欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 1826-1835.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01826

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同水分条件下水稻籽粒形态及其与粒重的关系

张卫星1,2;朱德峰1,*;徐一成1;林贤青1;张玉屏1;陈惠哲1;赵致2,*;周平3   

  1. 1 中国水稻研究所, 浙江杭州310006; 2 贵州大学, 贵州贵阳550025; 3 浙江理工大学视觉检测研究所, 浙江杭州310006
  • 收稿日期:2008-02-28 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-10-12 网络出版日期:2008-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 朱德峰

Grain Morphological Traits Measured Based on Vision Detection Tech-nology and Their Relation to Grain Weight in Rice under Different Water Condition

ZHANG Wei-Xing12,ZHU De-Feng1*,XU Yi-Cheng1, LIN Xian-Qing1, ZHANG Yu-Ping1,CHEN Hui-Zhe1,ZHAO Zhi2*,ZHOU Ping3   

  1. 1 China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang; 2 Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou; 3 Vision Detection Institute of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2008-02-28 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-10-12 Published online:2008-10-12
  • Contact: ZHU De-Feng

摘要: 运用机器视觉检测技术, 以普通杂交稻汕优63和超级杂交稻国稻6号为材料, 在幼穗分化开始至分化后30 d分别设置不同的控水处理, 通过水分仪结合称重法控制土壤含水量, 研究了稻穗及穗上不同部位籽粒的形态性状, 并分析各性状与粒重的关系。结果表明:水稻的籽粒面积、长度及千粒重对水分反应较明显, 水分亏缺对籽粒面积和粒重的影响引起比粒重(单位籽粒面积的重量)变化, 长宽比对水分也有一定反应, 宽度对水分的响应因品种而异。籽粒形态性状、产量及其构成因素均随水分亏缺的加重而有不同程度下降, 穗生长发育全阶段的控水处理影响最大, 其次是中期的重度和中度控水处理以及前期、后期的重度控水处理, 各时段控水对不同部位籽粒形态的影响与穗分化发育的顺序历期基本吻合。除粒宽与其他形态性状之间呈极显著或显著负相关以外, 其余各籽粒形态性状之间均呈极显著正相关。籽粒面积、长度及长宽比与千粒重之间存在极显著或显著的相关关系, 可以作为水稻抗旱性鉴定有效的籽粒形态指标。

关键词: 土壤水分, 水稻, 视觉检测技术, 籽粒形态, 粒重

Abstract: Based on machine vision detection technology, with Shanyou 63 (a representative common hybrid rice) and Guodao 6 (a super hybrid rice) as experiment materials, designed different water treatment from beginning to 30 days after panicle initiation and determined soil moisture by W.E.T Sensor (ML2x type, made in USA) and electronic balance (made in Shanghai, China), the grain morphological traits of full panicle and different position within a rice panicle under different water condition was studied, the relationship among these traits and their relation to grain weight was analyzed. The results indicated that the response of grain length, projective area, and 1000-grain weight to soil moisture was more obvious, the change of GRWA (ratio of grain weight to area) was caused by the effect of water deficit on grain area and weight, the response of ratio of grain length to width manifested complexity in a certain extent, and that of grain width to water was different in Shanyou 63 and Guodao 6. The grain morphologi-cal traits, yield and its components showed a drop trend of different extent with enhanced degree of water deficit, these grain morphological traits and grain weight reduced observably while controlling soil moisture from beginning to 30 days after panicle initiation, the effect of water deficit was most significant during 0–30 d control water, secondary, during 10–20 d heavy or middle water deficit and 0–10 d or 20–30 d heavy water deficit. The expressive laws of the effect of controlling water at different stage on grain morphological traits and weight of different position within a panicle was basically inosculated with the order of panicle initiation, growth and development. Among these morphological traits (except for width) all showed significant positive correla-tion at 0.01 probability level, while the relationship of grain width with other morphological traits was significant negative corre-lation at 0.01 or 0.05, respectively. The correlativity existed significantly between grain weight and grain length, projective area and ratio of grain length to width at 0.01 or 0.05, respectively. Therefore, the three traits can be used as grain morphological effec-tive index to appraise drought-resistance in rice.

Key words: Soil water, Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Vision detection technology, Grain morphology, Grain weight

[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[5] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[6] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[7] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[8] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[9] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[10] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[11] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[12] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[13] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[14] 吴美娟, 张寅辉, 李元昊, 刘海霞, 黄以琳, 李甜, 刘红霞, 张学勇, 郝晨阳, 郭杰, 侯健. 小麦蔗糖合酶基因TaSUS2调控籽粒淀粉合成及品质的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1514-1525.
[15] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!