欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 179-184.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00179

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

弱光下生长的高产小麦品系PH01-35旗叶光合机构对不同光强的响应

郭峰1,曲妍妍1,信长朋2,梁燕1,梁雪1,田纪春3,孟庆伟1,赵世杰1,*   

  1. 1山东农业大学生命科学学院/作物生物学国家重点实验室,山东泰安271018;2厦门大学生命科学学院,福建厦门361005;3山东农业大学农学院,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-17 修回日期:2008-07-14 出版日期:2009-01-12 网络出版日期:2008-11-18
  • 通讯作者: 赵世杰
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由山东省农业良种工程重大课题(鲁农良种字[2006]6号)资助

Response of Photosynthetic Apparatus to different Irradiance in flag Leaves of High-Yielding Winter Wheat PH01-35 Grown under Low Light Conditions

GUO Feng1,QU Yan-Yan1,XIN Chang-Peng2,LIANG Yan1,LIANG Xue1,TIAN Ji-Chun3,MENG Qing-Wei1,ZHAO Shi-Jie1,*   

  1. 1College of Life Sciences,Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai'an 271018,China; 2School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005,Fujian;3 College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University,Tai'an 271018,China
  • Received:2008-04-17 Revised:2008-07-14 Published:2009-01-12 Published online:2008-11-18
  • Contact: ZHAO Shi-Jie

摘要:

了解弱光下生长的小麦叶片在不同光强下PSII和光合电子传递链的工作状态,解释其突然转入强光下时发生光抑制和光破坏的原因,以PH01-35为材料,采用大田人工遮光的方法,测定了小麦旗叶叶绿素含量、光合特性参数及快速光曲线。弱光处理15 d后,旗叶叶绿素含量明显上升,净光合速率、光补偿点、光饱和点、表观量子效率、羧化效率均出现不同程度的下降。与250 μmol m-2 s-1的弱光适应3 h相比1 200 μmol m-2 s-1的强光适应3 h后,弱光下生长叶片的快速光曲线初始斜率下降幅度较大,曲线下降部分的斜率、最大相对电子传递速率、半饱和光强的上升幅度均小于自然光下生长的叶片,光能利用能力较低,其非光化学猝灭系数NPQ也明显低于自然光下生长的叶片,为自然光下生长叶片的87.5%。弱光下生长的小麦叶片光能吸收能力增强,但较低的光能利用能力和过剩光能耗散能力是其转入自然强光后易发生光抑制甚至光破坏的主要原因。

关键词: 冬小麦, 弱光, 叶绿素荧光, 快速光曲线

Abstract:

To further explain the mechanism of photoinhibition and light damage in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaves when it was suddenly transferred from low light to high light conditions, the responses of photosynthetic apparatus in shaded leaves of the high-yielding winter wheat line, PH01-35, were examined using chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange techniques. After 15-day shading, the chlorophyll content increased greatly, but the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), light compensation point (LCP), light saturation point (LSP), apparent quantum yield (AQY), and carboxylation efficiency (CE) all decreased. Compared with leaves grown in full sunlight, the initial slope (α), decline slope (β), maximum relative electron transport rate (rETRmax), and minimum saturating irradiance (Ek) of rapid light curves in leaves grown in low light were lower when the plant was transferred from low light intensity of 250 μmol m-2 s-1 to high light intensity of 1 200 μmol m-2 s-1. Non photochemical quenching (NPQ) in leaves grown in low light was significantly lower than that in leaves grown in full sunlight, indicating that the ability of light use and thermal energy dissipation was limited in leaves grown in low light. The wheat leaves grown in low light were more susceptible to photoinhibition due to low CO2 assimilation and photoprotective ability, such as xanthophylls cycle-dependent dissipation of excessive energy, despite the better energy absorbability in low light conditions.

