欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1552-1557.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01552

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种灌溉方式下保水剂用量对裸燕麦产量和品质的影响

吴娜1,赵宝平1,**,曾昭海1,任长忠2,郭来春2,陈昌龙1,赵国军2,胡跃高1,*   

  1. 1中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100193;2白城市农业科学院,吉林白城137000
  • 收稿日期:2009-01-05 修回日期:2009-03-15 出版日期:2009-08-12 网络出版日期:2009-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 胡跃高, E-mail: huyuegao@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD15B02)和农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项“优质燕麦生产与加工技术研究”(nyhyzx07-099-2)资助。

Effects of Super Absorbent Polymer Application Rate on Yield and Quality of Naked Oat(Avenue nuda L.) in Two Irrigation Systems

WU Na1,ZHAO Bao-Ping1,**,ZENG Zhao-Hai1,REN Chang-Zhong2,GUO Lai-Chun2,CHEN Chang-Long,ZHAO Guo-Jun2,HU Yue-Gao1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2 Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Baicheng 137000, China
  • Received:2009-01-05 Revised:2009-03-15 Published:2009-08-12 Published online:2009-06-11
  • Contact: HU Yue-Gao, E-mail: huyuegao@cau.edu.cn

摘要:

保水剂和滴灌是两种节水措施,在小麦、玉米和番茄上广泛应用。燕麦是一种对水分敏感的作物,籽粒产量和品质受水分影响较大,目前这方面研究较少。本文在大田条件下,采用裂区设计,研究了传统灌溉和滴灌两种灌溉方式下4个保水剂用量(0306090 kg hm-2)对裸燕麦白燕8号籽粒产量、籽粒品质、籽粒矿质元素含量和饲草品质的影响。结果表明,传统灌溉处理的籽粒产量比滴灌处理高14.78 %,粗蛋白、粗脂肪和β-葡聚糖含量比滴灌处理分别降低1.22%2.73%3.36%,差异显著(P < 0.05)。滴灌处理下籽粒中钙、镁、钾、锌、铁含量均显著高于传统灌溉,锰含量差异不显著。滴灌处理的相对饲用价值为122.38%~135.67%,显著高于传统灌溉(118.75%~134.44%)。保水剂用量对裸燕麦籽粒产量有显著影响,滴灌条件下施用保水剂比不施保水剂增产2.95%~12.14%,传统灌溉条件下施用保水剂比不施保水剂增产1.1%~5.0%60 kg hm-2保水剂有利于裸燕麦大多数品质性状的提高,以及矿质元素的吸收利用。

关键词: 保水剂, 滴灌, 传统灌溉, 裸燕麦, 产量, 品质

Abstract:

Super absorbent polymer (SAP) and drip irrigation technique are water-saving measurements in several crops, such as wheat, maize, and tomato. Oat is a water-sensitive crop that requires a large amount of water during the growth period. Grain yield and quality of oat are affected by water condition. However, studies in this area are rare. In this study, the variation of grain yield, grain quality, mineral element contents and forage quality of naked oat were investigated under two irrigation systems (traditional irrigation and drip irrigation) and four levels of super absorbent polymer (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1). Compared with drip irrigation, grain yield under traditional irrigation was 14.78% higher, but crude protein, crude fat, and β-glucan content of grain decreased by 1.22%, 2.73%, and 3.36%, respectively. The difference between two irrigation systems was significant (P < 0.05). Calcium, magnesium, potassium, zinc and iron contents in grains were significantly higher in drip irrigation system than in traditional irrigation system, except for the manganese content. Relative feeding value, which varied from 122.38% to 135.67% in drip irrigation system, was significantly higher than that in traditional irrigation system (118.75%–134.44%). SAP had positive effect on grain yield of naked oat. In drip irrigation system, the grain yield increased by 2.95% to 12.14% when SAP was applied; it in traditional irrigation system increased by 1.1% to 5.00%. The SAP application of 60 kg ha-1improved most quality traits of naked oat including the contents of mineral elements in grains.

Key words: Super absorbent polymer, Drip irrigation, Traditional irrigation, Naked oat, Yield, Quality

[1] Liu R-F(刘瑞风), Zhang J-P(张俊平), Wang A-Q(王爱勤). Water absorbency and its influence factor of PAM-atta superabsorbent composite. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2005, 21(9): 47-50 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Lentz R D, Shainberg I, Sojka R E, Carter D L. Preventing irrigationfurrow erosion with small application of polymers. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1992, 56: 1926-1932
[3] Sojka R E,Lentz R D, Westerman D T. Water and erosion management with multiple application of polyacrylamide in furrow irrigation. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1998, 62: 1672-1680

[4] Sui H(隋华), Dong J-H(董家行), Li X-G(李小刚), Liu Q(刘强), Sun X-H(孙秀华), Zheng S-Q(郑淑清), Xing P-Z(邢佩芝). Effects of drought-control and water-retention agent on wheat growth. J Tianjin Agric Univ (天津农学院学报), 2008, 15(2): 11-13 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Liu X-S(刘学生), Gao F-W(高凤文), Zhao F-M(赵凤民), Luo S-G (罗盛国). Effects of super absorbent polymer on corn yield and yield constituent factors. J Northeast Agric Univ (东北农业大学学报), 2006, 37(2): 151-154 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Oktem A, Simsek M, Oktem A G. Deficit irrigation effects on sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) with drip irrigation system in a semi-arid region: I. Water-yield relationship. Agric Water Manage, 2003, 61: 63-74

