欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (12): 3071-3079.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14227

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

Bna-miR171g提高甘蓝型油菜耐渗透胁迫能力的功能鉴定

杨文静(), 陆海芹, 陈吴钧, 曾蕾, 谢涛, 蒋金金(), 王幼平   

  1. 扬州大学生物科学与技术学院, 江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-04 接受日期:2022-03-25 出版日期:2022-12-12 网络出版日期:2022-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 蒋金金
  • 作者简介:E-mail: wjyang1205@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31972963);国家自然科学基金项目(31771825);,国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2018YFE0108000);江苏省研究生实践创新计划项目(SJCX21_1602)

Functional identification of Bna-miR171g on improving tolerance to osmotic stress in Brassica napus

YANG Wen-Jing(), LU Hai-Qin, CHEN Wu-Jun, ZENG Lei, XIE Tao, JIANG Jin-Jin(), WANG You-Ping   

  1. College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2021-12-04 Accepted:2022-03-25 Published:2022-12-12 Published online:2022-04-20
  • Contact: JIANG Jin-Jin
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31972963);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31771825);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFE0108000);Graduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship(SJCX21_1602)

RichHTML

17

PDF

436

摘要：

MicroRNA171 (miR171)是植物中非常保守的miRNA分子, 在调控植物生长发育方面具有重要的功能。关于其功能研究的报道多见于拟南芥、水稻、番茄等植物, 而甘蓝型油菜中miR171的功能研究还尚未报道。本研究发现Bna-miR171家族7个成员的序列高度保守, 其中miR171g受甘露醇诱导上调表达。在150 mmol L-1甘露醇模拟的渗透胁迫条件下, Bna-miR171g过表达油菜(OE-miR171g)的根长显著高于对照(J9712)。DAB组织化学染色结果表明渗透胁迫后OE-miR171g中过氧化氢的积累量低于J9712, 推测Bna-miR171g过表达材料的活性氧清除能力高于对照植株。渗透胁迫后OE-miR171g中脯氨酸含量、过氧化物酶和超氧化物歧化酶活性均高于对照, 而丙二醛含量显著低于对照。此外, 胁迫应答基因ABI5、ERD10、RAB18、OSR1、RD20、RD29B在OE-miR171g中的表达水平均高于对照植株。综上, 过表达Bna-miR171g可以提高甘蓝型油菜对渗透胁迫的耐受性, 本研究可以为甘蓝型油菜的抗逆性状改良提供理论依据。

关键词: 甘蓝型油菜, Bna-miR171g, 甘露醇, 渗透胁迫

Abstract:

MicroRNA171 (miR171) as a conserved miRNA family in plants, plays important roles in regulating plant growth and development. Functional researches of miR171 are mainly reported in Arabidopsis, rice, and tomato. However, the function of miR171 in Brassica napus is unclear. In the present study, we found that the seven members of Bna-miR171 were highly conserved, of which, miR171g was strongly up-regulated by osmotic stress. Under the osmotic stress of 150 mmol L-1 mannitol, the root length of rapeseed overexpressing Bna-miR171g (OE-miR171g) was significantly longer than the control (J9712). The diaminobenzidine staining revealed less H2O2 accumulation in OE-miR171g than that of J9712 after osmotic stress, indicating OE-miR171g had higher reactive oxygen species-scavenging ability than the control. The proline content, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase activity in OE-miR171g were higher than the control, while the malondialdehyde content in OE-miR171g was lower than the control. Besides, the relative expression level of stress responsive genes (ABI5, ERD10, RAB18, OSR1, RD20, and RD29B) in OE-miR171g were higher than the control. Generally, the overexpression of Bna-miR171g improved the rapeseed tolerance to osmotic stress, and could be helpful to the improvement of abiotic stress tolerance in B. napus.

Key words: Brassica napus, Bna-miR171g, mannitol, osmotic stress

表1

本研究所用引物序列"

引物名称
Primer name		 引物序列
Primer sequence (5'-3')		 引物名称
Primer name		 引物序列
Primer sequence (5'-3')
Q-Bna-miR171g TGATTGAGCCGCGCCAATATCT Q-RAB18-F ACTGAAACTTGCGATTTGGG
5.8S GTCTGCCTGGGTGTCACG Q-RAB18-R AGGTCGATTTCCTTAGCCC
miR171g-F GTGTCCCTCCTTTCTGCG Q-OSR1-F CAACGGCTGAGATTTGATGTC
miR171g-R GAAGGGTTGGGTGGAGGT Q-OSR1-R CGGAAGGAACGGTGGTAGA
miR171g-F (Spe I) GGACTAGTGTGTCCCTCCTTTCTGCG Q-RD20-F CACTTCCGAGTTGGTTGCC
miR171g-R (Asc I) TTGGCGCGCCGAAGGGTTGGGTGGAGGT Q-RD20-R TCCTTCGGTATCATAGGTGCTT
Q-BnABI5-F GATAACATAGGAGGACAGTAT Q-RD29B-F GTCCAAGGTTACTGATCCCACTC
Q-BnABI5-R CTCAACTACCTTCTCTACC Q-RD29B-R CTTCAGACCAAACTCATGGTTTC
Q-ERD10-F GGGAGAGGTTAAGGATCGTG BnActin-F TCTTCCTCACGCTATCCTCCG
Q-ERD10-R CTCGAGGAGAGTAGGCTTATGC BnActin-R AGCCGTCTCCAGCTCTTGC

图1

Bna-miR171序列的系统发生分析 A: miR171成熟序列的保守性分析(从上到下分别为拟南芥、水稻、玉米、白菜型油菜、甘蓝和甘蓝型油菜的序列); B: miR171前体序列的系统发生分析。Bna: 甘蓝型油菜; Ath: 拟南芥; Osa: 水稻; Zma: 玉米; Bra: 白菜型油菜; Bol: 甘蓝。"

图2

渗透胁迫条件下Bna-miR171g的表达分析"

图3

渗透胁迫下Bna-miR171g过表达植株的表型 A: 渗透胁迫下OE-miR171和J9712的表型; B: 根长; C: 下胚轴长; D: 鲜重; E: Bna-miR171g的表达水平; F: 子叶的DAB染色。数值表示为平均值±标准误, n = 20; *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01。"

图4

渗透胁迫下Bna-miR171g过表达植株和对照的生理指标 MDA: 丙二醛; Pro: 脯氨酸; POD: 过氧化物酶; SOD: 超氧化物歧化酶。*: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01。"

图5

Bna-miR171g过表达植株和对照中胁迫应答基因的表达量分析"

