欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 2064-2072.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02064

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

栽培小麦Brock和京411感染白粉菌后蛋白质组的变化

于振1,李倩1,赵建叶1,江帆1,王振英1,*,彭永康1,*,解超杰2,刘志勇2,孙其信2,杨作民2   

  1. 1天津师范大学化学与生命科学学院/细胞遗传与分子调控天津市重点实验室，天津300387；2中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院，北京100193
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-12 修回日期:2009-05-08 出版日期:2009-11-12 网络出版日期:2009-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 王振英, E-mail: wzycell@yahoo.com.cn; 彭永康, E-mail: pykcell@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金（30771346），天津市科委重点项目（08JCZDJC16500），天津市教委重点项目（2006ZD08）资助。

Proteome Changes in Wheat Varieties Brock and Jing 411 after Inoculating Blumenia graminis

YU Zhen1,LI Qian1,ZHAO Jian-Ye1,JIANG Fan1,WANG Zhen-Ying1,*,PENG Yong-Kang1*,XIE Chao-Jie2,LIU Zhi-Yong2,SUN Qi-Xin2,YANG Zuo-Min2   

  1. 1College of Chemistry and Life Science/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cyto-Genetical and Molecular Regulation,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China;2College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China
  • Received:2009-02-12 Revised:2009-05-08 Published:2009-11-12 Published online:2009-09-10
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Ying, E-mail: wzycell@yahoo.com.cn;PENG Yong-Kang, E-mail: pykcell@yahoo.com.cn

PDF

1810

被引次数

12

摘要：

用华北地区流行的白粉菌15号生理小种，感染强抗白粉病的栽培小麦Brock和对白粉病敏感的小麦京411，通过蛋白质组技术分析其差异蛋白。结果表明，Brock经白粉菌感染12 h后，至少有6个蛋白质斑点(43 kD/pI 6.7、43 kD/pI 6.9、43 kD/pI 7.2、28 kD/pI 5.8、26 kD/pI 5.5和26 kD/pI 6.5)表达量明显增加；感染3 d后，有5个蛋白质斑点(48 kD/pI 5.6、43 kD/pI 6.9、43 kD/pI7.2、28 kD/pI5.8和26 kD/pI5.5)表达量增加；感染5 d后，有12个新的蛋白质斑点(16 kD/pI 7.6、42 kD/pI 6.5、40 kD/pI 4.8、40 kD/pI 4.6、31 kD/pI 5.7、16 kD/pI 4.6、20 kD/pI 8.3、50 kD/pI 6.7、48 kD/pI 6.6、28 kD/pI 5.7、23 kD/pI 4.8和25 kD/pI 4.7 )被诱导合成，2种蛋白质斑点(26 kD/pI 4.6和17 kD/pI 7.9)消失。京411经白粉菌感染12 h后，3个蛋白质斑点(21 kD/pI 6.4、18 kD/pI 5.4和14 kD/pI 7.0)表达量增加；感染3 d后，有2个蛋白质斑点(80 kD/pI 5.4和14 kD/pI 7.0)表达量增加，1个蛋白质斑点(16 kD/pI 5.4)表达量下降；感染5 d后，有3个蛋白质斑点(50 kD/pI 7.3、40 kD/pI 7.3和24 kD/pI 7.2)表达量增加，2个斑点(40 kD/pI 4.8和14 kD/pI 7.2)表达量下降，但没有发现新的蛋白质合成。对Brock中诱导产生的12个新蛋白质斑点，利用MALDI-TOF-MS方法，于NCBI进行数据查询，其中有6个分别属于F-box亮氨酸高度重复蛋白、重金属转运/解毒蛋白、β-1,3-葡聚糖酶(两个同工体)、β-1,3-葡聚糖酶前体、锌指蛋白。功能查询表明，上述6个蛋白参与细胞周期调控、发育、激素响应、基因转录和病害防御等。推测Brock和京411感染白粉菌后，出现的蛋白质组变化可能与各自的抗、感白粉病特性有关。

关键词: 白粉病, 小麦, 蛋白质组, ß-1,3-葡聚糖酶, MALDI-TOF-MS

Abstract:

The protein of resistant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) variety Brock and susceptible variety Jing 411 was extracted from leaves and separated using two-dimensional polyacrylamid gel electrophoresis (2-DE) at 12 h, 3 d, and 5 d after inoculating prevalent race No. 15 of B. graminis f.sp. tritici. In Brock, compared with contral with no pathogen inoculation, at least six protein spots of 43 kD/pI 6.7, 43 kD/pI 6.9, 43 kD/pI 7.2, 28 kD/pI 5.8, 26 kD/pI 5.5 and 26 kD/pI 6.5 obviously increased in content at 12 h time point; and five protein spots of 48 kD/pI 5.6, 43 kD/pI 6.9, 43 kD/pI 7.2, 28 kD/pI 5.8 and 26 kD/pI 5.5 increased in content at 3 d time point. At 5d after inoculation, 12 novel proteins were induced, viz. 16 kD/pI 7.6, 42 kD/pI 6.5, 40 kD/pI 4.8, 40 kD/pI 4.6, 31 kD/pI 5.7, 16 kD/pI 4.6, 20 kD/pI 8.3, 50 kD/pI 6.7, 48 kD/pI 6.6, 28 kD/pI 5.7, 23 kD/pI 4.8 and 25 kD/pI 4.7; simultaneously, two protein spots that were observed earlier disappeared. In Jing 411, three protein spots of 21 kD/pI 6.4, 18 kD/pI 5.4, and 14 kD/pI 7.0 increased in content at 12 h after inoculation. At the 3 d time point, two protein spots of 80 kD/pI 5.4 and 14 kD/pI 7.0 increased in content, however, one protein spot (16 kD/pI 5.4) showed decrease in protein abundance. At the 5 d time point, three protein spots of 50 kD/pI 7.3, 40 kD/pI 7.3, and 24 kD/pI 7.2 and two protein spots of 40 kD/pI 4.8 and 14 kD/pI 7.2 showed increase and decrease in protein abundance, respectively, but there were no novel protein spots induced. Among the 12 novel protein spots induced in Brock, six spots were identified using MALDI-TOF-MS and NCBI database searching, which were F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein, heavy metal transport/detoxification protein, endo-beta-1,3-glucanase (two isozymes), beta-1,3-glucanase precursor and zinc finger protein. These proteins are involved in a wide range of physiological processes, such as cell cycle control, development, phytohormone response, and resistance to fungal disease. Thus, the proteome changes in Brock and Jing 411 leaves are probably associated with the resistance and susceptibility to powder mildew, respectively.

Key words: Powdery mildew, Wheat, Proteome, Beta-1,3-glucanase, MALDI-TOF-MS


[1] Liu J-Y(刘金元), Tao W-J(陶文静), Duan X-Y(段霞瑜), Xiang Q-J(向齐君), Liu D-J(刘大钧), Chen P-D(陈佩度). Molecular marker assisted identification of Pm genes involved in the powdery mildew resistant wheat cultivars (lines). Acta Phytopathol Sin (植物病理学报), 2000, 30(2): 133-139 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2] Liu J-Y(刘金元), Liu D-J(刘大钧). Progress of the study on wheat powdery mildew resistant genes. Acta Phytopathol Sin (植物病理学报), 2000, 30(4): 289-295 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3] Yu L, Niu J S, Ma Z Q, Chen P D, Qi L L, Liu D J. Cloning, characterization and chromosome localization of two powdery mildew resistance-related gene sequences from wheat.Acta Bot Sin, 2002, 44: 1438-1444

[4] Yahiaoui N, Srichumpa P, Dudler R, Keller B. Genome analysis at different ploidy levels allows cloning of the powdery mildew resistance gene Pm3b from hexaploid wheat. Plant J, 2004, 37: 528-538

[5] Wang Z Y, Zheng Q, Peng Y K, Xie C J, Sun Q X, Yang Z M. Identification of random amplified polymorphism DNA and simple sequence repeat markers linked to powdery mildew resistance in common wheat cultivar Brock. Plant Prod Sci, 2004, 7: 319-323

[6] Wang Z Y, Zhao P, Chen H, Peng Y K, Xie C J, Sun Q X, Yang Z M. Random amplified polymorphic DNA and sequence characterized amplified region marker linked to unknown powdery mildew resistance gene in wheat cultivar Brock. Plant Prod Sci, 2005, 8: 578-585

[7] Wang Z-Y(王振英), Zhao H-M(赵红梅), Hong J-X(洪敬欣), Chen L-Y(陈丽媛), Zhu J(朱婕), Li G(李刚), Peng Y-K(彭永康), Xie C-J(解超杰), Liu Z-Y(刘志勇), Sun Q-X(孙其信), Yang Z-M(杨作民). Identification and analysis of four novel molecular markers linked to powdery mildew resistance gene Pm21 in 6VS chromosome short arm of Haynaldia villosa. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33: 605-611 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Zhang W-J(张维佳), Li C-Z(李纯正), Huang H-Q(黄海泉), Wang Z-Y(王振英), Peng Y-K(彭永康). Different proteins in mitochondrial proteome of T-tape maize cytoplasmic male-sterile line and its maintainer line. J Mol Cell Biol (分子细胞生物学报), 2007, 40(6): 410-418 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Balmer Y, Vensel W H, DuPont F M, Buchanan B B, Hurkman W J. Proteome of amyloplasts isolated from developing wheat endosperm presents evidence of broad metabolic capability. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 1591-1602

[10] Zhao C F, Wang J Q, Cao M L, Zhao K, Shao J M, Lei T T, Yin J N, Hill G G, Xu N Z, Liu S Q. Proteomic changes in rice leaves during development of field-grown rice plants. Proteomics, 2005, 5: 961-972

[11] Cui S, Huang F, Wang J, Ma X, Cheng Y, Liu J. A proteomic analysis of cold stress responses in rice seedlings. Proteomics, 2005, 5: 3162-3172

[12] Yan S P, Tang Z C, Su W A, Sun W N. Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics, 2005, 5: 235-244

[13] Salekdeh G H, Siopongco J, Wade L J, Ghareyazie B, Bennett J. Proteomic analysis of rice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics, 2002, 2: 1131-1145

[14] Frédérique R, Pascale G, Dominique V, Michel Z. Protein changes in response to progressive water deficit in maize. Plant Physiol, 1998, 117: 1253-1263

[15] Taylor N L, Heazlewood J L, Day D A, Millar A H. Differential impact of environmental stresses on the pea mitochondrial proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2005, 4: 1122-1133

[16] Antonio J C, Christine C, Nathalie Z, Christian M, Emmanuelle L, Alain V D, Christophe C. Proteomic analysis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) tissues subjected to herbicide stress. J Exp Bot, 2005, 56: 2783-2795

[17] Sun T Kim, Sang G K, Du H H, Sun Y K, Han J K, Byung H L, Jeung J L, Kyu Y K. Proteomic analysis of pathogen-responsive proteins from rice leaves induced by rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea.Proteomics, 2004, 4: 3569-3578

[18] Curto M, Camafeita E, Lopez J A, Maldonado A M, Rubiales D, Jorrín J V. A proteomic approach to study pea (Pisum sativum)responses to powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi). Proteomics, 2006, 6: 163-174

[19] Wang Y, Yang L M, Xu H B, Li Q F, Ma Z Q, Chu C G. Differential proteomic analysis of proteins in wheat spikes induced by Fusarium graminearum. Proteomics, 2005, 5: 4496-4503

[20]Feng D-S(封德顺), Xu Q-Y(徐勤迎), Wang H-G(王洪刚), Tian J-C(田纪春). Changes of protein in wheat leaf after the infection of powdery mildew. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报)，2007, 22:123-126 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21] Wang Z, Zhao P, Chen H, Peng Y, Xie C, Sun Q, Yang Z. Identification of RAPD markers and development of SCAR markers linked to a powdery mildew resistance gene, and their location on chromosome in wheat cultivar Brock. Plant Prod Sci, 2005, 8: 578-585

[22] Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anual Biochem,1976, 72: 248-254

[23] O’Farrell P H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem,1975, 250: 4007-4021

[24] Laemmli U K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 1970, 227: 680-685

[25] Neuhoff V, Arold N, Taube D, Ehrhardt W. Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylami de gels including isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivity using Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 and R-250. Electrophoresis, 1988, 9: 255-262

[26] Xie D X, Feys B F, James S, Nieto M, Turner J G.COI1: An Arabidopsis gene required for jasmonate regulateddefense and fertility. Science, 1998, 280: 1091-1094

[27] Bai C, Sen P, Hofmann K, Ma L, Goebl M, Harper J W, Elledge S J. SKP1 connects cell cycle regulators to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through a novel motif, the F-box. Cell, 1996, 86: 263-274

[28] Ward E R, Payne G B, Moyer M B. Differential regulation of β-1,3-glucanase messenger RNAs in response to pathogen infection. Plant Physiol, 1991, 96: 390-397

[29] Selitrennikoff C P. Antifungal proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2001, 67: 2883-2894

[30] Anfoka G, Buchenauer H. Systemic acquired resistance in tomato against Phytophthora infestans by pre-inoculation with tobacco necrosis virus. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 1997, 50: 85-101

[31] Esquerré-Tugaé M T, Boudart G, Dumas B. Cell wall degrading enzymes, inhibitory proteins, and oligosaccharides participate in the molecular dialogue between plants and pathogens. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2000, 38: 157-163

[32] Klarzynski O, Plesse B, Joubert J M. Linear β-1,3-glucanase are elicitors of defense responses in tobacco. Plant Physiol, 2000, 124: 1027-1037

[33] Ham K S, Wu S C, Darvill A G. Fungal pathogens secrete an inhibitor protein that distinguishes isoforms of plant pathogenesis-related endo-β-1,3-glucanase. Plant J, 1997, 11: 169-179
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2