欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (02): 288-296.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00288

• • 上一篇    下一篇

春季低温对小麦产量和光合特性的影响

王瑞霞1, 闫长生2, 张秀英2, 孙果忠2, 钱兆国1, 亓晓蕾1, 牟秋焕1, 肖世和2,*()   

  1. 1 泰安市农业科学研究院, 山东泰安 271000
    2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 国家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-04 接受日期:2017-09-10 出版日期:2018-02-12 网络出版日期:2017-10-27
  • 通讯作者: 肖世和
  • 作者简介:

    ruixiawangli@163.com

  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-03-21), 国家公益性行业科研专项(201203033)和山东省泰安市科研专项(20123034)资助

Effect of Low Temperature in Spring on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Wheat

Rui-Xia WANG1, Chang-Sheng YAN2, Xiu-Ying ZHANG2, Guo-Zhong SUN2, Zhao-Guo QIAN1, Xiao-Lei QI1, Qiu-Huan MOU1, Shi-He XIAO2,*()   

  1. 1 Tai’an Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tai’an 271000, Shandong, China;
    2 National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2017-02-04 Accepted:2017-09-10 Published:2018-02-12 Published online:2017-10-27
  • Contact: Shi-He XIAO
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by China Agricultural Research System (CARS-03-21), Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201203033), and Scientific Research of Tai’an City, Shandong Province (20123034).

RichHTML

21

PDF

1379

被引次数

1

摘要：

黄淮麦区频发春季低温冻害, 造成小麦减产。为探讨小麦品种对春季低温胁迫响应的生理特点, 确定品种抗寒性鉴定的生理指标, 以泰山6426、泰山4033和济麦22为试验材料, 研究了起身期、拔节期和孕穗期低温处理下不同品种的产量性状、光合生理指标及叶片细胞结构差异。3个品种受低温胁迫后, 观测农艺性状的变化趋势相似, 且年度间有一定的一致性。不同低温处理对株高的影响相对较小, 尤其是起身期低温处理; 不同生育期低温处理, 小麦单株穗数均显著低于对照, 但下降幅度在年度间不完全一致; 单株穗粒数和单株产量随低温处理的推迟呈现显著降低趋势, 尤以孕穗期低温处理的降低幅度最大, 单株穗粒数比对照低90.5%~93.3% (2012—2013)和91.9%~96.6% (2013—2014), 单株产量比对照低87.9%~97.3% (2012—2013)和91.5%~97.8% (2013—2014); 拔节期是低温伤害的第二敏感期, 而起身期低温对小麦产量的影响相对最小。减产的主要原因是穗粒数降低。无论是拔节期还是孕穗期低温处理, 3个品种的叶绿素含量均呈现下降趋势, 下降的幅度因品种而异; 低温胁迫下光合速率、蒸腾速率和叶片气孔导度均显著下降, 胞间CO2浓度均有较大幅度的升高, 3个品种中泰山6426受影响最小。低温胁迫对叶绿素荧光参数也有明显影响, 除泰山6426外, 其余2个品种的Fv/Fm均显著下降。各品种受低温伤害后表皮叶肉细胞破坏严重, 排列趋于松散, 保卫细胞和副卫细胞变形, 气孔变大。本研究结果显示, 光合速率、蒸腾速率、叶片气孔导度、胞间CO2浓度及Fv/Fm可作为评价品种春季抗寒性的生理指标。

关键词: 小麦, 低温, 产量, 光合荧光参数, 抗寒性

Abstract:

