欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (04): 747-753.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00747

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GreenSeeker的冬小麦NDVI分析与产量估算

王磊,白由路,卢艳丽,王贺,杨俐苹   

  1. 农业部植物营养与肥料重点实验室/中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-26 修回日期:2012-01-19 出版日期:2012-04-12 网络出版日期:2012-02-13
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31000937)资助。

NDVI Analysis and Yield Estimation in Winter Wheat based on GreenSeeker

WANG Lei,BAI You-Lu,LU Yan-Li,WANG He,YANG Li-Ping   

  1. Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Ministry of Agriculture / Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2011-09-26 Revised:2012-01-19 Published:2012-04-12 Published online:2012-02-13

摘要: 以2007—2009年连续2个冬小麦生长季的田间试验数据为基础,利用GreenSeeker获取冠层归一化差值植被指数(NDVI),分别对不同氮营养条件下冬小麦的产量变化、冠层NDVI值随施氮量和生育期的动态变化,以及NDVI与产量的相关性定量分析,建立基于NDVI的冬小麦产量估算模型。结果表明,冬小麦的产量变化随施氮量的增加呈抛物线趋势变化;冠层NDVI在返青期前随施氮量增加基本不变,返青期至灌浆初期随施氮量增加呈显著增加趋势;整个生育期冠层NDVI呈现“低–高–低”变化趋势。冬小麦整个生育期不同施氮水平下的NDVI值与产量的相关性均为正相关关系,且相关性随生育期逐渐增强,在灌浆末期达到最大。利用NDVI建立的冬小麦产量估算模型,以灌浆初期(P=0.005)和灌浆末期(P<0.001)的模型达到极显著水平。经验证,灌浆初期的冬小麦产量预测值与实测值的回归关系达到了显著水平(P=0.0129),灌浆末期则达到极显著水平(P=0.0002)。因此,利用灌浆初期和灌浆末期的NDVI值可以预测冬小麦产量,尤以灌浆末期预测效果更佳。

关键词: 冬小麦, 施氮量, 产量, 冠层NDVI, 估算模型

Abstract: The field experiment was carried out in two winter wheat growing seasons during 2007–2009. Winter wheat canopy reflectances in the 656 nm and 770 nm wavelengths were obtained by GreenSeeker at over-wintering stage, reviving stage, jointing stage, early-filling stage, and last-filling stage, respectively, in order to compute NDVI [(NIR770-R656)/(NIR770+R656)]. Yields were collected at harvest stage and compared among different nitrogen application rates. Canopy NDVI changes were analyzed with nitrogen increasing and growth, respectively. Furthermore, correlation analysis was done between yield and canopy NDVI. Yield estimation models were established for winter wheat based on canopy NDVI. Results showed that, winter wheat yield changed in parabola shape with N increasing. Wheat canopy NDVI value presented almost changeless before reviving stage, but great increase from reviving stage to early-filling stage with N increasing. In the whole growth stage, canopy NDVI value presented a trend of “low–high–low”. The correlation between canopy NDVI and yield was positive in the whole growth stage with different N rates and gradually became higher with growth, and up to the highest at the late-filling stage. The yield estimation models based on canopy NDVI at early-filling stage (P=0.005) and late-filling stage (P<0.001) were greatly significant. Regression validated between predicted and measured values was significant at early-filling stage (P=0.0129) and greatly significant at late-filling stage (P=0.0002). So, it is feasible that using canopy NDVI at early-filling stage and late-filling stage estimates winter wheat yield, especially at late-filling stage.

Key words: Winter wheat, Nitrogen application rate, Yield, Canopy NDVI, Estimation models

[1]Chen J F, Chen K M, Xu J B. Research on the remote sensing monitoring of grassland productivity based on TM-NDVI. Agric Sci & Technol, 2011, 12: 119–122

[2]Mkhabela M S, Bullock P, Raj S, Wang S, Yang Y. Crop yield forecasting on the Canadian Prairies using MODIS NDVI data. Agric & Forest Meteorol, 2011, 115: 385–393

[3]Hasegawa K, Matsuyama H, Tsuzuki H, Sweda T. Improving the estimation of leaf area index by using remotely sensed NDVI with BRDF signatures Remote Sens Environ, 2010, 114: 514–519

[4]Aboelghar M, Arafat S, Saleh A, Naeem S, Shirbeny M, Belal A. Retrieving leaf area index from SPOT4 satellite data. The Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci, 2010, 13: 121–127

[5]Trishchenko A P. Effects of spectral response function on surface reflectance and NDVI measured with moderate resolution satellite sensors: extension to AVHRR NOAA-17, 18 and METOP-A. Remote Sens Environ, 2009, 113: 335–341

[6]Hansen P M, Schjoerring J K. Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression. Remote Sens Environ, 2003, 86: 542–553

[7]Aparicio N, Villegas D, Casadesus J, Araus J L, Royo C. Spectral vegetation indices as non-destructive tools for determining durum wheat yield. Agron J, 2000, 92: 83–91

[8]Soenen S A, Peddle D R, Hall R J, Coburn C A, Hall F G. Estimating aboveground forest biomass from canopy reflectance model inversion in mountainous terrain. Remote Sens Environ, 2010, 114: 1325–1337

[9]Gianquinto G, Orsini F, Fecondini M, Mezzetti M, Sanbo P, Bona S. A methodological approach for defining spectral indices for assessing tomato nitrogen status and yield. Eur J Agron, 2011, 35, 135–143

