欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1974-1980.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01974

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

控释肥对坡耕地花生生理特性、产量及品质的影响

王艳华,董元杰*,邱现奎,胡国庆   

  1. 山东农业大学资源与环境学院，山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-25 修回日期:2010-06-28 出版日期:2010-11-12 网络出版日期:2010-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 董元杰, E-mail: yjdong@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8241546
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD10B07)和山东农业大学博士后基金(76226)资助。

Effect of Controlled Release Fertilizer on Physiological Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Peanut in Slope Field

WANG Yan-Hua,DONG Yuan-Jie*,QIU Xian-Kui,HU Guo-Qing   

  1. College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
  • Received:2010-04-25 Revised:2010-06-28 Published:2010-11-12 Published online:2010-08-30
  • Contact: DONG Yuan-Jie,E-mail:yjdong@sdau.edu.cn,Tel:0538-8241546

PDF

1761

被引次数

24

摘要： 选用山东省大面积种植的花生品种小白沙，在不同坡度、相同降雨侵蚀条件下，以普通复合肥为对照，研究了控释复合肥对大田花生生理特性、产量及品质的影响。结果表明，在不同坡度、相同施肥水平下，与相同坡度普通肥料相比，控释肥能提高花生生长后期叶片叶绿素含量、净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)和气孔导度(Gs)，有效地降低气孔限制值(Ls)；改善花生植株氮、磷、钾积累量和养分当季利用效率；单株结果数提高7.1%~36.0%，百仁重提高5.8%~9.7%，荚果产量和生物产量都有增加，其中坡度为10°时，荚果产量和生物产量分别提高17.1%和3.8%，15°时分别提高15.7%和15.7%；花生籽粒的粗脂肪、蛋白质含量都高于对照。同时，随着坡度的增大，控释复合肥和普通复合肥处理的花生叶片叶绿素含量、净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)、花生体内氮、磷、钾积累量、肥料养分当季利用效率、荚果产量和生物产量均有不同程度的降低，但同种肥料不同坡度处理间花生籽粒品质差异不显著。

关键词: 控释肥, 坡耕地, 花生, 生理特性, 产量, 品质

Abstract: Slope field has been one of the major factors limiting peanut (Arachis hypogea) production in Shandong province. Improving fertilizer use efficiency and reducing nutrients loss play an important role to obtain high yield and quality in slope field. Previous studies have shown controlled release fertilizer can release nutrients to soil during peanut growing season and improve yield and quality.In the experiment, four treatments of man-made slopes in 0°, 5°, 10° and 15° were set in field conditions. The results showed that the controlled release fertilizer increased the leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rateandstomatal conductance and decreased stomatal limitation (Ls) in the leaf during the late growth stage, and improved the accumulation amount and use efficiency of N, P and K, and increased pods per plant by 7.1%–36.0%, 100-kemel weight by 5.8%–9.7%, pod yield by 17.1% and total biomass by 3.8% when the slope was 10°, pod yield by 15.7% and total biomass by 15.7% when the slope was 15°. The controlled release fertilizer also improved the protein and fat contents. In addition, when the slope increased, the leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), the accumulation amount and use efficiency of N, P and K, pod yield and total biomass under using the two kinds of fertilizers decreased by a certain extent. But the differences for the same fertilizer among different slopeswere not significant.

Key words: Controlled release fertilizer, Slope field, Peanut, Physiological characteristics, Yield, Quality

