欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1873-1877.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆脂肪酸组分的胚、细胞质和母体遗传效应分析

宁海龙**;李文霞;李文滨   

  1. 大豆生物学教育部重点实验室;东北农业大学大豆研究所,黑龙江哈尔滨 150030
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-28 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-12-12 网络出版日期:2006-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 宁海龙

Analysis of Embryo, Cytoplasmic and Maternal Effects on Fatty Acid Components in Soybean(G. max Merill)

NING Hai-Long*,LI Wen-Xia,LI Wen-Bin   

  1. Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology of Ministry of Education;Soybean Research Institute,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150030, Heilongjian,China
  • Received:2005-11-28 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-12-12 Published online:2006-12-12
  • Contact: NING Hai-Long

摘要:

利用5个大豆品种配制20个杂交组合,采用广义种子遗传模型分析了大豆脂肪酸组分的胚、细胞质和母体植株等3套遗传体系的基因主效应和基因型×环境效应。棕榈酸含量、硬脂酸含量和亚油酸含量是以基因型×环境互作效应为主。亚麻酸和油酸的遗传主效应和基因型×环境互作效应相近。在脂肪酸组分的遗传主效应中,棕榈酸、硬脂酸和亚油酸含量是以胚主效应为主。油酸含量和亚麻酸含量以细胞质主效应为主。在基因型×环境互作方差中,脂肪酸组分以极显著的胚互作方差为主。亚麻酸含量是以基因的加性效应和加性×环境互作效应为主,棕榈酸含量、硬脂酸含量、油酸含量和亚油酸含量以基因的显性和显性×环境互作效应为主。棕榈酸含量和油酸含量是以普通狭义遗传率为主。硬脂酸、亚油酸含量和亚麻酸含量以互作狭义遗传率为主。在普通狭义遗传率中,棕榈酸含量、油酸含量和亚麻酸含量以细胞质普通遗传率和母体普通遗传率为主。在互作狭义遗传率中,油酸含量和亚麻酸含量以胚互作狭义遗传率为主,亚油酸含量以母体植株互作遗传率为主。棕榈酸含量、硬脂酸含量、油酸含量和亚油酸含量以细胞质及母体选择响应和互作选择响应为主,亚麻酸含量的胚普通选择响应和互作选择响应为主。

关键词: 大豆, 脂肪酸组分, 胚遗传效应, 细胞质遗传效应, 母体遗传效应, 遗传率

Abstract:

Quality of oil determined by the constituents and proportion of fatty acid components, and the understanding of heredity of fatty acid components is of importance to breeding for good quality soybean varieties. Embryo, cytoplasmic and maternal effects and genotype×environment interaction effects for quality traits of soybean (G. max Merill)seeds were analyzed using a general genetic model for quantitative traits of seeds with parents,F1 and F2 of 20 crosses from a diallel mating design of 5 parents planted in the field in 2003 and 2004 in Harbin, China. The interaction effects of palmitic, stearic and linoleic acids contents were larger than genetic main effects,while genetic main effects were equal to interaction effects for linolenic and oleic acids content. Among all kinds of genetic main effects,the embryo effects were the largest for palmitic,stearic and linoleic acids,and cytoplasm effects were the largest for oleic and linolenic acids. Among all kinds of interaction effects,the embryo interaction effects were the largest for fatty acids. The sum of additive and additive×environment effects were larger than that of dominance and dominance×environment effects for linolenic acids content, but not for other quality traits. The general heritabilities were the main parts of heritabilities for palmitic acids content and oleic acids content,but the interaction were more important for stearic, linoleic and linolenic acids contents. For the general heritability, maternal and cytoplasm heritabilities were the main components for palmitic, oleic and linolenic acids contenst. It was shown for the interaction heritabilities that embryo interaction heritabilities were more important for oleic and linolenic acids contents,while maternal interaction heritabilities were more important for linoleic acids content. Among selection response components,maternal and cytoplasm general responses and/or interaction responses were more important for palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acids contents. The main selection response components were from embryo general response and/or interaction response for linolenic acid content. It suggested that the selection of palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acids contents in offspring should be in maternal plants,while linolenic acids content should be improved screening the single seed or selected in higher generations.

Key words: Soybean, Fatty acids, Embryo effects, Cytoplasmic effects, Maternal effects, Heritability

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[3] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[4] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[5] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[6] 王克晶, 李向华. 我国珍稀的大豆属多年生烟豆和短绒野大豆物种遗传资源濒危性评估分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2009-2019.
[7] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[8] 贺红利, 张雨涵, 杨静, 程云清, 赵杨, 李星诺, 司洪亮, 张兴政, 杨向东. 大豆e1-as基因突变体的创制及生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2228-2239.
[9] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[10] 王琼, 邹丹霞, 陈兴运, 张威, 张红梅, 刘晓庆, 贾倩茹, 魏利斌, 崔晓艳, 陈新, 王学军, 陈华涛. 大豆开花时间和成熟期性状全基因组关联分析与候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1558-1568.
[11] 殷丛丛, 李睿琦, 岳霈尧, 李晨, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 基于闭合哑铃介导等温扩增可视化检测大豆花叶病毒SC15方法的建立及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1248-1260.
[12] 许睿, 何妙华, 王昊, 李卫, 任杰, 夏志强. 基于空间转录组技术解析大豆种胚对X射线辐射的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3121-3132.
[13] 林洋, 史晓蕾, 陈强, 刘兵强, 杨庆, 于慧娟, 闫龙, 武小霞, 杨春燕. 大豆蛋白质脂肪及脂肪酸组分相关QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910.
[14] 王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885.
[15] 李威, 朱玉鹏, 孙宾成, 温有祥, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥. 转基因大豆结合免耕平作实现东北地区大豆生产轻简化[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2738-2749.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!