[1] 王汉中. 以新需求为导向的油菜产业发展战略. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40: 613-617.
Wang H Z. New-demand oriented oilseed rape industry developing strategy. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2018, 40: 613-617. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 刘成, 冯中朝, 肖唐华, 马晓敏, 周广生, 黄凤洪, 李加纳, 王汉中. 我国油菜产业发展现状、潜力及对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41: 485-489.
Liu C, Feng Z C, Xiao T H, Ma X M, Zhou G S, Huang F H, Li J N, Wang H Z. Development, potential and adaptation of Chinese rapeseed industry. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2019, 41: 485-489. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Lohani N, Jain D, Singh M B, Bhalla P L. Engineering multiple abiotic stress tolerance in canola, Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci, 2020, 11: 3.
[4] Trenberth K E, Dai A, Van Der Schrier G, Jones P D, Barichivich J, Briffa K R, Sheffield J. Global warming and changes in drought. Nat Clim Change, 2014, 4: 17-22.
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2067
[5] 张树杰, 王汉中. 我国油菜生产应对气候变化的对策和措施分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34: 114-122.
Zhang S J, Wang H Z. Policies and strategies analyses of rapeseed production response to climate change in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2012, 34: 114-122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 杨真, 王宝山. 中国盐渍土资源现状及改良利用对策. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(4): 125-130.
Yang Z, Wang B S. Present status of saline soil resources and countermeasures for improvement and utilization in China. Shandong Agric Sci, 2015, 47(4): 125-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Zhu J K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2002, 53: 247-273.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329
[8] Leung J, Bouvier-Durand M, Morris P C, Guerrier D, Chefdor F, Giraudat J. Arabidopsis ABA response gene ABI1: features of a calcium-modulated protein phosphatase. Science, 1994, 264: 1448-1452.
pmid: 7910981
[9] Liu Q, Kasuga M, Sakuma Y, Abe H, Miura S, Yamaguchi- Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K.Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low- temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 1998, 10: 1391-1406.
pmid: 9707537
[10] Boudsocq M, Barbier-Brygoo H, Lauriere C. Identification of nine sucrose nonfermenting 1-related protein kinases 2 activated by hyperosmotic and saline stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem, 2004, 279: 41758-41766.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405259200 pmid: 15292193
[11] Monks D E, Aghoram K, Courtney P D, Dewald D B, Dewey R E. Hyperosmotic stress induces the rapid phosphorylation of a soybean phosphatidylinositol transfer protein homolog through activation of the protein kinases SPK1 and SPK2. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 1205-1219.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.5.1205 pmid: 11340192
[12] Umezawa T, Yoshida R, Maruyama K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. SRK2C, a SNF1-related protein kinase 2, improves drought tolerance by controlling stress-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 17306-17311.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407758101
[13] Mao X, Zhang H, Tian S, Chang X, Jing R. TaSnRK2.4, an SNF1-type serine/threonine protein kinase of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), confers enhanced multistress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot, 2010, 61: 683-696.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp331
[14] Zhang H, Mao X, Jing R, Chang X, Xie H. Characterization of a common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) TaSnRK2.7 gene involved in abiotic stress responses. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 975-988.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq328
[15] Ying S, Zhang D F, Li H Y, Liu Y H, Shi Y S, Song Y C, Wang T Y, Li Y. Cloning and characterization of a maize SnRK2 protein kinase gene confers enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep, 2011, 30: 1683-1699.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1077-z
[16] Fujita Y, Yoshida T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF-SnRK2 pathway in ABRE-mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol Planta, 2013, 147: 15-27.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01635.x
[17] Wu J, Yan G, Duan Z, Wang Z, Kang C, Guo L, Liu K, Tu J, Shen J, Yi B, Fu T, Li X, Ma C, Dai C. Roles of the Brassica napus DELLA protein BnaA6.RGA, in modulating drought tolerance by interacting with the ABA signaling component BnaA10.ABF2. Front Plant Sci, 2020, 11: 577.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00577
[18] Yang M, Yang Q, Fu T, Zhou Y. Overexpression of the Brassica napus BnLAS gene in Arabidopsis affects plant development and increases drought tolerance. Plant Cell Rep, 2011, 30: 373-388.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0940-7
[19] Liang Y, Kang K, Gan L, Ning S, Xiong J, Song S, Xi L, Lai S, Yin Y, Gu J, Xiang J, Li S, Wang B, Li M. Drought-responsive genes, LEA3) and vicinal oxygen chelate, function in lipid accumulation in Brassica napus and Arabidopsis mainly via enhancing photosynthetic efficiency and reducing ROS. Plant Biotechnol J, 2019, 17: 2123-2142.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.13127 pmid: 30972883