[7] Ngouajio M, Wang G, Goldy R. Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch. Agric Water Manage, 2007, 87: 285-291

[8] Enciso J, Jifon J, Wiedenfeld B. Subsurface drip irrigation of onions: Effects of drip tape emitter spacing on yield and quality. Agric Water Manage, 2007, 92: 126-130

[9] Li G-R(李桂荣), Zhao B-P(赵宝平), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Cheng F-M(程方民), Zeng Z-H(曾昭海), Zhao N-C(赵宁春). Effects of irrigation regimes on phytic acid, protein, and mineral element contents in two oat cultivars. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(5): 866-870 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Oraby H F, Ransom C B, Kravchenko A N, Sticklen M B. Barley HVA1 gene confers salt tolerance in R3 transgenic oats. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 2218-2227

[11] Wight C P, O’Donoughue L S, Chong J, Tinker N A, Molnar S J.Discovery, localization, and sequence characterization of molecular markers for the crown rust resistance genes Pc38, Pc39, and Pc48 in cultivated oat (Avena sativa L.).Mol Breed, 2004, 14: 349-361
[12] Long J, Holland J B, Munkvold G P, Jannink J L. Responses to selection for partial resistance to crown rust in oat. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 1260-1265
[13] Nicholson I A. The effect of stage of maturity on the yield and chemical composition of oats for haymaking. J Agric Sci, 1957, 49: 129-139

[14] Eagles H A, Lewis T D, Holland R. Quality and quantity of forage from winter oats in the manawatu. New Zealand J Exp Agric, 1979, 7: 337-341

[15] Bao G-S(鲍根生), Zhou Q-P(周青平), Han Z-L(韩志林). Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on yield and quality of oat. Pratacult Sci (草业科学), 2008, 25(10): 48-53(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] Zheng D-S(郑殿升), Lü Y-C(吕耀昌), Tian C-Y(田长叶), Zhao W(赵伟). Analysis on beta-glucan content of naked oat(Avena nuda L.) in China. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2006, 7(1): 54-58 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Zhao N-C(赵宁春), Zhang Q-F(张其芳), Cheng F-M(程方民), Zhou W-J(周伟军). Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc supply levels on grain phytic acid content and its correlation with several mineral nutrients in rice grains. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(2): 185-190 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Feng J-H(冯继华). Comparison of the van soest method and conventional method for measuring lignin and cellulose content. J Southwest Natl Coll (Nat Sci Edn) (西南民族学院学报·自然科学版), 1994, 20(1): 55-56(in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] SAS Institute SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 2001
[20] Antony E, Singandhupe R B. Impact of drip and surface irrigation on growth, yield and WUE of capsicum. Agric Water Manage, 2004, 65: 121-132
[21] Najafi P. Effects of using subsurface drip irrigation and treated municipal waste water in irrigation of tomato. Pakistan J Biol Sci, 2006, 9: 2672-2676

[22] Liu Z H, Cheng F M, Zhang G P. Grain phytic acid content in japonica rice as affected by cultivar and environment and its relation to protein content. Food Chem, 2005, 89: 49-52
[23] Xie Z J, Jiang D, Cao W X. Effects of post-anthesis soil water status on the activities of key regulatory enzymes of starch and protein accumulation in wheat grains. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 2003, 29: 309-316
[24] Ma X-M(马新明), Xiong S-P(熊淑萍), Li L(李琳), Zhang J-J(张娟娟), He J-G(何建国). Effects of soil moisture on photosynthetic characteristics of different specialized end-uses winter wheat at their later growth stages and on their yield. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报) , 2005, 16(1): 83-87 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] Wang L-Q(王立秋), Jin Z-Z(靳占忠), Cao J-S(曹敬山), Wang Z-Y(王占宇). Effect of water and fertilizer factors on grain quality and bread baking quality of wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1997, 30(3): 67-73 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] Zhang G, Chen J, Wang J, Ding S. Cultivar and environmental effects on (1-3,1-4)-β-D-glucan and protein content in malting barley. J Cereal Sci, 2001, 34: 295-301
[27] Bassiri A, Nahapetian A. Differences in concentrations and interrelationships of phytate, phosphorus, magnesium, calcium, zinc, and iron in wheat varieties grown under dryland and irrigated conditions. J Agric Food Chem, 1977, 25: 1118-1122
[28] Luo M-Z(罗明珠), Liu Z-F(刘子凡), Liang J-N(梁计南), Luo C-J(罗朝觉). Effects of water-holding agent on the yield and quality of sugarcane. Sugarcane (甘蔗), 2003, 10(3): 13-16 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[2] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[3] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[4] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[10] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[11] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[12] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[13] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!