小麦GMP含量发育动态的QTL定位

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (07): 995-1000.

小麦GMP含量发育动态的QTL定位

李卫华^1,2;尤明山¹;刘伟²;徐杰¹;刘春雷¹;李保云^1,*;刘广田¹

1中国农业大学农业部作物基因组学与遗传改良重点开放实验室/北京市作物遗传改良重点实验室，北京100094; 2石河子大学，新疆石河子832003

收稿日期:2005-07-11 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-07-12 网络出版日期:2006-07-12
通讯作者: 李保云

QTL Mapping for Developmental Behavior of GMP Content in Wheat

LI Wei-Hua^{1 2},YOU Ming-Shan¹,LIU Wei²,XU Jie¹,LIU Chun-Lei¹,LI Bao-Yun^{1 *},LIU Guang-Tian¹

1Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics ＆ Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture / Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 2Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China

Received:2005-07-11 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-07-12 Published online:2006-07-12
Contact: LI Bao-Yun

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用小麦京771和Pm97034杂交后代重组自交系（RIL）群体，对小麦谷蛋白大聚合体（GMP）含量发育动态进行了QTL定位研究。结果表明，在籽粒灌浆的5个不同时期，共检测到8个条件QTL和10个非条件QTL，但没有一个QTL能在测定的5个时期都有效应。花后12 d，控制GMP形成的基因就已经有了一定的表达量，条件QTL能解释6.21%的表型变异，该基因位于1A染色体上。花后17 d，在1D染色体上测到了1个新表达的条件QTL位点，单独能解释14.14%的表型变异。花后22 d，控制GMP形成的基因的表达比较活跃，非条件分析检测到3个QTL位点，条件分析检测到2个QTL位点，这5个QTL位点分别位于1B、5B、6B和7B染色体上，其效应值都比较低，2个条件QTL共同能解释12.67%的净表型变异。花后27 d，在2D和3B染色体上各检测到2个条件和非条件QTL位点，加性效应值比较大。条件QTL能解释16.37%的表型变异，非条件QTL能解释23.94%的变异。花后32 d，仍有2个新的基因位点在表达，但此时QTL的净表达量已经开始下降，条件QTL仅能解释11.43%的表型变异。

关键词: 小麦, RIL群体, GMP含量, 发育动态, QTL定位

Abstract:

Glutenin macropolymer (GMP) content is a key factor influencing wheat processing quality, which is determined by quantitative trait locus (QTL). To date many QTLs related to quality characteristics, including the GMP content, have been mapped on wheat chromosomes. However, these researches were all focused on gene expression at a certain developmental stage, and could gave little information to understand the dynamic effects of corresponding QTLs at different developmental stages as well as the directions of gene action. In the present paper, QTL mapping for developmental behavior of wheat GMP content was studied, using recombinant inbred lines (RIL) population derived from Jing 771×Pm97034. The results showed that eight conditional QTLs and ten unconditional QTLs were detected in different seed filling periods totally, but no one was detected in all periods. Each of these genes expressed in a special period. The additive effects of a conditional QTL located on chromosome 1A could be detected 12 days after anthesis, which could account for 6.21% of phenotypic variation in GMP content. A new conditional QTL was detected 17 days after anthesis, accounting for 14.14% of phenotypic variation. At the period of 17–22 days after anthesis the gene expression was active, and three unconditional QTLs and the two conditional QTLs were detected to be located on chromosome 1B, 5B, 6B and 7B with smaller additive effects, and the general contribution rate of the two conditional QTLs was 12.67%. Four QTLs located on chromosome 2D and 3B were detected 27 days after anthesis with larger additive effects, in which the two conditional QTLs accounted for 16.37% of phenotypic variation, while the other two unconditional QTLs accounted for 23.94%. Up to 32 days after anthesis, there still two new expressed genes were detected, but the net genetic variation declined, and conditional QTL just explained 11.43% of phenotypic variation.

Key words: Wheat, RIL population, GMP content, Developmental behavior, QTL mapping

中图分类号:

S512

李卫华;尤明山;刘伟;徐杰;刘春雷;李保云;刘广田. 小麦GMP含量发育动态的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(07): 995-1000.

LI Wei-Hua ;YOU Ming-Shan;LIU Wei;XU Jie;LIU Chun-Lei;LI Bao-Yun ;LIU Guang-Tian. QTL Mapping for Developmental Behavior of GMP Content in Wheat[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32(07): 995-1000.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2006/V32/I07/995

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2]	胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3]	陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4]	高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5]	郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[6]	张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[7]	翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[8]	习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[9]	王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10]	何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11]	张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12]	侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13]	尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14]	乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15]	刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed