精量播种减免间定苗对棉花产量和产量构成因素的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.02040

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

间苗、定苗是黄河流域棉区十分普及却费工费时的棉田管理措施。通过精量播种减免间苗、定苗环节，将为黄河流域棉区棉花轻简化栽培提供新的技术途径。2011—2013年连续3年在山东省临清市、夏津县、惠民县和东营市4个地点，以常规播种保苗方式为对照，研究了精量播种保苗(播量11.25 kg hm–2，出苗放苗后不间苗、定苗)方式对棉花收获密度、籽棉产量和产量构成因素的影响。年份、地点和播种保苗方式对棉花收获密度、籽棉产量和铃数皆有显著的互作效应。12个点次(3年4个地点)中有10个点次精量播种保苗方式的收获密度达到4.5~8.5株 m–2，铃数和籽棉产量与常规播种保苗方式相当；2011年东营点和2012年惠民点精量播种保苗方式的密度分别只有3.53株 m–2和3.63株 m–2，铃数比常规播种分别减少13.8%和9.7%，单铃重与各自的对照无显著差异，籽棉产量分别减少14.2%和5.5%。精量播种处理中2个点次减产的主要原因在于收获密度过低，导致铃数降低。通过提高播种质量确保较高的收获密度，精量播种减免间定苗能够实现省工节本不减产，可作为一项重要的简化栽培措施在黄河流域棉区推行。

关键词: 棉花, 精量播种, 减免间定苗, 产量, 产量构成因素

Abstract:

Thinning is a considerably popular practice in cotton field management in the Yellow River valley of China, but such a traditional practice is currently facing a big challenge because of labor costs and time consuming. The objective of the present study was to determine the effects of precision seeding on seed cotton yield and yield components so as to provide a new alternative technique to simplify cotton cultivation in the Region. A three-year field experiment was conducted at four experimental sites (Linqing, Xiajin, Huimin and Dongying) to comparatively investigate the effects of precision seeding without thinning on plant population density, seed cotton yield and yield components, with conventional seeding with thinning (seeding rate of 22.5 kg hm^–2and thinning seedlings two times after emergence) as the control. There existed significant interaction effects among planting years, experimental sites and planting patterns on plant density, seed cotton yield and number of bolls per unit area. In 2011–2013, the plant population reached 4.5–8.5 plants m^{–2 in precision seeding treatment at ten out of twelve sites, and number of bolls per unit area and seed cotton yield were equivalent to those of conventional seeding at these ten sites. However, the seed cotton yield of precision seeding treatment at Dongying in 2011 and at Huimin in 2012 was significantly reduced by 14.2% and 5.5% owing to the low density (3.53 and 3.63 plants m–2}) and their boll number was reduced by 13.8% and 9.7% relative to that of conventional seeding treatment. There was no significant difference in single boll weight between the two seeding patterns. The yield reduction of precision seeding treatment at two experimental sites was mainly attributed to the decrease in number of bolls per unit area as a result of reduced plant density. Therefore, costs saving without yield reduction can be realized through precision seeding under the support of improved seeding quality and a relatively high plant density. Precision seeding without seedling thinning can be one of the simplified cultivation measures of cotton production in the Yellow River valley of China.

Key words: Cotton, Precision seeding, Seedling thinning, Yield, Yield components

代建龙,李振怀,罗振,卢合全,唐薇,张冬梅,李维江,辛承松,董合忠*. 精量播种减免间定苗对棉花产量和产量构成因素的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(11): 2040-2045.

DAI Jian-Long,LI Zhen-Huai,LUO Zhen,LU He-Quan,TANG Wei,ZHANG Dong-Mei,LI Wei-Jiang,XIN Cheng-Song,DONG He-Zhong*. Effects of Precision Seeding without Thinning Process on Yield and Yield Components of Cotton[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(11): 2040-2045.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.02040

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2014/V40/I11/2040

参考文献

[1]Dai J L, Dong H Z. Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crops Res, 2014, 155: 99–110

[2]董合忠. 滨海盐碱地棉花轻简栽培: 现状、问题与对策. 中国棉花, 2011, 38(12): 2–4

Dong H Z. Extensive cultivation of cotton in salt-affected soil: current situation, problems and countermeasures. China Cotton, 2011, 38(12): 2–4 (in Chinese)

[3]Wrather J A, Phipps B J, Stevens W E, Phillips A S, Vories E D. Cotton planting date and plant population effects on yield and fiber quality in the Mississippi Delta. J Cotton Sci, 2008, 12: 1–7

[4]Zhang L Z, Li B G, Yan G T, Werf W V D, Spiertz J H J, Zhang S P. Genotype and planting density effects on rooting traits and yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Integr Plant Biol, 2006, 48: 1287–1293

[5]Jost P H, Cothren J T. Phenotypic alterations and crop maturity differences in ultra-narrow row and conventionally spaced cotton. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 1150–1159

[6]Fowler J L, Ray L L. Response of two cotton genotypes to five equidistant spacing patterns. Agron J, 1977, 69: 733–738