[20] Georges F, Das S, Ray H, Bock C, Nokhrina K, Kolla VA, Keller W. Over-expression of Brassica napus phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C2 in canola induces significant changes in gene expression and phytohormone distribution patterns, enhances drought tolerance and promotes early flowering and maturation. Plant Cell Environ, 2009, 32: 1664-1681.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02027.x
[21] Li Q, Yin M, Li Y, Fan C, Yang Q, Wu J, Zhang C, Wang H, Zhou Y. Expression of Brassica napus TTG2, a regulator of trichome development, increases plant sensitivity to salt stress by suppressing the expression of auxin biosynthesis genes. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66: 5821-5836.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv287
[22] Xiong J L, Wang H C, Tan X Y, Zhang C L, Naeem M S. 5-aminolevulinic acid improves salt tolerance mediated by regulation of tetrapyrrole and proline metabolism in Brassica napus L. seedlings under NaCl stress. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2018, 124: 88-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.01.001
[23] Jones-Rhoades M W, Bartel D P, Bartel B. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2006, 57: 19-53.
pmid: 16669754
[24] Zhou R, Yu X, Ottosen C O, Zhang T, Wu Z, Zhao T. Unique miRNAs and their targets in tomato leaf responding to combined drought and heat stress. BMC Plant Biol, 2020, 20: 107.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2313-x pmid: 32143575
[25] Liu H H, Tian X, Li Y J, Wu C A, Zheng C C. Microarray-based analysis of stress-regulated microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. RNA, 2008, 14: 836-843.
doi: 10.1261/rna.895308
[26] Jian H, Wang J, Wang T, Wei L, Li J, Liu L. Identification of rapeseed microRNAs involved in early stage seed germination under salt and drought stresses. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 658.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00658 pmid: 27242859
[27] Hwang E W, Shin S J, Yu B K, Byun M O, Kwon H B. MiR171 family members are involved in drought response in Solanum tuberosum. J Plant Biol, 2010, 54: 43-48.
doi: 10.1007/s12374-010-9141-8
[28] Liu Z, Lei X, Wang P, Wang Y, Lv J, Li X, Gao C. Overexpression of ThSAP30BP from Tamarix hispida improves salt tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2020, 146: 124-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.11.020
[29] Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods, 2001, 25: 402-408.
doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 pmid: 11846609
[30] Yang Y, Zhu K, Li H, Han S, Meng Q, Khan S U, Fan C, Xie K, Zhou Y. Precise editing of CLAVATA genes in Brassica napus L. regulates multilocular silique development. Plant Biotechnol J, 2018, 16: 1322-1335.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12872 pmid: 29250878
[31] Li J, Lin K, Zhang S, Wu J, Fang Y, Wang Y. Genome-wide analysis of myeloblastosis-related genes in Brassica napus L. and positive modulation of osmotic tolerance by BnMRD107. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 678202.
[32] Jiang J, Yuan Y, Zhu S, Fang T, Ran L, Wu J, Wang Y. Comparison of physiological and methylational changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and diploid progenitors under drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant, 2019, 41: 45.
doi: 10.1007/s11738-019-2837-6
[33] Xia L, Yang L, Sun N, Li J, Fang Y, Wang Y. Physiological and antioxidant enzyme gene expression analysis reveals the improved tolerance to drought stress of the somatic hybrid offspring of Brassica napus and Sinapis alba at vegetative stage. Acta Physiol Plant, 2016, 38: 88.
doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2111-0
[34] Kantar M, Lucas S J, Budak H. MiRNA expression patterns of Triticum dicoccoides in response to shock drought stress. Planta, 2011, 233: 471-484.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1309-4 pmid: 21069383
[35] Dalton-Morgan J, Hayward A, Alamery S, Tollenaere R, Mason A S, Campbell E, Patel D, Lorenc M T, Yi B, Long Y, Meng J, Raman R, Raman H, Lawley C, Edwards D, Batley J. A high-throughput SNP array in the amphidiploid species Brassica napus shows diversity in resistance genes. Funct Integr Genomics, 2014, 14: 643-655.
doi: 10.1007/s10142-014-0391-2
[36] Luo J, Tang S, Mei F, Peng X, Li J, Li X, Yan X, Zeng X, Liu F, Wu Y, Wu G. BnSIP1-1, a trihelix family gene, mediates abiotic stress tolerance and ABA signaling in Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 44.
[37] Yang H, Deng L, Liu H, Fan S, Hua W, Liu J. Overexpression of BnaAOX1b confers tolerance to osmotic and salt stress in rapeseed. Gene Genom Genet, 2019, 9: 3501-3511.
[38] Liu N, Chen J, Wang T, Li Q, Cui P, Jia C, Hong Y. Overexpression of WAX INDUCER1/SHINE1 gene enhances wax accumulation under osmotic stress and oil synthesis in Brassica napus. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20: 4435.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20184435
