欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01): 84-89.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

两个直链淀粉含量不同的小麦品种籽粒淀粉合成酶活性与淀粉积累特征的比较

闫素辉1;王振林1;戴忠民1;李文阳1;付国占1,2;贺明荣1;尹燕枰1*   

  1. 1山东农业大学农学院 / 农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室 / 山东省作物生物学重点实验室,山东泰安 271018;2河南科技大学农学院,河南洛阳 471003
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-04 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-01-12 网络出版日期:2007-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 尹燕枰

Activities of Enzymes Involved in Starch Synthesis and Starch Accumulation in Grains of Two Wheat Cultivars with a Different Amylose Content

YAN Su-Hui1,WANG Zhen-Lin1,DAI Zhong-Min1,LI Wen-Yang1, FU Guo-Zhan12,HE Min-Rong1,YIN Yan-Ping1*   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture / Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2 Agronomy College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, Henan, China
  • Received:2006-01-04 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-01-12 Published online:2007-01-12
  • Contact: YIN Yan-Ping

摘要:

以均含有3个Waxy蛋白亚基的普通小麦品种济麦20(低直链淀粉含量)和鲁麦21(高直链淀粉含量)为材料,对灌浆期籽粒淀粉合成相关酶活性的变化及淀粉积累特征进行了研究,并分析了两者之间的关系。结果表明,蔗糖合成酶(SS)、腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGPP)、束缚态淀粉合成酶(GBSS)、可溶性淀粉合成酶(SSS)和淀粉分支酶(SBE)活性均呈单峰曲线变化。鲁麦21的上述酶活性均高于济麦20。相关分析表明,支链淀粉积累速率与SS、AGPP、SSS和SBE呈显著或极显著正相关;直链淀粉积累速率与SS、AGPP和GBSS呈极显著正相关。Logistic方程拟合淀粉积累过程发现,支、直链淀粉最终积累量的高低取决于积累启动时间的早晚和积累速率的高低,而积累持续期的调节作用较小。直链淀粉的积累速率除受GBSS活性影响外,还受SS和AGPP活性的影响,其中,GBSS活性的变化与2品种籽粒直链淀粉积累量的变化情况基本吻合。籽粒灌浆后期的GBSS活性对直链淀粉最终积累量的调节作用大于灌浆前期,说明对同时具有3个Waxy蛋白亚基的不同品种,Waxy蛋白亚基表达量(GBSS活性)的差异可能是导致品种间籽粒直链淀粉含量较大差异的一个关键原因。

关键词: 冬小麦, 籽粒, 直链淀粉, 支链淀粉, 酶活性

Abstract:

The amylose content of wheat grain is significantly correlated with amount of Waxy protein subunit. However, there is a great difference in amylose content among different wheat cultivars which all have three Waxy genes. In order to investigate the activity changes of enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis, the characteristics of starch accumulation in grains, and the relationship between them, two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars, JM20 (lower amylose content in grains) and LM21 (higher amylose content in grains) were used in the study, which both carry three Waxy protein subunits. The results indicated that the activities of sucrose synthase (SS), adenosine diphosphorate glucose pyrophrylase (AGPP), soluble starch synthase (SSS), granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) changed in the pattern of a single-peak curve during grain filling. The activities of SS, AGPP, GBSS, SSS and SBE in LM21, which had higher starch content, were higher than those in JM20. The accumulation rate of amylopectin was significantly or highly significantly correlated with the activities of SS, AGPP, SSS and SBE, and the accumulation rate of amylose was highly significantly correlated with the activities of SS, AGPP and GBSS. The accumulation courses of both amylopectin and amylose were well fitted to the logistic equation by relating amylopectin and amylose contents against days post anthesis. The simulation parameters revealed that the higher contents of amylopectin and amylose resulted from earlier initiating accumulation time and greater accumulation rate, but accumulation duration probably played a less important role for them. The amylose content in grains was mainly determined by GBSS activity as well as the activities of SS and AGPP. The change of GBSS activity reflected expression level of waxy gene was closely associated with the accumulation rate of amylose, indicating that amylose content in grains was determined by GBSS activity, especially at late grain filling stage. The difference in expression of waxy gene might be a major reason for the large difference in amylose contents between JM20 and LM21.

Key words: Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Grain, Amylose, Amylopectin, Enzyme activity

[1] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[2] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[3] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[4] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[5] 徐宁坤, 李冰, 陈晓艳, 魏亚康, 刘子龙, 薛永康, 陈洪宇, 王桂凤. 一个新的玉米Bt2基因突变体的遗传分析和分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[6] 杨谨, 白爱宁, 白雪, 陈娟, 郭林, 刘春明. 水稻胚胎和胚乳双缺陷突变体eed1的表型与遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 292-303.
[7] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
[8] 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 任丹阳, 刘洪润, 刘雪晴, 张明才, 李召虎. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下的品种匹配与资源效率[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[9] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[10] 陈云, 刘昆, 张宏路, 李思宇, 张亚军, 韦佳利, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 机插密度和穗肥减量对优质食味水稻品种籽粒淀粉合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1540-1550.
[11] 张骁, 闫岩, 王文辉, 郑恒彪, 姚霞, 朱艳, 程涛. 基于小波分析的水稻籽粒直链淀粉含量高光谱预测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1563-1580.
[12] 贺军与, 钟伟, 陈云琼, 王卫斌, 熊静蕾, 蒋亚丽, 施辉蒙, 陈升位. 大麦籽粒发育进程中7种黄酮类化合物的积累特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1624-1630.
[13] 张志兴, 陈花, 敏秀梅, 许海龙, 宋果, 林文雄. 多肽配体R18促进水稻弱势籽粒灌浆的初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1332-1341.
[14] 郑迎霞, 陈杜, 魏鹏程, 卢平, 杨锦越, 罗上轲, 叶开梅, 宋碧. 种植密度对贵州春玉米茎秆抗倒伏性能及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 738-751.
[15] 朱亚利, 王晨光, 杨梅, 郑学慧, 赵成凤, 张仁和. 不同熟期玉米不同粒位籽粒灌浆和脱水特性对密度的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 507-519.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!