欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 1147-1157.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.34148

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉花种质资源萌发期耐盐性鉴定及筛选

李航1,2**(), 刘丽2**(), 黄乾1,2, 刘文豪2, 司爱君2, 孔宪辉2, 王旭文2, 赵福相2, 梅拥军1,*(), 余渝2,*()   

  1. 1塔里木大学农学院, 新疆阿拉尔 843300
    2新疆农垦科学院棉花研究所 / 农业农村部西北内陆区棉花生物学与遗传育种重点实验室, 新疆石河子 832000
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-31 接受日期:2023-10-23 出版日期:2024-05-12 网络出版日期:2024-02-06
  • 通讯作者: 梅拥军, E-mail: xnmeiyj@126.com; 余渝, E-mail: xjyuyu021@sohu.com
  • 作者简介:李航, E-mail: 1298044524@qq.com;
    刘丽, E-mail: cottonliuli@sina.com第一联系人：

    **同等贡献

  • 基金资助:
    新疆生产建设兵团第三师重大科技计划项目(KY2022ZD02);新疆生产建设兵团第三师科技创新人才项目(KJ2023PT01);棉花生物学国家重点实验室开放课题(CB2022A27)

Identification and screening of salt tolerance of cotton germplasm resources at germination stage

LI Hang1,2**(), LIU Li2**(), HUANG Qian1,2, LIU Wen-Hao2, SI Ai-Jun2, KONG Xian-Hui2, WANG Xu-Wen2, ZHAO Fu-Xiang2, MEI Yong-Jun1,*(), YU Yu2,*()   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Tarim University, Alar 843300, Xinjiang, China
    2Cotton Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy Agricultural and Reclamation Science / Northwest Inland Region Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding (Xinjiang), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2023-08-31 Accepted:2023-10-23 Published:2024-05-12 Published online:2024-02-06
  • Contact: E-mail: xnmeiyj@126.com; E-mail: xjyuyu021@sohu.com
  • About author:First author contact:

    **Contributed equally to this work

  • Supported by:
    Major science and Technology Plan Project of the Third Division of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(KY2022ZD02);Science and Technology Innovation Talent Project of the Third Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps(KJ2023PT01);State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology(CB2022A27)

RichHTML

60

PDF

619

摘要：

种子萌发期是对盐分较敏感的时期, 测定不同盐浓度胁迫下的棉花种子发芽情况是筛选棉花耐盐种质的重要依据之一。本研究对629份棉花种质资源进行0、150 mmol L-1 NaCl处理, 对鲜重、发芽势等6个性状的耐盐系数进行差异分析, 结果显示盐胁迫下各个性状较对照均存在显著差异; 使用主成分分析、隶属函数分析对棉花种质耐盐性进行综合评价; 对综合评价值D值进行聚类分析, 根据D值的大小将629份种质资源分成5类: 188份耐盐中间型材料、376份耐盐型材料、36份高耐盐型材料、28份盐敏感型材料、1份高盐敏感型材料; 通过逐步回归分析建立棉花萌发期耐盐性评价预测模型: D = 0.277RFW+0.29RGP+0.189RPL+0.387RGR-0.32 (R2=0.992), 筛选出鲜重、下胚轴长、发芽势和发芽率4个指标可作为棉花萌发期耐盐性鉴定的指标。本研究建立了一套精准、高效的耐盐性鉴定体系, 筛选到36份高耐盐材料和1份高敏感材料, 为棉花耐盐机制研究和培育耐盐新品种提供参考。

关键词: 棉花, 萌发期, 耐盐性, 综合评价

Abstract:

Seed germination stage is sensitive to salt. The determination of cotton seed germination under different salt concentration stress is one of the important bases for screening cotton salt-tolerant germplasm. In this study, 629 cotton germplasm resources were treated with 0 mmol L-1 and 150 mmol L-1 NaCl, and the salt tolerance coefficients of 6 traits such as fresh weight and germination potential were analyzed. The results showed that there were significant differences in each trait under salt stress compared with the control. Principal component analysis and membership function analysis were used to comprehensively evaluate the salt tolerance of cotton germplasm. Cluster analysis was carried out on the comprehensive evaluation value (D-value), and 629 germplasm resources were divided into 5 categories according to the D-value: 188 medium salt-tolerant materials, 376 salt-tolerant materials, 36 high salt-tolerant materials, 28 salt-sensitive materials, 1 high salt-sensitive material. A prediction model for salt tolerance evaluation of cotton at germination stage was established by stepwise regression analysis: D = 0.277RFW + 0.29RGP + 0.189RPL + 0.387RGR-0.32 (R2 =0.992). Four indexes of fresh weight, hypocotyl length, germination potential, and germination rate were selected as the indexes of salt tolerance identification in cotton germination stage. In this study, a set of accurate and efficient salt tolerance identification system was established, and 4 high salt-tolerant materials and 1 high salt-sensitive material were screened, which providing the reference for the study of salt tolerance mechanism and the cultivation of new salt tolerant varieties in cotton.

Key words: cotton, germination stage, salt tolerance, comprehensive evaluation

图1

5个棉花品种在不同浓度盐胁迫处理下的性状差异和耐盐系数变化曲线 a~e: 性状差异; f~j: 耐盐系数变化曲线。FW: 鲜重; SL: 幼苗全长; RL: 胚根长; GR: 发芽率; RFW: 相对鲜重; RSL: 相对幼苗全长; RRL: 相对胚根长; RGR: 相对发芽率。"

图2

对照与盐胁迫下棉花的表型性状 CK: 正常处理; ST: 盐胁迫; ST-CK: 盐胁迫与对照的均值差; ***代表P < 0.001。"

表1

盐胁迫下629份棉花品种(系)的表型性状"

处理
Treatment		 参数
Parameter		 鲜重
Fresh weight
(g)		 幼苗全长
Seedlings length (cm)		 胚根长
Root length (cm)		 下胚轴长Hypocotyl length (cm) 发芽势
Germination potential (%)		 发芽率
Germination rate (%)
对照 最大值Max. 0.85 25.59 15.18 12.60 1.00 1.00
Control 最小值Min. 0.39 10.75 5.29 3.93 0.71 0.79
平均值Average 0.61 17.35 10.09 7.26 0.97 0.98
标准差SD 0.07 2.22 1.57 1.31 0.04 0.03
变异系数CV (%) 12.21 12.79 15.55 18.01 4.52 2.79
盐处理 最大值Max. 0.69 18.19 11.98 8.82 1.00 1.00
Salt treatment 最小值Min. 0.18 3.78 2.09 1.42 0.14 0.37
平均值Average 0.42 10.88 6.73 4.15 0.81 0.88
标准差SD 0.07 2.14 1.50 1.17 0.10 0.08
变异系数CV (%) 16.81 19.64 22.35 28.12 12.98 8.96
较对照变化 变化值Variation -0.19 -6.47 -3.36 -3.11 -0.16 -0.10
Comparison with the control 变化百分比
Percentage of variation (%)		 -31.57 -37.27 -33.30 -42.78 -16.52 -9.93

表2

棉花各性状的耐盐系数"

系数
Coefficient		 相对鲜重
RFW		 相对幼苗全长
RSL		 相对胚根长
RRL		 相对下胚轴长
RHL		 相对发芽势
RGP		 相对发芽率
RGR
最大值Max. 1.08 1.05 1.31 1.41 1.13 1.13
最小值Min. 0.31 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.42
平均值Average 0.69 0.63 0.68 0.58 0.83 0.90
标准差SD 0.11 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.08
变异系数CV (%) 16.02 19.83 25.13 29.12 12.65 8.57

表3

棉花各性状耐盐系数的相关性分析"

性状
Trait		 相对鲜重
RFW		 相对幼苗全长
RSL		 相对胚根长
RRL		 相对下胚轴长
RHL		 相对发芽势
RGP		 相对发芽率
RGR
相对鲜重RFW 1
相对幼苗全长RSL 0.762** 1
相对胚根长RRL 0.485** 0.803** 1
相对下胚轴长RHL 0.688** 0.656** 0.106** 1
相对发芽势RGP 0.174** 0.124** 0.093* 0.112** 1
相对发芽率RGR 0.194** 0.141** 0.147** 0.077 0.771** 1

表4

棉花各性状耐盐系数的主成分分析"

指标名称
Item name		 特征向量 Eigen vector
PC1 PC2 PC3
相对鲜重 RFW 0.875 -0.166 0.192
相对幼苗全长 RSL 0.935 -0.260 -0.150
相对胚根长 RRL 0.699 -0.162 -0.691
相对下胚轴长 RHL 0.709 -0.215 0.634
相对发芽势 RGP 0.371 0.864 0.050
相对发芽率 RGR 0.389 0.857 -0.031
特征值Eigen value 2.919 1.649 0.942
贡献率Contribution ratio (%) 48.65 27.48 15.71
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution ratio (%) 48.65 76.13 91.84
权重Weight 0.530 0.299 0.171

图3

629份棉花耐盐性聚类分析"

表5

高耐盐材料种质、D值及排名"

编号
Code		 种质
Germpalsm name		 D值
D-value		 排名 Rank 编号
Code		 种质
Germpalsm name		 D值
D-value		 排名 Rank
ST542 天云07164 Tianyun 07164 0.824 1 ST480 86-27 0.728 19
ST624 晋棉25 Jinmian 25 0.818 2 ST548 河南抗黄 Henankanghuang 0.728 20
ST620 冀棉19 Jimian 19 0.817 3 ST566 Sic74 0.721 21
ST450 14-23*9-2 0.812 4 ST584 惠远14 Huiyuan 14 0.720 22
ST83 中棉所17 Zhongmiansuo 17 0.771 5 ST603 44-35 0.719 23
ST210 苏棉11 Sumian 11 0.770 6 ST175 鲁棉29 Lumian 29 0.718 24
ST40 新陆中3号 Xinluzhong 3 0.768 7 ST144 苏棉10号 Sumian 10 0.716 25
ST221 皖棉8号 Wanmian 8 0.761 8 ST347 鄂岱棉 Edaimian 0.713 26
ST219 宛棉1号 Wanmian 1 0.760 9 ST582 惠远12 Huiyuan 12 0.713 27
ST154 晋中200 Jinzhong 200 0.758 10 ST189 宁棉7号 Ningmian 7 0.709 28
ST486 9-8*41-79 0.755 11 ST216 苏棉19 Sumian 19 0.709 29
ST622 锦棉5号 Jinmian 5 0.751 12 ST26 冀棉3号 Jimian 3 0.708 30
ST15 辽棉9号 Liaomian 9 0.750 13 ST503 ZB0848 0.706 31
ST312 新陆中20 Xinluzhong 20 0.748 14 ST426 标杂A父本 Biaoza A male parent 0.704 32
ST586 新石K25 Xinshi K25 0.748 15 ST88 晋棉8号 Jinmian 8 0.703 33
ST225 协作2号 Xiezuo 2 0.733 16 ST207 泗阳331 Siyang 331 0.703 34
ST305 新陆中34 Xinluzhong 34 0.730 17 ST208 苏棉6号 Sumian 6 0.699 35
ST194 陕401 Shaan 401 0.729 18 ST531 C2 0.698 36
[1] 王晓伟, 岳丕昌, 丁建国, 张利召. 新疆棉花生产的比较优势分析. 中国棉花, 2012, 39(6): 4-6.
doi: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.20120602
Wang X W, Yue P C, Ding J G, Zhang L Z. Study on the comparative advantage of Xinjiang cotton production. China Cotton, 2012, 39(6): 4-6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 李彬, 王志春, 孙志高, 陈渊, 杨福. 中国盐碱地资源与可持续利用研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 39(2): 154-158.
Li B, Wang Z C, Sun Z G, Chen Y, Yang F. Study on saline-alkali land resources and sustainable utilization in China. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2012, 39(6): 4-6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 王东明, 贾媛, 崔继哲. 盐胁迫对植物的影响及植物盐适应性研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(4): 124-128.
Wang D M, Jia Y, Cui J Z. Advances in research on effects of salt stress on plant and adaptive mechanism of the plant to salinity. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2009, 25(4): 124-128 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2008-1216
[4] Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress: comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25: 239-250.
doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
[5] Abdelraheem A, Esmaeili N E, O’Connell M, Zhang J F. Progress and perspective on drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. Indust Crops Prod, 2019, 130: 118-129.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.070
[6] 孙小芳, 刘友良. 棉花品种耐盐性鉴定指标可靠性的检验. 作物学报, 2001, 27: 794-801.
Sun X F, Liu Y L. Test on criteria of evaluating salt tolerance of cotton cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2001, 27: 794-801 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 贾玉珍, 朱禧月, 唐予迪, 蔡养廉, 林同保, 罗先宝. 棉花出苗及苗期耐盐性指标的研究. 河南农业大学学报, 1987, 21(1): 30-41.
Jia Y Z, Zhu X Y, Tang Y D, Cai Y L, Lin T B, Luo X B. Study on salt tolerance index of cotton seedling emergence and seedling stage. J Henan Agric Univ, 1987, 21(1): 30-41 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 王俊娟, 叶武威, 周大云, 吕有军, 樊保香, 宋丽艳. 盐胁迫下不同耐盐类型棉花的萌发特性. 棉花学报, 2007, 19(4): 315-317.
Wang J J, Ye W W, Zhou D Y, Lyu Y J, Fan B X, Song L Y. Studies on germination characteristics of different salinity resistant cotton under salt stress. Cotton Sci, 2007, 19(4): 315-317 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 王静, 许兴, 麻冬梅. 紫花苜蓿种质资源萌发期耐盐性鉴定. 核农学报, 2018, 32: 1939-1948.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.10.1939
Wang J, Xu X, Ma D M. Salt tolerance identification of alfalfa germplasm resources at germination stage. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2018, 32: 1939-1948 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 靳路真, 王洋, 张伟, 邱红梅, 陈健, 候云龙, 马晓萍, 王跃强, 谢甫绨. 大豆品种(系)耐热性鉴定及分级评鉴. 中国油料作物学报, 2016, 38: 77-87.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2016.01.013
Jin L Z, Wang Y, Zhang W, Qiu H M, Chen J, Hou Y L, Ma X P, Wang Y Q, Xie F T. Grading evaluation on heat-tolerance in soybean and identification of heat-tolerant cultivars. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2016, 38: 77-87 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 郜欢欢, 叶桑, 王倩, 王刘艳, 王瑞莉, 陈柳依, 唐章林, 李加纳, 周清元, 崔翠. 甘蓝型油菜种子萌发期耐铝毒特性综合评价及其种质筛选. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 1416-1430.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84169
Gao H H, Ye S, Wang Q, Wang L Y, Wang R L, Chen L Y, Tang Z L, Li J N, Zhou Q Y, Cui C. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of aluminum-toxicity tolerance during seed germination in Brassca napus. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 1416-1430 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 杨瑰丽, 杨美娜, 李帅良, 曲志恒, 黄明, 陈志强, 王慧. 水稻萌芽期抗旱指标筛选与抗旱性综合评价. 华南农业大学学报, 2015, 36(2): 1-5.
Yang G L, Yang M N, Li S L, Qu Z H, Huang M, Chen Z Q, Wang H. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance indices of rice at germination stage. J South China Agric Univ, 2015, 36(2): 1-5 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 李丰先, 周宇飞, 王艺陶, 孙璐, 白薇, 闫彤, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 高粱品种萌发期耐碱性筛选与综合鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 1762-1771.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.09.003
Li X F, Zhou Y F, Wang Y T, Sun L, Bai W, Yan T, Xu W J, Huang R D. Screening and identification of sorghum cultivars for alkali tolerance during germination. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 1762-1771 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 李国瑞, 马宏亮, 胡雯媚, 汤永禄, 荣晓椒, 樊高琼. 西南麦区小麦品种萌发期抗旱性的综合鉴定及评价. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35: 479-487.
Li G R, Ma H L, Hu W M, Tang Y L, Rong X J, Fan G Q. Identification and evaluation of wheat cultivars for drought resistance during germination in Southwest Area. J Triticeae Crops, 2015, 35: 479-487 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] Yang Q Y, Guo Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol, 2018, 217: 523-539.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14920 pmid: 29205383
[16] 孙小芳, 刘友良, 陈沁. 棉花耐盐性研究进展. 棉花学报, 1998, 10(3): 118-124.
Sun X F, Liu Y L, Chen Q. Recent progresses in studies on salinity tolerance in Cotton. Cotton Sci, 1998, 10(3): 118-124 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] Garratt L C, Janagoudar B S, Lowe K C, Anthony P, Davey M R. Salinity tolerance and antioxidant status in cotton cultures. Free Rad Biol Med, 2002, 33: 502-511.
doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)00838-9
[18] Iram S, Saba A, Jehanzeb F, Muhammad R, Abia Y, Ghulam S, Shaid M C. Salinity stress in cotton: effects, mechanism of tolerance and its management strategies. Physiol Mol Biol Plants, 2019, 25: 807-820.
doi: 10.1007/s12298-019-00676-2
[19] 白灯莎·买买提艾力, 张少民, 孙良斌, 李寒暝, 宁新民, 孔杰, 冯固. 新疆不同年代27个棉花品种(系)种子萌发阶段耐盐能力比较. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(1): 72-79.
Baidengsha M, Zhang S M, Sun L B, Li H M, Ning X M, Kong J, Feng G. Comparisons of salt resistances during germination stage among 27 cotton varieties (line) grown in Xinjiang. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2012, 21(1): 72-79 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 张国伟, 路海玲, 张雷, 陈兵林, 周治国. 棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22: 2045-2053.
Zhang G W, Lu H L, Zhang L, Chen B L, Zhou Z G. Salt tolerance evaluation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) at its germinating and seedling stages and selection of related indices. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2011, 22: 2045-2053 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 苏莹, 郭安慧, 华金平. 棉花耐盐性鉴定方法讨论. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(12): 11-19.
Su Y, Guo A H, Hua J P. Strategies for evaluation the salt tolerance in cotton. J Agric Univ, 2021, 26(12): 11-19 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 沈倩, 张思平, 刘瑞华, 刘绍东, 陈静, 葛常伟, 马慧娟, 赵新华, 杨国正, 宋美珍, 庞朝友. 棉花出苗期耐冷综合评价体系的构建及耐冷指标筛选. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55: 4342-4355.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.22.002
Shen Q, Zhang S P, Liu R H, Liu S D, Chen J, Ge C W, Ma H J, Zhao X H, Yang G Z, Song M Z, Pang C Y. Construction of a comprehensive evaluation system and screening of cold tolerance indicators for cold tolerance of cotton at seedling emergence stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2022, 55: 4342-4355 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.22.002
[23] Li W H, Zhang H Z, Zeng Y L, Xiang L J, Lei Z H, Huang Q X, Li T Y, Shen F, Cheng Q. A salt tolerance evaluation method for sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at the seed germination stage. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 10626.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67210-3
[24] 王东明, 贾媛, 崔继哲. 盐胁迫对植物的影响及植物盐适应性研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(4): 124-128.
Wang D M, Jia Y, Cui J Z. Advances in research on effects of salt stress on plant and adaptive mechanism of the plant to salinity. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2009, 25(4): 124-128 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2008-1216
[25] 辛承松, 董合忠, 唐薇, 温四民. 棉花盐害与耐盐性的生理和分子机理研究进展. 棉花学报, 2005, 17(5): 309-313.
Xin C S, Dong H Z, Tang W, Wen S M. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of salt injury and salt tolerance in cotton. Cotton Sci, 2005, 17(5): 309-313 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 李双男, 郭慧娟, 王晶, 闵伟, 侯镇安. 不同盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响. 种子, 2018, 37(1): 38-45.
Li S N, Guo H J, Wang J, Min W, Hou Z A. Effects of different saline and alkaline stress on seed. Seed, 2018, 37(1): 38-45 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 孙小芳, 郑青松, 刘友良. NaCl胁迫对棉花种子萌发和幼苗生长的伤害. 植物资源与环境学报, 2000, 9(3): 22-25.
Sun X F, Zheng Q S, Liu Y L. Salinity injury to germination and growth of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at emergence and seedling stages. J Plant Resour Environ, 2000, 9(3): 22-25 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 王俊娟, 王德龙, 樊伟莉, 宋贵方, 王帅, 叶武威. 陆地棉萌发至三叶期不同生育阶段耐盐特性. 生态学报, 2011, 31: 3720-3727.
Wang J J, Wang D L, Fan W L, Song G F, Wang S, Ye W W. The characters of salt-tolerance at different growth stages in cotton. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31: 3720-3727 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 陈莉, 刘连涛, 马彤彤, 江丹, 孙红春, 张永江, 张科, 白志英, 李存东. 褪黑素对盐胁迫下棉花种子抗氧化酶活性及萌发的影响. 棉花学报, 2019, 31: 438-447.
doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.cllcd.20190905
Chen L, Liu L T, Ma T T, Jiang D, Sun H C, Zhang Y J, Zhang K, Bai Z Y, Li C D. Effects of melatonin on the antioxidant enzyme activities and seed germination of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under salt-stress conditions. Cotton Sci, 2019, 31: 438-447 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.cllcd.20190905
[30] Wang Q Q, Lu X K, Chen X G, Malik W A, Wang D L, Zhao L J, Wang J J, Wang S, Guo L X, Cui R F, Han M G, Rui C, Zhang Y X, Fan Y P, Chen C, Ye W W. Transcriptome analysis of upland cotton revealed novel pathways to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) responding to Na2SO4 tolerance. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 8670.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87999-x
[31] Zhang L, Ma H J, Chen T T, Pen J, Yu S X, Zhao X H. Morphological and physiological responses of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants to salinity. PLoS One, 2014, 9: e112807.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112807
[1] 马小倩, 秦娜, 代书桃, 秦家范, 李小艳, 王淑婷, 刘忠玲, 李君霞. 175份谷子种质在2种环境下的表型变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1757-1773.
[2] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[3] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[4] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[5] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[6] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[7] 汪玲, 胡好, 宋家凤, 程洁蓝, 陈颖, 郑婷婷, 吕钊彦, 朱晓彪, 侯华兰. 马铃薯UDP-糖基转移酶基因StUGT52的克隆及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 665-676.
[8] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[9] 亓青松, 牛翔雨, 刘冰可, 康禄, 王琛, 封德顺. 小偃麦辐射诱变种质芽期和苗期耐盐鉴定、筛选及耐盐指标评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 389-404.
[10] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[11] 黄丽霞, 张卫卫, 甄一越, 王秋宝, 田洪岭, 李国栋, 刘龙龙, 张丽君. 盐胁迫下苦荞萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[12] 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[13] 胡润慧, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 李兴茂, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 刘青, 姚立蓉, 李葆春. 小麦苗期耐旱耐盐种质筛选及抗旱耐盐综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386.
[14] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[15] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2