[39] Chen L, Ren F, Zhou L, Wang Q Q, Zhong H, Li X B. The Brassica napus calcineurin B-like 1/CBL-interacting protein kinase 6 (CBL1/CIPK6) component is involved in the plant response to abiotic stress and ABA signalling. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 6211-6222.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers273
[40] Xie M, Zhang S, Yu B. MicroRNA biogenesis, degradation and activity in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2015, 72: 87-99.
doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1728-7 pmid: 25209320
[41] Li J, Duan Y, Sun N, Wang L, Feng S, Fang Y, Wang Y. The miR169n-NF-YA8 regulation module involved in drought resistance in Brassica napus L. Plant Sci, 2021, 313: 111062.
[42] Song X, Li Y, Cao X, Qi Y. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plant-environment interactions. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2019, 70: 489-525.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100334 pmid: 30848930
[43] Raza A, Su W, Gao A, Mehmood S S, Hussain M A, Nie W, Lv Y, Zou X, Zhang X. Catalase (CAT) gene family in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): genome-wide analysis, identification, and expression pattern in response to multiple hormones and abiotic stress conditions. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22: 4281.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22084281
[44] Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci, 2002, 7: 405-410.
doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9 pmid: 12234732
[45] Naheed R, Aslam H, Kanwal H, Farhat F, Gamar M I A, Al-Mushhin A A M, Jabborova D, Ansari M J, Shaheen S, Aqeel M, Noman A, Hessini K. Growth attributes, biochemical modulations, antioxidant enzymatic metabolism and yield in Brassica napus varieties for salinity tolerance. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2021, 28: 5469-5479.
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.021
[46] El-Badri A M, Batool M, Mohamed I A A, Wang Z, Khatab A, Sherif A, Ahmad H, Khan M N, Hassan H M, Elrewainy I M, Kuai J, Zhou G, Wang B. Antioxidative and metabolic contribution to salinity stress responses in two rapeseed cultivars during the early seedling stage. Antioxidants, 2021, 10: 1227.
doi: 10.3390/antiox10081227
[47] Zhang Y, Yang C, Li Y, Zheng N, Chen H, Zhao Q, Gao T, Guo H, Xie Q.SDIR1 is a RING finger E3 ligase that positively regulates stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 1912-1929.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048488
[48] Kovacs D, Kalmar E, Torok Z, Tompa P. Chaperone activity of ERD10 and ERD14, two disordered stress-related plant proteins. Plant Physiol, 2008, 147: 381-390.
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.118208 pmid: 18359842
[49] Aubert Y, Vile D, Pervent M, Aldon D, Ranty B, Simonneau T, Vavasseur A, Galaud J P. RD20, a stress-inducible caleosin, participates in stomatal control, transpiration and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol, 2010, 51: 1975-1987.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq155 pmid: 20952421
[50] Jeannette E, Rona J P, Bardat F, Cornel D, Sotta B, Miginiac E. Induction of RAB18gene expression and activation of K+outward rectifying channels depend on an extracellular perception of ABA in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells. Plant J, 1999, 18: 13-22.
pmid: 10341440
[51] Bihmidine S, Lin J, Stone J M, Awada T, Specht J E, Clemente T E. Activity of the Arabidopsis RD29A and RD29B promoter elements in soybean under water stress. Planta, 2013, 237: 55-64.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1740-9 pmid: 22983672
[52] Lim C W, Baek W, Lee S C. Roles of pepper bZIP protein CaDILZ1 and its interacting partner RING-type E3 ligase CaDSR1 in modulation of drought tolerance. Plant J, 2018, 96: 452-467.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14046
[1] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[2] 张清怡, 肖义涛, 李秋霞, 张钰石, 张明才, 李召虎. 渗透胁迫下不同玉米品种幼苗ABA合成及生理生化响应差异[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 221-232.
[3] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[4] 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197.
[5] 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899.
[6] 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675.
[7] 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567.
[8] 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197.
[9] 巨建业, 杨柳, 陈浩, 康雷, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 单细胞核转录组分析揭示油菜种皮分化过程和种子颜色差异原因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874.
[10] 张雯, 李玉, 王创, 石磊, 丁广大. 甘蓝型油菜磷转运蛋白BnaPT48的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995.
[11] 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692.
[12] 王晨, 贺丹, 姚敏, 邱萍, 何昕, 熊兴华, 康雷, 刘忠松, 钱论文. 基于转录组分析鉴定甘蓝型油菜开花候选基因以及BnaCOR27功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704.
[13] 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148.
[14] 李嘉欣, 黄莹, 吴潞梅, 赵伦, 易斌, 马朝芝, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 文静. 甘蓝型油菜BnaSLY1基因进化分析及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 44-57.
[15] 折萌, 郑登俞, 柯照, 吴忠义, 邹华文, 张中保. 玉米ZmGRAS13基因的克隆及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1420-1434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2