欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (07): 1325-1329.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01325

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

非生物胁迫对玉米杂交种及其亲本自交系产量性状的影响

杨晓钦1,张仁和1,*,薛吉全1,*,邰书静2,张兴华1,路海东1,郭艳萍1,郭德林1   

  1. 1西北农林科技大学农学院 / 农业部西北旱区玉米生物学与遗传育种重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100; 2陕西省咸阳市农业科学研究院, 陕西咸阳 712000
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-14 修回日期:2012-04-07 出版日期:2013-07-12 网络出版日期:2013-03-23
  • 通讯作者: 张仁和, E-mail: zhangrenhe1975@yohoo.com.cn; 薛吉全, E-mail: xjq2934@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2009CB118604)和陕西省科技统筹项目(2010KTZB02-01-02)资助。

Effects of Abiotic Stress on Yield Traits of Maize Hybrids and Their Parental Inbred Lines

YANG Xiao-Qin1,ZHANG Ren-He1,*,XUE Ji-Quan1,*,TAI Shu-Jing2,ZHANG Xing-Hua1,LU Hai-Dong1,GUO Yan-Ping1,GUO De-Lin1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University / Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Maize in Arid Area of Northwest Region, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling 712100, China; 2 Xianyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xianyang 712000, China
  • Received:2012-09-14 Revised:2012-04-07 Published:2013-07-12 Published online:2013-03-23
  • Contact: 张仁和, E-mail: zhangrenhe1975@yohoo.com.cn; 薛吉全, E-mail: xjq2934@yahoo.com.cn

RichHTML

PDF

1337

被引次数

12

摘要：

以抗逆性较强玉米杂交种郑单958及其亲本(郑58、昌7-2)和抗逆性较差的杂交种陕单902及其亲本(K22、K12)为材料, 在不同种植密度(45 000株 hm-2和75 000株 hm-2)、施氮量(112.5 kg hm-2和337.5 kg hm-2)和灌水量(正常灌水和前期干旱控水)条件下, 分析了2个杂交种及其亲本产量及相关生理特性的变化规律。结果表明, 在非生物胁迫条件下(高密度、低氮和前期干旱控水), 与陕单902相比, 品种郑单958叶面积指数、SPAD值、花后干物质积累量和产量的中亲优势值分别增加18%、9%、28%和22%; 与陕单902亲本(K22、K12)比, 郑单958亲本(郑58、昌7-2)叶面积指数、SPAD值、花后干物质积累量和产量的中亲值分别增加45%、36%、51%和45%; 郑单958产量的中亲值和中亲优势显著高于陕单902, 且中亲值增幅高于杂种优势值。玉米杂交种郑单958较陕单902增产的同时, 增强了对非生物逆境适应的能力。玉米杂交种的抗逆性来自亲本自交系。玉米杂交种抗逆性强在于增强了花后叶片光合能力(较高的LAI和SPAD值), 促进了花后干物质积累。

关键词: 玉米, 杂交种, 自交系, 抗逆性, 产量

Abstract:

The field experiments were conducted to study the changes of grain yield and concerned physiological traits in stress-tolerant maize variety Zhengdan 958 and its parental inbred lines (Zheng 58 and Chang 7-2), as well as stress-sensitive maize variety Shaandan 902 and its parental inbred lines (K22, K12) under different treatments of density (45 000 and 75 000 plants ha−1), nitrogen application (112.5 and 337.5 kg ha−1), and irrigation (normal irrigation and controlling water at prophase). The results showed that there were little differences in yield, mean leaf area index after anthesis, mean SPAD after anthesis, post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and harvest index between Zhengdan 958 and Shaandan 902 under resource-replete conditions (low density, high nitrogen and normal irrigation). But there were great differences in all traits (besides harvest index) between Zhengdan 958 and Shaandan 902 under abiotic stress (high density, low nitrogen and drought stress), with much higher values in Zhengdan 958 than in Shaandan 902. Compared with Shaandan 902, mid-parent values of leaf area index, SPAD, post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and grain yield of Zhengdan 958 under abiotic stress (high density, low nitrogen and drought stress) increased by 45%, 36%, 51%, and 45%, respectively, and heterosis of Zhengdan 958 increased by 18%, 9%, 28%, and 22%, respectively. The mid-parent value of yield was much higher than heterosis of yield and both of them were higher in Zhengdan 958 than in Shaandan 902. So the maize variety Zhengdan 958 showed greater tolerance to abiotic stress which was mainly inherited from its parental inbred lines. Higher SPAD and LAI after anthesis contributed to post-anthesis dry matter accumulation, resulting in higher yield and higher stress tolerance.

Key words: Maize, Hybrids, Inbred lines, Stress tolerance, Grain yield

[1]Zhang S-H(张世煌), Xu Z-G(徐志刚). Cultival system changes and its effect on agricultural technique. Crops (作物杂志), 2009, (1): 1–3 (in Chinese)



[2]Duvick D N. Genetic progress in yield of united states maize. Maydica, 2005, 50: 193−202



[3]Ci X-K(慈晓科), Zhang S-H(张世煌), Xie Z-J(谢振江), Xu J-S(徐家舜), Lu Z-Y(卢振宇), Ru G-L(茹高林), Zhang D-G(张德贵), Li X-H(李新海), Xie C-X(谢传晓), Bai L(白丽), Li M-S(李明顺), Dong S-T(董树亭). Comparison of analysis method of genetic yield gain for the single-cross hybrids released during 1970s–2000s. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(12): 2185−2190 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Tollenaar M, Ahmadzadeh A, Lee A E. Physiological basis of heterosis for grain yield in maize. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 2086–2094



[5]Duvick D N. What is yield? In: Developing Drought and Low N-Tolerant Maize. Proceedings of Symposium. El Batan, Mexico: CIMMYT, 1996. pp 332−335



[6]Ci X K, Li M S, Liang X L, Xie Z J, Zhang D G, Li X H, Lu Z Y, Ru G L, Bai L, Xie C X, Hao Z F, Zhang S H. Genetic contribution to advanced yield for maize hybrids released from 1970 to 2000 in China. Crop Sci, 2011, 51: 13–20



[7]Zhang S-H(张世煌), Xu W-P(徐伟平), Li M-S(李明顺), Li X-H(李新海), Xu J-S(徐家舜). Challenge and opportunity in maize breeding program. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2008, 16(6): 1−5 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Tollernaar M, Lee A E. Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica, 2006, 51: 399-408



[9]Chen C-Y(陈传永), Hou Y-H(侯玉虹), Sun R(孙锐), Zhu P(朱平), Dong Z-Q(董志强), Zhao M(赵明). Effects of planting density on yield performance and density-tolerance analysis for maize hybrids. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(7): 1153−1160 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Wu Y S, Liu W G, Li X H, Li M S, Zhang D G, Hao Z F, Weng J F, Xu Y B, Bai L, Zhang S H, Xie C X. Low-nitrogen stress tolerance and nitrogen agronomic efficiency among maize inbreds: comparison of multiple indices and evaluation of genetic variation. Euphytica, 2011, 180: 281−290



[11]Qi W(齐伟), Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Wang K-J(王空军), Liu P(刘鹏), Dong S-T(董树亭). Effect of drought stress on the grain yield and root physiological traits of maize varieties with different drought tolerance. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2010, 21(1): 48−52 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Liu W, Tollenaar M. Response of yield heterosis to increasing plant density in maize. Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 1807–1816



[13]Liu W, Tollenaar M. Physiological mechanisms underlying heterosis for shade tolerance in maize. Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 1817–1826



[14]Troyer A F. Adaptedness and heterosis in corn and mule hybrids. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 528–543



[15]Zhang W-X(张卫星), Zhao Z(赵致), Bai G-X(柏光晓), Fu F-J(付芳婧), Cao S-S(曹绍书). Response on water stress and low nitrogen in different maize hybrid varieties and evaluation for their adversity-resistance. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(7): 1361–1370 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Lian Y-X(连艳鲜), Li C-H(李潮海), Zhou S-M(周苏玫). Maize dry matter yield production and distribution characteristic. J Henan Agric Sci (河南农业科学), 2003, (7): 7–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Andrea K E, Otegui M E, Cirilo A G, Eyherabide G. Genotypic variability in morphological and physiological traits among maize inbred line-nitrogen response. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 1266–1276



[18]Tollenaar M, Wu J. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1597−1640



[19]Xue J-Q(薛吉全), Zhang R-H(张仁和), Ma G-S(马国胜), Lu H-D(路海东), Zhang X-H(张兴华), Li F-Y(李凤艳), Hao Y-C(郝引川), Tai S-J(邰书静). Effects of plant density, nitrogen application, and water stress on yield formation of maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(6): 1022−1029 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Valentinuz O, Tollernaar M. Vertical profile of leaf senescence during grain filling period in older and newer maize hybrids. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 827–834



[21]Betran F J, Beck D, Banziger M, Edmeades O G. Secondary traits in parental inbreds and hybrids under stress and non-stress environments in tropical maize. Field Crops Res, 2003, 83: 51–65



[22]Banziger M, Edmeades O G, Lafitte R H. Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increasing N stress tolerance of tropical maize selected for drought tolerance. Field Crops Res, 2002, 75: 223–233
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[5] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[6] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[9] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[10] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[11] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[14] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[15] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2