欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (09): 1693-1700.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01693

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

1983—2010年北京市大豆育成品种的亲缘关系分析

刘章雄1,孙石1,李卫东2,陈立军3,常汝镇1,邱丽娟1,*   

  1. 1农作物基因资源与基因改良国家重大科学工程 / 农业部作物种质资源利用重点开放实验室 / 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所，北京 100081；2河南省农业科学院经济作物研究所, 河南郑州 450002；3北京市种子管理站, 北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2012-12-12 修回日期:2013-06-04 出版日期:2013-09-12 网络出版日期:2013-07-09
  • 通讯作者: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net, Tel: 010-82105843
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由农业部保种项目(NB2010-2130135-25-05)和国家科技支撑项目(2011BAD35B06-2-9)资助。

Analysis of Parental Relationship for Soybean Cultivars Released from 1983 to 2010 in Beijing

LIU Zhang-Xiong1,SUN Shi1,LI Wei-Dong2,CHEN Li-Jun3,CHANG Ru-Zhen1,QIU Li-Juan1,*   

  1. 1 National Key Facility for Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China; 2 Institute of Industrial Crops Research, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 3 Beijing Seed Station, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2012-12-12 Revised:2013-06-04 Published:2013-09-12 Published online:2013-07-09
  • Contact: 邱丽娟, E-mail: qiu_lijuan@263.net, Tel: 010-82105843

RichHTML

PDF

1866

被引次数

7

摘要：

追溯北京市1983—2010年90个大豆品种的系谱信息，计算其亲本间及品种组合间亲缘系数(coefficient of parentage，COP)并据此聚类，旨在探讨北京市育成大豆品种的遗传多样性特点。结果表明，19个品种的父母本间存在亲缘关系，占品种总数的21.11%；90个品种间共组成4005个组合，其中63.62%存在亲缘关系，COP平均值为0.031，表明大部分品种亲缘关系相对较远。随着时间的推移，品种间亲缘系数呈下降趋势，但从2005年至2010年亲缘系数值增大。除12个品种各自独为一类外，其余78个品种被聚成10类，从中可见不同年代的育种特征和品种的演化过程；中品661等9份种质对北京市大豆品种贡献较大，是骨干亲本。北京市品种总体的遗传背景丰富，但随年代推移，遗传多样性有逐渐降低趋势。

关键词: 大豆, 亲缘系数, 遗传多样性, 系谱, 演化

Abstract:

To explore the relationship and genetic diversity of soybean cultivars in Beijing and provide theoretical guidance for soybean breeding, we traced the pedigree information of 90 soybean cultivars released from 1983 to 2010 and calculated the coefficients of parentage (COP) between the parents and between cross combinations. The results showed that 19 of 90 cultivars had relationships in their parents. A total of 4005 cross combinations were made with 90 varieties, and 63.62% of the combinations shared parental relationship, but their average COP value was only 0.031, showing that there existed abundant genetic diversity because there were not close relationship among most cultivars; COP value between cultivars reduced in the process of time, but increased from 2005 to 2010. Cluster analysis suggested that 78 cultivars could be divided into 10 groups, showing characters of cultivars of different times and evolution of cultivars. Nine varieties were found to be core parents. In general, the genetic basis of soybean cultivars in Beijing was abundant but genetic diversity became narrower in the process of time.

Key words: Soybean, Coefficient of parentage, Genetic diversity, Pedigree, Evolution

[1]Cui Z-L(崔章林), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Carter T E Jr, Qiu J-X(邱家训), Zhao T-J(赵团结). The Released Chinese Soybean Cultivars and Their Pedigree Analyses (中国大豆育成品种及其系谱分析) (1923–1995). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998 (in Chinese)

[2]Sun G-H(孙贵荒), Zhang R-S(张仁双), Sun E-Y(孙恩玉), Men X-Y(门晓云). Pedigree analysis and cytoplasmic source of main soybean cultivars from Liaoling province. Liaoling Agric Sci (辽宁农业科学), 1998, (1): 32–35 (in Chinese)

[3]Committee on Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops. Genetic vulnerability of Major Crops. National Academy Sciences. Washington D. C, 1972

[4]Souza E, Sorrells M E. Pedigree analysis of North American oat cultivars released from 1951 to 1985. Crop Sci, 1989, 29: 595–601

[5]Mercado L A, Souza E, Kephart K D. Origin and diversity of North American hard spring wheats. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 93: 593–599

[6]Smith O S, Smith J S C, Bowen S L, Tenborg R A, Wall S J. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, Fl grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet, 1990, 80: 833–840

[7]Stachel M, Lelley T, Grausgruber H, Vollmann J. Application of microsatellites in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for studying genetic differentiation caused by selection for adaptation and use. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 100: 242–248

[8]Corbellini M, Perenzin M, Accerbi M, Vaccino P, Borghi B. Genetic diversity in bread wheat, as revealed by coefficient of parentage and molecular markers, and its relationship to hybrid performance. Euphytica, 2002, 123: 273–285

[9]Chen Y-Q(陈玉清), Zheng Y-L(郑有良), Zhou Y-H(周永红). Genetic diversity of Sichuan wheat germplasm based on coefficient of parentage. J Nanjing Norm Univ (Nat Sci)(南京师大学报?自然科学版), 2002, 25(2): 22–26 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Wang J-C(王江春), Hu Y-J(胡延吉), Yu S-L(余松烈), Wang Z-L(王振林), Liu A-F(刘爱峰), Wang H-G(王洪刚). Relationship coefficient analysis among winter wheat varieties and their parents in Shandong province after liberation. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2006, 9(4): 664–672 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Xu X-D(徐晓丹), Feng J(冯晶), Lin R-M(蔺瑞明), Zhao L(赵蕾), Lin F(林凤), Xu S-C(徐世昌). Coefficient of parentage analysis for leading wheat cultivars in Henan province. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2011, 31(4): 653–659 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Lima M L A, Garcia A A F, Oliveira K M, Matsuoka S, Arizono H, de Souza Jr C L, de Souza A P. Analysis of genetic similarity detected by AFLP and coefficient of parentage among genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104: 30–38

[13]Duarte Filho L S C, Silva P P, Santos J M, Barbosa G V S, Ramalho-Neto C E, Soares L, Andrade J C F, Almeida C. Genetic similarity among genotypes of sugarcane estimated by SSR and coefficient of parentage. Sugar Tech, 2010, 12(2): 145–149

[14]Wang S, Lu Z. Genetic diversity among parental lines of Indica hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) in China based on coefficient of parentage. Plant Breed, 2006, 125(6): 606–612

[15]Sneller C H. Pedigree analysis of elite soybean lines. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 1515–1522

[16]Helms T, Vallad G, McClean P, Orf J. Genetic variance, coefficient of parentage, and genetic distance of six soybean populations. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 94(1): 20–26

[17]Cui Z L, Carter T E Jr, Burton J W. Genetic diversity patterns in Chinese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1780–1793

[18]Zhou X L, Carter T E Jr, Cui Z L, Miyazaki S, Burton J W. Genetic diversity patterns in Japanese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 1331–1342

[19]Cox T S, Lookhart G L, Walker D E, Harrell L G, Albers L D, Rodgers D M. Genetic relationship among hard red winter wheat cultivars as evaluated by pedigree analysis and gliadin ployacrylamide gel electrophoretic patterns. Crop Sci, 1985, 25: 1058–1063

[20]Narvel J M, Walter R, Chu W C, Grant D, Shoemaker C. Simple sequence repeat diversity among soybean plant introductions and elite genotypes. Crop Sci, 2000, 40(5): 1452–1458

[21]Qin J(秦君), Li Y-H(李英慧), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Li G-M(李广敏), Ma Z-Y(马峙英), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Genetic relationship among parents of elite soybean (Glycine max) cultivars Suinong14 pedigree revealed by SSR markers. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2008, 41(12): 3999–4007 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Li Y-H(李英慧), Liu Y(刘燕), Guan R-X(关荣霞), Wei S-H(魏淑红), Yang G-Y(杨光宇), Zhou X-A(周新安), Zhang M-C(张孟臣), Yang C-Y(杨春燕), Zhu B-G(朱保葛), Li W-D(李卫东), Liu X-Y(刘学义), Xu R(徐冉), Sun J-M(孙君明), Zhu S-L(朱申龙), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Liu Z-X(刘章雄), Chang R-Z(常汝镇), Qiu L-J(邱丽娟). Genetic structure and diversity of both enhanced germplasms developed during 10th Five-Year Plan and modern cultivars released during 1963—1995 in China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(10): 1630–1636 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Zhang L(张磊), Dai O-H(戴瓯和), Zhu G-F(朱国富), Huang Z-P(黄志平). Pedigree analysis of soybean cultivars released in Anhui province. J Anhui Agric Sci (安徽农业科学), 2000, 28(2): 139–140, 142 (in Chinese)
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[4] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[5] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[6] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[7] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[8] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[9] 梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[10] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[11] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[12] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[13] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[14] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[15] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2