[1]Zhai H-J(翟海军), Gao Y-J(高亚军), Zhou J-B(周建斌). The review of controlled/slow release fertilizer. Agric Res Arid Area (干旱地区农业研究), 2002, 20(1): 45–48 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Shaviv A. Advances in controlled-release fertilizer. In: Spark D L ed. Advances in Agronomy. California: Academic Press, 2001. 71: pp 1–49
[3]Lu Z-S(陆正松), Zhao L(赵玲), Zhang S(张硕), Ma Y-J(马永军). Effect of soil pollution and fertilization on qualities of rice and vegetable. Soils Fert (土壤肥料), 2001, (4): 13–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Zhang N-M(张乃明), Li G(李刚), Su Y-B(苏友波), Mao K-M(毛昆明), Deng Y-L(邓玉龙). Characteristics of nitrate accumulation in the greenhouse soil of Dianchi basin and its effect on the environment. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2006, 22(6): 215–217(in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Fu T(傅涛), Ni J-P(倪九派), Wei C-F(魏朝富), Xie D-T(谢德体). Research on nutrient loss from terra gialla soil in three gorges region under different rainfall intensity. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2002, 16(2): 33–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Fu T(傅涛), Ni J-P(倪九派), Wei C-F(魏朝富), Xie D-T(谢德体). Research on the nutrient loss from purple soil under different rain fall intensities and slopes. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2003, 9(1): 71–74 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Zheng J-Y(郑剑英), Wu R-J(吴瑞俊), Zhai L-N(翟连宁). Distribution of soil fertility in Zhifang gully watershed of the loess hilly region. Bull Soil Water Conserv (水土保持通报), 1996, 16(4): 26–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Liu B-Z(刘秉正), Li G-L(李光录), Wu F-Q(吴发启), Zhao X-G(赵晓光). The regular patterns of the loss of soil nutrients on southern loess plateau. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 1995, 9(2): 77–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Zhao S-M(赵世民), Tang H(唐辉), Wang Y-M(王亚明), Zhou L-H(周立宏). Study situation and developing prospect of coated slow/controlled release fertilizers. Sci Technol Chem Ind (化工科技), 2003, 11(5): 50–54(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]Acquaye S, Inubushi K. Comparative effects of application of coated and noncoated urea in clayey and sandy paddy soil microcosms examined by the 15N tracer technique. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2004, 50: 205–213
[11]Zheng S-X(郑圣先), Nie J(聂军), Xiong J-Y(熊金英), Xiao J(肖剑), Luo Z-Z(罗尊长), Yi G-Y(易国英). Study on role of controlled release fertilizer in increasing the efficiency of nitrogen utilization and rice yield. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2001, 7(1): 11–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Wang X-M(王新民), Hou Y-L(侯彦林), Jie X-L(介晓磊), Tan J-F(谭金芳). Effect of applying controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on yield enhancement of winter wheat. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国农业生态学报), 2004, 12(2): 98–101 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Wang Q(汪强), Li S-L(李双凌), Han Y-L(韩燕来). Effect of slow/controlled release fertilizers on yield and fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency. Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2007, 38(4): 693–696 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Fu J-R(符建荣). Effects of controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and N recovery. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2001, 7(2): 145–152 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Li X-D(李向东), Wang X-Y(王晓云), Zhang G-Y(张高英), Wan Y-S(万勇善), Li J(李军). The regulation of nitrogen for peanut senescence. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2000, 33(5): 30–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Wan S-B(万书波), Zhang J-C(张建成), Feng H-S(封海胜). Status and effect of production of peanut in agricultural development of western China. Rev China Agric Sci Technol (中国农业科技导报), 2004, 6(5): 53–54 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]He Z-F(何照范). The seed quality and its analytic technique of grain and oil. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1985. pp 167–172 (in Chinese)
[18]The Biochemistry Teaching and Research Section of Biology Department of Beijing University (北京大学生物系生物化学教研室). The Experiment Instruction of Biochemistry (生物化学实验指导). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1979 (in Chinese)
[19]Kong G(孔刚), Wang Q-J(王全九), Fan J(樊军). Research on nutrient Loss from loessial soil under different slope. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2007, 21(3): 14–18 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Zhang Y-S(张玉树), Ding H(丁洪), Lu C-S(卢春生), Li W-H(李卫华), Chen L(陈磊). Effect of controlled release fertilizers on the yield and quality of peanut and nutrient use efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2007, 13(4): 700–706 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Li F-M(李方敏), Fan X-L(樊小林), Chen W-D(陈文东). Effects of controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2005, 11(4): 494–500 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[6] 陆一楚, 李振影, 买春海, 赵晓蕊, 王利祥. 夜间复合体关键基因AhLUX1正向调控花生结瘤的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1658-1668.
[7] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[8] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[11] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[12] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[13] 谷春苗, 王润风, 黄璐, 刘浩, 鲁清, 李海芬, 李少雄, 何双呈, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 谭斌, 余倩霞. 花生WOX基因家族的全基因组分析及不定芽再生候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1326-1340.
[14] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[15] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2