欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01): 84-89.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

两个直链淀粉含量不同的小麦品种籽粒淀粉合成酶活性与淀粉积累特征的比较

闫素辉1;王振林1;戴忠民1;李文阳1;付国占1,2;贺明荣1;尹燕枰1*   

  1. 1山东农业大学农学院 / 农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室 / 山东省作物生物学重点实验室,山东泰安 271018;2河南科技大学农学院,河南洛阳 471003
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-04 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-01-12 网络出版日期:2007-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 尹燕枰

Activities of Enzymes Involved in Starch Synthesis and Starch Accumulation in Grains of Two Wheat Cultivars with a Different Amylose Content

YAN Su-Hui1,WANG Zhen-Lin1,DAI Zhong-Min1,LI Wen-Yang1, FU Guo-Zhan12,HE Min-Rong1,YIN Yan-Ping1*   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physiology and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture / Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong; 2 Agronomy College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, Henan, China
  • Received:2006-01-04 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-01-12 Published online:2007-01-12
  • Contact: YIN Yan-Ping

摘要:

以均含有3个Waxy蛋白亚基的普通小麦品种济麦20(低直链淀粉含量)和鲁麦21(高直链淀粉含量)为材料,对灌浆期籽粒淀粉合成相关酶活性的变化及淀粉积累特征进行了研究,并分析了两者之间的关系。结果表明,蔗糖合成酶(SS)、腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGPP)、束缚态淀粉合成酶(GBSS)、可溶性淀粉合成酶(SSS)和淀粉分支酶(SBE)活性均呈单峰曲线变化。鲁麦21的上述酶活性均高于济麦20。相关分析表明,支链淀粉积累速率与SS、AGPP、SSS和SBE呈显著或极显著正相关;直链淀粉积累速率与SS、AGPP和GBSS呈极显著正相关。Logistic方程拟合淀粉积累过程发现,支、直链淀粉最终积累量的高低取决于积累启动时间的早晚和积累速率的高低,而积累持续期的调节作用较小。直链淀粉的积累速率除受GBSS活性影响外,还受SS和AGPP活性的影响,其中,GBSS活性的变化与2品种籽粒直链淀粉积累量的变化情况基本吻合。籽粒灌浆后期的GBSS活性对直链淀粉最终积累量的调节作用大于灌浆前期,说明对同时具有3个Waxy蛋白亚基的不同品种,Waxy蛋白亚基表达量(GBSS活性)的差异可能是导致品种间籽粒直链淀粉含量较大差异的一个关键原因。

关键词: 冬小麦, 籽粒, 直链淀粉, 支链淀粉, 酶活性

Abstract:

The amylose content of wheat grain is significantly correlated with amount of Waxy protein subunit. However, there is a great difference in amylose content among different wheat cultivars which all have three Waxy genes. In order to investigate the activity changes of enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis, the characteristics of starch accumulation in grains, and the relationship between them, two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars, JM20 (lower amylose content in grains) and LM21 (higher amylose content in grains) were used in the study, which both carry three Waxy protein subunits. The results indicated that the activities of sucrose synthase (SS), adenosine diphosphorate glucose pyrophrylase (AGPP), soluble starch synthase (SSS), granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) changed in the pattern of a single-peak curve during grain filling. The activities of SS, AGPP, GBSS, SSS and SBE in LM21, which had higher starch content, were higher than those in JM20. The accumulation rate of amylopectin was significantly or highly significantly correlated with the activities of SS, AGPP, SSS and SBE, and the accumulation rate of amylose was highly significantly correlated with the activities of SS, AGPP and GBSS. The accumulation courses of both amylopectin and amylose were well fitted to the logistic equation by relating amylopectin and amylose contents against days post anthesis. The simulation parameters revealed that the higher contents of amylopectin and amylose resulted from earlier initiating accumulation time and greater accumulation rate, but accumulation duration probably played a less important role for them. The amylose content in grains was mainly determined by GBSS activity as well as the activities of SS and AGPP. The change of GBSS activity reflected expression level of waxy gene was closely associated with the accumulation rate of amylose, indicating that amylose content in grains was determined by GBSS activity, especially at late grain filling stage. The difference in expression of waxy gene might be a major reason for the large difference in amylose contents between JM20 and LM21.

Key words: Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Grain, Amylose, Amylopectin, Enzyme activity

[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[3] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[4] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[5] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[6] 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261.
[7] 杨颖聪, 张俊豪, 唐一哲, 乔唱唱, 王鹏博, 黄明, 徐国伟, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对旱地小麦籽粒淀粉及其合成相关酶活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2467-2484.
[8] 杨婷婷, 陈娟, ABDUL Rehman, 李婧, 闫素辉, 汪建来, 李文阳. 花后弱光对软质小麦干物质积累转运、籽粒产量和淀粉品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2204-2219.
[9] 宋改利, 王璐倩, 屈柯飞, 唐建卫, 董纯豪, 黄振朴, 高艳, 牛吉山, 殷贵鸿, 李巧云. Bipolaris sorokiniana黑胚病对中筋小麦淀粉含量、粒度分布与糊化特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2164-2175.
[10] 董伟进, 张亚封, 李启云, 路杨, 张正坤, 隋丽. CO2浓度升高条件下球孢白僵菌定殖对玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1874-1886.
[11] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[12] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[13] 王若楠, 张颖星, 于筱菡, 刘少雄, 王跃, 薛亚鹏, 辛旭霞, 张莉, 刘敏轩. 基于近红外快速检测技术的谷子淀粉多样性分析及模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1757-1768.
[14] 闫尚龙, 王琦明, 柴强, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 刘志鹏, 韦金贵. 绿洲灌区玉米籽粒产量及品质对密植及间作豌豆的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1665-1675.
[15] 杨晓慧, 晏宣军, 杨文妍, 付俊杰, 杨琴, 谢玉心. 玉米ZmKL1优异等位基因调控籽粒大小的效应评估及分子机制解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1501-1513.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!