欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 1740-1747.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01740

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

带状套作荫蔽及复光对不同大豆品种(系)生长及产量的影响

吴雨珊1,龚万灼1,廖敦平2,武晓玲1,杨峰1,刘卫国1,雍太文1,杨文钰1   

  1. 1四川农业大学农学院 / 农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,四川成都 611130;2 眉山市东坡区农业局植保植检站,四川眉山 620020
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-05 修回日期:2015-07-20 出版日期:2015-11-12 网络出版日期:2015-08-12
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31171476)和国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-04-PS19)资助。

Effects of Shade and Light Recovery on Soybean Cultivars (Lines) and Its Relationship with Yield in Relay Strip Intercropping System

WU Yu-Shan1,GONG Wan-Zhuo1,LIAO Dun-Ping2,WU Xiao-Ling1,YANG Feng1,LIU Wei-Guo1,YONG Tai-Wen1,YANG Wen-Yu1,   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 611130, China; 2 Plant Protection and Inspection Station in Dongpo Region of Meishan, Meishan 620020, China
  • Received:2015-02-05 Revised:2015-07-20 Published:2015-11-12 Published online:2015-08-12

摘要:

选取我国南方套作模式下20个不同产量水平的大豆品种(),于2013—2014年采用净作和遮荫(遮阳网或玉米)对比分析了高产和低产大豆品种在荫蔽期及复光期的生长特点。结果表明,荫蔽期间,茎叶干物重显著低于净作,分配规律表现为茎多叶少,分别为58.4%41.6%与高产类型大豆相比,低产类型茎叶干重下降比例、茎长、茎长/茎粗、茎长/地上部干物质、茎长/叶面积显著增加;荫蔽期地上部干物质与产量呈显著正相关,茎干物质比例与产量呈显著负相关。光照恢复后,地上部干物质迅速增加,分配规律表现为茎少叶多复光后30 d分别为47.7%52.3%高产类型地上部干物质、叶面积、叶干重比例、茎粗均显著大于低产类型,茎长/茎粗、茎长/地上部干物质、茎长/叶面积均显著小于低产类型;地上部干物质、叶面积、茎粗、叶干物质比与产量呈显著正相关,茎长/茎粗、茎长/地上部干物质、茎长/叶面积与产量呈极显著负相关。通过复光前后生长性状与产量的回归分析,复光后30 d叶干物质比例、茎长/地上部干物质、茎粗可作为预测套作大豆产量的主要指标上述结果表明,选择荫蔽期茎长较短、地上部干物质较大、叶面积更大,光照恢复期茎粗较大、叶干物质比例较大、茎长/地上部干物质较小的大豆品种可以在套作下获得高产。

关键词: 套作, 荫蔽{复光, 大豆, 补偿生长, 产量

Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted to compare agronomic traits during shade and light recovery periods between high yield and low yield soybean cultivars undershade net or in “maize-soybean” relay strip intercropping in 2013 and 2014. Twenty typical soybean varieties with dirrerent yield levels in relay cropping in south of China were used. The results showed that during shade period stem dry weight and leaf dry weight were significantly lower than those of control , the dry weght natio of stem and leaf was 58.4% and 41.6% respectively under shade. Compared with the high yield soybeans, low yield cultivars had significantly higher decline rate of aboveground dry weight, stem length , stem length/ stem diameter, stem length/ aboveground dry weight, stem length/ leaf area. and the yield was positively correlated with aboveground dry weight, and negatively correlated with stem weight ratio during shade period. During light recovery period, aboveground dry weight and leaf area increased rapidly, soybean showed more leaf weight ratio, stem dry weight and leaf dry weight were 47.7% and 52.3% respectively at 30 days after the recovery of light. High yield soybeans had significantly higher aboveground dry weight, leaf area, stem diameter, leaf weightratio and significantly smaller stem length/ stem diameter, stem length/aboveground dry weight, stem length/leaf area. In light recovery duration, yield was positively correlated with aboveground dry weight, stem diameter, leaf area,and leaf weight ratio, and negatively correlated with stem length/ stem diameter, stem length/ aboveground dry weight. Stem length/ aboveground dry weight, stem diameter and leaf weight ratio were the three biggest variables determing yield selected by regression analysis. These results concluded that soybean cultivars with smaller stem length, larger aboveground dry weight and leaf area during shade period and smaller stem length/ aboveground dry weight, larger stem diameter and higher leaf weight ratio could obtain high yield in relay strip intercropping.

Key words: Relay strip intercropping, Shade, Light recovery, Soybean, Compensation growth, Yield

[1]李文静. 大豆进口步入6时代: 2013进口6340万吨创纪录. 每日经济新闻. 2014-01-17



Li W J. Soybean Imports into the “Six” Era: 2013 Imported a Record 63.4 Million Tons. Daily Economy News, 2014.1.17 (in Chinese)



[2]尹宗伦. 担起重振我国大豆产业的任务. 中国食品学报, 2006, 6(4): 1–5



Yin Z L. Undertaking the task for revitalization of our soybean. J Chin Inst Food Sci Technol, 2006, 6(4): 1–5 (in Chinese)



[3]杨文钰, 雍太文, 任万军, 樊高琼, 牟锦毅, 卢学兰. 发展套作大豆, 振兴大豆产业. 大豆科学, 2008, 27: 1–7



Yang W Y, Yong T W, Ren W J, Fan G. Q, Mou J Y, Lu X L. Develop relay-planting soybean, revitali ze soybean industry. Soybean Sci, 2008, 27: 1–7 (in Chinese)



[4]Yan Y, Gong W, Yang W, Wan Y, Chen X L, Chen Z Q, Wang L Y. Seed treatment with uniconazole powder improves soybean seedling growth under shading by corn in relay strip intercropping system. Plant Prod Sci, 2010, 13: 367–374



[5]Zhang J, Smith D L, Liu W, Chen X, Yang W. Effects of shade and drought stress on soybean hormones and yield of main-stem and branch. Afr J Biotechnol, 2011, 10: 14392–14398



[6]杨文钰. 套作大豆优势突出, 农民欢迎, 发展潜力巨大——国家大豆产业体系专家考察四川套作大豆纪实. 大豆科技, 2009, (6): 14–15(in Chinese)



Yang W Y. Highlight the advantages of intercropping soybean, farmers welcomed, Enormous potential for development-- national soybean industry experts inspected Sichuan intercropping system of soybean documentary. Soybean Technol, 2009, (6): 14–15



[7]陈小林, 杨文钰, 陈忠群, 王晶晶. 不同施氮水平下净, 套作大豆茎秆特征比较研究. 大豆科学, 2011, 30: 101–104



Chen X L, Yang W Y, Chen Z Q, Wang J J. Characteristics of stem between sole-cropping and relay-cropping soybean under different nitrogen applied levels. Soybean Sci, 2011, 30: 101–104 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]于晓波, 张明荣, 吴海英, 杨文钰. 净套作下不同耐荫性大豆品种农艺性状及产量分布的研究. 大豆科学, 2012, 31: 757–761



Yu X B, Zhang M R, Wu H Y, Yang W Y. Agronomic characters and yield distribution of different shade tolerance soybean under monoculture and relay strip intercropping systems. Soybean Sci, 2012. 31: 757–761 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Yang F, Huang S, Gao R, Liu W, Yong T, Wang X, Wu X, Yang W, Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red:far-red ratio. Field Crops Res, 2014, 155: 245–253



[10]宋艳霞, 杨文钰, 李卓玺, 于晓波, 郭凯, 向达兵. 不同大豆品种幼苗叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性对套作遮荫的响应. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31: 474–479



Song Y X, Yang W Y, Li Z X, Yu X B, Guo K, Xiang D B. The effects of shading on photosynthetic and fluorescent characteristics of soybean seedlings under maize - soybean relay cropping. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2009, 31: 474–479 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]王竹, 杨文钰, 吴其林. 玉/豆套作荫蔽对大豆光合特性与产量的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 1502–1507



Wang Z, Yang W Y, Wu Q L. Effects of shading in maize/soybean relay strip intercropping on the photosyntheric characteristics and yield of soybean. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 1502–1507 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]王竹, 杨文钰, 伍晓燕, 吴其林. 玉米株型和幅宽对套作大豆初花期形态建成及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19: 323–329



Wang Z, Yang W Y, Wu X Y, Wu Q L. Effect of maize planting type and planting wide on the early morphological characters and yield of relay planted soybean, 2008, 19: 323–329 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]刘卫国, 蒋涛, 佘跃辉, 杨峰, 杨文钰. 大豆苗期茎秆对荫蔽胁迫响应的生理机制初探. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33: 141–146