Low temperature (LT) stress in spring occurs frequently in the Huang-Huai Rivers Valley, resulting in yield loss of wheat. The objectives of this study were to understand the physiological responses of wheat cultivars to LT and determine suitable physiological indicator(s) for cold-tolerance selection. Three cultivars, Taishan 6426, Taishan 4033, and Jimai 22, were exposed to LT stress at standing, jointing and booting stages, and the yield-related traits, photosynthetic parameters as well as leaf cell structure were compared among different cultivars. The agronomic traits of different cultivars changed in similar trends after LT treatment with the consistent result across years. Plant height received small influence of LT, especially LT at standing stage. In contrast, spike number per plant decreased significantly compared with the control (normal temperature), but the reduced percentage varied across years. Grain number per spike and yield per plant showed significantly declined trends with delaying LT stress, and the maximum decrements were observed in the treatment of LT at booting stage. The grain number per spike was 90.5%-93.3% (2012-2013) and 91.9%-93.6% (2013-2014) lower, and the yield per plant was 87.9%-97.3% (2012-2013) and 91.5%-97.8% (2013-2014) lower in LT treatment at booting than in the control. Booting stage was secondly sensitive to LT in yield, whereas jointing stage was less influenced by LT. Grain yield loss under LT stress mainly resulted from the decrease of grain number per spike. Under LT at jointing or booting stage, the chlorophyll content decreased in the three cultivars, but the decrement varied across cultivars. Moreover, the photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomata conductance decreased significantly and the intercellular CO2 concentration increased greatly in the three cultivars, and those in Taishan 6426 had the minimum variations. LT also had inhibition in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of wheat. For example, the Fv/Fm value was significantly lower in the treatment of LT at jointing or booting stage than in the control except for Taishan 6426. When exposed to LT stress, leaf epidermic cells were severely damaged, showing their loose arrangement and irregular structures of guard cell and accessory cell. Our results indicate that photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomata conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration and Fv/Fm can be used as indicators to identify tolerance of wheat cultivars to spring coldness.

Key words: wheat, low temperature, yield, photosynthetic and fluorescent parameters, cold resistance

图1

不同时期低温处理对小麦品种产量构成因素的影响 CK: 对照; LT-S: 起身期低温; LT-J: 拔节期低温; LT-B: 孕穗期低温处理。误差线上不同字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。"

表1

低温处理后各品种的光合特性差异"

年份
Year		 品种
Cultivar		 参数
Parameter		 CK1 LT-J CK2 LT-B
2012-2013 济麦22
Jimai 22		 Chl (mg mg-1) 63.40 55.10** 62.90 54.60**
Pn (μmol m-2 s-1) 17.30 8.44** 10.22 2.35**
E (mmol m-2 s-1) 1.93 0.68** 0.94 0.67*
Cleaf (mmol m-2 s-1) 187.30 73.50** 74.30 48.60**
Cint (μmol mol-1) 97.90 340.50** 260.50 337.30**
泰山6426
Taishan 6426		 Chl (mg mg-1) 61.20 54.80** 57.50 54.20
Pn (μmol m-2 s-1) 15.96 5.14** 10.35 2.39**
E (mmol m-2 s-1) 0.65 0.31** 0.76 0.51*
Cleaf (mmol m-2 s-1) 131.10 69.70** 63.40 49.50**
Cint (μmol mol-1) 164.80 353.80** 269.6 356.20**
泰山4033
Taishan 4033		 Chl (mg mg-1) 58.40 49.90** 56.10 45.00**
Pn (μmol m-2 s-1) 20.01 5.17** 9.07 1.89**
E (mmol m-2 s-1) 0.60 0.11** 0.60 0.32*
Cleaf (mmol m-2 s-1) 134.50 64.80** 59.00 45.90**
Cint (μmol mol-1) 138.60 375.80** 234.10 354.80**
2013-2014 济麦22
Jimai 22		 Chl (mg mg-1) 65.80 57.10** 60.90 57.40*
Pn (μmol m-2 s-1) 26.50 4.77** 27.66 5.54**
E (mmol m-2 s-1) 1.62 0.80** 0.80 0.78
Cleaf (mmol m-2 s-1) 305.90 83.60** 66.20 53.80**
Cint (μmol mol-1) 280.40 341.20** 271.10 289.60**
泰山6426
Taishan 6426		 Chl (mg mg-1) 62.30 58.00** 59.90 58.20
Pn (μmol m-2 s-1) 18.07 4.92** 20.79 0.33**
E (mmol m-2 s-1) 1.24 0.81** 0.45 0.34**
Cleaf (mmol m-2 s-1) 193.90 95.40** 58.80 43.00**
Cint (μmol mol-1) 279.00 343.50** 239.80 436.70**
泰山4033
Taishan 4033		 Chl (mg mg-1) 57.60 51.80** 57.50 47.10**
Pn (μmol m-2 s-1) 22.45 1.34** 21.56 0.28**
E (mmol m-2 s-1) 1.14 0.56** 1.82 1.27**
Cleaf (mmol m-2 s-1) 180.60 68.60** 57.20 41.30**
Cint (μmol mol-1) 229.10 406.90** 161.30 401.40**

表2

低温处理后各品种荧光特性"

年份
Year		 品种
Cultivar		 参数
Parameter		 CK1 LT-J CK2 LT-B
2012-2013 济麦22
Jimai 22		 最大荧光产量 Fm 849.00 682.00** 1121.00 735.00**
最小荧光产量 Fo 203.00 194.00* 239.00 294.00**
光化学猝灭系数 NPQ 1.65 0.95** 1.76 0.83**
PSII最大光化学效率Fv/Fm 0.76 0.72** 0.79 0.60**
泰山6426
Taishan 6426		 最大荧光产量 Fm 728.00 707.00** 886.00 647.00**
最小荧光产量 Fo 227.00 231.00 315.00 243.00**
光化学猝灭系数 NPQ 1.37 1.30 1.27 0.90**
PSII最大光化学效率Fv/Fm 0.69 0.67 0.64 0.62
泰山4033
Taishan 4033		 最大荧光产量 Fm 673.00 591.00** 771.00 694.00**
最小荧光产量 Fo 210.00 246.00** 281.00 371.00**
光化学猝灭系数 NPQ 0.70 0.48** 0.73 0.97**
PSII最大光化学效率Fv/Fm 0.69 0.58** 0.64 0.51**
2013-2014 济麦22
Jimai 22		 最大荧光产量 Fm 1114.00 928.00** 1034.00 735.00**
最小荧光产量 Fo 370.00 358.00* 186.00 294.00**
光化学猝灭系数 NPQ 0.67 0.22** 0.87 0.83**
PSII最大光化学效率Fv/Fm 0.67 0.61** 0.72 0.60**
泰山6426
Taishan 6426		 最大荧光产量 Fm 1101.00 1027.00** 794.00 647.00**
最小荧光产量 Fo 508.00 403.00** 287.00 243.00**
光化学猝灭系数 NPQ 0.92 0.57** 0.50 0.90**
PSII最大光化学效率Fv/Fm 0.63 0.61 0.64 0.62
泰山4033
Taishan 4033		 最大荧光产量 Fm 2079.00 1419.00** 1076.00 874.00**
最小荧光产量 Fo 257.00 328.00** 345.00 444.00**
光化学猝灭系数 NPQ 0.70 0.62** 0.24 0.30*
PSII最大光化学效率Fv/Fm 0.80 0.69** 0.61 0.49**

图2

拔节期、孕穗期低温处理各品种叶片组织结构变化 CK1和CK2分别为拔节期和孕穗期对照; LT-J和LT-B分别在拔节期和孕穗期低温处理。EP: 表皮; MC: 叶肉细胞; GC: 保卫细胞; SAC: 副卫细胞; STO: 气孔。"

