小麦灌浆期蔗糖代谢关键酶活性变化及其与籽粒淀粉积累的关系

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (07): 1122-1128.

小麦灌浆期蔗糖代谢关键酶活性变化及其与籽粒淀粉积累的关系

王文静¹;王国杰²;王永华³

1 郑州牧业工程高等专科学校生物系，河南郑州450011；2郑州市农林科学研究所，河南郑州450005；3 河南农业大学国家小麦工程技术研究中心，河南郑州 450002

收稿日期:2006-03-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-07-12 网络出版日期:2007-07-12
通讯作者: 王文静

Dynamic Changes of Activities of Key Enzymes Involved in Sucrose Metabolism during Grain Filling in Wheat and the Relationship with Starch Accumulation in Grain

WANG Wen-Jing¹,WANG Guo-Jie²,WANG Yong-Hua³

1 Department of Biology, Zhengzhou Animal Husbandry Engineering College, Zhengzhou 450011, Henan; 2 Zhengzhou Institute of Agricultural and Forestry Science, Zhongmou 450005; 3National Engineering Research Center for Wheat, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China

Received:2006-03-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-07-12 Published online:2007-07-12
Contact: WANG Wen-Jing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在池栽条件下，研究了藁城8901(强筋品种)、豫麦49(中筋品种)和洛麦1号(弱筋品种)小麦灌浆期旗叶、叶鞘、穗茎、籽粒蔗糖磷酸合酶(SPS)、蔗糖合酶(SS)活性变化及其与淀粉及组分积累的关系。结果表明，其SPS和SS活性变化均呈单峰曲线。豫麦49旗叶、旗叶鞘和籽粒中及洛麦1号穗茎中SPS酶活性较高。豫麦49的旗叶、旗叶鞘、穗茎和籽粒中SS活性高于其他两品种，表明豫麦49和洛麦1号营养器官和籽粒中蔗糖合成和降解代谢比较活跃。相关分析表明，豫麦49和洛麦1号籽粒中淀粉和支链淀粉积累对SPS催化的蔗糖合成过程具有较强的反馈调节作用。豫麦49和洛麦1号籽粒中SS活性均与总淀粉与支链淀粉积累速率极显著正相关，而在藁城8901中无此相关性。

关键词: 小麦, 蔗糖代谢, 关键酶, 淀粉

Abstract:

Sucrose and starch are the main product of wheat photosynthesis. During sucrose metabolism, Sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) is the key enzyme controlling sucrose synthesis, but sucrose synthase (SS) is the key enzyme controlling sucrose degradation. In the present experiment conducted in cement cultural pool, three winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars GC8901 (strong gluten), YM49 (medium gluten) and LM1 (weak gluten) were used to investigate the activities of the key enzymes involved in sucrose metabolism in leaf, sheath, ear stem and grain during grain filling and the relationship with starch accumulation in grain. Ten main tillers of each plot were sampled at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 days after anthesis, and partitioned into flag leaf, sheath of flag leaf, and ear stem.One hundred grains of each plot were sampled from the spikes from which only two basal grains of the 4th to 12th spikelets were collected. Half of the plant samples were used to determinate the enzyme activities, and the other half for starch content measurement.In the three cultivars, the dynamic changes of activities of sucrose phosphate synthase(SPS) and sucrose synthase(SS) in leaf, sheath, ear stem and grain during grain filling period all fit the single-peak curve. The SPS activity in flag leaf, flag leaf sheath and grain of YM49 was higher than that of other two cultivars, but the SPS activity in ear stem of LM1 was higher than that of other two cultivars. The SS activity in flag leaf, flag leaf sheath, ear stem and grain of YM49 was higher than that of other two cultivars,indicating the sucrose synthesis and degradation in the vegetative organs and grain of YM49 and LM1 were active. Correlation analysis showed that the starch and amylopectin accumulation in the grain of YM49 and LM 1 had strong feedback regulation to sucrose synthesis catalyzed by SPS. The SS activities in the grain of YM49 and LM1 were significantly(P＜0.01) correlated with the starch and amylopectin accumulating rate, but that of GC8901 was not. The results suggested that the SPS and SS activities in the vegetative organs and grain in three different wheat cultivars were closely related to starch accumulation.

Key words: Wheat, Sucrose Metabolism, Key enzyme, Starch

王文静;王国杰;王永华. 小麦灌浆期蔗糖代谢关键酶活性变化及其与籽粒淀粉积累的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(07): 1122-1128.

WANG Wen-Jing;WANG Guo-Jie;WANG Yong-Hua. Dynamic Changes of Activities of Key Enzymes Involved in Sucrose Metabolism during Grain Filling in Wheat and the Relationship with Starch Accumulation in Grain[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(07): 1122-1128.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2]	郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[3]	郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[4]	付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[5]	冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[6]	刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[7]	马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[8]	王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[9]	陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[10]	徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[11]	马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[12]	孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[13]	韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[14]	李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[15]	罗江陶, 郑建敏, 蒲宗君, 范超兰, 刘登才, 郝明. 四倍体小麦与六倍体小麦杂种的染色体遗传特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed