欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (04): 612-619.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

作物高产群体LAI动态模拟模型的建立与检验

张宾1;赵明2,*;董志强2;李建国1;陈传永1;孙锐1   

  1. 1中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094;2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2006-10-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-04-12 网络出版日期:2007-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵明

Establishment and Test of LAI Dynamic Simulation Model for High Yield Population

ZHANG Bin1,ZHAO Ming2*,DONG Zhi-Qiang2,LI Jian-Guo1,CHEN Chuan-Yong1,SUN Rui1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, 2 Crop Science Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2006-10-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-04-12 Published online:2007-04-12
  • Contact: ZHAO Ming

摘要:

针对目前已有群体叶面积指数(LAI)模拟模型形式多样、参数较多以及应用性不强等问题,对春玉米、水稻和冬小麦的LAI及出苗至成熟天数进行归一化处理,分别将最大LAI和出苗至成熟天数定为1,以相对LAI (0~1)和相对时间(0~1)为参数进行LAI动态模拟,筛选、建立了一个适用于这3种作物的相对化LAI动态模拟模型y= (a+bx) / (1+cx+dx2)。其中,春玉米y= (0.0134+0.3234x) / (1-2.774x+2.4178x2),r=0.9859**;水稻y= (0.0777+0.0205x) / (1-2.73744x+2.0484x2),r=0.9865**;冬小麦y= (0.0131+0.0035x) / (1-2.4515x+1.5273x2),r=0.9719**。利用该模型,自拔节期起就能够较准确地进行LAI的动态预测,其在春玉米、水稻和冬小麦上的准确度(以k表示)分别为1.050、1.0357和1.1168,精确度(以R2表示)分别为0.8728、0.9270和0.9254。3种作物整个生育期内模型的模拟值与测量值的精确度均在0.98以上,准确度达0.86以上,表明相对化LAI动态模型能够准确地反映作物群体动态变化。不仅可以计算出作物生育期间的平均LAI、总光合势,还能计算任一时刻的LAI以及任一时段的光合势。结合田间调查还可得到作物生长期间的平均净同化率和平均作物生长率等产量相关的重要生理参数。根据作物群体中各光合生理参数与产量的关系,提出了3种作物进一步增产的可能途径。

关键词: 高产, 作物, 相对叶面积指数, 模型

Abstract:

Leaf Area Index (LAI) simulation models is an indispensable tool for supporting crop scientific research, population and community growth analysis, and crop management. However, LAI is very difficult to be quantified properly, owing to ecological and varietal factors and temporal variability. Many methods have been developed to quantify LAI and yielded good results, but most of them have different formats with many parameters, which hamper their application. In this paper, an extensively suitable LAI simulation model, y= (a+bx) / (1+cx+dx2), was developed with normalized LAI and crop growth duration data. And by means of which, the specific normalized models y= (0.0134+0.3234x) / (1-2.774x+2.4178x2) for spring maize (r=0.9858**), y= (0.0777+0.0205x) / (1-2.7374x+2.0484x2) for rice (r=0.9865**), and y= (0.0131+0.0035x) / (1-2.4515x+1.5273x2) for winter wheat (r=0.9719**) were established. Compared with other LAI simulation models, normalized LAI dynamic model can not only generate reliable prediction for the evolution of LAI, but also estimate leaf area duration (LAD) and LAI in any period. Once the crop life span and a total leaf area of a crop population in any moment are acquired, the crop LAI and LAD can be estimated easily. From the time of jointing stage, the model could make a good pre-estimation of LAI dynamics with the accuracy of 1.050, 1.0357, and 1.1168 and the precision (R2) were 0.8728, 0.9270, and 0.9254 for spring maize, rice and winter wheat, respectively. Compared with the measured values, the simulated LAI had a linear coefficient (k) over 0.98, with R2 above 0.86. The results showed that normalized LAI dynamic model provided a better description for crop population dynamics. Combined with dry matter accumulation, the average LAI, NAR (net assimilation rate), and CGR (crop growth rate) can be calculated. By means of which, the relationships between the physiological parameters and crop yield were analyzed, and the possible ways for higher crop yield were put forward accordingly.

Key words: High yield, Crop, Normalized leaf area index, Simulation model

[1] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[2] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[3] 蒯婕, 娄洪祥, 谭晓强, 郜耿东, 邵东李, 肖胜男, 赵杰, 徐正华, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生. 直播油菜单产提升的生理基础及实践途径[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 982-992.
[4] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[5] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[6] 李赢, 石晓旭, 刘海翠, 石吕, 薛亚光, 魏亚凤. 裸大麦籽粒β-葡聚糖含量近红外预测模型的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 735-745.
[7] 李心怡, 陈欣童, 赵闯, 王茜, 丛佳慧, 林若薇, 邱渝欣, 杨晓光. 气候变化对作物病虫害影响的研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 331-348.
[8] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[9] 林子晴, 钟醒宇, 刘樊, 任子澳, 马瑞, 邓秀峰, 王东伟, 刘少鹏, 陈康, 张明才, 李召虎, 周于毅, 段留生. 山东北部沿海平原区小麦-玉米周年两吨粮超高产技术创建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 631-643.
[10] 郭保卫, 王旺, 王开, 王岩, 曾鑫, 景秀, 王晶, 倪新华, 许轲, 张洪程. 长江中下游两类型糯稻高产群体动态特征及超高产形成规律[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2433-2453.
[11] 高园, 李霞, 魏少博, 田小海, 周文彬. 植物光合午休研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2253-2265.
[12] 李宜谦, 徐守振, 刘萍, 马麒, 谢斌, 陈红. 基于40K SNP芯片的陆地棉产量构成因素全基因组关联分析及单铃重位点挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2128-2138.
[13] 闫知兰, 赵芹, 常甜达, 王一鸣, 王碧辉, 王鹏, 黄春国, 张会, 王利祥, 郝晓鹏, 赵波. 豆科作物AOX基因鉴定及其在普通菜豆响应非生物胁迫中的表达模式研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1769-1783.
[14] 万书波, 张佳蕾, 高华鑫, 王才斌. 中国花生高产栽培研究进展与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1703-1711.
[15] 胡超贵, 董鹏斌, 王辰玥, 李欠. 基于MaxEnt模型和HPLC技术的独活潜在适宜种植区预测及品质区化研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1676-1689.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!