[1] Fang S B, Yang J J, Zhou G S.Change trend distributive characteristics of agrometeorological disasters in China in recent 30 years.J Nat Dis, 2011, 20: 69-73
[2] Wang J F, Zhu Y Y, Liu H P.Main agrometeorological disasters and their impact in recent 28 years in Henan.Meteorol Environ Sci, 2007, 30: 9-11
[3] Cao H M, Shi Z M, Zhou X B, Lei P Z, Dong S G.A review on response of plant to low temperature and its cold resistance.Chin J Agrometeorol, 2010, 31: 310-314
[4] Gana J A, Sutton F, Kenefick D G. cDNA structure and expression patterns of a low-temperature-specific wheat genetacr7. Plant Mol Biol, 1997, 34: 643-650
[5] Minami A, Nagao M, Ikegami K, Koshiba T, Arakawa K, Fujikawa S, Takezawa D.Cold acclimation in bryophytes: low- temperature- induced freezing tolerance inPhyscomitrella patens is associated with increases in expression levels of stress-related genes but not with increase in level of endogenous abscisic acid. Planta, 2005, 220: 414-423
[6] 刘艳阳, 李俊周, 陈磊, 崔党群. 低温胁迫对小麦叶片细胞膜脂质过氧化产物及相关酶活性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(4): 70-73
Liu Y Y, Li J Z, Chen L, Cui D Q.Effect of low temperature stress on peroxidation product of membrane lipids and activity of related enzymes in wheat seeding leaves.J Triticeae Crops, 2006, 26(4): 70-73 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 姜丽娜, 张黛静, 宋飞, 刘佩, 樊婷婷, 余海波, 李春喜. 不同品种小麦叶片对拔节期低温的生理响应及抗寒性评价. 生态学报, 2014, 34: 4251-4261
Jiang L N, Zhang D J, Song F, Liu P, Fan T T, Yu H B, Li C X.Evaluation of cold resistance of different wheat varieties based on physiological responses of leaves to low temperature at the jointing stage.Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34: 4251-4261 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 张志伟, 王法宏, 李升东, 冯波, 司纪升, 张宾. 不同类型小麦品种孕穗期低温生理反应及其抗寒性分析.麦类作物学报, 2012, 32: 900-906
Zhang Z W, Wang F H, Li S D, Feng B, Si J S, Zhang B.Analysis on physiological reaction to low temperature at booting stage and their cold resistance of different types of wheat varieties.J Triticeae Crops, 2012, 32: 900-906 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 张军, 鲁敏, 孙树贵, 杜万里, 刘洋, 武军, 陈新宏. 拔节期低温胁迫对小麦生理生化特性和产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(02): 73-79
Zhang J, Lu M, Sun S G, Du W L, Liu Y, Wu J, Chen X H.Changes of physiological and biochemical parameters and grain yield at joining stage of wheat under low temperature stress.Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2014, 23(02): 73-79 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 孙金月, 赵玉田, 梁博文, 刘方, 尤勇. HRGP在小麦抗寒锻炼过程中的变化及其与抗寒性的关系. 植物遗传资源学报, 2004, 5: 6-11
Sun J Y, Zhao Y T, Liang B W, Liu F, You Y.Changes of hydroxyproline-rich glyco-protein wheat under cold stress and its relationship to cold resistance. Plant Genet Resour, 2004, 5: 6-11 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Equiza M A.Morphological, anatomical and physiological responses related to differential shoot vs. root growth inhibition at low temperature in spring and winter wheat.Ann Bot, 2001, 87: 67-76
[12] 刘艳阳, 李俊周, 陈磊, 崔党群. 低温胁迫对小麦叶片细胞膜脂质过氧化产物及相关酶活性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(4): 70-73
Liu Y Y, Li J Z, Chen L, Cui D Q.Effect of low temperature stress on peroxidation product of membrane lipids and activity of related enzymes in wheat seed-ling leaves. J Triticeae Crops, 2006, 26(4): 70-73 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Bohn M, Luthje S.Plasma membrane lipid alterations induced by cold acclimation and abscisic acid treatment of winter wheat seedlings differing in frost resistance.J Plant Physiol, 2007, 164: 146-156
[14] 刘炜, 孙德兰, 王红, 简令成, 张可夫. 2°C低温下抗寒冬小麦与冷敏感春小麦幼苗细胞质膜Ca2+-ATPase活性比较. 作物学报, 2002, 28: 227-229
