欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 1826-1835.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01826

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同水分条件下水稻籽粒形态及其与粒重的关系

张卫星1,2;朱德峰1,*;徐一成1;林贤青1;张玉屏1;陈惠哲1;赵致2,*;周平3   

  1. 1 中国水稻研究所, 浙江杭州310006; 2 贵州大学, 贵州贵阳550025; 3 浙江理工大学视觉检测研究所, 浙江杭州310006
  • 收稿日期:2008-02-28 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-10-12 网络出版日期:2008-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 朱德峰

Grain Morphological Traits Measured Based on Vision Detection Tech-nology and Their Relation to Grain Weight in Rice under Different Water Condition

ZHANG Wei-Xing12,ZHU De-Feng1*,XU Yi-Cheng1, LIN Xian-Qing1, ZHANG Yu-Ping1,CHEN Hui-Zhe1,ZHAO Zhi2*,ZHOU Ping3   

  1. 1 China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang; 2 Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou; 3 Vision Detection Institute of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2008-02-28 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-10-12 Published online:2008-10-12
  • Contact: ZHU De-Feng

摘要: 运用机器视觉检测技术, 以普通杂交稻汕优63和超级杂交稻国稻6号为材料, 在幼穗分化开始至分化后30 d分别设置不同的控水处理, 通过水分仪结合称重法控制土壤含水量, 研究了稻穗及穗上不同部位籽粒的形态性状, 并分析各性状与粒重的关系。结果表明:水稻的籽粒面积、长度及千粒重对水分反应较明显, 水分亏缺对籽粒面积和粒重的影响引起比粒重(单位籽粒面积的重量)变化, 长宽比对水分也有一定反应, 宽度对水分的响应因品种而异。籽粒形态性状、产量及其构成因素均随水分亏缺的加重而有不同程度下降, 穗生长发育全阶段的控水处理影响最大, 其次是中期的重度和中度控水处理以及前期、后期的重度控水处理, 各时段控水对不同部位籽粒形态的影响与穗分化发育的顺序历期基本吻合。除粒宽与其他形态性状之间呈极显著或显著负相关以外, 其余各籽粒形态性状之间均呈极显著正相关。籽粒面积、长度及长宽比与千粒重之间存在极显著或显著的相关关系, 可以作为水稻抗旱性鉴定有效的籽粒形态指标。

关键词: 土壤水分, 水稻, 视觉检测技术, 籽粒形态, 粒重

Abstract: Based on machine vision detection technology, with Shanyou 63 (a representative common hybrid rice) and Guodao 6 (a super hybrid rice) as experiment materials, designed different water treatment from beginning to 30 days after panicle initiation and determined soil moisture by W.E.T Sensor (ML2x type, made in USA) and electronic balance (made in Shanghai, China), the grain morphological traits of full panicle and different position within a rice panicle under different water condition was studied, the relationship among these traits and their relation to grain weight was analyzed. The results indicated that the response of grain length, projective area, and 1000-grain weight to soil moisture was more obvious, the change of GRWA (ratio of grain weight to area) was caused by the effect of water deficit on grain area and weight, the response of ratio of grain length to width manifested complexity in a certain extent, and that of grain width to water was different in Shanyou 63 and Guodao 6. The grain morphologi-cal traits, yield and its components showed a drop trend of different extent with enhanced degree of water deficit, these grain morphological traits and grain weight reduced observably while controlling soil moisture from beginning to 30 days after panicle initiation, the effect of water deficit was most significant during 0–30 d control water, secondary, during 10–20 d heavy or middle water deficit and 0–10 d or 20–30 d heavy water deficit. The expressive laws of the effect of controlling water at different stage on grain morphological traits and weight of different position within a panicle was basically inosculated with the order of panicle initiation, growth and development. Among these morphological traits (except for width) all showed significant positive correla-tion at 0.01 probability level, while the relationship of grain width with other morphological traits was significant negative corre-lation at 0.01 or 0.05, respectively. The correlativity existed significantly between grain weight and grain length, projective area and ratio of grain length to width at 0.01 or 0.05, respectively. Therefore, the three traits can be used as grain morphological effec-tive index to appraise drought-resistance in rice.

Key words: Soil water, Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Vision detection technology, Grain morphology, Grain weight

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[8] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[9] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[10] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[11] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[12] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[15] 王娟, 张彦威, 焦铸锦, 刘盼盼, 常玮. 利用PyBSASeq算法挖掘大豆百粒重相关位点与候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!