欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1974-1980.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01974

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

控释肥对坡耕地花生生理特性、产量及品质的影响

王艳华,董元杰*,邱现奎,胡国庆   

  1. 山东农业大学资源与环境学院,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-25 修回日期:2010-06-28 出版日期:2010-11-12 网络出版日期:2010-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 董元杰, E-mail: yjdong@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8241546
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD10B07)和山东农业大学博士后基金(76226)资助。

Effect of Controlled Release Fertilizer on Physiological Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Peanut in Slope Field

WANG Yan-Hua,DONG Yuan-Jie*,QIU Xian-Kui,HU Guo-Qing   

  1. College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
  • Received:2010-04-25 Revised:2010-06-28 Published:2010-11-12 Published online:2010-08-30
  • Contact: DONG Yuan-Jie,E-mail:yjdong@sdau.edu.cn,Tel:0538-8241546

摘要: 选用山东省大面积种植的花生品种小白沙,在不同坡度、相同降雨侵蚀条件下,以普通复合肥为对照,研究了控释复合肥对大田花生生理特性、产量及品质的影响。结果表明,在不同坡度、相同施肥水平下,与相同坡度普通肥料相比,控释肥能提高花生生长后期叶片叶绿素含量、净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)和气孔导度(Gs),有效地降低气孔限制值(Ls);改善花生植株氮、磷、钾积累量和养分当季利用效率;单株结果数提高7.1%~36.0%,百仁重提高5.8%~9.7%,荚果产量和生物产量都有增加,其中坡度为10°时,荚果产量和生物产量分别提高17.1%和3.8%,15°时分别提高15.7%和15.7%;花生籽粒的粗脂肪、蛋白质含量都高于对照。同时,随着坡度的增大,控释复合肥和普通复合肥处理的花生叶片叶绿素含量、净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)、花生体内氮、磷、钾积累量、肥料养分当季利用效率、荚果产量和生物产量均有不同程度的降低,但同种肥料不同坡度处理间花生籽粒品质差异不显著。

关键词: 控释肥, 坡耕地, 花生, 生理特性, 产量, 品质

Abstract: Slope field has been one of the major factors limiting peanut (Arachis hypogea) production in Shandong province. Improving fertilizer use efficiency and reducing nutrients loss play an important role to obtain high yield and quality in slope field. Previous studies have shown controlled release fertilizer can release nutrients to soil during peanut growing season and improve yield and quality.In the experiment, four treatments of man-made slopes in 0°, 5°, 10° and 15° were set in field conditions. The results showed that the controlled release fertilizer increased the leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rateandstomatal conductance and decreased stomatal limitation (Ls) in the leaf during the late growth stage, and improved the accumulation amount and use efficiency of N, P and K, and increased pods per plant by 7.1%–36.0%, 100-kemel weight by 5.8%–9.7%, pod yield by 17.1% and total biomass by 3.8% when the slope was 10°, pod yield by 15.7% and total biomass by 15.7% when the slope was 15°. The controlled release fertilizer also improved the protein and fat contents. In addition, when the slope increased, the leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), the accumulation amount and use efficiency of N, P and K, pod yield and total biomass under using the two kinds of fertilizers decreased by a certain extent. But the differences for the same fertilizer among different slopeswere not significant.

Key words: Controlled release fertilizer, Slope field, Peanut, Physiological characteristics, Yield, Quality