Liu W G, Jiang T, She Y H, Yang F, Yang W Y. Preliminary study on physiological response mechanism of soybean (Glycine max Merr.) stem to shade stress at seedling stage. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2011, 33: 141–146 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]伍晓燕, 王竹, 张含彬, 杨文钰. 玉/豆套作对大豆开花后光合生产的影响. 作物杂志, 2006, (3): 30–33



Wu X Y, Wang Z, Zhang H B,Yang W Y. Influence on soybean photosynthetic production after flowering in maize/soybean relay strip intercropping, Crops, 2006, (3): 30–33 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]王艺陶, 周宇飞, 李丰先, 依兵, 白薇, 闫彤, 许文娟, 高明超, 黄瑞冬. 基于主成分和SOM聚类分析的高粱品种萌发期抗旱性鉴定与分类. 作物学报, 2014: 110–121



Liu W G, Zhou Y F, Li F X, Yi B, Bai W, Yan T, Xu W J, Gao M C, Huang R D. Identification and classification of sorghum cultivars for drought resistance during germination stage based on principal components analysis and self organizing map cluster analysis. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 110–121 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Vandenbussche F, Pierik R, Millenaar F F, Voesenek L A C J, Van Der Straeten D. Reaching out of the shade. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2005, 8: 462–468



[17]Franklin K A, Shade avoidance. New Phytol, 2008, 179: 930–944



[18]王一, 杨文钰, 张霞, 雍太文, 刘卫国,苏本营. 不同生育时期遮荫对大豆形态性状和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1871–1879 (in Chinese with English abstract)



Wang Y, Yang W Y, Zhang X, Yong T W, Liu W G, Su B Y. Effects of shading at different growth stages on different traits and yield of soybean. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1871–1879



[19]杨峰, 崔亮, 武晓玲, 刘卫国, 杨文钰. 不同空间配置套作大豆后期农学参数及光谱特征分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34: 268–272



Yang F, Cui L, Wu X L, Liu W G, Yang W Y. Soybean agronomic and hyperspectral characteristics at later stage under spatial patterns of maize-soybean intercropping. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2012, 34: 268–272 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Mathew J P, Herbert S J, Zhang S H, Rautenkranz A A F, Litchfield, G V. Differential response of soybean yield components to the timing of light enrichment. Agron J, 2000, 92: 1156–1161



[21]Liu, X B, Herbert S J, Hashemi A M. Litchfield G V, Zhang, Q, Barzegar A R. Yield and yield components responses of old and new soybean cultivars to source-sink manipulation under light enrichment. J Agron Crop Sci, 2006, 192: 140–146



[22]刘兵, 王程, 金剑, 刘居东, 张秋英, 刘晓冰, Herbert S J. 生殖生长期光富集及遮荫对大豆产量及其构成特性的影响. 大豆科学, 2008, 30: 764–772



Liu B, Wang C, Jing J, Liu J D, Zhang Q Y, Liu X B, Stephen J. Herbert. Effects of light enrichment and shade during reproductive atage on yield and yield components in soybean. Soybean Sci, 2008, 30: 764–772 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]Jiang H, Egli D B. Soybean seed number and crop growth rate during flowering. Agron J, 1995, 87: 264–267

[1] 陈玲玲, 李战, 刘亭萱, 谷勇哲, 宋健, 王俊, 邱丽娟. 基于783份大豆种质资源的叶柄夹角全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[2] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[3] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[4] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[5] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[6] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[7] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[8] 王炫栋, 杨孙玉悦, 高润杰, 余俊杰, 郑丹沛, 倪峰, 蒋冬花. 拮抗大豆斑疹病菌放线菌菌株的筛选和促生作用及防效研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1546-1557.
[9] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[10] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[11] 李阿立, 冯雅楠, 李萍, 张东升, 宗毓铮, 林文, 郝兴宇. 大豆叶片响应CO2浓度升高、干旱及其交互作用的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[12] 彭西红, 陈平, 杜青, 杨雪丽, 任俊波, 郑本川, 罗凯, 谢琛, 雷鹿, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 减量施氮对带状套作大豆土壤通气环境及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[13] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[14] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[15] 王好让, 张勇, 于春淼, 董全中, 李微微, 胡凯凤, 张明明, 薛红, 杨梦平, 宋继玲, 王磊, 杨兴勇, 邱丽娟. 大豆突变体ygl2黄绿叶基因的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!