欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1038-1043.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01038

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用永久F2群体定位小麦株高的QTL

王岩，李卓坤，田纪春*   

  1. 山东农业大学/国家作物生物学重点实验室小麦品质育种室，山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2008-11-27 修回日期:2009-02-17 出版日期:2009-06-12 网络出版日期:2009-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 田纪春，E-mail:jctian@sdau.edu.cn;Tel:0538-8242040
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家基础研究重大发展计划（973计划）项目（2009CB118301）和国家高技术研究发展计划（863计划）项目（2006AA1021E9）资助。

Detection of Quantitative Trait Loci for Plant Height Using an Immortalized F2 Population in Wheat

WANG Yan,LI Zhuo-Kun,TIAN Ji-Chun*   

  1. Group of Quality Wheat Breeding of Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an 271018,China
  • Received:2008-11-27 Revised:2009-02-17 Published:2009-06-12 Published online:2009-04-16
  • Contact: TIAN Ji-Chun，E-mail:jctian@sdau.edu.cn;Tel:0538-8242040

PDF

5330

被引次数

24

摘要：

为研究小麦株高的遗传机制，利用DH群体构建了一套包含168个杂交组合的小麦永久F2群体, 并于2007年种植于山东泰安和山东聊城。构建了一套覆盖小麦21条染色体的遗传连锁图谱并利用该图谱的324个SSR标记对小麦株高进行QTL定位研究，使用基于混合线性模型的QTLNetwork 2.0软件进行QTL分析。在永久F2群体中定位了7个株高QTL，包括4个加性QTL，一个显性QTL，一对上位性QTL，共解释株高变异的20%，其中位于4D染色体的qPh4D，具有最大的遗传效应，贡献率为7.5%；位于2D 染色体显性效应位点qPh2D，可解释1.6%的表型变异；位于5B~6D染色体上位效应位点，可解释1.7%的表型变异。还发现加性效应、显性效应和上位效应对小麦株高的遗传起重要作用，并且基因与环境具有互作效应，结果表明利用永久F2群体进行QTL定位研究的方法有助于分子标记辅助育种。

关键词: 小麦, 永久F2群体, 株高, 数量性状位点

Abstract:

To study the genetic mechanism of wheat plant height, a set of doubled haploid (DH) lines were used to construct an immortalized F2 (IF2) population comprising 168 different crosses. The IF2 population was evaluated for plant height in 2007 cropping seasons in Tai’an and Liaocheng, Shandong province. Linkage map was constructed with 324 SSR markers covering the whole wheat genome, including 284 SSR, 37 ESTs loci, 1 ISSR loci and 2 HMW-GS loci, was constructed. This linkage map covered a total length of 2 485.7 cM with an average distance of 7.67 cM between adjacent markers. QTL analyses were performed using the software QTLNetwork version 2.0 based on the mixed linear model at P < 0.05. Four additive QTLs, 1 dominance QTL and pair of epistatic QTLs were detected, the total QTL effects detected for the plant height explained 20% of the phenotypic variation. One QTL qPh4D for plant height was identified on chromosome 4D, was identified on chromosome 2D, explaining 7.5% of the phenotypic variances. Dominance effect loci qPh2D was identified on chromosome 2D, explaining 1.6% of the phenotypic variances；Epistatic effects of loci was identified on chromosome 5B–6D, explaining 1.7% of the phenotypic variances . The results indicate additive effects, dominance effects and epistatic effects are important in genetics of wheat for plant height, which are also subjected to environmental modifications. These results further demonstrate that the use of IF2 groups QTL positioning research methods contribute to the molecular marker-assisted breeding.

Key words: Common wheat, IF2, Plant height, QTL


[1] Sears E R. The aneuploids of common wheat. Univ Missouri Res Bull, 1954, 572: 1-58

[2] Kuspira J, Unrau J. Genetic analyses of certain characters in common wheat using whole chromosome substitution lines. Can J Plant Sci, 1957, 37: 300-326

[3] Snape J W, Law C N, Worland A J. Whole chromosome analysis of height in wheat. Heredity, 1977, 38: 25-36

[4] McIntosh R A, Hart G E, Devos K M, Gale M D, Rogers W J. Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat, proceedings of the 9th international wheat genetics symposium. Saskatoon, Canada: University Extension Press, 1998. pp 77-78

[5] Huang X Q, Coster H, Ganal M W, Roder M S. Advanced backcross QTL analysis for the identification of quantitative trait loci alleles from wild relatives of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 106:1379-1389

[6] Liu D-C(刘冬成), Gao M-Q(高睦枪), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Li R-Z(李润枝), Cao S H(曹双河), Guo X L(郭小丽), Zhang A M(张爱民). Mapping quantitative trait loci for plant height in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a F2:3 population. Acta Genet Sin(遗传学报), 2002, 29: 706-711 (in English with Chinese abstract)

[7] Cadalen T, Sourdille P, Charmet G, Tixier M H, Gay G, Boeuf C, Bernard S, Leroy P, Bernard M. Molecular markers linked to genes affecting plant height in wheat using a double haploid population. Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 96: 933-940

[8] Sourdille P, Cadalen T, Guyomarc H H, Snape J W, Perretant M R, Charmet G, Boeuf C, Bernard S, Bernard M. An update of the Courtot × Chinese Spring intervarietal molecular marker linkage map for the QTL detection of agronomic traits in wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 106: 530-538

[9] Zhang K P, Tian J C, Zhao L, Wang S S. Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL × environment interactions for plant height using a doubled haploid population in cultivated wheat.JGenetGenomics, 2008, 35: 119-127

[10] Keller M, Karutz C H, Schmid J E, Stamp P, Winzeler M, Keller B, Messmer M M. Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance in a segregating wheat × spelt population. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 98: 1171-1182

[11] Borner A, Schumann E, Furste A, Coster H, Leithold B, Röder M S, Weber W E. Mapping of quantitative trait loci determining agronomic important characters in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 105: 921-936

[12] Shah M M, Gill K S, Baenziger P S, Yen Y, Kaeppler S M, Ariyarathne H M. Molecular mapping of loci for agronomic traits on chromosome 3A of bread wheat. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1728-1732

[13] Araki E, Miura H, Sawada S. Identification of genetic loci affecting amylose content and agronomic traits on chromosome 4A of wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 98: 977-984

[14] Kato K, Miura H, Sawada S. QTL mapping of genes controlling ear emergence time and plant height on chromosome 5A of wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 98: 472-477

[15] Hua JP, Xing YZ, Xu CG, Sun XL, Yu SB, Zhang QF. Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics, 2002, 162: 1885-1895

[16] Tang J-H(汤继华), Yan J-B(严建兵), Ma X-Q(马西青), Teng W-T(滕文涛), Meng Y-J(孟义江), Dai J-R(戴景瑞), Li J-S(李建生). Genetic dissection for grain yield and its components using an immortalized F2 population in maize. Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2007, 33: 1299-1303(in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Chen W, Zhang Y, Liu X P, Chen B Y, Tu J X, Fu T D. Detection of QTL for six yield-related traits in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) using DH and immortalized F2 populations. Theor Appl Genet, 115: 849-858

[18] Ma Z Q, Zhao D M, Zhang C Q, Zhang Z Z, Xue S L, Lin F, Kong Z X, Tian D G, Luo Q Y. Molecular genetic analysis of five spike-related traits in wheat using RIL and immortalized F2 populations. Mol Gen Genet, 277: 31-42

[19] Wang D L, Zhu J, Li Z K, Paterson A H. Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL × environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor Appl Genet,1999, 99: 1255-1264

[20] Yang J, Zhu J. Predicting superior genotypes in multiple environments based on QTL effects. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110: 1268-1274

[21] Hai Y(海燕), Kang M-H(康明辉). Breeding of a new wheat variety Huapei 3 with high yield and early maturing. Henan Agric Sci (河南农业科学), 2007, (5): 36-37 (in Chinese)

[22] Guo C-Q(郭春强), Bai Z-A(柏志安), Liao P-A(廖平安), Jin W-K(靳文奎). New high quality and yield wheat variety Yumai 57. China Seed Ind(中国种业), 2004, (4): 54 (in Chinese)

[23] Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Wu W R, Xu C G, Sun X L, Yu S B, Zhang Q F. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interaction can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 2574-2579

[24] Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E. Mapping genetic mapping with MAPMAKER/EXP3.0b. Cambridge: MA: Whitehead Institute Technical Report, 1992
Cao G, Zhu J, He C, Gao Y, Yan J, Wu P. Impact of epistasis and QTL × environment interaction on the developmental behavior of plant height in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 153-160
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[6] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[7] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[8] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2