[1]Zhai H-J(翟海军), Gao Y-J(高亚军), Zhou J-B(周建斌). The review of controlled/slow release fertilizer. Agric Res Arid Area (干旱地区农业研究), 2002, 20(1): 45–48 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Shaviv A. Advances in controlled-release fertilizer. In: Spark D L ed. Advances in Agronomy. California: Academic Press, 2001. 71: pp 1–49
[3]Lu Z-S(陆正松), Zhao L(赵玲), Zhang S(张硕), Ma Y-J(马永军). Effect of soil pollution and fertilization on qualities of rice and vegetable. Soils Fert (土壤肥料), 2001, (4): 13–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Zhang N-M(张乃明), Li G(李刚), Su Y-B(苏友波), Mao K-M(毛昆明), Deng Y-L(邓玉龙). Characteristics of nitrate accumulation in the greenhouse soil of Dianchi basin and its effect on the environment. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2006, 22(6): 215–217(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Fu T(傅涛), Ni J-P(倪九派), Wei C-F(魏朝富), Xie D-T(谢德体). Research on nutrient loss from terra gialla soil in three gorges region under different rainfall intensity. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2002, 16(2): 33–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Fu T(傅涛), Ni J-P(倪九派), Wei C-F(魏朝富), Xie D-T(谢德体). Research on the nutrient loss from purple soil under different rain fall intensities and slopes. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2003, 9(1): 71–74 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Zheng J-Y(郑剑英), Wu R-J(吴瑞俊), Zhai L-N(翟连宁). Distribution of soil fertility in Zhifang gully watershed of the loess hilly region. Bull Soil Water Conserv (水土保持通报), 1996, 16(4): 26–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Liu B-Z(刘秉正), Li G-L(李光录), Wu F-Q(吴发启), Zhao X-G(赵晓光). The regular patterns of the loss of soil nutrients on southern loess plateau. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 1995, 9(2): 77–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Zhao S-M(赵世民), Tang H(唐辉), Wang Y-M(王亚明), Zhou L-H(周立宏). Study situation and developing prospect of coated slow/controlled release fertilizers. Sci Technol Chem Ind (化工科技), 2003, 11(5): 50–54(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Acquaye S, Inubushi K. Comparative effects of application of coated and noncoated urea in clayey and sandy paddy soil microcosms examined by the 15N tracer technique. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2004, 50: 205–213
[11]Zheng S-X(郑圣先), Nie J(聂军), Xiong J-Y(熊金英), Xiao J(肖剑), Luo Z-Z(罗尊长), Yi G-Y(易国英). Study on role of controlled release fertilizer in increasing the efficiency of nitrogen utilization and rice yield. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2001, 7(1): 11–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Wang X-M(王新民), Hou Y-L(侯彦林), Jie X-L(介晓磊), Tan J-F(谭金芳). Effect of applying controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on yield enhancement of winter wheat. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国农业生态学报), 2004, 12(2): 98–101 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Wang Q(汪强), Li S-L(李双凌), Han Y-L(韩燕来). Effect of slow/controlled release fertilizers on yield and fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency. Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2007, 38(4): 693–696 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Fu J-R(符建荣). Effects of controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and N recovery. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2001, 7(2): 145–152 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Li X-D(李向东), Wang X-Y(王晓云), Zhang G-Y(张高英), Wan Y-S(万勇善), Li J(李军). The regulation of nitrogen for peanut senescence. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2000, 33(5): 30–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Wan S-B(万书波), Zhang J-C(张建成), Feng H-S(封海胜). Status and effect of production of peanut in agricultural development of western China. Rev China Agric Sci Technol (中国农业科技导报), 2004, 6(5): 53–54 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]He Z-F(何照范). The seed quality and its analytic technique of grain and oil. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1985. pp 167–172 (in Chinese)
[18]The Biochemistry Teaching and Research Section of Biology Department of Beijing University (北京大学生物系生物化学教研室). The Experiment Instruction of Biochemistry (生物化学实验指导). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1979 (in Chinese)
[19]Kong G(孔刚), Wang Q-J(王全九), Fan J(樊军). Research on nutrient Loss from loessial soil under different slope. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2007, 21(3): 14–18 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Zhang Y-S(张玉树), Ding H(丁洪), Lu C-S(卢春生), Li W-H(李卫华), Chen L(陈磊). Effect of controlled release fertilizers on the yield and quality of peanut and nutrient use efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2007, 13(4): 700–706 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Li F-M(李方敏), Fan X-L(樊小林), Chen W-D(陈文东). Effects of controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2005, 11(4): 494–500 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 李海芬, 魏浩, 温世杰, 鲁清, 刘浩, 李少雄, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 梁炫强. 花生电压依赖性阴离子通道基因(AhVDAC)的克隆及在果针向地性反应中表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1558-1565.
[8] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[9] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[10] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[11] 刘嘉欣, 兰玉, 徐倩玉, 李红叶, 周新宇, 赵璇, 甘毅, 刘宏波, 郑月萍, 詹仪花, 张刚, 郑志富. 耐三唑并嘧啶类除草剂花生种质创制与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1027-1034.
[12] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 杜浩, 程玉汉, 李泰, 侯智红, 黎永力, 南海洋, 董利东, 刘宝辉, 程群. 利用Ln位点进行分子设计提高大豆单荚粒数[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[15] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!