欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (06): 1092-1096.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01092

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

灌浆期高温对小麦籽粒淀粉的积累、粒度分布及相关酶活性的影响

闫素辉;尹燕枰;李文阳;梁太波;李勇;邬云海;王平;耿庆辉;戴忠民;王振林*   

  1. 作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学农学院, 山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-06-12 网络出版日期:2008-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 王振林

Effect of High Temperature during Grain Filling on Starch Accumulation, Starch Granule Distribution, and Activities of Related Enzymes in Wheat Grains

YAN Su-Hui,YIN Yan-Ping,LI Wen-Yang,LIANG Tai-Bo,LI Yong,WU Yun-Hai,WANG Ping,GENG Qing-Hui,DAI Zhong-Min,WANG Zhen-Lin*   

  1. National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2007-10-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-06-12 Published online:2008-06-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Lin

PDF

2030

被引次数

114

摘要： 以不同耐热性品种济麦20和鲁麦21为材料, 于花后5~9 d进行高温处理, 研究了小麦灌浆期高温对籽粒淀粉的积累、粒度分布及合成相关酶活性的影响。结果表明, 灌浆期高温显著降低籽粒淀粉积累量, 显著降低籽粒淀粉、支链淀粉含量, 提高直链淀粉含量和直/支链淀粉比例。高温对济麦20籽粒淀粉积累的影响程度较鲁麦21大。灌浆期高温使小麦籽粒A型淀粉粒的体积、数量和表面积百分比显著增加, B型淀粉粒这3指标则显著降低。高温处理后, 济麦20籽粒蔗糖合酶(SS)、ADPG焦磷酸化酶(AGPP)、可溶性淀粉合酶(SSS)、束缚态淀粉合酶(GBSS)活性与对照无显著差异, 而鲁麦21上述酶活性则高于对照。济麦20、鲁麦21籽粒上述酶活性分别于花后15 d和20 d开始低于对照。与其他淀粉合成相关酶相比, 高温对籽粒GBSS活性的影响程度较小。两品种处理间籽粒蔗糖含量及SS、AGPP、SSS和GBSS活性的变化趋势, 与其籽粒淀粉积累量的变化趋势基本一致。灌浆期高温使籽粒淀粉积累量降低, 主要因高温抑制了籽粒灌浆中后期的淀粉合成, 这是由籽粒蔗糖供应不足和籽粒淀粉合成相关酶活性下降所造成的。

关键词: 小麦, 高温, 淀粉, 淀粉粒, 酶活性

Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of high temperature at early grain filling stages (5–9 d after anthesis) on grain starch formation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cultivars Jimai 20 (weak heat tolerance) and Lumai 21 (strong heat tolerance), were used with a heat stress treatment in the field by plastic sheds. Starch accumulation, starch granule distribution, and changes of enzymes activities involved in starch synthesis were examined. The results showed that heat stress after anthesis remarkably reduced starch accumulation at maturity. The total starch and amylopectin contents decreased significantly, but amylose content increased in heat treatments compared to control. Accordingly the ratio of amylose to amylopectin of heat treantment was significantly higher than that of control. The effect of high temperature on starch accumulation in Jimai 20 was greater than that in Lumai 21. The volume, number, and surface area percentage of A type starch granule were enhanced significantly, but those of B type starch granule reduced greatly under high temperature. After 5 d heating stress, the sucrose content, the activities of sucrose synthase (SS), adnosine diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPP), soluble starch synthase (SSS), and granule-bounded starch synthase (GBSS) increased in heat-treated grains of Lumai 21, but changed slightly in treated grains of Jimai 20 with no significant difference to control. These indexes of Jimai 20 and Lumai 21 became lower than those of control at 15 and 20 d post anthesis (6 and 11 d after heat stress removal), respectively. The GBSS activity was affected slightly by heat treatment. The results indicate that the changes in grain sucrose content and the activities of SS, AGPP, SSS, and GBSS are companied with the changes in grain starch accumulation, and high temperature restrains starch synthesis at middle and late grain filling stages, which is caused by inferior sucrose providing capacity and low activities of enzymes (SS, AGPP, SSS, and GBSS) involved in starch synthesis.

Key words: Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), High temperature, Starch, Starch granule, Enzyme activity

[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[3] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[4] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[5] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[6] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[7] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[8] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[9] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[10] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[11] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[12] 荐红举, 尚丽娜, 金中辉, 丁艺, 李燕, 王季春, 胡柏耿, Vadim Khassanov, 吕典秋. 马铃薯PIF家族成员鉴定及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 86-98.
[13] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[14] 韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[15] 李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2