[7]Bednarz C W, Nichols R L, Brown S M. Plant density modifications of cotton within-boll yield components. Crop Sci, 2006, 46: 2076–2080

[8]中国农业科学院棉花研究所. 中国棉花栽培学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2013

Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Cultivation of Cotton in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2013 (in Chinese)

[9]董合忠. 棉花轻简栽培的若干技术问题分析. 山东农业科学, 2013, (4): 115–117

Dong H Z. The analysis of cotton extensive cultivation technology in China. Shandong Agric Sci, 2013, (4): 115–117 (in Chinese)

[10]刘鹏云, 肖春胜, 李海廷. 棉花精量播种技术. 中国棉花, 1999, 26(9): 37

Liu P Y, Xiao C S, Li H T. The cotton precision seeding techniques. China Cotton, 1999, 26(9): 37 (in Chinese)

[11]张晓洁, 李浩, 王志伟. 精量播种对棉花产量结构的影响. 中国棉花, 2012, 39(7): 33–35

Zhang X J, Li H, Wang Z W. Effects of precision seeding on the yield components of cotton. China Cotton, 2012, 39(7): 33–35 (in Chinese)

[12]唐启义, 冯明光. 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002

Tang Q Y, Feng M G. DPS Data processing System for Practical Statistics. Beijing: Science Press, 2002 (in Chinese)

[13]毛树春. 我国棉花种植技术的现代化问题. 中国棉花, 2010, 37(3): 2–5

Mao S C. The modernization of cotton planting techniques in China. China Cotton, 2010, 37(3): 2–5 (in Chinese)

[14]Dong H Z, Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M, Li Z H. Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River valley of China. Field Crops Res, 2006, 98: 106–115

[15]Bednarz C W, Bridges D C, Brown S M. Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities. Agron J, 2000, 92: 128–135

[16]Jones M A, Wells R. Fiber yield and quality of cotton grown at two divergent population densities. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1190–1195

[17]O’Berry N B, Faircloth J C, Edmisten K L, Collins G D, Stewart A M, Abaye A O, Herbert D A, Haygood R A. Plant population and planting date effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and yield. J Cotton Sci, 2008, 12: 178–187

[18]Darawsheh M K, Chachalis D, Aivalakis G, Khah E M. Cotton row spacing and plant density cropping systems: II. Effects on seedcotton yield, boll components and lint quality. J Food Agric Environ, 2009, 7: 262–265

[19]Dong H Z, Li W J, Xin C S, Zhang D M. Late planting of short-season cotton in saline fields of the Yellow River Delta. Crop Sci, 2010, 50: 292–300

[20]王大光, 李禹. 棉花精量播种与配套栽培技术. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(5): 40–41

Wang D G, Li Y. Precision sowing and corresponding cultivation techniques in cotton. China Cotton, 2013, 40(5): 40–41 (in Chinese)

[21]李春玲. 棉花精量、半精量播种高产栽培技术探讨. 安徽农学通报, 2010, 16(10): 95–96

Li C L. Studies on high yielding cultivated technology of precision and semi-precision seeding in cotton. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2010, 16(10): 95–96 (in Chinese)

[22]董合忠, 李维江, 李振怀, 唐薇, 苑振戈. 抗虫杂交棉精播栽培技术研究. 山东农业科学, 2000, (3): 14–17

Dong H Z, Li W J, Li Z H, Tang W, Yuan Z G. Studies on less seeding-rate cultivation technique for transgenic hybrid cotton. Shandong Agric Sci, 2000, (3): 14–17 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]董合忠, 李维江, 唐薇, 李振怀, 牛曰华, 张冬梅. 留叶枝对抗虫杂交棉库源关系的调节效应和对叶片衰老与皮棉产量的影响. 中国农业科学，2007, 40: 909–915

Dong H Z, Li W J, Tang W, Li Z H, Niu Y H, Zhang D M. Effects of retention of vegetative branches on source-sink relation, leaf senescence and lint yield in Bt transgenic hybrid cotton. Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 40: 909–915 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]董合忠, 牛曰华, 李维江, 唐薇, 李振怀, 张冬梅. 不同整枝方式对棉花库源关系的调节效应. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19: 819–824

Dong H Z, Niu Y H, Li W J, Tang W, Li Z H, Zhang D M. Regulation effects of various training modes on source-sink relation of cotton. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2008, 19: 819–824 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]代建龙, 李维江, 辛承松, 董合忠. 黄河流域棉区机采棉栽培技术. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(1): 35–36

Dai J L, Li W J, Xin C S, Dong H Z. The cultivation techniques of machine-harvested cotton in the Yellow River valley region. China Cotton, 2013, 40(1): 35–36 (in Chinese)

相关文章 15

[1]	胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2]	马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3]	张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4]	张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5]	王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[6]	赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7]	郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[8]	张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[9]	张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[10]	闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[11]	刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[12]	王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[13]	张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[14]	蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15]	崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed