

Key words: Maize (Zea mays L.), Seedlings, Heterosis, Root growth, Water availability

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 崔连花, 詹为民, 杨陆浩, 王少瓷, 马文奇, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平, 杨青华. 2个玉米ZmCOP1基因的克隆及其转录丰度对不同光质处理的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[8] 雷新慧, 万晨茜, 陶金才, 冷佳俊, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 王鹏科, 杨清华, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 褪黑素与2,4-表油菜素内酯浸种对盐胁迫下荞麦发芽与幼苗生长的促进效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221.
[9] 许静, 高景阳, 李程成, 宋云霞, 董朝沛, 王昭, 李云梦, 栾一凡, 陈甲法, 周子键, 吴建宇. 过表达ZmCIPKHT基因增强植物耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
[10] 刘磊, 詹为民, 丁武思, 刘通, 崔连花, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平. 玉米矮化突变体gad39的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[11] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[12] 徐宁坤, 李冰, 陈晓艳, 魏亚康, 刘子龙, 薛永康, 陈洪宇, 王桂凤. 一个新的玉米Bt2基因突变体的遗传分析和分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[13] 宋仕勤, 杨清龙, 王丹, 吕艳杰, 徐文华, 魏雯雯, 刘小丹, 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王永军, 王立春. 东北主推玉米品种种子形态及贮藏物质与萌发期耐冷性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[14] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
[15] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!