欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (06): 791-798.

• 研究论文 •    下一篇

应用三维数字化仪对玉米植株叶片方位分布的研究

马韫韬;郭焱;李保国   

  1. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院/植物-土壤相互作用教育部重点实验室,北京 100094
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-02 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-06-12 网络出版日期:2006-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 李保国

Azimuthal Distribution of Maize Plant Leaves Determined by 3D Digitizer

MA Yun-Tao,GUO Yan,LI Bao-Guo   

  1. Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China

  • Received:2005-06-02 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-06-12 Published online:2006-06-12
  • Contact: LI Bao-Guo

摘要:

采用三维数字化仪在田间原位测量了玉米(品种为农大108)植株生长过程中每个叶片中脉在空间坐标系中的位置,据此计算出植株每个叶片的方位角,应用对方向数据的统计分析方法对植株叶片的空间伸展方向规律进行了研究,并分析了单个叶片在生长过程中方位角的变化规律。结果表明,(1) 单株叶位越高叶片偏离植株方位平面的程度越大。叶片方位角从露尖到完全展开前3 d变化较大,最大可达150°,此后基本不变。(2) 种植行向与行距相同(0.6 m)而株距不同(分别为0.3 m和0.6 m)的2个处理的玉米群体中各植株方位平面取向分布均匀,但株距影响叶片在植株方位平面附近的分散程度,株距小的植株叶片方向对植株方位平面的偏离大,其第9~13片叶分散程度与宽株距处理对应叶片差异显著,但没有发现上层叶片有明显转向行间的趋势。

关键词: 玉米, 方向数据统计, 冠层结构, 方位角, 三维数字化

Abstract:

Differences in spatial arrangement of plant organs strongly affect the interception of light within the canopy. Modelling light interception by maize leaves usually assumes a random distribution of leaf azimuth. Three-dimensional (3D) digitizing technology allows spatial data on plant architecture to be collected non-destructively and the movement of plant organs to be monitored dynamically. In order to simulate the course of possible changes in the plant geometrical structure during maize growth more accurately, some results were analyzed with circular data statistics using data from 3D digitizing.
Field measurements were conducted at the China Agricultural University (39º50’ N, 116º25’ E). Maize (Zea mays L. cv. ND108) was planted in north-south rows on June 29, 2003. There were two plant spacing treatments, both with rows spaced 0.6 m apart. Plant spacing of 0.3 m was used in the high plant density treatment and 0.6 m in the low plant density treatment. From the five-leaf stage to silking, measurements were carried out every 1–2 d since July 13, 2003 in the first experiment. Sixteen plants were selected for the study of the time course of leaf azimuthal movement and possible adaptive re-positioning of the successive leaves during and after their growth. At grain filling stage (75 d after sowing date), the second experiment (36 plants per plot) was conducted to assess the plant spacing effects on the distribution of the plant azimuthal planes and the deviation of leaves from the plane along the row.
An electromagnetic digitizer (3Space Fastrak Long Ranger, Polhemus) was used to measure the 3D coordinates of leaf midrib in situ for the taken plants in the field with two experiments. Data were collected when the plants were not affected by wind. Measurement points were selected to delineate the curve of midrib for each maize leaf. Then the azimuth of each leaf with respect to that of the row was computed according to collected 3D coordinates.
Azimuths of maize leaf were statistically analyzed with von Mises distribution which has two parameters (μ, k). The equation is , and in which . The parameter μ defines the reference direction of the distribution and k defines the deviation from that direction which k =0 represents the uniformity and the increasing k indicates the increasing concentration near that reference direction. Fisher test were used to compare the concentration parameters of the two circular distributions. Rayleigh test was used to test the uniformity of azimuthal plane of each individual plant amongst two treatments. The statistical results are as follows:
For any individual maize plant, there was an azimuthal shift from the bottom to the top. The parameter k tended to decrease with the rising of leaf position. The maximum azimuthal angle changed for a given leaf was about 150°. The final azimuth was fixed for 83% of the plant leaves about 3 d before the leaf fully expanded.
Plant azimuthal plane is essential to the study of the probability distribution of plant azimuth in field. The distributions of plant azimuthal plane for the two treatments were uniform. The plant spacing had an effect on dispersions of maize leaves from the plant azimuthal plane. From graphical inspection, a general trend of increasing dispersion with the rising of leaf position took place in both plant spacing treatments. For leaves ranked from 9 to 13, the distribution tended to be normal, with a rather low dispersion. For leaves 14 to 17, the dispersion was increased. For leaves 18 to 21, the angular distribution tended to be uniform. But for a single leaf, the concentration parameters were always higher in low density treatment than in high density treatment. The difference between treatments was significant at the 5% probability level for the leaves 9 to 13. This study provided a method of quantitative analysis and a description of the architecture in maize.

Key words: Maize, Circular data statistics, Canopy architecture, Azimuth, 3D digitizing

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 崔连花, 詹为民, 杨陆浩, 王少瓷, 马文奇, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平, 杨青华. 2个玉米ZmCOP1基因的克隆及其转录丰度对不同光质处理的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[8] 许静, 高景阳, 李程成, 宋云霞, 董朝沛, 王昭, 李云梦, 栾一凡, 陈甲法, 周子键, 吴建宇. 过表达ZmCIPKHT基因增强植物耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
[9] 刘磊, 詹为民, 丁武思, 刘通, 崔连花, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平. 玉米矮化突变体gad39的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[10] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[11] 徐宁坤, 李冰, 陈晓艳, 魏亚康, 刘子龙, 薛永康, 陈洪宇, 王桂凤. 一个新的玉米Bt2基因突变体的遗传分析和分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[12] 宋仕勤, 杨清龙, 王丹, 吕艳杰, 徐文华, 魏雯雯, 刘小丹, 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王永军, 王立春. 东北主推玉米品种种子形态及贮藏物质与萌发期耐冷性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[13] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
[14] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[15] 苏达, 颜晓军, 蔡远扬, 梁恬, 吴良泉, MUHAMMAD AtifMuneer, 叶德练. 磷肥对甜玉米籽粒植酸和锌有效性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 203-214.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!