[10]William R R, Gordon V J. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron J, 1999, 91: 357–363

[11]Wu J-H(吴军华), Yue S-C(岳善超), Hou P(侯鹏), Meng Q-F(孟庆峰), Cui Z-L(崔振领), Li W(李雯), Chen X-P(陈新平). Monitoring winter wheat population dynamics using an active crop sensor. Spectroscopy and Spectral Anal (光谱学与光谱分析), 2011, 31(2): 535–538 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Tan C-W(谭昌伟), Wang J-H(王纪华), Zhu X-K(朱新开), Wang Y(王妍), Wang J-C(王君婵), Tong L(童璐), Guo W-S(郭文善). Monitoring main growth status parameters at jointing stage in winter wheat based on Landsat TM images. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2011, 44(7): 1358–1366 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Feng M-C(冯美臣), Xiao L-J(肖璐洁), Yang W-D(杨武德), Ding G-W(丁光伟). Predicting grain yield of irrigation-land and dry-land winter wheat based on remotesensing data and meteorological data. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2010, 26(11): 183–188 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Reyniers M, Vrindts E, Baerdemaeker J D. Comparison of an aerial-based system and an on the ground continuous measuring device to predict yield of winter wheat. Eur J Agron, 2006, 24: 87–94

[15]Lu Y-L(卢艳丽), Hu H(胡昊), Bai Y-L(白由路), Wang L(王磊), Wang H(王贺), Yang L-P(杨俐苹). Effects of vegetation coverage on the canopy spectral and yield quantitative estimation in wheat. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2010, 30(1): 96–100 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Feng M-C(冯美臣), Yang W-D(杨武德). Changes in NDVI and yield of winter wheat cultivars with different plant types. Chin J Eco-agric (中国生态农业学报), 2011, 19(1): 87–92 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Ren J-Q(任建强), Chen Z-X(陈仲新), Zhou Q-B(周清波), Tang H-J(唐华俊). Retrieving the spatial-explicit harvest index for winter wheat from NDVI time series data. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2010, 26(8): 160–167 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Hu H(胡昊), Bai Y-L(白由路), Yang L-P(杨俐苹), Lu Y-L(卢艳丽), Wang L(王磊), Wang H(王贺), Wang Z-Y(王志勇). Diagnosis of nitrogen nutrition in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) via SPAD-502 and GreenSeeker. Chin J Eco-agric (中国生态农业学报), 2010, 18(4): 748–752 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Gou J-H(郭建华), Wang X(王秀), Meng Z-J(孟志军), Zhao C-J(赵春江), Yu Z-R(于振荣), Chen L-P(陈立平). Study on diagnosing nitrogen nutrition status of corn using GreenSeeker and SPAD meter. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2008, 14(1): 43–47 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Pinter P J, Jackson R D, Idso S B, Reginato R J. Multidate spectral reflectance as predictors of yield inwater stressed wheat and barley. Int J Remote Sens, 1981, 2: 43-48

[21]Mahey R K, Singh R, Sidhu S S, Narang R S. The use of remote sensing to assess the effects of water stress on wheat. Exp Agric, 1991, 27: 423–429

[22]Lukina E V, Freeman K W, Wynn K J, Thomason W E, Mullen R W, Stone M L, Solie J B, Klatt A R, Johnson G V, Elliott R L, Raun W R. Nitrogen fertilization optimization algorithm based on in-season estimates of yield and plant nitrogen uptake. J Plant Nutr, 2001, 24: 885–898

[23]Raun W R, Johnson G V, Stone M L, Solie J B, Lukina E V, Thomason W E, Schepers J S. In-season prediction of potential grain yield in winter wheat using canopy reflectance. Agron J, 2001, 93: 131–138

[24]Hansen P M, Jørgensen J R, Thomsen A. Predicting grain yield and protein content in winter wheat and spring barley using repeated canopy reflectance measurements and partial least squares regression. J Agric Sci, 2002, 139: 307–318

[25]Ferrio J P, Villegas D, Zarco J, Aparicio N, Araus J L, Royo C. Assessment of durum wheat yield using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectra of canopies. Field Corps Res, 2005, 94: 126–148

[26]Moriondo M, Maselli F, Bindi M. A simple model of regional wheat yield based on NDVI data. Eur J Agron, 2007, 26: 266–274

[27]Xue L H, Cao W X, Yang L Z. Predicting grain yield and protein content in winter wheat at different N supply levels using canopy reflectance spectra. Pedosphere, 2007, 17: 646–653

[28]Royo C, Aparicio N, Villegas D, Casadesus J, Monneveux P, Araus J L. Usefulness of spectral reflectance indices as durum wheat yield predictors under contrasting Mediterranean conditions. Int J Remote Sens, 2003, 24: 4403–4419

[29]Freeman K W, Raun W R, Johnson G V, Mullen R W, Stone M L, Solie J B. Late-season prediction of wheat grain yield and grain protein. Comm Soil Sci & Plant Anal, 2003, 34: 1837–1852

[30]Li S-D(李升东), Wang F-H(王法宏), Si J-S(司纪升), Kong L-A(孔令安), Feng B(冯波), Zhang B(张宾). The relationship between normalized difference vegetation index and yield of different genotype wheat varieties. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2008, 26(6): 47–50 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[2] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[3] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[4] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[5] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[6] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[7] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[10] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[11] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[12] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[13] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!