欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (05): 728-733.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

关于水稻穗芽的生理学研究

陶龙兴;王熹;谈惠娟;陈海生;杨长登;庄杰云;郑康乐   

  1. 中国水稻研究所水稻生物学国家重点实验室,浙江杭州310006
  • 收稿日期:2005-05-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-05-12 网络出版日期:2006-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 王熹

A Physiological Study on Pre-harvest Sprouting in Rice

TAO Long-Xing; WANG Xi*; TAN Hui-Juan; CHEN Hai-Sheng; YANG Chang-Deng; ZHUANG Jie-Yun and ZHENG Kang-Le   

  1. National Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2005-05-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-05-12 Published online:2006-05-12
  • Contact: WANG Xi

摘要:

利用重组自交系籼稻中-156/谷梅2号304份株系为材料,在田间条件下营造高温、高湿的小气候,以“穗穗芽率”及“粒穗芽率”为指标,筛选易发生穗芽与不易发生穗芽的极端材料,比较研究重组自交系亲本与各供试株系籽粒在穗芽发生期间的生理差异。结果表明,该重组自交系母本谷梅2号比父本中-156易穗芽,在正常成熟过程中籽粒内源GA1含量水平高于中-156,ABA含量水平低于中-156;谷梅2号籽粒淀粉酶活性也高于中-156。花后15 d至完熟的籽粒灌浆期如遇高温、高湿条件,谷梅2号及易穗芽的株系籽粒内源GA1随雨日渐增,增幅高于中-156及不易穗芽的株系,同时其淀粉酶活性回升,在正常成熟过程中花后15 d后籽粒中淀粉酶活性与日渐降,但其幅度远高于父本中-156及不易穗芽的株系,这种变化可能是易穗芽的亲本与株系对高温、高湿敏感诱发穗上发芽的主要生理基础。

关键词: 穗芽, 生理分析, 杂交稻种子F1, 淀粉酶活性, 重组自交系

Abstract:

“Pre-harvest sprouting” in rice is usually caused by high temperature and humility or continuous raining. It has frequently happened in F1 in hybrid rice seed production. Those “Pre-harvest sprouting” or “Physiologically germinated” seeds are of lower quality, by which the hybrid rice seed production is badly affected, and the problem usually happens every three years. 20% or even 50% yield in the seed production losts by “Pre-harvest sprouting” in the Yangtze River and the South West areas. It is estimated that “Pre-harvest sprouting” causes an average decrease of seed activity by 10%.
A recombinant inbred line (RIL) population comprising 304 lines derived from a cross between indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars Zhong-156 and Gumei-2 was used to study the physiology of pre-harvest sprouting.
Based on the data of “Sprouting rate in panicle” and “Sprouting rate in grain”, two kinds of lines namely easy-sprouting lines and hardly-sprouting lines were selected to investigate their physiological differences when pre-harvest sprouting happened.
The experiment was conducted in a special field with higher temperature and higher humidity microclimate. The results indicated that female parent GM-2 was easier to produce pre-harvest sprouting than the male parent ZH-156, GA1 content and amylase activity in GM-2 grains were higher than that in ZH-156. However, ABA content in GM-2 grains was lower than that in ZH-156. Higher temperature and higher humidity facilitated the GA1 increment from milk ripe stage to yellow ripe stage, GM-2 and the easy-sprouting lines showed a even higher span of increase tendency than ZH-156 and the hardly-sprouting lines, which enhanced amylase activity and led to pre-harvest sprouting. This may be the physiological basis for pre-harvest sprouting induced by higher temperature and higher humidity, and these special characters must be inherited from their parents.

Key words: Pre-harvest sprouting, Physiological analysis, Hybrid rice seed F1, Amylase activity, Recombinant inbred lines

中图分类号: 

  • Q945.6
[1] 黄妍, 贺焕焕, 谢之耀, 李丹莹, 赵超越, 吴鑫, 黄福灯, 程方民, 潘刚. 水稻矮化宽叶突变体osdwl1的生理特性和基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 50-60.
[2] 郭建斌,黄莉,刘念,罗怀勇,周小静,陈伟刚,吴贝,淮东欣,任小平,姜慧芳. 利用RIL群体创制低山嵛酸花生新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(5): 661-667.
[3] 杨晓梦, 李霞, 普晓英, 杜娟, Muhammad Kazim Ali, 杨加珍, 曾亚文, 杨涛. 大麦重组自交系群体籽粒总花色苷含量和千粒重QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 52-61.
[4] 刘江宁,王楚鑫,张宏根,缪一栩,高海林,许作鹏,刘巧泉,汤述翥. 水稻黑条矮缩病抗性QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1664-1671.
[5] 赵佳佳,马小飞,郑兴卫,郝建宇,乔玲,葛川,王爱爱,张树伟,张晓军,姬虎太,郑军. 不同水分条件下HMW-GS对小麦品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1682-1690.
[6] 胡德益,蔡露,陈光登,张锡洲,刘春吉. 不同磷水平下大麦分蘖期磷效率相关性状QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12): 1746-1759.
[7] 周升辉,吴秋红,谢菁忠,陈娇娇,陈永兴,傅琳,王国鑫,于美华,王振忠,张德云,王令,王丽丽,张艳,梁荣奇,韩俊,刘志勇. 小麦燕大1817×北农6号重组自交系群体在正常和盐胁迫水培条件下苗期性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(12): 1764-1778.
[8] 宁海龙,白雪莲,李文滨,薛红,庄煦,李文霞,刘春燕. 大豆四向重组自交系群体蛋白质含量与油分含量QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(11): 1620-1628.
[9] 龚盼,黎坤瑜,黄福灯,韦荔全,杨茜,程方民,潘刚. 水稻叶片早衰突变体ospls3的生理特征和基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(05): 667-674.
[10] 于亚辉,刘郁,李振宇,陈广红,徐正进,唐亮,毛艇,徐海. 亲本籼粳成分与两系杂交粳稻杂种优势的关系及遗传基础[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(05): 648-657.
[11] 卢坤,曲存民,李莎,赵会彦,王瑞,徐新福,梁颖,李加纳. 甘蓝型油菜BnTT3基因的表达与eQTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(11): 1758-1766.
[12] 吴秋红,陈娇娇,陈永兴,周升辉,傅琳,张德云,肖尧,王国鑫,王振忠,王立新,韩俊,袁成国,尤明山,刘志勇. 燕大1817/北农6号重组自交系群体穗部性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(03): 349-358.
[13] 刘波,李英慧,于佰双,王家军,刘玉林,常汝镇,邱丽娟. 中品03-5373对大豆胞囊线虫3号生理小种免疫抗性的遗传解析[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(01): 15-21.
[14] 赵晨晨,黄福灯,龚盼,杨茜,程方民,潘刚. 水稻叶片早衰突变体osled的生理特征与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(11): 1946-1955.
[15] 张文英,智慧,柳斌辉,王雪征,庞昭进,李积铭,王广才,李明哲,王永芳,李伟,李海权,贾冠清,刁现民. 豫谷1号和青狗尾草RIL群体根系变异和垂直分布[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(10): 1717-1724.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!