欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (07): 1100-1107.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

海南三种野生稻遗传多样性的比较研究

孙希平1,2;杨庆文2,*;李润植1;王效宁3   

  1. 1山西农业大学生物工程中心,山西太谷030801;2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081;3海南省农业科学院水稻研究所,海南海口571100
  • 收稿日期:2006-10-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-07-12 网络出版日期:2007-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨庆文

Genetic Diversity of Three Wild Rice Species in Hainan Province

SUN Xi-Ping12,YANG Qing-Wen2*,LI Run-Zhi1,WANG Xiao-Ning3   

  1. 1 Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi; 2 Institute of Crop Science,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3 Institute of Rice Sciences, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571100, Hainan, China
  • Received:2006-10-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-07-12 Published online:2007-07-12
  • Contact: YANG Qing-Wen

摘要:

利用39对SSR引物对海南114份普通野生稻、146份疣粒野生稻和81份药用野生稻进行扩增,从多态位点比率、平均等位基因数、香农指数等多个指标比较了3种野生稻遗传多样性的差异。结果表明,普通野生稻的遗传多样性最高,疣粒野生稻次之;在所检测的53个位点中,药用野生稻和疣粒野生稻的多态位点数分别为普通野生稻的1/7和2/7,等位基因数分别为普通野生稻的37%和39%;平均每个位点的实际杂合度,以普通野生稻杂合度最高(60%),分别是疣粒野生稻和药用野生稻的4.6倍和6.6倍。Wright-统计量和聚类分析结果表明,普通野生稻群体的遗传多样性主要来自群间,当遗传一致度I等于0.53时,3个居群分别属于不同类群,因此建议将3个普通野生稻居群都纳入原生境保护点建设范围。同时,药用野生稻和疣粒野生稻无论居群间还是居群内遗传变异都很小,各居群个体间出现部分交叉,只有当I大于0.9时才分别聚为不同的类群,因此,在进行原生境保护时只需保护遗传多样性水平高的居群即可。

关键词: 普通野生稻, 疣粒野生稻, 药用野生稻, SSR, 遗传多样性

Abstract:

The genetic diversity of three wild rice species in Hainan, China, was comparatively analyzed with 39 selected SSR markers which evenly distributed throughout rice genome and normally amplified bands in all three wild rice species. The results indicated that total 210 alleles were detected with 39 SSR primers. Polymorphic loci were 97.44% in Oryza rufipogon and 23.08% and 15.38% in meyeriana and O. officinalis respectively. Based on the related parameters, Oryza rufipogon showed the highest genetic diversity and O. officinalis maintained the lowest one. For instance, the percentage of polymorphic loci (P) and the mean number of alleles (A) per locus in O. officinalis were only 1/7 and 37% of those in O. rufipogon while those in O. meyerian were 2/7 and 39% of those in Oryza rufipogon respectively. Similarly, the average observed heterozygosity of O. rufipogon was the highest, which was 4.6 and 6.6 times of that of O. meyeriana and O. officinalis respectively. Wright’s F-statistics showed that the genetic variations within and among O. rufipogon populations were rather high, but those of both O. officinalis and O. meyeriana were very low, meaning that both individuals and populations of O. rufipogon have much different genetic backgrounds and those of the other two species have similar genetic backgrounds. The UPGMA clusters also showed that the three populations of O. rufipogon clustered into different groups at the point of I = 0.53, while the populations from the other two species grouped only after I = 0.9 or more. Similarly, the individuals within each population of O. rufipogon showed different genetic backgrounds with a few exceptions, but a lot of individuals in each population of both O. officinalis and O. meyeriana had the same genetic background. Considering above results, all tested populations of O. rufipogon and those with the highest genetic diversity of the other two species should be conserved with an in situ approach. O. meyeriana and O. officinalis should be conserved with only several individuals sampled in each population.

Key words: Oryza rufipogon Griff., O. meyeriana Baill., O. officinalis Wall., SSR, Genetic diversity

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 陈小红, 林元香, 王倩, 丁敏, 王海岗, 陈凌, 高志军, 王瑞云, 乔治军. 基于高基元SSR构建黍稷种质资源的分子身份证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 908-919.
[3] 张霞, 于卓, 金兴红, 于肖夏, 李景伟, 李佳奇. 马铃薯SSR引物的开发、特征分析及在彩色马铃薯材料中的扩增研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 920-929.
[4] 王琰琰, 王俊, 刘国祥, 钟秋, 张华述, 骆铮珍, 陈志华, 戴培刚, 佟英, 李媛, 蒋勋, 张兴伟, 杨爱国. 基于SSR标记的雪茄烟种质资源指纹图谱库的构建及遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1259-1274.
[5] 罗兰, 雷丽霞, 刘进, 张瑞华, 金桂秀, 崔迪, 黎毛毛, 马小定, 赵正武, 韩龙植. 利用东乡普通野生稻染色体片段置换系定位产量相关性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1391-1401.
[6] 韩贝, 王旭文, 李保奇, 余渝, 田琴, 杨细燕. 陆地棉种质资源抗旱性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 438-450.
[7] 刘少荣, 杨扬, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 康定明, 范亚明, 任洁, 江彬, 葛建镕, 成广雷, 王凤格. 基于农艺及品质性状与SSR标记的青贮玉米品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2362-2370.
[8] 郭艳春, 张力岚, 陈思远, 祁建民, 方平平, 陶爱芬, 张列梅, 张立武. 黄麻应用核心种质的DNA分子身份证构建[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 80-93.
[9] 孙倩, 邹枚伶, 张辰笈, 江思容, Eder Jorge de Oliveira, 张圣奎, 夏志强, 王文泉, 李有志. 基于SNP和InDel标记的巴西木薯遗传多样性与群体遗传结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 42-49.
[10] 赵孟良,王丽慧,任延靖,孙雪梅,侯志强,杨世鹏,李莉,钟启文. 257份菊芋种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(5): 712-724.
[11] 王恒波,祁舒婷,陈姝琦,郭晋隆,阙友雄. 甘蔗栽培种单倍体基因组SSR位点的发掘与应用[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 631-642.
[12] 张红岩,杨涛,刘荣,晋芳,张力科,于海天,胡锦国,杨峰,王栋,何玉华,宗绪晓. 利用EST-SSR标记评价羽扇豆属(Lupinus L.)遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 330-340.
[13] 张力岚, 张列梅, 牛焕颖, 徐益, 李玉, 祁建民, 陶爱芬, 方平平, 张立武. 黄麻SSR标记与纤维产量性状的相关性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1905-1913.
[14] 刘荣, 王芳, 方俐, 杨涛, 张红岩, 黄宇宁, 王栋, 季一山, 徐东旭, 李冠, 郭瑞军, 宗绪晓. 利用2个F2群体整合中国豌豆高密度SSR遗传连锁图谱[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1496-1506.
[15] 刘易科,朱展望,陈泠,邹娟,佟汉文,朱光,何伟杰,张宇庆,高春保. 基于SNP标记揭示我国小麦品种(系)的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 307-314.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!