欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (06): 791-798.

• 研究论文 •    下一篇

应用三维数字化仪对玉米植株叶片方位分布的研究

马韫韬;郭焱;李保国   

  1. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院/植物-土壤相互作用教育部重点实验室,北京 100094
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-02 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-06-12 网络出版日期:2006-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 李保国

Azimuthal Distribution of Maize Plant Leaves Determined by 3D Digitizer

MA Yun-Tao,GUO Yan,LI Bao-Guo   

  1. Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China

  • Received:2005-06-02 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-06-12 Published online:2006-06-12
  • Contact: LI Bao-Guo

摘要:

采用三维数字化仪在田间原位测量了玉米(品种为农大108)植株生长过程中每个叶片中脉在空间坐标系中的位置,据此计算出植株每个叶片的方位角,应用对方向数据的统计分析方法对植株叶片的空间伸展方向规律进行了研究,并分析了单个叶片在生长过程中方位角的变化规律。结果表明,(1) 单株叶位越高叶片偏离植株方位平面的程度越大。叶片方位角从露尖到完全展开前3 d变化较大,最大可达150°,此后基本不变。(2) 种植行向与行距相同(0.6 m)而株距不同(分别为0.3 m和0.6 m)的2个处理的玉米群体中各植株方位平面取向分布均匀,但株距影响叶片在植株方位平面附近的分散程度,株距小的植株叶片方向对植株方位平面的偏离大,其第9~13片叶分散程度与宽株距处理对应叶片差异显著,但没有发现上层叶片有明显转向行间的趋势。

关键词: 玉米, 方向数据统计, 冠层结构, 方位角, 三维数字化

Abstract:

Differences in spatial arrangement of plant organs strongly affect the interception of light within the canopy. Modelling light interception by maize leaves usually assumes a random distribution of leaf azimuth. Three-dimensional (3D) digitizing technology allows spatial data on plant architecture to be collected non-destructively and the movement of plant organs to be monitored dynamically. In order to simulate the course of possible changes in the plant geometrical structure during maize growth more accurately, some results were analyzed with circular data statistics using data from 3D digitizing.
Field measurements were conducted at the China Agricultural University (39º50’ N, 116º25’ E). Maize (Zea mays L. cv. ND108) was planted in north-south rows on June 29, 2003. There were two plant spacing treatments, both with rows spaced 0.6 m apart. Plant spacing of 0.3 m was used in the high plant density treatment and 0.6 m in the low plant density treatment. From the five-leaf stage to silking, measurements were carried out every 1–2 d since July 13, 2003 in the first experiment. Sixteen plants were selected for the study of the time course of leaf azimuthal movement and possible adaptive re-positioning of the successive leaves during and after their growth. At grain filling stage (75 d after sowing date), the second experiment (36 plants per plot) was conducted to assess the plant spacing effects on the distribution of the plant azimuthal planes and the deviation of leaves from the plane along the row.
An electromagnetic digitizer (3Space Fastrak Long Ranger, Polhemus) was used to measure the 3D coordinates of leaf midrib in situ for the taken plants in the field with two experiments. Data were collected when the plants were not affected by wind. Measurement points were selected to delineate the curve of midrib for each maize leaf. Then the azimuth of each leaf with respect to that of the row was computed according to collected 3D coordinates.
Azimuths of maize leaf were statistically analyzed with von Mises distribution which has two parameters (μ, k). The equation is , and in which . The parameter μ defines the reference direction of the distribution and k defines the deviation from that direction which k =0 represents the uniformity and the increasing k indicates the increasing concentration near that reference direction. Fisher test were used to compare the concentration parameters of the two circular distributions. Rayleigh test was used to test the uniformity of azimuthal plane of each individual plant amongst two treatments. The statistical results are as follows:
For any individual maize plant, there was an azimuthal shift from the bottom to the top. The parameter k tended to decrease with the rising of leaf position. The maximum azimuthal angle changed for a given leaf was about 150°. The final azimuth was fixed for 83% of the plant leaves about 3 d before the leaf fully expanded.
Plant azimuthal plane is essential to the study of the probability distribution of plant azimuth in field. The distributions of plant azimuthal plane for the two treatments were uniform. The plant spacing had an effect on dispersions of maize leaves from the plant azimuthal plane. From graphical inspection, a general trend of increasing dispersion with the rising of leaf position took place in both plant spacing treatments. For leaves ranked from 9 to 13, the distribution tended to be normal, with a rather low dispersion. For leaves 14 to 17, the dispersion was increased. For leaves 18 to 21, the angular distribution tended to be uniform. But for a single leaf, the concentration parameters were always higher in low density treatment than in high density treatment. The difference between treatments was significant at the 5% probability level for the leaves 9 to 13. This study provided a method of quantitative analysis and a description of the architecture in maize.

Key words: Maize, Circular data statistics, Canopy architecture, Azimuth, 3D digitizing

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[7] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[14] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[15] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!