欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (07): 1168-1176.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻生理生化特性对氮肥的反应及与氮利用效率的关系

曾建敏1;崔克辉1,*;黄见良1;贺帆1;彭少兵2   

  1. 1华中农业大学植物科技学院作物生理与栽培研究中心,湖北武汉 430070;2 国际水稻研究所,菲律宾
  • 收稿日期:2006-09-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-07-12 网络出版日期:2007-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 崔克辉

Responses of Physio-Biochemical Properties to N-Fertilizer Application and Its Relationship with Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

ZENG Jian-Min1,CUI Ke-Hui1*,HUANG Jian-Liang1,HE Fan1,PENG Shao-Bing2   

  1. 1Crop Physiology and Production Center, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei; 2 International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Philippines
  • Received:2006-09-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-07-12 Published online:2007-07-12
  • Contact: CUI Ke-Hui

摘要:

选用水稻氮高效基因型IR72和9311及氮低效基因型Lemont和PECOS,采用土培方法,在5个施氮量(0、0.51、1.02、1.53、2.04 g N 钵-1,分别相当于0、75、150、225、300 kg N hm-2)处理下,研究了生理生化特性对氮肥的反应及与氮效率的关系。结果表明,在幼穗分化期,氮高效基因型水稻的可溶性蛋白含量相对低,而谷氨酰胺合成酶(GS)活性高;不同氮效率基因型间1,5-二磷酸核酮糖羧化酶/加氧酶(Rubisco)含量的差异不大;两种氮效率基因型间的净光合速率(Pn)在幼穗分化期差异不明显。而在齐穗期,氮低效基因型的Pn比高效基因型的低28.66%左右;氮低效基因型在两个时期的单位叶绿素光合速率(Pn/Chl)比氮高效基因型分别低18.51%和29.67%左右。在成熟期,氮高效基因型干物质积累能力强,籽粒产量高。这些结果说明氮效率不同的基因型对氮肥的生理反应差异大。相关性分析表明,低氮水平时(0~1.53 g N 钵-1), GS酶活性与收获时生物量呈显著或极显著正相关;氮肥偏生产力(PFP)、氮肥农学利用率(AE)及氮素生理利用率(NUEb)分别与GS活性、Pn/Chl和齐穗期的Pn呈显著正相关,而与可溶性蛋白含量、Rubisco含量显著负相关;氮肥吸收效率(RE)与这些生理指标没有显著相关。结果表明水稻光合特征及氮代谢与水稻氮效率间存在紧密的关系,GS活性和可溶性蛋白含量对评价水稻氮肥利用率具有重要的参考价值。

关键词: 氮肥利用率(NUE), 谷氨酰胺合成酶(GS), 光合特性, Rubisco含量, 水稻

Abstract:

Improvement in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in crop plants is significant in the view of economic efficiency and environment friendly. A better understanding of the physiological mechanism underlying nitrogen use efficiency is necessary for genotype screening and breeding rice cultivar with high NUE. In present study, four rice genotypes identified as high and low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) were used to investigate their responses of physio-biochemical properties to N-fertilizer and its relationship with NUE at the rate of 0, 0.51, 1.02, 1.53, and 2.04 g N pot-1 (equivalent to 0, 75, 150, 225, 300 kg N ha-1, respectively) under pot-grown conditions. The results showed that the soluble protein content in leaves was relatively lower in high-NUE genotypes than that in low-NUE genotypes at panicle initiation stage, while the glutamine synthetase (GS) activity was higher significantly. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) content in leaves appeared to be no significant difference between two NUE types of rice. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) in the low-NUE genotypes was significantly lower by 28.66% in comparison with that in high-NUE genotypes at full heading stage, regardless of no significant difference at panicle initiation stage. Interestingly, Pn per chlorophyll unit (Pn/Chl) was lower in low-NUE genotypes than in high-NUE genotypes at both two stages by about 18.51% and 29.67%, respectively. Total aboveground biomass and grain yield at five nitrogen levels were significantly higher in high-NUE genotypes than those in low-NUE genotypes. It was observed GS activity was significantly correlated with biomass at harvest stage at the rate of 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 g N pot-1. Pn at full heading stage, GS activity, and Pn/Chl were all significantly and positively correlated with agronomy efficiency (AE), partial factor production of applied N (PFP), and nitrogen physiology efficiency (NUEb), respectively. However, PFP, AE, and NUEb were negatively correlated with soluble protein content in leaves, respectively. Additionally, no significant correlation was observed between nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE) and the physiological parameters mentioned above. The results presented in the paper suggest the important contributions of Pn and GS to NUE. According to the relationships among NUE, GS and soluble protein content, GS activity and soluble protein content in leaves might be candidate indicators for NUE evaluation in rice.

Key words: Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), Glutamine synthetase (GS), Photosynthetic properties, Rubisco content, Rice

[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[4] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[7] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[8] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[9] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[10] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[11] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[12] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[13] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[14] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[15] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!