作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (08): 1345-1351.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01345
彭学聪,杨秀芬,邱德文,曾洪梅,郭立华,刘峥*
PENG Xue-Cong,YANG Xiu-Fen,QIU De-Wen,ZENG Hong-Mei,GUO Li-Hua,LIU Zheng*
摘要:
Hrip1是从极细链格孢(Alternaria tenuissima)代谢物中分离的一种蛋白激发子。将蛋白激发子基因Hrip1转化到拟南芥,对5个T1代转基因拟南芥株系进行分子检测, 证明Hrip1基因能够在拟南芥中转录和表达。转基因植株对盐和干旱胁迫的抗性显著增强, 75 mmol L−1 NaCl和50 mmol L−1甘露醇渗透胁迫2 d, 转基因植株种子平均相对发芽率为32.1%和77.9%, 分别比野生型的增加3.72倍和5.61倍; 150 mmol L−1 NaCl和50 mmol L−1甘露醇处理拟南芥幼苗7 d后, 转基因植株平均相对根长为81.79%和93.25%, 分别是野生型的1.53倍和1.34倍。3周龄的转基因植株在250 mmol L−1 NaCl条件下胁迫20 d, 平均存活率为67%, 显著高于野生型(42%)(P<0.05); 干旱胁迫25 d后, 复水5 d转基因植株平均存活率为72%, 而野生型仅为44%。检测结果显示转基因植株叶片的抗氧化酶活性明显高于野生型, 用200 mmol L−1 NaCl和200 mmol L−1甘露醇处理24 h后, POD活性分别比野生型植株提高1.56倍和1.85倍, CAT活性分别比野生型植株提高1.64和1.86倍。说明蛋白激发子Hrip1基因在拟南芥中的表达能够改善和提高植株的耐盐抗旱能力。
| [1]Xiong L Z, Yang Y. Disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in rice are inversely modulated by an abscisic acid-inducible mitogen-activated protein kinase. Plant Cell Online, 2003, 15: 745–759[2]Fujita M, Fujita Y, Noutoshi Y, Takahashi F, Narusaka Y, Shinozaki K Y, Shinozaki K. Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2006, 9: 436–442[3]Zhang Y H, Yang X F, Liu Q, Zhang Y L, Zeng H M, Yuan J J, Mao J J. Purification of novel protein elicitor from Botrytis cinerea that induces disease resistance and drought tolerance in plants. Microbiol Res, 2010, 165: 142–151[4]Zhao M-Z(赵明治), Yang X-F(杨秀芬), Zhang M(张明), Yuan J-J(袁京京), Qiu D-W(邱德文). Purification and Bioactivities of a Protein Growth-activator from Aternaria tenuissima. Chin J Biol Control (中国生物防治), 2007, 23(2): 170–173 (in Chinese with English abstract)[5]Yang Y Y, Zhang H J, Li G J, Li W, Wang X E, Song F M. Ectopic expression of MgSM1, a Cerato-platanin family protein from Magnaporthe grisea, confers broad-spectrum disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol J, 2009, 7(8): 763–777[6]Qiu D W, Mao J J, Yang X F, Zeng H M. Expression of an elicitor-encoding gene from Magnaporthe grisea enhances resistance against blast disease in transgenic rice. Plant Cell Rep, 2009, 28: 925–933[7]Kulye M, Liu H, Zhang Y L, Zeng H M, Yang X F, Qiu D W. Hrip1, a novel protein elicitor from necrotrophic fungus, Alternaria tenuissima, elicits cell death, expression of defence-related genes and systemic acquired resistance in tobacco. Plant Cell Environ, 2012, 35: 2104–2120[8]Clough S J, Bent A F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J, 1998, 16: 735–743[9]Kobayashi K, Cabral S, Calamante G, Maldonado S. Mentaberry A. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing the potato virus X open reading frame 3 gene develop specific resistance and necrotic ring symptoms after infection with the homologous virus. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact, 2001, 14: 1274−1285[10]Dai X Y, Xu Y Y, Ma Q B, Xu W Y, Wang T, Xue Y B, Chong K. Overexpression of an R1R2R3 MYB gene, OsMYB3R-2, increases tolerance to freezing, drought, and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2007, 143: 1739–1751[11]Liu Y-C(刘颖超). Resistance Mechanism and Pathogensis-related Genes ExPression in Different Arabidopsis thaliana Ecotypes to Phytophthora infestans. PhD Dissertation of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2004 (in Chinese with English abstract)[12]Zhang Y-H(张云华), Qiu D-W(邱德文), Zhang L-J(张立军), Yang X-F(杨秀芬), Zeng H-M(曾洪梅), Yuan J-J(袁京京). Purification and its bioactivity of an activator protein PEBC2 from Botrytis cinerea. Acta Phytophyl Sin (植物保护学报), 2009, 35(2): 123–126 (in Chinese with English abstract)[13]Tang H-K(唐宏琨), Zeng H-M(曾洪梅). Recent advances in fungal protein elicitor and its transgenic plants. Chin J Biol Control (中国生物防治), 2010, 26(4): 480–485 (in Chinese with English abstract)[14]Kong X P, Pan J W, Zhang M Y, Xing X, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Li D P, Li D Q. ZmMKK4, a novel group C mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase in maize (Zea mays), confers salt and cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ, 2011, 34: 1291–1303[15]Ali Q, Ashraf M. Induction of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) due to exogenous application of trehalose: growth, photosynthesis, water relations and oxidative defence mechanism. J Agron Crop Sci, 2011, 197: 258–271[16]Zhang Y M, Yang J F, Lu S Y, Cai J L, Guo Z F. Overexpressing SgNCED1 in tobacco increases ABA level, antioxidant enzyme activities, and stress tolerance. J Plant Growth Regul, 2008, 27: 151–158 |
| [1] | 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742. |
| [2] | 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139. |
| [3] | 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812. |
| [4] | 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493. |
| [5] | 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420. |
| [6] | 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577. |
| [7] | 刘海波, 张蕾, 王立琦, 石晓丽, 周文莹, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 苎麻BnGCL1基因响应干旱胁迫的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 14-27. |
| [8] | 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84. |
| [9] | 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261. |
| [10] | 胡城祯, 高维东, 孔斌雪, 王建飞, 车卓, 杨德龙, 陈涛. 小麦TaAPC11基因家族鉴定及TaAPC11-5B参与干旱胁迫的生物学功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 148-164. |
| [11] | 何鹏旭, 姚立蓉, 陈远玲, 闫妍, 张宏, 汪军成, 李葆春, 杨轲, 司二静, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦干旱胁迫萌发生理及分子机理的差异性与相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2412-2432. |
| [12] | 陆雯佳, 汪军成, 姚立蓉, 张宏, 司二静, 杨轲, 孟亚雄, 李葆春, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦PRX基因家族全基因组鉴定及其干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1198-1214. |
| [13] | 李雪婷, 任昊, 王洪章, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘莹, 姚海燕, 刘鹏. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型玉米品种叶片光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1091-1101. |
| [14] | 潘炬忠, 韦萍, 朱德平, 邵胜雪, 陈珊珊, 韦雅倩, 高维维. 水稻转录因子OsERF104的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 900-913. |
| [15] | 王林, 陈晓雨, 张文梦龙, 汪思琦, 程冰云, 程靖秋, 潘锐, 张文英. 大麦HvMYB2分子特性及响应干旱胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 873-887. |
|
||