欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 2016-2022.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.02016

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米-大豆轮作及氮肥施用对土壤细菌群落结构的影响

周岚1,2,**，杨永1,**，王占海3，陈阜1，曾昭海1,*   

  1. 1 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院，北京100193；2 吉林农业科技学院，吉林吉林132101；3呼伦贝尔市农业科学研究所，内蒙古扎兰屯 162650
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-16 修回日期:2013-06-24 出版日期:2013-11-12 网络出版日期:2013-08-14
  • 通讯作者: 曾昭海, E-mail: zengzhaohai@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30871491, 3117509)，国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD16B15)和国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201103001)资助。

Influence of Maize-soybean Rotation and N fertilizer on Bacterial Community Composition

ZHOU Lan1,2,**,YANG Yong1,**,WANG Zhan-Hai3,CHEN Fu1,ZENG Zhao-Hai1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Beijing 100193, China; 2 Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China; 3Hulunbeler Agricultural Institute, Zalantun 162650, China?
  • Received:2013-04-16 Revised:2013-06-24 Published:2013-11-12 Published online:2013-08-14

RichHTML

PDF

1573

被引次数

13

摘要：

在大豆开花期分别对3个施氮水平下(0、50和100 kg hm-2)大豆连作(大豆-大豆-大豆)、玉米-大豆轮作I (大豆-玉米-大豆)及玉米-大豆轮作II (玉米-玉米-大豆)，应用PCR-DGGE技术研究了玉米-大豆轮作及施氮对土壤细菌群落结构变化的影响。结果表明，随着施氮水平的提高，3种种植方式土壤中细菌群落多样性、丰富度均呈减少趋势。高氮处理(100 kg hm-2)明显降低了大豆连作、玉米-大豆轮作II根际土壤细菌群落多样性及丰富度，玉米-大豆轮作I根际土壤细菌群落多样性及丰富度略有降低。玉米-大豆轮作I种植方式可减轻氮肥对其根际细菌群落多样性和丰富度的影响，但施氮明显改变了其细菌群落结构。玉米-大豆轮作II中大豆根际土壤细菌群落结构较为稳定，受氮肥影响较小。在3种种植方式的土壤中，分布着酸杆菌门、变形菌门及厚壁菌门细菌，其中前两门菌群占主导地位。

关键词: 轮作, 氮肥, 大豆, 玉米, DGGE, 细菌群落

Abstract:

In soybean flowering period, took rhizosphere soil samples from three treatments including continuous cropping soybean (soybean-soybean-soybean), maize-soybean rotation I(soybean-maize-soybean) and maize-soybean rotation II (maize-maize-soybean). Each treatment had three levels of nitrogen application including 0, 50 and 100 kg ha-1. Soil microbial community changes under maize-soybean rotation system and various nitrogen applications were investigated by the techniques of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis. The results showed that the biological diversity and abundance of three kinds of soil microbial community had a decline trend along with the increase of nitrogen application levels. Under high nitrogen application level (100 kg ha-1), a significant decrease in diversity and abundance of rhizosphere soil microbial communities was observed in both continuous cropping soybean system and maize-soybean rotation II system. And in maize-soybean rotation I system, there was only a slightly decrease in diversity and abundance of rhizosphere soil microbial communities. Therefore, 1-year maize in rotation with soybean (soybean-maize-soybean) can alleviate the effect of nitrogen fertilizer on rhizosphere soil microbial diversity and richness, but the effect of nitrogen application significantly changed its bacterial community structure. Maize-soybean rotation II system (maize-maize-soybean) was less affected by nitrogen fertilizer and showed relatively high stability. In addition, in those three kinds of soil, there were the categories of Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, in which, Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria were predominant.