Key words: Winter wheat, Low light, Chlorphyll fluorescence, Rapid light curves

[1] Li Y-G(李永庚), Yu Z-W(于振文), Liang X-F(梁晓芳), Zhao J-Y(赵俊晔), Qiu X-B(邱希斌). Response of wheat yields and quality to low light intensity at different grain filling stages. Acta Phytoecol Sin (植物生态学报), 2005, 29(5): 807–813 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] He M-R(贺明荣), Wang Z-L(王振林), Gao S-P(高淑萍). Analysis on adaptability of wheat cultivars to low light intensity during grain filling. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(5): 640–644 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Pei B-H(裴保华), Yuan Y-X(袁玉欣), Wang Y(王颖). The effect of simulation tree shading to wheat growth and output. J Agric Univ Hebei (河北农业大学学报), 1998, 21(1): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] Zhou J-Z(周继泽), Liu D-J(柳德钧), Cheng G-Q(程国强). Studies on the physiological response of shading to wheat grain filling. J Henan Vocation-Technical Teachers Coll (河南职技师院学报), 1995, 23(3): 12–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Liu X(刘霞), Yin Y-P(尹燕枰), Jiang C-M(姜春明), He M-R(贺明荣), Wang Z-L(王振林). Effects of weak light and high temperature stress after anthesis on flag leaf chlorophyll fluorescence and grain fill of wheat. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2005, 16(11): 2117–2121 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Xu D-Q(许大全), Zhang Y-Z(张玉忠), Zhang R-X(张荣铣). Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol Commun (植物生理学通讯), 1992, 28(4): 237–243 (in Chinese)
[7] Demming-Adams B, Adams III W W. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1992, 43: 599–626
[8] Lichtenthaler H K, Burkart S. Photosynthesis and high light stress. Bulg J Plant Physiol, 1999, 25: 3–16
[9] Yang X-H(杨兴洪), Zou Q(邹琦), Zhao S-J(赵世杰). Photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of cotton plants grown in full light and 40% sunlight. Acta Phytoecol Sin (植物生态学报), 2005, 29(1): 8–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] ?quist G, Anderson J M, McCaffery S, Chow W S. Mechanistic differences in photoinhibition of sun and shade plants. Planta, 1992, 188: 422–431
[11] Ralph P J, Gademann R. Rapid light curves: a powerful tool to assess photosynthetic activity. Aquat Bot, 2005, 82: 222–237
[12] Kühl M, Chen M, Ralph P J, Schreiber U, Larkum A W D. A niche for cyanobacteria containing chlorophyll d. Nature, 2005, 433: 820
[13] White A J, Critchley C. Rapid light curves: A new fluorescence method to assess the state of the photosynthetic apparatus. Photosynth Res, 1999, 59: 63–72
[14] Ser?dio J, Vieira S, Cruz S, Barroso F. Short-term variability in the photosynthetic activity of microphytobenthos as detected by measuring rapid light curves using variable fluorescence. Mar Biol, 2005, 146: 903–914
[15] Ralph P J, Polk S M, Moore K A, Orth R J, Smith Jr W A. Operation of the xanthophyll cycle in the seagrass Zostera marina in response to variable irradiance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 2002, 271: 189–207
[16] Schreiber U, Gademann R, Ralph P J, Larkum A W D. Assessment of photosynthetic performance of Prochloron in Lissoclinum patella in hospite by chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Plant Cell Physiol, 1997, 38: 945–951
[17] Zhao S-J(赵世杰), Shi G-A(史国安), Dong X-C(董新纯). Laboratory Guide for Plant Physiology (植物生理学实验指导). Beijing: Beijing Science & Technology Press, 2002. pp 55–57 (in Chinese)
[18] Bassman J H, Zwier J C. Gas exchange characteristics of Populus trichocarpa, Populus deltoids and Populus trichocarpa×P. deltoids clones. Tree Physiol, 1991, 8: 145–159
[19] Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R. The relationship between the quenching of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1989, 990: 87–92
[20] Platt T, Gallegos C L, Harrison W G. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phytoplankton. J Mar Res, 1980, 38: 687–701
[21] Demmig-Adams B. Carotenoids and photoprotection in plants: a role for the xanthophyll zeaxanthin. Biochim Biophy Acta, 1990, 1020: 1–24
[22] Schreiber U. Pulse-amplitude-modulation (PAM) fluorometry and saturation pulse method: an overview. In: Papageorgiou G C, Govindjee eds. Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. pp 279–319
[23] Lichrenthaler H K, Babani F. Light adaptation and senescence of the photosynthetic apparatus. Changes in pigment composition, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic activity. In: Papageorgiou G C, Govindjee, eds. Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. pp 713–736
[24] Saroussi S, Beer S. Alpha and quantum yield of aquatic plants derived from PAM fluorometry: uses and misuses. Aquat Bot, 2007, 86: 89–92
[25] Müller P, Li X P, Niyogi K K. Non-photochemical quenching: a response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol, 2001, 125: 1558–1566
[26] Pascal A A, Liu Z F, Broess K, Oort B V, Amerongen H V, Wang C, Horton P, Robert B, Chang W R, Ruban A. Molecular basis of photoprotection and control of photosynthetic light-harvesting. Nature, 2005, 436: 134–137
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 王文辕, 燕雪嘉, 刘玉霖, 孙晓彤, 李亚楠, 唐鑫华, 石瑛. 耐弱光马铃薯品种筛选及转录因子编码基因StPIF3的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1631-1645.
[3] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[4] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[5] 杨婷婷, 陈娟, ABDUL Rehman, 李婧, 闫素辉, 汪建来, 李文阳. 花后弱光对软质小麦干物质积累转运、籽粒产量和淀粉品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2204-2219.
[6] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[7] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[8] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[9] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[10] 王娇, 白海霞, 韩语燕, 梁惠, 冯雅楠, 张东升, 李萍, 宗毓铮, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇. CO2浓度升高、升温及其交互作用对良星99冬小麦叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1061-1076.
[11] 胡雅杰, 郭靖豪, 丛舒敏, 蔡沁, 徐益, 孙亮, 郭保卫, 邢志鹏, 杨文飞, 张洪程. 灌浆前期低温弱光复合处理对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 405-417.
[12] 张妍妍, 李迎, 刘栩辰, 黄超, 吕佳宁, 周海佳, 马守田, 秦安振, 高子乐, 吴光辉, 陈丹, 姬夏楠, 刘战东. 深松耕作条件下滴灌对冬小麦花后干物质积累及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3065-3079.
[13] 张军, 胡川, 周起晖, 任开明, 董誓言, 刘傲寒, 吴金芝, 黄明, 李友军. 减氮及有机肥替代对旱地冬小麦干物质积累、转运、分配和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 207-220.
[14] 马艳明, 娄鸿耀, 王威, 孙娜, 颜国荣, 张胜军, 刘杰, 倪中福, 徐麟. 新疆冬小麦籽粒品质性状遗传差异与关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1394-1405.
[15] 黄宏胜, 张馨月, 居辉, 韩雪. 大气CO2浓度升高背景下冬小麦冠层光谱特征和地上生物量估算[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 991-1003.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!