Liu W, Sun D L, Wang H, Jian L C, Zhao K F.Comparison of Ca2+-ATPase activity in seedling plasmolemma of cold resistant winter wheat vs. cold-sensitive spring wheat under 2°C low temperature.Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28: 227-229 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 蒋高明. 植物生理生态学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004. pp 46-53
Jiang G M. Plant Ecophysiology.Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004. pp 46-53 (in Chinese)
[16] Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R.The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence.Biochim Biophys Acta, 1989, 99: 87-92
[17] Schreiber U, Bilger W, Neubauer C.Chlorophyll fluorescence as a non-destructive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photo- synthesis.Ecol Studies, 1994, 100: 49-70
[18] Krause G H, Weis E.Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1991, 42: 313-349
[19] Van Kooten O, Snel J F.The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology.Photosynth Res, 1990, 25: 147-150
[20] 王晓楠, 付连双, 李卓夫, 杨方, 孙艳丽, 刘灿, 王金伟, 陈禹兴. 低温驯化及封冻阶段不同冬小麦品种叶绿素荧光参数的比较. 麦类作物学报, 2009, 29: 83-88
Wang X N, Fu L S, Li Z F, Yang F, Sun Y L, Liu C, Wang J W, Chen Y X.Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters between two winter wheat cultivars during cold acclimation and frozen period.J Triticeae Crops, 2009, 29: 83-88 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 高艳, 唐建卫, 殷贵鸿, 韩玉林, 黄峰, 王丽娜. 倒春寒发生时期和次数对冬小麦产量性状的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35: 687-692
Gao Y, Tang J W, Yin G H, Han Y L, Huang F, Wang L N.Effect of different periods and frequency of late spring coldness on winter wheat yield related traits.J Triticeae Crops, 2015, 35: 687-692 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 王树刚, 王振林, 王平, 王海伟, 黄玮, 武玉国, 尹燕枰. 基于生理指标与籽粒产量关系的小麦品种抗冻性分析. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22: 1477-1484
Wang S G, Wang Z L, Wang P, Wang H W, Huang W, Wu Y G, Yin Y P.Freeze resistance analysis of different wheat cultivars based on relationships between physiological indices and grain yield. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2011, 22: 1477-1484 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] Fracheboud Y, Haldimann P, Leipner J, Stamp P.Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection tool for cold tolerance of photosynthesis in maize.J Exp Bot, 1999, 50: 1533-1540
[24] Xu C C, Zhang J H.Effect of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence and xanthophylls cycle components in winter wheat leaves with different ages. Acta Phytophysiol Sin, 1999, 25: 29-37
[25] Kratsh H A, Wise R R.The ultrastructure of chilling stress.Plant Cell Environ, 2000, 23: 337-350
[26] 陈思思, 李春燕, 杨景, 徐雯, 朱新开, 郭文善, 封超年. 拔节期低温冻害对扬麦16光合特性及产量形成的影响. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2014, 35(3): 59-64
Chen S S, Li C Y, Yang J, Xu W, Zhu X K, Guo W S, Feng C N.Effect of low temperature at jointing stage on photosynthetic characteristics and yield in wheat cultivar Yangmai 16. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric Life Sci Edn), 2014, 35(3): 59-64 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 简令成. 植物抗寒机理研究的新进展. 植物学通报, 1992, 9(3): 17-22
Jian L C.Advance of the studies on the mechanism of plant cold hardiness.Chin Bull Bot, 1992, 9(3): 17-22 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[8] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[9] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[10] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[11] 徐苗苗, 邸太妹, 王洁, 吴叶蝶, 刘恩贝, 王玉春, 王新超, 王璐. 外源槲皮素增强茶树抗寒性的分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1418-1429.
[12] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[13] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[14] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[15] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2