Key words: Rotation, Nitrogen, Soybean, Maize, PCR-DGGE, Bacterial community

[1]Bu H-Z(卜洪震), Wang L-H(王丽宏), Xiao X-P(肖小平), Yang G-L(杨光立), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Zeng Z-H(曾昭海). Diversity of microbial community of paddy soil types in double-rice cropping system. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(5): 826−832 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[2]Liu X-J(刘新晶), Xu Y-L(许艳丽), Li C-J(李春杰), Meng Q-J(孟庆杰). Effect of soybean rotation system on the bacterial physiological groups. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2007, 26(5): 723-727 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Gu Y(谷岩), Qu Q(邱强), Wang Z-M(王振民), Chen X-F(陈喜凤), Wu C-S(吴春胜). Effects of soybean continuous cropping on microbial and soil enzymes in soybean rhizosphere. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2012, 45(19): 3955–3964 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Brock T D. The study of microorganisms in situ: progress and problems. Symp Soc Gen Microbiol, 1987, 41: 1–17



[5]Muyzer G, Waal E C, Uitterlinden A G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction amplified genes coding for 1 6S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1993, 59: 695–700



[6]Li Z-Z(李梓正), Zhu L-B(朱立博), Lin Y-C(林叶春), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Zeng Z-H(曾昭海). Seasonal variation of soil bacterial community under different degrees of degradation of Hulunbuir grassland. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2010, 30(11): 2883–2889 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Qiao Y J, Li Z Z, Wang X, Zhu B, Hu Y G, Zeng Z H. Effect of legume-cereal mixtures on the diversity of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil Environ, 2012, 58: 174–180



[8]Liu E-K(刘恩科), Zhao B-Q(赵秉强), Li X-Y(李秀英), Jiang R-B(姜瑞波). Microbial C and N biomass and soil community analysis using DGGE of 16SrDNA V3 fragment PCR products under different long-term fertilization systems. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2007, 27(3): 1079–1085 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Stella A E, Max D C. Effect of soybean plant populations in a soybean and maize rotation. Agron J, 2001, 93: 396–403 



[10]Xing H-Q(邢会琴), Xiao Z-W(肖占文), Yan J-Z(闫吉智), Ma J-C(马建仓), Meng Y(孟嫣). Effects of continuous cropping of maize on soil microbes and main soil nutrients. Pratacult Sci (草业科学), 2011, 28(10): 1777–1780 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Xu Y-L(许艳丽), Liu X-B(刘晓冰), Han X Z(韩晓增), Li Z-L(李兆林), Wang S-Y(王守宇), He X-Y(何喜云). Effect of soybean continuous cropping on its growth and production. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1999, 32(suppl): 64–68 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Xue Q-X(薛庆喜), Yang S-P(杨思平), Zhang Y-C(张玉春), Gong X-K(宫学凯), Yang J(杨军), Chen L(陈良). Effects of different crop stubbles on yield and agronomic characters of continuous cropping soybean. Soybean Sci(大豆科学), 2009, 28(21): 72–75 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Liu J-B(刘金波), Xu Y-L(许艳丽). Current research of soil microbial of successive soybean cropping in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2008, 30(1): 132–136 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Janssen P H. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2006, 72: 1719–1728



[15]Wang G-H(王光华), Liu J-J(刘俊杰), Qi X-N(齐晓宁), Jin J(金剑), Wang Y(王洋), Liu X-B(刘晓冰). Effects of fertilization on bacterial community structure and function in a black soil of Dehui region estimated by Biolog and PCR-DGGE methods. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2008, 28(1): 220–206 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Shi P(时鹏), Gao Q(高强), Wang S-P(王淑平), Zhang Y(张妍). Effects of continuous cropping of corn and fertilization on soil microbial community functional diversity. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2010, 30(22): 6173–6182 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Ma C-M(马春梅), Tang Y-Z(唐远征), Ji S-N(季尚宁). Long-term crop rotation research—The dynamics investigation of microorganisms around crop rhizosphere during growing season (1). J Northeast Agric Univ (东北农业大学学报), 2004, 35(2): 129–134 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Wu F Z(吴凤芝), Wang X Z(王学征). Effect of soybean-cucumber and wheat-cucumber rotation on soil microbial communits species diversity. Acta Hortic Sin(园艺学报), 2007, 34(6): 1543–1546 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Yao Q(姚钦). Microorganism Diversity of Mollisols in Different Rotation Systems. MS Dissertation of Northeast Forestry University, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Zhang L(张丽), Yan Q(闫倩), Wang B-L(王保莉), Qu D(曲东). Changes in bacteria diversity of coastal saline soils under different land use patterns. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2011, 20(8): 163–167 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[5] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[6] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[7] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[8] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[9] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[10] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[11] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[12] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[13] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[14] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2