欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (04): 540-547.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻根和籽粒细胞分裂素和脱落酸浓度与籽粒灌浆及蒸煮品质的关系

常二华;张文杰;唐成 ;刘立军;王志琴;杨建昌   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2005-08-15 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-04-12 网络出版日期:2006-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Concentrations of Cytokinin and Abscisic Acid in the Roots and Grains and Relationship with Grain Filling and Cooking Quality of Rice

CHANG Er-Hua; ZHANG Wen-Jie; TANG Cheng; LIU Li-Jun; WANG Zhi-Qin and YANG Jian-Chang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu,China
  • Received:2005-08-15 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-04-12 Published online:2006-04-12

摘要:

以10个不同基因型水稻品种和杂交稻组合为材料,分析了结实期水稻根系和籽粒细胞分裂素和脱落酸(ABA)浓度的变化及其与籽粒灌浆速率和稻米蒸煮品质的关系。结果表明,灌浆早期(花后0~12 d)根和籽粒玉米素+玉米素核苷(Z+ZR)浓度以及灌浆中期(花后13~26 d)根和籽粒ABA浓度与籽粒起始生长势、平均灌浆速率、最大灌浆速率、糙米重呈显著或极显著正相关(r=0.726* ~ 0.984**),与活跃灌浆期呈显著或极显著负相关(r=-0.749* ~ -0.834**)。灌浆中、后期(花后27~40 d)根和籽粒Z+ZR浓度与活跃灌浆期呈显著或极显著正相关(r=0.689* ~ 0.932**),但灌浆后期Z+ZR浓度与灌浆速率呈极显著负相关(r=-0.826** ~ -0.927**)。灌浆中期和后期根和籽粒Z+ZR浓度与胶稠度及碱化值呈显著或极显著正相关(r=0.722* ~ 0.896**),与直链淀粉含量呈显著或极显著负相关(r=-0.633* ~-0.778**)。灌浆中期根和籽粒ABA浓度与胶稠度及碱化值呈极显著负相关(r=-0.883** ~ -0.913**),与直链淀粉含量呈显著或极显著正相关(r=0.803** ~ 0.871**)。不同灌浆期ZR或ABA处理对籽粒灌浆、稻米胶稠度和直链淀粉含量的影响,与内源激素同灌浆特征参数和稻米蒸煮品质指标的关系基本吻合。表明根和籽粒细胞分裂素和ABA对籽粒灌浆和稻米蒸煮品质起调控作用,其调控的正、负效应取决于灌浆的时期。

关键词: 水稻, 根系, 细胞分裂素, 脱落酸, 籽粒灌浆, 蒸煮品质

Abstract:

Cytokinin and abscisic acid (ABA) are two kinds of important plant hormones. Their roles in the grain filling and quality of rice, however, are not fully understood. The objective of this study was to determine changes in concentrations of zeatin (Z) + zeatin riboside (ZR) and ABA in both the roots and grains during grain filling, grain filling characteristics and the indexes for cooking quality using ten rice cultivars (including hybrids and lines) grown in nutrient solution. The results showed that the change in concentrations of Z+ZR and ABA in roots and grains exhibited a single peak curve during the grain filling period. The Z + ZR concentration in roots was very high at early grain filling stage and reached a peak at 3–9 d after anthesis (DAA), and that in grains at 9–12 DAA. ABA concentrations in roots and grains were rather low at early grain filling stage, then increased with grain filling, and reached a peak at 15–18 DAA in roots and at 15–21 DAA in grains. Concentrations of Z + ZR in roots and grains at early grain filling stage (0–12 DAA) and ABA at the mid stage (13–26 DAA) were significantly or very significantly correlated with the initial grain growth potential, mean grain filing rate, maximum grain filling rate and brown rice weight (r=0.726* ~ 0.984**), whereas significantly and negatively correlated with active grain filling period (r=-0.749* ~ -0.834**). Z+ZR concentrations at the mid or late grain filling stage (27–40 DAA) significantly or very significantly correlated with active grain filling period (r=0.689* ~ 0.932**) but those at the late stage negatively correlated with grain filling rate (r=-0.826** ~ -0.927**). The gel consistency and alkali spreading value of rice were significantly or very significantly correlated with Z+ZR concentrations in roots and grains at mid and late grain filling stages (r = 0.722* ~ 0.896**), whereas significantly and negatively correlated with ABA concentrations at mid grain filling stage (r=-0.883**~-0.913**). The correlations between amylose content and the concentrations of Z+ZR and ABA were reversed to the correlations of gel consistency with the two hormones. When roots were treated with 10-7 mol/L ZR or with 10-7 mol/L ABA at 0-6, 14–20 and 24–30 DAA, respectively, the effects of the exogenous hormones on grain filling and the cooking quality were consistent with the relationships of the two endogenous hormones with the grain filling parameters and indexes for cooking quality. The results suggest that cytokinin and ABA play important roles in the regulation of grain filling and quality of rice, and the direction of effects may dependent on grain filling stages.

Key words: Rice, Root, Cytokinin, Abscisic acid, Grain filling, Cooking quality

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[7] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[8] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[9] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[10] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[11] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[12] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[13] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[14] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[15] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!