欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (07): 1108-1115.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻叶色变化动态的模拟模型研究

常丽英;张文宇;张玉屏;顾东祥;姚鑫锋;朱艳;曹卫星*   

  1. 南京农业大学/江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室,江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2006-10-09 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-07-12 网络出版日期:2007-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 曹卫星

A Simulation Model on Leaf Color Dynamic Changes in Rice

CHANG Li-Ying,ZHANG Wen-Yu,ZHANG Yu-Pin,GU Dong-Xiang,YAO Xin-Feng,ZHU Yan,CAO Wei-Xing*   

  1. Nanjing Agricultural University/Hi-Tech Key Laboratory of Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2006-10-09 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-07-12 Published online:2007-07-12
  • Contact: CAO Wei-Xing

摘要:

定量描述叶片颜色变化的动态过程是植物生长数字化和可视化的重要内容。本研究通过对不同水稻品种和不同水氮处理条件下主茎和分蘖不同叶位叶色变化过程的连续观测和定量分析,构建了水稻叶片颜色随生长度日变化的动态模拟模型。水稻叶片颜色变化的基本过程可以用3个阶段的SPAD值分别表达,第一阶段为基于幂函数的伸长期,叶色逐渐增强,第二阶段为相对稳定的功能期,叶色基本不变,第三阶段为基于二次曲线的衰老期,叶色逐渐减弱;并基于二次曲线方程分别描述了叶片含氮量和含水量对叶色变化过程的调控效应。在此基础上,进一步建立了叶片SPAD值与叶色组分(RGB)值的关系模型。利用独立的水稻田间试验资料对所建模型进行了测试和检验,显示主茎不同叶位叶色变化3个阶段模拟值的均方根差分别为2.58、3.69和3.82,4个分蘖不同叶位叶色变化模拟值的均方根差分别为4.65、4.39、3.51和4.25;SPAD值与叶色组分间模拟值的均方根差分别为2.98和3.25。表明本模型可较好地模拟不同生长条件下水稻不同茎蘖上不同叶位叶色的动态变化过程,从而为实现水稻生长系统的数字化模拟和可视化显示奠定了基础。

关键词: 水稻, 叶色, 变化动态, 模拟模型

Abstract:

With the development of digital agriculture, the visualization expression of plant growth process is very important. Quantifying the dynamic process of leaf color is the basic part of plant growth visualization. At present, the study on plant leaf color visualization at home and abroad is emphasized on reversing and rebuilding crop virtual growth with the figure identifying technique in computer, however, simulation model and visualization technique based on leaf color dynamic process have not been established successfully.
Modeling leaf color dynamics in rice is an important task for realizing virtual and digital plant growth. Based on time-course observations on leaf color changes at different leaf positions of stem and tillers under different nitrogen rates and water conditions with four rice cultivars, we developed a simulation model on leaf color dynamic changes in rice in relation to GDD. Leaf color changes in the model were described with SPAD in three phases. The first phase during leaf growth period was based on the exponential relationship of leaf color to cumulative GDD; the second phase during leaf function period was represented with a relative stable SPAD; the third phase during leaf senescence period was described in a quadratic equation between SPAD and GDD. In addition, the effects of nitrogen and water conditions on leaf color were quantified through the effectiveness values of leaf nitrogen concentration and water content in relation to SPAD. Then, the RGB values were further predicted from the changing SPAD. The model was validated with the independent field experiment data involving different rice cultivars and nitrogen rates. The average RMSEs between the simulated and observed SPAD dynamics at different leaf positions were 2.58, 3.69, and 3.82, respectively, for three leaf color phases on main stem, 4.65, 4.39, 3.51, and 4.25, respectively, for four individual tillers in rice, and 2.98, 3.25, respectively, for SPAD and R, G values.
The results indicate that the present model has a good performance in predicting leaf color changes at different leaf positions in rice under different growth conditions, and thus lays a foundation for further constructing digital and visual rice growth system.

Key words: Rice, Leaf color, dynamic Changes, Simulation model

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!