海南三种野生稻遗传多样性的比较研究

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (07): 1100-1107.

海南三种野生稻遗传多样性的比较研究

孙希平^1,2;杨庆文^2,*;李润植¹;王效宁³

1山西农业大学生物工程中心，山西太谷030801；2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所，北京100081；3海南省农业科学院水稻研究所，海南海口571100

收稿日期:2006-10-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-07-12 网络出版日期:2007-07-12
通讯作者: 杨庆文

Genetic Diversity of Three Wild Rice Species in Hainan Province

SUN Xi-Ping¹²,YANG Qing-Wen^2*,LI Run-Zhi¹,WANG Xiao-Ning³

1 Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi; 2 Institute of Crop Science，Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3 Institute of Rice Sciences, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571100, Hainan, China

Received:2006-10-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-07-12 Published online:2007-07-12
Contact: YANG Qing-Wen

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用39对SSR引物对海南114份普通野生稻、146份疣粒野生稻和81份药用野生稻进行扩增，从多态位点比率、平均等位基因数、香农指数等多个指标比较了3种野生稻遗传多样性的差异。结果表明，普通野生稻的遗传多样性最高，疣粒野生稻次之；在所检测的53个位点中，药用野生稻和疣粒野生稻的多态位点数分别为普通野生稻的1/7和2/7，等位基因数分别为普通野生稻的37%和39%；平均每个位点的实际杂合度，以普通野生稻杂合度最高（60%），分别是疣粒野生稻和药用野生稻的4.6倍和6.6倍。Wright-统计量和聚类分析结果表明,普通野生稻群体的遗传多样性主要来自群间，当遗传一致度I等于0.53时，3个居群分别属于不同类群,因此建议将3个普通野生稻居群都纳入原生境保护点建设范围。同时，药用野生稻和疣粒野生稻无论居群间还是居群内遗传变异都很小，各居群个体间出现部分交叉，只有当I大于0.9时才分别聚为不同的类群，因此，在进行原生境保护时只需保护遗传多样性水平高的居群即可。

关键词: 普通野生稻, 疣粒野生稻, 药用野生稻, SSR, 遗传多样性

Abstract:

The genetic diversity of three wild rice species in Hainan, China, was comparatively analyzed with 39 selected SSR markers which evenly distributed throughout rice genome and normally amplified bands in all three wild rice species. The results indicated that total 210 alleles were detected with 39 SSR primers. Polymorphic loci were 97.44% in Oryza rufipogon and 23.08% and 15.38% in meyeriana and O. officinalis respectively. Based on the related parameters, Oryza rufipogon showed the highest genetic diversity and O. officinalis maintained the lowest one. For instance, the percentage of polymorphic loci (P) and the mean number of alleles (A) per locus in O. officinalis were only 1/7 and 37% of those in O. rufipogon while those in O. meyerian were 2/7 and 39% of those in Oryza rufipogon respectively. Similarly, the average observed heterozygosity of O. rufipogon was the highest, which was 4.6 and 6.6 times of that of O. meyeriana and O. officinalis respectively. Wright’s F-statistics showed that the genetic variations within and among O. rufipogon populations were rather high, but those of both O. officinalis and O. meyeriana were very low, meaning that both individuals and populations of O. rufipogon have much different genetic backgrounds and those of the other two species have similar genetic backgrounds. The UPGMA clusters also showed that the three populations of O. rufipogon clustered into different groups at the point of I = 0.53, while the populations from the other two species grouped only after I = 0.9 or more. Similarly, the individuals within each population of O. rufipogon showed different genetic backgrounds with a few exceptions, but a lot of individuals in each population of both O. officinalis and O. meyeriana had the same genetic background. Considering above results, all tested populations of O. rufipogon and those with the highest genetic diversity of the other two species should be conserved with an in situ approach. O. meyeriana and O. officinalis should be conserved with only several individuals sampled in each population.

Key words: Oryza rufipogon Griff., O. meyeriana Baill., O. officinalis Wall., SSR, Genetic diversity

孙希平;杨庆文;李润植;王效宁. 海南三种野生稻遗传多样性的比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(07): 1100-1107.

SUN Xi-Ping;YANG Qing-Wen;LI Run-Zhi;WANG Xiao-Ning. Genetic Diversity of Three Wild Rice Species in Hainan Province[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(07): 1100-1107.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2007/V33/I07/1100

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[2]	张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[3]	徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[4]	田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[5]	侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[6]	梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[7]	王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[8]	张正康, 苏延红, 阮孙美, 张敏, 张攀, 张慧, 曾千春, 罗琼. 疣粒野生稻中OgXa13的克隆和功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 334-346.
[9]	王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885.
[10]	郑栋, 周仙莉, 滕长才, 侯万伟, 张红岩, 刘玉皎. 基于SSR标记的青海蚕豆品种亲缘关系分析与指纹图谱构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 79-90.
[11]	匡博文, 韦妳, 刘金典, 陈美燕, 毛兴洁, 段维兴, 杨细平. 基于甘蔗及其近缘属参考基因组开发SSR标记及数据库[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 103-116.
[12]	张红岩, 敏玉霞, 滕长才, 彭小星, 陈志凯, 周仙莉, 娄树宝, 刘玉皎. 利用130K液相芯片分析中国蚕豆种质资源遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 1989-2000.
[13]	李长喜, 董占鹏, 关永虎, 刘金伟, 李航, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉农艺性状与皮棉产量性状的遗传贡献及决策系数分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1486-1502.
[14]	丁艺冰, 辛旭霞, 冯智尊, 曹越, 郭娟, Dipak K SANTRA, 王瑞云, 陈喜明. 东北春播区糜子核心种质及其DNA分子身份证构建[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1181-1192.
[15]	柯会锋, 苏红梅, 孙正文, 谷淇深, 杨君, 王国宁, 徐东永, 王洪这, 吴立强, 张艳, 张桂寅, 马峙英, 王省芬. 棉花现代品种资源产量与纤维品质性状鉴定及分子标记评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 280-293.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed